印媒称俄在重型直升机和加油机项目双双落败,俄否认正在 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/05/02 20:55:44


俄罗斯武器出口公司周三否认正在失去印度订单。之前印度和俄罗斯媒体报道称印度陆军选择了CH-47,而非米-26;空军加油机选择了A330,而非伊尔-78

去年两大打击是,印度攻击直升机选择了AH-64,而非米-28,中型战斗机选择了“阵风”,而非米格-35

Russia Denies Losing Indian Arms Tenders

    Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport denied on Wednesday media reports that it had lost tenders on the delivery of heavy-lift helicopters and aerial tankers to the Indian air force.

    “Rosoboronexport denies media speculation about Russia’s loss in both tenders as these reports are false,” the company said in a statement.

    “The results of these tenders have not been announced, and any premature speculation on the subject misleads the public and professionals, both in Russia and in India,” the statement said.

    Media reports in Russian and Indian media earlier indicated that the Russian upgraded Mi-26T2 Halo heavy-lift helicopter lost to the Boeing Chinook CH-47F, while the Il-78MK-90 aerial tanker lost to Airbus A330 MRTT.

    The Indian media cited cost effectiveness and after-sales service as main factors that tilted the scales in favor of the US and European aircraft.

    Rosoboronexport insists, however, that the Russian aircraft deserve to win the tenders as “they not only possess unique characteristics, but also satisfy all Indian requirements, including high cost effectiveness.”

    Russia’s traditionally strong position on the Indian arms market has been recently undermined by fierce competition with the US and European companies and failures to fulfill several contracts.

    Last year Russian arms exporters suffered two painful losses at Indian tenders. Russia did not win the contract to supply 22 helicopters to India, which preferred the US AH-64D Apache to Russia’s Mi-28N.

    During the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender announced by the Indian Air Force to replace the aging MiG-21s, the Russian MiG-35 did not even make it to the finals, where the Eurofighter Typhoon twin-engine multirole fighter lost a contract worth at least $10 billion to France’s Dassault Rafale.
http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20121128/177799243.html

俄罗斯武器出口公司周三否认正在失去印度订单。之前印度和俄罗斯媒体报道称印度陆军选择了CH-47,而非米-26;空军加油机选择了A330,而非伊尔-78

去年两大打击是,印度攻击直升机选择了AH-64,而非米-28,中型战斗机选择了“阵风”,而非米格-35

Russia Denies Losing Indian Arms Tenders

    Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport denied on Wednesday media reports that it had lost tenders on the delivery of heavy-lift helicopters and aerial tankers to the Indian air force.

    “Rosoboronexport denies media speculation about Russia’s loss in both tenders as these reports are false,” the company said in a statement.

    “The results of these tenders have not been announced, and any premature speculation on the subject misleads the public and professionals, both in Russia and in India,” the statement said.

    Media reports in Russian and Indian media earlier indicated that the Russian upgraded Mi-26T2 Halo heavy-lift helicopter lost to the Boeing Chinook CH-47F, while the Il-78MK-90 aerial tanker lost to Airbus A330 MRTT.

    The Indian media cited cost effectiveness and after-sales service as main factors that tilted the scales in favor of the US and European aircraft.

    Rosoboronexport insists, however, that the Russian aircraft deserve to win the tenders as “they not only possess unique characteristics, but also satisfy all Indian requirements, including high cost effectiveness.”

    Russia’s traditionally strong position on the Indian arms market has been recently undermined by fierce competition with the US and European companies and failures to fulfill several contracts.

    Last year Russian arms exporters suffered two painful losses at Indian tenders. Russia did not win the contract to supply 22 helicopters to India, which preferred the US AH-64D Apache to Russia’s Mi-28N.

