老新闻：F35B 垂直降落貌似有点难了

it brought to mind one of the capabilities the Marines’ F-35B Lightning II will have that the Harrier doesn’t.

有些人总能把优点说成坏事。

看看原文怎么说的

A Marine Corps photo set this week shows a squadron of veteran AV-8B Harriers at work in Afghanistan supporting troops on the ground, and it brought to mind one of the capabilities the Marines’ F-35B Lightning II will have that the Harrier doesn’t. Everybody knows that the B can  “transform,” like a Decepticon, for short takeoffs and vertical landings on Navy amphibious ships at sea. But unlike a Harrier, the B also can land like a conventional airplane, said Lockheed Martin vice president Steve O’Bryan at the company’s big media day last month.

So what, you might say. Well, the Harrier doesn’t land conventionally: Every time it comes back, even to a ground base, it needs to do a vertical landing or a rolling vertical landing, O’Bryan said, burning fuel and working its jet nozzles more or less the same way. But if a Lightning II pilot wants to, she’ll be able to land down a runway like a normal fighter jet, without engaging the lift fan or all those other ports and hatches and bells and whistles.

If many — or most — of the flights that a fighter makes over its life are not under operational circumstances, because pilots are training or ferrying their jets, that could mean that a typical B won’t need its vertical landing capability most of the time.
  “I don’t want to speak for the Marine Corps, but as we do analysis for the STOVL variant, [we think] most of the landings will be conventional landings — you can come back and land on a normal 8,000-foot airstrip without stressing all those components,” O’Bryan said. “Of course it’s up to the operational units, but why would I stress those if I don’t have to? … That is an option that’s not available on the current generation of STOVL airplanes.”

  不过楼主至少是给出链接让人了解原始资料。

   实际上这段话就是说这么一个实情：f35b可以常规降落，这相对av8b是一个优点。，因为后者不具有这个能力（自行车式起落架的原因吧）

  





it brought to mind one of the capabilities the Marines’ F-35B Lightning II will have that the Harrier doesn’t.

有些人总能把优点说成坏事。

看看原文怎么说的

A Marine Corps photo set this week shows a squadron of veteran AV-8B Harriers at work in Afghanistan supporting troops on the ground, and it brought to mind one of the capabilities the Marines’ F-35B Lightning II will have that the Harrier doesn’t. Everybody knows that the B can  “transform,” like a Decepticon, for short takeoffs and vertical landings on Navy amphibious ships at sea. But unlike a Harrier, the B also can land like a conventional airplane, said Lockheed Martin vice president Steve O’Bryan at the company’s big media day last month.

So what, you might say. Well, the Harrier doesn’t land conventionally: Every time it comes back, even to a ground base, it needs to do a vertical landing or a rolling vertical landing, O’Bryan said, burning fuel and working its jet nozzles more or less the same way. But if a Lightning II pilot wants to, she’ll be able to land down a runway like a normal fighter jet, without engaging the lift fan or all those other ports and hatches and bells and whistles.

If many — or most — of the flights that a fighter makes over its life are not under operational circumstances, because pilots are training or ferrying their jets, that could mean that a typical B won’t need its vertical landing capability most of the time.
  “I don’t want to speak for the Marine Corps, but as we do analysis for the STOVL variant, [we think] most of the landings will be conventional landings — you can come back and land on a normal 8,000-foot airstrip without stressing all those components,” O’Bryan said. “Of course it’s up to the operational units, but why would I stress those if I don’t have to? … That is an option that’s not available on the current generation of STOVL airplanes.”

  不过楼主至少是给出链接让人了解原始资料。

   实际上这段话就是说这么一个实情：f35b可以常规降落，这相对av8b是一个优点。，因为后者不具有这个能力（自行车式起落架的原因吧）

  

看不懂鸟语！！！

costrave 发表于 2011-11-3 20:57
it brought to mind one of the capabilities the Marines’ F-35B Lightning II will have that the Harri ...
你确定AV-8不能水平降落吗？

Well, the Harrier doesn’t land conventionally: Every time it comes back, even to a ground base, it needs to do a vertical landing or a rolling vertical landing,


如果你有看到常规降落的视频，不妨拿出来给大家瞧瞧

MD总喜欢拿电影来显耀自己的最新装备。F35是可以停在半空，不过。。。。。。。。。。有点时候它连常规的飞机还不如。

有意思。

唉，虎蛋龙萎2啊…… X35样式的JJ居然像武直一样灵活地悬停用机炮摧毁一切……

f35b垂直降落没有难度，有难度的是降落后甲板的维修，另外35b常规降落的主要原因是减小升力系统的负担，再有就是这个常规降落指的是地面机场，舰艇上的35b没有拦阻降落的能力

chenpi_ye 发表于 2011-11-4 19:48
唉，虎蛋龙萎2啊…… X35样式的JJ居然像武直一样灵活地悬停用机炮摧毁一切……
其实f22更适合灵活的悬停用机炮摧毁目标，f22的悬停能力和低速控制能力比35好，尤其比35b好得多，只是22只能短暂悬停，不能支持超过10秒，35虽然能悬停，但是这个时候控制性能远不如f22