超级军网美军力报告 南海距离及时间
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/04 09:31:05
他美帝起咱们的标题也太邪恶了 ~
他美帝起咱们的标题也太邪恶了 ~
Key Infrastructure That Enables
Expeditionary Warfighting Capabilities
Any planning for operations in the Pacific will be dominated by the “tyranny of distance.” Because of the extensive distances that must be traversed in order to deploy forces, even Air Force units will take one or more days to deploy, while ships measure steaming time in weeks. For instance, ships require four days to get from the West Coast of the United States to Hawaii. From there, it takes a further seven days to get to Guam, six days to Japan, and eight days to Okinawa or Australia—if ships move at top speed, undertake no evasive measures, and encounter no interference.
China’s growing anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, ranging from an expanding feet of modern submarines to anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles, increase the operational risk for deployment of U.S. forces in the event of conflict. China’s capabilities not only jeopardize American combat forces that would fow into the theater for initial combat, but also would continue to threaten the logistical support that would sustain American combat power for the subsequent days, weeks, and months.
American basing structure in the Indo–Pacific region, including access to key allied facilities, is therefore both necessary and increasingly at risk.
Expeditionary Warfighting Capabilities
Any planning for operations in the Pacific will be dominated by the “tyranny of distance.” Because of the extensive distances that must be traversed in order to deploy forces, even Air Force units will take one or more days to deploy, while ships measure steaming time in weeks. For instance, ships require four days to get from the West Coast of the United States to Hawaii. From there, it takes a further seven days to get to Guam, six days to Japan, and eight days to Okinawa or Australia—if ships move at top speed, undertake no evasive measures, and encounter no interference.
China’s growing anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, ranging from an expanding feet of modern submarines to anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles, increase the operational risk for deployment of U.S. forces in the event of conflict. China’s capabilities not only jeopardize American combat forces that would fow into the theater for initial combat, but also would continue to threaten the logistical support that would sustain American combat power for the subsequent days, weeks, and months.
American basing structure in the Indo–Pacific region, including access to key allied facilities, is therefore both necessary and increasingly at risk.
鸟文看不懂
北方的人 发表于 2015-11-2 07:14
鸟文看不懂
好在有网
鸟文看不懂
好在有网
楼主说的邪恶是“tyranny of distance”吗，
这个翻译为距离的障碍更准确，我一开始也吓一跳，查了网络专业释义才知道。google翻译和百度翻译都太简单了。
说正事儿，不知道从夏威夷部署到台湾要多少天呢，应该用不了1个星期吧，西海岸会多些。
楼主说的邪恶是“tyranny of distance”吗，
这个翻译为距离的障碍更准确，我一开始也吓一跳，查了网络专业释义才知道。google翻译和百度翻译都太简单了。
说正事儿，不知道从夏威夷部署到台湾要多少天呢，应该用不了1个星期吧，西海岸会多些。
maxbear 发表于 2015-11-2 07:32
楼主说的邪恶是“tyranny of distance”吗，
这个翻译为距离的障碍更准确，我一开始也吓一跳，查了网络专 ...
老大多指导指导 ~
楼主说的邪恶是“tyranny of distance”吗，
这个翻译为距离的障碍更准确，我一开始也吓一跳，查了网络专 ...
老大多指导指导 ~