超级军网马来西亚总理纳吉布称：中国是亚洲有影响力的区域性国家 ...
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 05:47:03
版主按：
楼主是造谣者升级马甲，请你看看，本帖中有几个楼层上当？
复制本通知提醒相关楼层，一贴一次，不算灌水。
The Diplomat《外交家》：马来西亚的安全南海策略。
今年是马来西亚成为东盟国家的轮值主席国，马来西亚总理纳吉布称：“ 中国已经成为了亚洲很有影响力的区域性国家，并在未来有望成为世界性的大国。东盟需要更谨慎的处理与中国的领土问题，但是也必须发挥美国及北约在东亚和东南亚的作用。”
ht tp://t hediplomat.com/2015/03/malaysias-south-china-sea-policy-playing-it-safe/
版主按：
楼主是造谣者升级马甲，请你看看，本帖中有几个楼层上当？
复制本通知提醒相关楼层，一贴一次，不算灌水。
The Diplomat《外交家》：马来西亚的安全南海策略。
今年是马来西亚成为东盟国家的轮值主席国，马来西亚总理纳吉布称：“ 中国已经成为了亚洲很有影响力的区域性国家，并在未来有望成为世界性的大国。东盟需要更谨慎的处理与中国的领土问题，但是也必须发挥美国及北约在东亚和东南亚的作用。”
ht tp://t hediplomat.com/2015/03/malaysias-south-china-sea-policy-playing-it-safe/
列兵开始造大马的谣了
按这个标准，只有宇宙第一大国算全球性大国。
列兵又来了。凡是列兵发的帖子真实性都存疑
我就纳闷了，图啥啊……
相比之下，重庆医博菊花医院的小广告更好看
才区域性。。。五常看来只有米帝才是全球了
那个ID沈某某的，不也搞得风生水起么？当笑话看吧，呵呵
原文没有这段 造谣无疑 @版主 请处理
我也仔细的阅读这个,完全没有"有影响力的区域性国家"的说法,完全是造谣中伤!
欺负我看不懂英文吗，楼主上面说的纯瞎扯嘛！
单方面脑补，这人是外国人吧，内心受伤的不行
捞一分，有病得电
有病，得治疗……
捞一分走人
捞一分走人！
TG是区域性大国？LZ的标准果然与众不同
MD提G2，我们不响应，因为只是区域大国
MD提G2，我们不响应，因为只是区域大国
文章看完了，通篇都在描述中国对马来西亚的经济重要性和中马之间不同于中菲，中越的"特殊关系"，没看见所谓的"区域性大国"言论。
听大家的，捞一分走人。
如果他真这么说 ，那么这个人真是只有小学水平
捞一分走人
看注册日期，嗯
怕又是死全家系列。
怕又是死全家系列。
靠。。。除了阿拉伯数字。。。。看不懂。
Malaysia's South China Sea Policy: Playing It Safe
Malaysian and US ships on an exercise around the Strait of Malacca.
Image Credit: Flickr/U.S. Navy Photo
Malaysia's South China Sea Policy: Playing It Safe
Before asking what the country should do, we should look at what it is doing and why.
7XRzjYON
By Prashanth Parameswaran
March 06, 2015
278 55 1 0
334 Shares
22 Comments
As Malaysia chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this year, there is no shortage of commentary urging the country to ‘do more’ on the South China Sea. Malaysia, it is said, is after all not only a founding member of ASEAN but a claimant state in the South China Sea disputes that also has a good relationship with China. But as I’ve said and written both publicly and privately, it is wise to consider what Malaysia’s current policy on the South China Sea is before asking it to change its stance or questioning whether and why it is or is not doing so.
So what is the current Malaysian government’s South China Sea policy? Of course, there is no official public documentation of exactly what the country’s stance is. One term often heard is ‘quiet diplomacy,’ which was praised by Chinese president Xi Jinping last year. But as I have argued elsewhere, most recently in a report for the Center for New American Security, Malaysia’s position might be better summed up as ‘playing it safe,’ particularly under the current administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak. That is, Malaysia is pursuing a combination of diplomatic, economic, legal, and security initiatives to secure its interests as a claimant state while also being careful not to disrupt its bilateral relationship with China.
