超级军网F-14X这样的设想对航母舰载机联队很不错啊
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/27 16:14:39
在资源充分的情况下，大国的航母舰载机联队往往会采用两种以上的舰载机，比如以前毛子的航母上同时配备苏-27和米格-29。美国人在冷战高峰时期，也是F-14和F/A-18搭档，也就是用不同机型高低搭配。
但是美国人过去也曾经提出过F-14X的设想，就是采用一种降低性能的F-14搭配F-14.比如美国人提出的F-14x就有改装雷达，去掉不死鸟发射能力等措施。其实我觉得从简化舰载机编队，简化后勤的角度来说，似乎后一种选择更有利。
我们在航母上配备部分高性能战机，再配备一些其性能简化版战机。比如两者采用相同的机体，后者采用可以同时攻击8个目标的高性能雷达，很先进的发动机。后者采用性能低一些，只能同时攻击4个目标的雷达，采用性能低一些的发动机，以及一下部件采用性能相对低一些的部件。前者侧重空优，后者打杂。这样一个舰载机编队可以只有1种主站飞机。虽然老美HM现在都只有超级虫，但是那是有特殊的情况，再也没有过去那样的威胁了在资源充分的情况下，大国的航母舰载机联队往往会采用两种以上的舰载机，比如以前毛子的航母上同时配备苏-27和米格-29。美国人在冷战高峰时期，也是F-14和F/A-18搭档，也就是用不同机型高低搭配。
但是美国人过去也曾经提出过F-14X的设想，就是采用一种降低性能的F-14搭配F-14.比如美国人提出的F-14x就有改装雷达，去掉不死鸟发射能力等措施。其实我觉得从简化舰载机编队，简化后勤的角度来说，似乎后一种选择更有利。
我们在航母上配备部分高性能战机，再配备一些其性能简化版战机。比如两者采用相同的机体，后者采用可以同时攻击8个目标的高性能雷达，很先进的发动机。后者采用性能低一些，只能同时攻击4个目标的雷达，采用性能低一些的发动机，以及一下部件采用性能相对低一些的部件。前者侧重空优，后者打杂。这样一个舰载机编队可以只有1种主站飞机。虽然老美HM现在都只有超级虫，但是那是有特殊的情况，再也没有过去那样的威胁了
但是美国人过去也曾经提出过F-14X的设想，就是采用一种降低性能的F-14搭配F-14.比如美国人提出的F-14x就有改装雷达，去掉不死鸟发射能力等措施。其实我觉得从简化舰载机编队，简化后勤的角度来说，似乎后一种选择更有利。
我们在航母上配备部分高性能战机，再配备一些其性能简化版战机。比如两者采用相同的机体，后者采用可以同时攻击8个目标的高性能雷达，很先进的发动机。后者采用性能低一些，只能同时攻击4个目标的雷达，采用性能低一些的发动机，以及一下部件采用性能相对低一些的部件。前者侧重空优，后者打杂。这样一个舰载机编队可以只有1种主站飞机。虽然老美HM现在都只有超级虫，但是那是有特殊的情况，再也没有过去那样的威胁了在资源充分的情况下，大国的航母舰载机联队往往会采用两种以上的舰载机，比如以前毛子的航母上同时配备苏-27和米格-29。美国人在冷战高峰时期，也是F-14和F/A-18搭档，也就是用不同机型高低搭配。
但是美国人过去也曾经提出过F-14X的设想，就是采用一种降低性能的F-14搭配F-14.比如美国人提出的F-14x就有改装雷达，去掉不死鸟发射能力等措施。其实我觉得从简化舰载机编队，简化后勤的角度来说，似乎后一种选择更有利。
我们在航母上配备部分高性能战机，再配备一些其性能简化版战机。比如两者采用相同的机体，后者采用可以同时攻击8个目标的高性能雷达，很先进的发动机。后者采用性能低一些，只能同时攻击4个目标的雷达，采用性能低一些的发动机，以及一下部件采用性能相对低一些的部件。前者侧重空优，后者打杂。这样一个舰载机编队可以只有1种主站飞机。虽然老美HM现在都只有超级虫，但是那是有特殊的情况，再也没有过去那样的威胁了
你也可以去建议USAF，把什么F-15/16马上退光，F-35也砍了，就只弄一个F-22，改几个不同功能的版本，多完美呀。
其实我的意思还包括：单发战机和它的双发放大版，比如幻影2000和幻影4000
我怎么觉得超级虫子比F14威胁大多了...............