    During the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender announced by the Indian Air Force to replace the aging MiG-21s, the Russian MiG-35 did not even make it to the finals, where the Eurofighter Typhoon twin-engine multirole fighter lost a contract worth at least $10 billion to France’s Dassault Rafale.
http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20121128/177799243.html
3锅天时地利人和呀~想买啥就能买啥
LZ, 你是想告诉大家你的逆天淫文水平来着?
毛子滴钱袋子灰鸟……
kulbit 发表于 2012-11-29 10:37
毛子滴钱袋子灰鸟……
我们还是期待那群毛子无敌的ID来洗地吧。。
三锅也开始不看菜谱看兵法了
Forum-S萨博5代 发表于 2012-11-29 10:36
LZ, 你是想告诉大家你的逆天淫文水平来着?
嘿嘿,没看仔细
其实也就印度-美国政府间采购协议执行比较快,C-130和C-17很快就交付了

其他印度项目竞标——重启——竞标——签合同——。。。——经常10年都没谱,空中加油机项目都很多年了
大毛你继续忽悠啊,最后把自己都忽悠残了
th945 发表于 2012-11-29 10:42
我们还是期待那群毛子无敌的ID来洗地吧。。
哈哈,你等着吧。
经济不景气
重剑无锋1977 发表于 2012-11-29 11:14
大毛你继续忽悠啊,最后把自己都忽悠残了
大毛是真没优势,要不是欧洲对中国禁运,兔子也不会买大毛的装备
有航母和T50两大项目,毛子还是利润丰厚的
如果有的选择,还买毛子货,那才是真脑残。
航母还在毛子手里攥着,三哥还能翻起多大浪?
毛子的观念再不转变,后面的路越来越难走了



毛子货太坑爹
刚知道27的机体寿命就3000小时,吓了一跳

毛子货太坑爹
刚知道27的机体寿命就3000小时,吓了一跳
否认就是死不承认的意思,毛子说现在不太需要中国市场,貌似全球有钱的主顾很多,现在看来TG的市场还是举足轻重
毛毛熊。。。毛毛虫。。。
三哥也有点脑残
为什么美国愿意卖给阿三,阿三不要美国货要买毛子货和法国货,迷惑了。
话说A3未来会不会选择香水国的阵风作为自己的舰载机呢?那估计比米格29K强
杳杳 发表于 2012-11-29 21:34
为什么美国愿意卖给阿三,阿三不要美国货要买毛子货和法国货,迷惑了。
买美国货从来是带一堆条件的,再说三哥之前好像没怎么用过美帝货
不急....超日王还够毛子吃十年
杳杳 发表于 2012-11-29 21:34
为什么美国愿意卖给阿三,阿三不要美国货要买毛子货和法国货,迷惑了。
因为MD卖东西向来是讲政治条件的,譬如把港口借我用用,我就卖东西给你!
三哥这样的都能被毛子惹得,发点小脾气了,毛子是优点不像话了,要坑也别净坑一个呀。不过,话说回来,毛子也没什么可以坑的,除了三哥
杳杳 发表于 2012-11-29 21:34
为什么美国愿意卖给阿三,阿三不要美国货要买毛子货和法国货,迷惑了。
印巴核爆影响,美国制裁了印度好几年

现在正常了,C-130、C-17、AH-64、P-8。。。买的还是很欢实的
有本事就别买毛哥的东西。
sadfeeling 发表于 2012-11-29 11:16
哈哈,你等着吧。
老毛子还是少看孙子兵法啊。不懂有的放矢。
毛子货太坑爹  刚知道27的机体寿命就3000小时,吓了一跳
正常,当年老毛子作战思路不同而已,现在大毛转过神来已经迟了…!
毛子货太坑爹
刚知道27的机体寿命就3000小时,吓了一跳
那时候设计就是大世界大战的,消耗品
为什么美国愿意卖给阿三,阿三不要美国货要买毛子货和法国货,迷惑了。
给五常交保护费,英国就一美国的狗,所以买飞机的时候没鸟他。中国。。。你懂的
毛子的服务就是砸自己牌子
买美国货从来是带一堆条件的,再说三哥之前好像没怎么用过美帝货
多谢解惑。
美法也学会给回扣上美人计这些招数了
就毛货那悲催的寿命,稀烂的可靠性。有条件的肯定买西方货,全寿命成本远比毛货划算。
阿三的钱也不好赚了,哈哈