An analysis of this ‘playing it safe’ approach should begin with an appreciation of what Malaysia’s interests are on the South China Sea issue. The first and most obvious one is preserving Malaysia’s claims, which is not just essential to securing Malaysia’s territorial integrity, but its prosperity as well because of some of the fields and platforms it uses to exploit hydrocarbons are within China’s nine-dashed line.
But there are broader interests too. Malaysia is dedicated to cultivating a good relationship with Beijing beyond the South China issue not just because China is Malaysia’s largest trading partner, but also because of the symbolism: the two countries share a “special relationship,” with Malaysia being the first ASEAN state to normalize ties with China in 1974 under Najib’s father, Tun Razak. Besides, China’s treatment of Malaysia on the South China Sea issue has been quite mild relative to that of Vietnam or the Philippines, which is a product of various factors including geography. As a trading and maritime nation, Malaysia also has an interest in ensuring broader regional peace and stability and an open commons. Lastly, Malaysia also has an interest in the preservation of global norms and international law including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as they provide a common basis of understanding without resorting to “might makes right” approaches.
To secure these interests, Malaysia has adopted a ‘playing it safe’ approach and employed a variety of diplomatic, legal, economic and security initiatives. China’s growing assertiveness in recent years, including increasing encroachments into Malaysian waters as well as Beijing’s initial strident tone following the MH370 incident last year – quickly corrected – has led Malaysia to recalibrate its outlook to a certain extent and has led some in the country to question the effectiveness of some of the four aforementioned components. But the evidence also seems to suggest that it continues to employ a ‘play it safe’ approach.
Diplomatically, Malaysia prefers to adroitly manage the South China Sea issue by communicating its concerns privately to China rather than publicly airing grievances, as Vietnam or the Philippines are wont to do. But it has also worked quietly behind the scenes to ensure ASEAN maintains a basic level of unity on the matter. Legally, the Malaysian government has not been shy about securing its claims as its joint submission to the UN with Vietnam in May 2009 illustrated, but it has thus far been unwilling to publicly support the Philippine case now pending with the arbitral tribunal at The Hague. Security-wise, as I’ve written previously, Malaysia has recently looked to advance relationships with countries like the United States and also boost its own capabilities, including by announcing plans for a new naval base in Bintulu, Sarawak, even if they are meant to address a wide variety of threats and the country is careful about how it deploys these capabilities against Beijing. Economically, Malaysia continues to maximize the economic benefits of oil and gas resources in the South China Sea, and for the most part China has not yet significantly disrupted those activities.
Of course, the Malaysian government may choose to revisit its overall approach in the South China Sea further down the line if there are major changes on the ground, including significant threats to its oil and gas interests. And there may be other events this year that could put Malaysia in an uncomfortable position, such as a potential ruling on the Philippine case. But thus far in its chairmanship, Malaysia has continued to strike a careful balance. Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman was not shy, for instance, about publicly announcing ASEAN’s desire for an early conclusion of a Code of Conduct on the South China Sea and mentioning that there were concerns about China’s ongoing reclamation efforts after the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Retreat in Kota Kinabalu. At the same time, Malaysia has continued to do what is required to preserve its own claims, and has been working hard to boost its relationship with China even further, particularly in the economic domain. The art of playing it safe often involves walking a tightrope, but Malaysia is still determined to continue on this path as long as it can.
Malaysian and US ships on an exercise around the Strait of Malacca.
Image Credit: Flickr/U.S. Navy Photo
Malaysia's South China Sea Policy: Playing It Safe
Before asking what the country should do, we should look at what it is doing and why.
7XRzjYON
By Prashanth Parameswaran
March 06, 2015
278 55 1 0
334 Shares
22 Comments
As Malaysia chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this year, there is no shortage of commentary urging the country to ‘do more’ on the South China Sea. Malaysia, it is said, is after all not only a founding member of ASEAN but a claimant state in the South China Sea disputes that also has a good relationship with China. But as I’ve said and written both publicly and privately, it is wise to consider what Malaysia’s current policy on the South China Sea is before asking it to change its stance or questioning whether and why it is or is not doing so.
So what is the current Malaysian government’s South China Sea policy? Of course, there is no official public documentation of exactly what the country’s stance is. One term often heard is ‘quiet diplomacy,’ which was praised by Chinese president Xi Jinping last year. But as I have argued elsewhere, most recently in a report for the Center for New American Security, Malaysia’s position might be better summed up as ‘playing it safe,’ particularly under the current administration of Prime Minister Najib Razak. That is, Malaysia is pursuing a combination of diplomatic, economic, legal, and security initiatives to secure its interests as a claimant state while also being careful not to disrupt its bilateral relationship with China.
