【不懂就问】对于在南海的诉求究竟是什么，我们的领导层 ...

         请问超大神人，我们有没有明确对外公布过在南海的诉求？是岛礁的领土/领海/领空要求吗？建了灯塔跑道，只说是民用目的，却不做领土要求算是什么，历史上有过先例吗？如果没有领土要求，这次还我们是否定性为美国侵犯主权？或者只是挑衅行为？
         看到有人也有类似的疑问，老美的专家也扑出来说这只是挑战中国的在岛礁问题上含糊不清的，甚至将来有可能过分的诉求。
The just-concluded operation was not a challenge to China's claim to Subi Reef itself, but rather to what kind of waters and rights China thinks the reef grants it. It was a case study aimed at challenging the excessive and ambiguous claims that China makes throughout the disputed South China Sea more generally.
       还说选在这么打脸的时间，也是因为习大大对着观海也是外交部发言人的一套，观海实在摸不清，于是认为外交这套没戏了，所以也就从了军队里那群人。
Xi's visit actually seems to have convinced many holdouts that there is no diplomatic solution given Beijing's current intransigence (an extremely ambiguous statement from President Xi about China's "intention" not to "militarize" the features it occupies notwithstanding).
      想问问看大家的观点。一是咱们到目前是怎么表态的？二是，如果确实含糊不清，是领导层没想清还在评估，还是想清了，但不能或不敢说清？三是，这样到底是给将来留出了空间，还是让现在陷入了被动？
以下链接
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/27/opinions/poling-south-china-sea-tensions/index.html         请问超大神人，我们有没有明确对外公布过在南海的诉求？是岛礁的领土/领海/领空要求吗？建了灯塔跑道，只说是民用目的，却不做领土要求算是什么，历史上有过先例吗？如果没有领土要求，这次还我们是否定性为美国侵犯主权？或者只是挑衅行为？
         看到有人也有类似的疑问，老美的专家也扑出来说这只是挑战中国的在岛礁问题上含糊不清的，甚至将来有可能过分的诉求。
The just-concluded operation was not a challenge to China's claim to Subi Reef itself, but rather to what kind of waters and rights China thinks the reef grants it. It was a case study aimed at challenging the excessive and ambiguous claims that China makes throughout the disputed South China Sea more generally.
       还说选在这么打脸的时间，也是因为习大大对着观海也是外交部发言人的一套，观海实在摸不清，于是认为外交这套没戏了，所以也就从了军队里那群人。
Xi's visit actually seems to have convinced many holdouts that there is no diplomatic solution given Beijing's current intransigence (an extremely ambiguous statement from President Xi about China's "intention" not to "militarize" the features it occupies notwithstanding).
      想问问看大家的观点。一是咱们到目前是怎么表态的？二是，如果确实含糊不清，是领导层没想清还在评估，还是想清了，但不能或不敢说清？三是，这样到底是给将来留出了空间，还是让现在陷入了被动？
以下链接
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/27/opinions/poling-south-china-sea-tensions/index.html