转贴自yahoo:牛!留学生妙计:30美金就能让CNN破产

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/26 17:51:45
http://bbs.cn.yahoo.com/message/ ... 04_1.html?source=TX



每一个在美的华人都可 以到当地的法院去控告 cnn和卡弗蒂,索赔 500美金。你只需花 50美金。你也可能得 不到赔偿,因为你无法 证明你遭受500美金 的损失。但每一个案件 就要花掉cnn 1000美金, 而且cnn也不能反告 你,因为你没有给cn n造成损失。如果有5 000个华人这样做, cnn必须马上应诉。 你可以在美国任何地方 上诉,越偏远的地方越 好。

我是这样做的: 我在堪沙斯州,我在一 民事法庭对cnn及卡 弗蒂提出索赔控诉。

cnn的地址: Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER NEW YORK, NY 10019 Telephone 2124848000

我的理由:cnn的雇 员卡弗蒂当众辱骂中国 人是一群暴徒和傻子, 伤害了我的名誉,导致 我损失了500美金。

分析:
1, 为什么500美金? 在堪萨斯州,500美 金以下的案件,我只需 出30美金的上诉费, 500美金以上,我要 付50美金。
2, 下一步。 我寄挂号信寄给被告。
3, 以后会怎样? a, 如果被告未出庭,cn n赔我500美金,外 加我那30美金诉讼费 。 b, 如果被告的律师出庭, 我有可能就输了,因为 我拿不出证据,我顶多 就损失那30美金。 c, 对方律师有可能打电话 给我要求庭外和解。我 要求解雇卡弗蒂,否则 ,法庭上见。

无论怎样,cnn要花 大笔的律师费。

问:如果我不是美国公 民,我可不可以上诉?
答:美国法律说,不是 美国公民都可以告。

问:可不可以群体上诉 ?
答:可以,但效果不好 。因为你提不出证据你 损失了500美金。这 就是为什么我们要人多 ,而且要在不同的地方 上诉,越多越好。

原文写得更好!我译了 一些。有兴趣的朋友可 以看看:
Every Chinese in America goes to the local small claim court and to file a small claim ($500) against CNN and Cafferty. It will cost you $50 or so to do it, you are probably not going to win (since you have no way to prove that you have the $500 financial damage). But it will cost CNN $1000 or more to defend each case, they can not counter-su e you either, because you did not cause damage to them. If we have 5000 to do so, they will act right away. You can do it anywhere in USA, the more remote location the better.
. This is what I did.
I filed a small claim in a county small claim court in Kansas. The defandant is TIME WARNER INC.
Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER
NEW YORK, NY 10019
Telephone 2124848000
My claim: Time Warner employee, Jack Cafferty in a publically broadcaste d TV news program (CNN) asserted Chinese are a bunch of 'goons'. This statement severely damaged my credit, which resulted $500 financial loss to my business.
Analysis: 1. why $500?
A: In Kansas, $500 or less, the filing fee is $30, otherwise it will be $50.
2. What is the next step?
In Kansas, you just need to use registered mail to mail it to the defendant, other states may require you to use law enforcemen t to serve a summon, which will cost you $25 to $50.
3. What will happen?
a) If the defendant does not show up, the judge will make a default judgment, that means, Time Warner will pay me $500, plus the $30 court fee.
b) If the defendant send an attorney to the court at the court date, (which is 3 weeks later, the defendant can request a postpone), then the judge will probably make a judgment to the defendant (I lose) since I can not provide evidence that I had the $500 damage. Then I lose the $30 court fee, that is it.
c) The defendant attorney could call me before the court date, try to settle it outside the court, or try to persuade me to withdraw by threatenin g counter-su ing me, (which I know they can't, I did not do anything to cause them damage, suing them does not count).
I am waiting for their call, I am willing to settle outside the court, my request is “CNN fires Jack Cafferty.” Otherwise, I will see you in court.
No matter what, it will cost them a lot of money for the attorney fee.
Why not a class-acti on lawsuit?
Can anyone provide evidences that you really suffered material damage? Otherwise, you do not have a case.
Besides, all big companies in US have one kind or another lawsuit ongoing, they are not afraid of one or two lawsuits. But, will they defend 1000 or 5000 suits to protect a worth-less employee?
This is why we need to have as many people as possible to file the suit in as many places as possible.
Can we sue Cafferty only?
No, it is very hard for a local court to enforce a judgment against an out-of-sta te person, many courts will not accept these type of suit. Even the case is accepted, the judge can still dismiss the case, (you will lose your court fee). Even a judgment is made in your favor, you will not be able to collect anything from him.
Can I sue if I am not a US citizen?
Anybody can file the suit. Please do it, this is American experience .
Is there any negative consequenc e on me if I sue?
If you lose, I will lose the court fee. If you are going to apply a mortgage DURING the suit, you need to disclose it , it may not affect your mortgage applicatio n at all. Other than that, no negative effects on you. It will NOT have anything to do with your green card applicatio n.
Will it damage the Chinese image by filing so many lawsuits?
I don't know how will other people think. It is a common practice for Americans. If you do not fight the American way, you lose already, what good is your image for?
Sorry, written in a hurry, there might be mis-inform ation.http://bbs.cn.yahoo.com/message/ ... 04_1.html?source=TX