An analysis of this ‘playing it safe’ approach should begin with an appreciation of what Malaysia’s interests are on the South China Sea issue. The first and most obvious one is preserving Malaysia’s claims, which is not just essential to securing Malaysia’s territorial integrity, but its prosperity as well because of some of the fields and platforms it uses to exploit hydrocarbons are within China’s nine-dashed line.
But there are broader interests too. Malaysia is dedicated to cultivating a good relationship with Beijing beyond the South China issue not just because China is Malaysia’s largest trading partner, but also because of the symbolism: the two countries share a “special relationship,” with Malaysia being the first ASEAN state to normalize ties with China in 1974 under Najib’s father, Tun Razak. Besides, China’s treatment of Malaysia on the South China Sea issue has been quite mild relative to that of Vietnam or the Philippines, which is a product of various factors including geography. As a trading and maritime nation, Malaysia also has an interest in ensuring broader regional peace and stability and an open commons. Lastly, Malaysia also has an interest in the preservation of global norms and international law including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as they provide a common basis of understanding without resorting to “might makes right” approaches.
To secure these interests, Malaysia has adopted a ‘playing it safe’ approach and employed a variety of diplomatic, legal, economic and security initiatives. China’s growing assertiveness in recent years, including increasing encroachments into Malaysian waters as well as Beijing’s initial strident tone following the MH370 incident last year – quickly corrected – has led Malaysia to recalibrate its outlook to a certain extent and has led some in the country to question the effectiveness of some of the four aforementioned components. But the evidence also seems to suggest that it continues to employ a ‘play it safe’ approach.
Diplomatically, Malaysia prefers to adroitly manage the South China Sea issue by communicating its concerns privately to China rather than publicly airing grievances, as Vietnam or the Philippines are wont to do. But it has also worked quietly behind the scenes to ensure ASEAN maintains a basic level of unity on the matter. Legally, the Malaysian government has not been shy about securing its claims as its joint submission to the UN with Vietnam in May 2009 illustrated, but it has thus far been unwilling to publicly support the Philippine case now pending with the arbitral tribunal at The Hague. Security-wise, as I’ve written previously, Malaysia has recently looked to advance relationships with countries like the United States and also boost its own capabilities, including by announcing plans for a new naval base in Bintulu, Sarawak, even if they are meant to address a wide variety of threats and the country is careful about how it deploys these capabilities against Beijing. Economically, Malaysia continues to maximize the economic benefits of oil and gas resources in the South China Sea, and for the most part China has not yet significantly disrupted those activities.
Of course, the Malaysian government may choose to revisit its overall approach in the South China Sea further down the line if there are major changes on the ground, including significant threats to its oil and gas interests. And there may be other events this year that could put Malaysia in an uncomfortable position, such as a potential ruling on the Philippine case. But thus far in its chairmanship, Malaysia has continued to strike a careful balance. Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman was not shy, for instance, about publicly announcing ASEAN’s desire for an early conclusion of a Code of Conduct on the South China Sea and mentioning that there were concerns about China’s ongoing reclamation efforts after the ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Retreat in Kota Kinabalu. At the same time, Malaysia has continued to do what is required to preserve its own claims, and has been working hard to boost its relationship with China even further, particularly in the economic domain. The art of playing it safe often involves walking a tightrope, but Malaysia is still determined to continue on this path as long as it can.
本来是英国 列兵 现在扩大到英联邦 列兵了
捞一分
捞分走人，谢谢楼主
捞一分走人！
听说可以捞一分
捞一分走人，谢谢版主。
班主放开捞分了吗？？？
可以捞吗？
不捞不好意思啊
先不说是否是假新闻，现实来讲咱们还就是区域性国家，连个海外基地都木有……
真爱又来送分下乡。。。没文化，真可怕！
呵呵，楼主太不不可思议了，哪怕即使是转帖，也应该先好好读读
呵呵，楼主太不不可思议了，哪怕即使是转帖，也应该先好好读读
有人管没人管？版主就这样放任这个货？
搞不懂这些马甲咋想的，天天整些假新闻