雄猫和超级大虫子对地球上的任何一国海空军来说都是大杀器。
可是老美还嫌不够 还要拼命发展 真是不叫人活啊
bs回帖不看贴的
顺便问一下，那个吸收了ATF和A-12技术的ASF-14究竟什么样
A-12那件事情不是说是有猫腻的吗？那这个吸收A-12的技术又是什么意思呢？
A-12那件事情不是说是有猫腻的吗？那这个吸收A-12的技术又是什么意思呢。
我也不知道，但是在《雄猫的故事》里面提到F-14的型号，其中TOMCAT21有图有真相，但是就这个ASF-14只是一句话而已
我也不知道，但是在《雄猫的故事》里面提到F-14的型号，其中TOMCAT21有图有真相，但是就这个ASF-14只是一句话而已
A-12那件事情不是说是有猫腻的吗？那这个吸收A-12的技术又是什么意思呢？
我也不知道，《雄猫的故事》里面提到几种改型，TOMCAT21有图有真相，ASF-14只有一句话概括
我也不知道，《雄猫的故事》里面提到几种改型，TOMCAT21有图有真相，ASF-14只有一句话概括
同一机种使用两种不同的发动机对于俺们这样的国家太奢侈了
关于ASF-14,狗搜了一下：If the Tomcat 21 was a relatively low cost structural modification to the F-14D then the Attack Super Tomcat 21 (hereafter referred to as AST-21) was the most advanced derivative Grumman could make, both in terms of aerodynamics and avionics.
As well as the structural changes mentioned above the AST-21 would have thicker outer wing panels, allowing even more fuel to be carried. Larger external fuel tanks would also be developed. Flaps and slats would be further refined, reducing approach speeds by 18mph.
A new version of the F110, the GE F110-GE-129 would power the aircraft, giving the potential for the AST-21 to supercruise (achieve and sustain supersonic flight without need for fuel hungry afterburners) at up to Mach 1.3. Vectoring nozzles were also considered, but felt unnecessary when the design displayed a 77 degree angle of attack without the vectoring nozzles.
To aid servicing and repairs all maintenance controls would be grouped onto a single panel.
In the cockpit each crewmember would receive colour MFD's and helmet mounted displays. A single piece forward canopy would replace the present windscreen, enabling full all round vision for the first time.
Carrying the nav-attack FLIRS of the other variants the AST-21 would replace the AN/APG-71 with an electronically scanned unit, incorporating a host of air-to-air and air-to-ground modes. This would have twice the power of the AN/APG-71 and be among the biggest leaps in capability. Some reports suggest this radar would have been that developed for the A-12. Defensive electronics would also have been upgraded, with the AST-21 carrying 135 packets of chaff/flares in launchers on the LAU-7 missile rails.
At present it is unclear whether the ASF-14 differed in any notable way from the AST-21, but the former was the designation used when the Navy carried out a serious study of the Grumman proposals in 1994. Unfortunately for Grumman the study decided the ASF-14 to be unaffordable. As a result the Navy moved ahead with its present plans to develop the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet variants.
As well as the structural changes mentioned above the AST-21 would have thicker outer wing panels, allowing even more fuel to be carried. Larger external fuel tanks would also be developed. Flaps and slats would be further refined, reducing approach speeds by 18mph.
A new version of the F110, the GE F110-GE-129 would power the aircraft, giving the potential for the AST-21 to supercruise (achieve and sustain supersonic flight without need for fuel hungry afterburners) at up to Mach 1.3. Vectoring nozzles were also considered, but felt unnecessary when the design displayed a 77 degree angle of attack without the vectoring nozzles.
To aid servicing and repairs all maintenance controls would be grouped onto a single panel.
In the cockpit each crewmember would receive colour MFD's and helmet mounted displays. A single piece forward canopy would replace the present windscreen, enabling full all round vision for the first time.
Carrying the nav-attack FLIRS of the other variants the AST-21 would replace the AN/APG-71 with an electronically scanned unit, incorporating a host of air-to-air and air-to-ground modes. This would have twice the power of the AN/APG-71 and be among the biggest leaps in capability. Some reports suggest this radar would have been that developed for the A-12. Defensive electronics would also have been upgraded, with the AST-21 carrying 135 packets of chaff/flares in launchers on the LAU-7 missile rails.
At present it is unclear whether the ASF-14 differed in any notable way from the AST-21, but the former was the designation used when the Navy carried out a serious study of the Grumman proposals in 1994. Unfortunately for Grumman the study decided the ASF-14 to be unaffordable. As a result the Navy moved ahead with its present plans to develop the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet variants.