每一个在美的华人都可 以到当地的法院去控告 cnn和卡弗蒂,索赔 500美金。你只需花 50美金。你也可能得 不到赔偿,因为你无法 证明你遭受500美金 的损失。但每一个案件 就要花掉cnn 1000美金, 而且cnn也不能反告 你,因为你没有给cn n造成损失。如果有5 000个华人这样做, cnn必须马上应诉。 你可以在美国任何地方 上诉,越偏远的地方越 好。

我是这样做的: 我在堪沙斯州,我在一 民事法庭对cnn及卡 弗蒂提出索赔控诉。

cnn的地址: Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER NEW YORK, NY 10019 Telephone 2124848000

我的理由:cnn的雇 员卡弗蒂当众辱骂中国 人是一群暴徒和傻子, 伤害了我的名誉,导致 我损失了500美金。

分析:
1, 为什么500美金? 在堪萨斯州,500美 金以下的案件,我只需 出30美金的上诉费, 500美金以上,我要 付50美金。
2, 下一步。 我寄挂号信寄给被告。
3, 以后会怎样? a, 如果被告未出庭,cn n赔我500美金,外 加我那30美金诉讼费 。 b, 如果被告的律师出庭, 我有可能就输了,因为 我拿不出证据,我顶多 就损失那30美金。 c, 对方律师有可能打电话 给我要求庭外和解。我 要求解雇卡弗蒂,否则 ,法庭上见。

