47秒到地狱，对海军条令的挑战

http://breakingdefense.com/2014/11/47-seconds-from-hell-a-challenge-to-navy-doctrine/

一年多前的文章，现在看起来倒是应景
WASHINGTON: Someone shoots a cruise missile at you. How far away would you like to stop it: over 200 miles out or less than 35?

If you answered “over 200,” congratulations, you’re thinking like the US Navy, which has spent billions of dollars over decades to develop ever more sophisticated anti-missile defenses. According to Bryan Clark, until 12 months ago a top advisor to the nation’s top admiral, you and the Navy are wrong.

作者建议只保留廉价的近程拦截武器，而将金钱和搭载能力放到远程攻击武器上去。SM6反舰模式看来是个两面讨好的做法，远程拦截和远程攻击都要，但是如果还要讨好纳税人，这个远程反舰能力应该不会高级到哪儿去。

换个角度看，塑料虫加鱼叉的确落伍了，但是好歹LRASM也能挂上去，这么着急全面发展远程反舰能力，压力得是多大啊。

http://breakingdefense.com/2014/11/47-seconds-from-hell-a-challenge-to-navy-doctrine/

一年多前的文章，现在看起来倒是应景
WASHINGTON: Someone shoots a cruise missile at you. How far away would you like to stop it: over 200 miles out or less than 35?

If you answered “over 200,” congratulations, you’re thinking like the US Navy, which has spent billions of dollars over decades to develop ever more sophisticated anti-missile defenses. According to Bryan Clark, until 12 months ago a top advisor to the nation’s top admiral, you and the Navy are wrong.

作者建议只保留廉价的近程拦截武器，而将金钱和搭载能力放到远程攻击武器上去。SM6反舰模式看来是个两面讨好的做法，远程拦截和远程攻击都要，但是如果还要讨好纳税人，这个远程反舰能力应该不会高级到哪儿去。

换个角度看，塑料虫加鱼叉的确落伍了，但是好歹LRASM也能挂上去，这么着急全面发展远程反舰能力，压力得是多大啊。