外文关于钓鱼岛的争端解说对我不利

不论维基百科还是其他外文报道，对于钓鱼岛归属的解说都是对日本有利的。外国人强调具体事实说话，日本给的是具体年月日，我们总是说自古以来。自古以来是什么时候？没有人知道，只会降低陈述的可信度。


What is Japan's claim?

Japan says it surveyed the islands for 10 years and determined that they were uninhabited. That being the case, on 14 January 1895 it erected a sovereignty marker that formally incorporated the islands into Japanese territory. The Senkaku islands became part of the Nansei Shoto islands - also known as the Ryukyu islands and now as modern-day Okinawa prefecture.

After World War II Japan renounced claims to a number of territories and islands including Taiwan in the 1951 Treaty of San Francisco. But under the treaty the Nansei Shoto islands came under US trusteeship and were then returned to Japan in 1971, under the Okinawa reversion deal.

Japan says that China raised no objections to the San Francisco deal. And it says that it is only since the 1970s, when the issue of oil resources in the area emerged, that Chinese and Taiwanese authorities began pressing their claims.

What is China's claim?
China says that the Diaoyu islands have been part of its territory since ancient times, serving as important fishing grounds administered by the province of Taiwan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that this is "fully proven by history and is legally well-founded".

Taiwan was ceded to Japan in the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, after the Sino-Japanese war. When Taiwan was returned in the Treaty of San Francisco, China says the islands - as part of it - should also have been returned. But Beijing says Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek did not raise the issue, even when the Diaoyu islands were named in the later Okinawa reversion deal, because he depended on the US for support.

Separately, Taiwan also claims the islands.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11341139




百度百科有一段佐证名称由来http://baike.baidu.com/view/2876.htm
　　中国有关钓鱼岛的最早文献出自明朝永乐元年（1403年）的《顺风相送》，称该岛为“钓鱼屿”[2]。其后文献及官方舆图亦采用“钓鱼屿”名称，见诸如明朝嘉靖十三年（1534年）第十一次册封使陈侃所著《使琉球录》[3]、嘉靖四十一年（1562年）浙江提督胡宗宪编纂之《筹海图编》、清乾隆三十二年（1767年）乾隆皇帝钦命绘制之《坤舆全图》（《坤舆全图》使用闽南语发音，称为“好鱼须”[Hao-yu-su]，即“钓鱼屿”）。台湾沿用“钓鱼台”名称至今。大陆现代则称该岛为“钓鱼岛”，有时也用“钓鱼台”的名称[4]。
其中一段为日本的主张
　1786年日本仙台藩人林子平制作的《三国通览图说》之《琉球国全图》已列出钓鱼岛群岛，并注明这是中国往琉球的航道，98年后，亦即1884年，日本福冈人古贺辰四郎声称“发现”钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿，并向日本内务省申请划入日本国界

搞笑的是，在英文中几乎找不到关于中国明朝的具体佐证，却有《三国通览图说》的报导。

觉得声明时能向外界阐明清楚，争取舆论支持。例如自古以来就是中国的，明朝多少年在XX上就有记录~~~。不懂汉字的外国人是不可能搞清钓鱼岛是谁的，而且也不可能花时间的查阅。结果给他的感觉是日本人主张是对的。
不论维基百科还是其他外文报道，对于钓鱼岛归属的解说都是对日本有利的。外国人强调具体事实说话，日本给的是具体年月日，我们总是说自古以来。自古以来是什么时候？没有人知道，只会降低陈述的可信度。


What is Japan's claim?

Japan says it surveyed the islands for 10 years and determined that they were uninhabited. That being the case, on 14 January 1895 it erected a sovereignty marker that formally incorporated the islands into Japanese territory. The Senkaku islands became part of the Nansei Shoto islands - also known as the Ryukyu islands and now as modern-day Okinawa prefecture.

After World War II Japan renounced claims to a number of territories and islands including Taiwan in the 1951 Treaty of San Francisco. But under the treaty the Nansei Shoto islands came under US trusteeship and were then returned to Japan in 1971, under the Okinawa reversion deal.

Japan says that China raised no objections to the San Francisco deal. And it says that it is only since the 1970s, when the issue of oil resources in the area emerged, that Chinese and Taiwanese authorities began pressing their claims.

What is China's claim?
China says that the Diaoyu islands have been part of its territory since ancient times, serving as important fishing grounds administered by the province of Taiwan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that this is "fully proven by history and is legally well-founded".

Taiwan was ceded to Japan in the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, after the Sino-Japanese war. When Taiwan was returned in the Treaty of San Francisco, China says the islands - as part of it - should also have been returned. But Beijing says Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek did not raise the issue, even when the Diaoyu islands were named in the later Okinawa reversion deal, because he depended on the US for support.

Separately, Taiwan also claims the islands.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11341139




百度百科有一段佐证名称由来http://baike.baidu.com/view/2876.htm
　　中国有关钓鱼岛的最早文献出自明朝永乐元年（1403年）的《顺风相送》，称该岛为“钓鱼屿”[2]。其后文献及官方舆图亦采用“钓鱼屿”名称，见诸如明朝嘉靖十三年（1534年）第十一次册封使陈侃所著《使琉球录》[3]、嘉靖四十一年（1562年）浙江提督胡宗宪编纂之《筹海图编》、清乾隆三十二年（1767年）乾隆皇帝钦命绘制之《坤舆全图》（《坤舆全图》使用闽南语发音，称为“好鱼须”[Hao-yu-su]，即“钓鱼屿”）。台湾沿用“钓鱼台”名称至今。大陆现代则称该岛为“钓鱼岛”，有时也用“钓鱼台”的名称[4]。
其中一段为日本的主张
　1786年日本仙台藩人林子平制作的《三国通览图说》之《琉球国全图》已列出钓鱼岛群岛，并注明这是中国往琉球的航道，98年后，亦即1884年，日本福冈人古贺辰四郎声称“发现”钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿，并向日本内务省申请划入日本国界

搞笑的是，在英文中几乎找不到关于中国明朝的具体佐证，却有《三国通览图说》的报导。

觉得声明时能向外界阐明清楚，争取舆论支持。例如自古以来就是中国的，明朝多少年在XX上就有记录~~~。不懂汉字的外国人是不可能搞清钓鱼岛是谁的，而且也不可能花时间的查阅。结果给他的感觉是日本人主张是对的。