无论怎样,cnn要花 大笔的律师费。

问:如果我不是美国公 民,我可不可以上诉?
答:美国法律说,不是 美国公民都可以告。

问:可不可以群体上诉 ?
答:可以,但效果不好 。因为你提不出证据你 损失了500美金。这 就是为什么我们要人多 ,而且要在不同的地方 上诉,越多越好。

原文写得更好!我译了 一些。有兴趣的朋友可 以看看:
Every Chinese in America goes to the local small claim court and to file a small claim ($500) against CNN and Cafferty. It will cost you $50 or so to do it, you are probably not going to win (since you have no way to prove that you have the $500 financial damage). But it will cost CNN $1000 or more to defend each case, they can not counter-su e you either, because you did not cause damage to them. If we have 5000 to do so, they will act right away. You can do it anywhere in USA, the more remote location the better.
. This is what I did.
I filed a small claim in a county small claim court in Kansas. The defandant is TIME WARNER INC.
Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER
NEW YORK, NY 10019
Telephone 2124848000
My claim: Time Warner employee, Jack Cafferty in a publically broadcaste d TV news program (CNN) asserted Chinese are a bunch of 'goons'. This statement severely damaged my credit, which resulted $500 financial loss to my business.
Analysis: 1. why $500?
A: In Kansas, $500 or less, the filing fee is $30, otherwise it will be $50.
2. What is the next step?
In Kansas, you just need to use registered mail to mail it to the defendant, other states may require you to use law enforcemen t to serve a summon, which will cost you $25 to $50.
3. What will happen?
a) If the defendant does not show up, the judge will make a default judgment, that means, Time Warner will pay me $500, plus the $30 court fee.
b) If the defendant send an attorney to the court at the court date, (which is 3 weeks later, the defendant can request a postpone), then the judge will probably make a judgment to the defendant (I lose) since I can not provide evidence that I had the $500 damage. Then I lose the $30 court fee, that is it.
c) The defendant attorney could call me before the court date, try to settle it outside the court, or try to persuade me to withdraw by threatenin g counter-su ing me, (which I know they can't, I did not do anything to cause them damage, suing them does not count).
I am waiting for their call, I am willing to settle outside the court, my request is “CNN fires Jack Cafferty.” Otherwise, I will see you in court.
No matter what, it will cost them a lot of money for the attorney fee.
Why not a class-acti on lawsuit?
Can anyone provide evidences that you really suffered material damage? Otherwise, you do not have a case.
Besides, all big companies in US have one kind or another lawsuit ongoing, they are not afraid of one or two lawsuits. But, will they defend 1000 or 5000 suits to protect a worth-less employee?
This is why we need to have as many people as possible to file the suit in as many places as possible.
Can we sue Cafferty only?
No, it is very hard for a local court to enforce a judgment against an out-of-sta te person, many courts will not accept these type of suit. Even the case is accepted, the judge can still dismiss the case, (you will lose your court fee). Even a judgment is made in your favor, you will not be able to collect anything from him.
Can I sue if I am not a US citizen?
Anybody can file the suit. Please do it, this is American experience .
Is there any negative consequenc e on me if I sue?
If you lose, I will lose the court fee. If you are going to apply a mortgage DURING the suit, you need to disclose it , it may not affect your mortgage applicatio n at all. Other than that, no negative effects on you. It will NOT have anything to do with your green card applicatio n.
Will it damage the Chinese image by filing so many lawsuits?
I don't know how will other people think. It is a common practice for Americans. If you do not fight the American way, you lose already, what good is your image for?
Sorry, written in a hurry, there might be mis-inform ation.
油钱,寄信钱也是钱啊。
有够损.:D
CNN有中情局的补贴 最后的收入不都归美国高院所有?
想办法在中国告比较好
主要是律师费,归律师所有
这些费用不都是由败诉一方承担的么?
就是要想法让曹奶奶难受
有1000个,曹奶奶一定难受:D
如果有几十万人一齐玩, 美国的司法系统得停止运作.:D
30美金只是上诉费,还不包括你请律师的钱,也不确定官司要打多久,万一官司打输了,是不是要承担双方的诉讼费啊:L
我想知道在中国要怎么个告法?:D
在中国,你想告,就和谐你。
原帖由 tcicby 于 2008-4-29 19:58 发表
在中国,你想告,就和谐你。

是去告曹奶奶!
这位民主斗士怎么急着回贴,连贴都不看清楚?
原帖由 mobylee 于 2008-4-29 19:26 发表
30美金只是上诉费,还不包括你请律师的钱,也不确定官司要打多久,万一官司打输了,是不是要承担双方的诉讼费啊:L

这个已经说了,
根本不会请律师,
根本就不打算赢,
就是要曹奶奶出律师费,到处应诉。。。
输了,也没什么,就是30刀而已。:D :D
输了,对方的费用不也要你承担的么,怎么会只30刀。
那个叫 “必要诉讼支出”,
:D :D
得自己兜着
哭吧:') :') :')
]]
不得拒绝裁判,
这个法律的信条,
如果还挂在嘴边的话:D
原帖由 zh020 于 2008-4-29 21:30 发表
不得拒绝裁判,
这个法律的信条,
如果还挂在嘴边的话:D

法官直接判决证据不足,不立案,这个不叫拒绝裁判。
阿哈哈哈哈
楼上,
你看看22 大叔的编辑时间,:D :D
他编辑干我*事?
谁是22大叔啊
原帖由 xx_9 于 2008-4-29 19:51 发表
我想知道在中国要怎么个告法?:D

同意,美国滴事跟我鸟关系,俺还是对国内事关心些。
]]
法庭受理就惨了,但是……:D
原帖由 nangi 于 2008-4-29 22:00 发表
他编辑干我*事?

哈哈哈
因为我的原话,是针对他编辑以前的话说的。:D
很明显,不受理和驳回,是很不同的:D
人家要以无理取闹反诉呢?比如说让你赔偿1000美元啥的。
谢谢啦,有意思:handshake
原帖由 士大夫惹是非 于 2008-4-30 08:47 发表
法庭受理就惨了,但是……:D

:L :Q
看铁不认真!!
就是要法院受理,就是要打官司,就是要CNN出律师费,就是要CNN应诉。。。。。:D :D
原帖由 zh020 于 2008-4-30 08:56 发表

:L :Q
看铁不认真!!
就是要法院受理,就是要打官司,就是要CNN出律师费,就是要CNN应诉。。。。。:D :D

如此好事,汝去做来:D
原帖由 深涧悠蓝 于 2008-4-29 20:48 发表

是去告曹奶奶!
这位民主斗士怎么急着回贴,连贴都不看清楚?

这位御用手纸怎么没有自知之明

朝廷用你的时候就上,朝廷用不着的时候,不要主动给朝廷惹麻烦

汤晔什么下场不知道?

这次合肥武汉砸家乐福的,你等着看宣判几个吧:D ;P
原帖由 歌幽的马甲 于 2008-4-30 11:41 发表

如此好事,汝去做来:D

我的事情,你也要管。。。:D
有文化就是不一样,比打砸厉害多了
果然是典型的TG后代啊,麻雀战学的不错
说的容易,事实上并没有那么多人做的
原帖由 吸毒欧阳疯 于 2008-4-30 22:25 发表
说的容易,事实上并没有那么多人做的

所以说看不起他们呢

大多数都是口头爱国派

让他们撕毁美国绿卡,回来报效祖国,就当缩头乌龟了

不过这些人也算有自知之明,知道那些爱国散步啊、反分裂散步啊、起诉CNN什么的,只能在美国加拿大搞,若是回国后还敢组织发动这样的爱国活动,下场就是和汤晔一个样:D :D
你不提我倒忘了
上次是谁说汤某被FBI逮捕了?
怎么这么多法盲.

华人这一方不请律师,只出30美元。CNN要请律师,那费用,就是CNN也头皮发麻。
歌幽兄,你好像对美国的政治、司法制度比较了解,能否详细说说,这种做法有没有可操作性?
原帖由 八宝山老妖 于 2008-4-30 23:56 发表
歌幽兄,你好像对美国的政治、司法制度比较了解,能否详细说说,这种做法有没有可操作性?

惭愧得紧,本人对美国司法制度没有什么具体了解,只是看过一些案例,对那些旧上海俗称“落地开花”,美国俗称“Ambulance Chaser”的野鸡律师有点感性的认识罢了:L

从理论上讲,这个做法肯定是可操作的。但十九世纪的英国商人也从理论上论证过中国四亿人口,只要一百人中有一人买一台钢琴,就可以向大清出口四百万台钢琴;P

那梁某人据说是搞老鼠会出身的,还说过许多骂共产党的言论:D