参议院412号决议案全文

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/05/05 11:15:12


先看大家关心的声明

call ...to widraw其实强度还好

Agreed to Senate (07/10/2014)


[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. Res. 412 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 412

  Reaffirming the strong support of the United States Government for
freedom of navigation and other internationally lawful uses of sea and
airspace in the Asia-Pacific region, and for the peaceful diplomatic
resolution of outstanding territorial and maritime claims and disputes.

..............................................................................................................

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    The Senate--
            (1) condemns coercive and threatening actions or the use of
        force to impede freedom of operations in international airspace
        by military or civilian aircraft, to alter the status quo or to
        destabilize the Asia-Pacific region;
            (2) urges the Government of the People's Republic of China
        to refrain from implementing the declared East China Sea Air
        Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), which is contrary to
        freedom of overflight in international airspace, and to refrain
        from taking similar provocative actions elsewhere in the Asia-
        Pacific region;
            (3) commends the Governments of Japan and of the Republic
        of Korea for their restraint, and commends the Government of
        the Republic of Korea for engaging in a deliberate process of
        consultations with the United States, Japan and China prior to
        announcing its adjustment of its Air Defense Identification
        Zone on December 9, 2013, and for its commitment to implement
        this adjusted Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in a
        manner consistent with international practice and respect for
        the freedom of overflight and other internationally lawful uses
        of international airspace; and

            (4) calls on the Government of the People's Republic of
        China to withdraw its Hai Yang Shi You 981 (HD-981) drilling
        rig and associated maritime forces from their current
        positions, to refrain from maritime maneuvers contrary to
        COLREGS, and to return immediately to the status quo as it
        existed before May 1, 2014.


連結

https://beta.congress.gov/bill/1 ... resolution/412/text

先看大家关心的声明

call ...to widraw其实强度还好

Agreed to Senate (07/10/2014)


[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. Res. 412 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 412

  Reaffirming the strong support of the United States Government for
freedom of navigation and other internationally lawful uses of sea and
airspace in the Asia-Pacific region, and for the peaceful diplomatic
resolution of outstanding territorial and maritime claims and disputes.

..............................................................................................................

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    The Senate--
            (1) condemns coercive and threatening actions or the use of
        force to impede freedom of operations in international airspace
        by military or civilian aircraft, to alter the status quo or to
        destabilize the Asia-Pacific region;
            (2) urges the Government of the People's Republic of China
        to refrain from implementing the declared East China Sea Air
        Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), which is contrary to
        freedom of overflight in international airspace, and to refrain
        from taking similar provocative actions elsewhere in the Asia-
        Pacific region;
            (3) commends the Governments of Japan and of the Republic
        of Korea for their restraint, and commends the Government of
        the Republic of Korea for engaging in a deliberate process of
        consultations with the United States, Japan and China prior to
        announcing its adjustment of its Air Defense Identification
        Zone on December 9, 2013, and for its commitment to implement
        this adjusted Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in a
        manner consistent with international practice and respect for
        the freedom of overflight and other internationally lawful uses
        of international airspace; and

            (4) calls on the Government of the People's Republic of
        China to withdraw its Hai Yang Shi You 981 (HD-981) drilling
        rig and associated maritime forces from their current
        positions, to refrain from maritime maneuvers contrary to
        COLREGS, and to return immediately to the status quo as it
        existed before May 1, 2014.


連結

https://beta.congress.gov/bill/1 ... resolution/412/text
这叫脱裤子放屁。
7月10日怎么解释?
iewgnem 发表于 2014-7-16 13:03
7月10日怎么解释?
所以不排除有人炒作,隔了好几天才报道,按照有些人的逻辑,只要在10号后撤离都是怂了
关于981的部分,决议本身用词是call on(呼吁),到咱们媒体口中怎么就变成“要求”甚至“勒令”了呢?
tugong 发表于 2014-7-16 13:57
所以不排除有人炒作,隔了好几天才报道,按照有些人的逻辑,只要在10号后撤离都是怂了
不炒作谁会看
tugong 发表于 2014-7-16 13:57
所以不排除有人炒作,隔了好几天才报道,按照有些人的逻辑,只要在10号后撤离都是怂了
同感,参议院10号就出了,这边却到了981撤离的时候才普遍报道。莫非是让读者产生美国国会一放话,中国马上从命的感觉?
tugong 发表于 2014-7-16 13:57
所以不排除有人炒作,隔了好几天才报道,按照有些人的逻辑,只要在10号后撤离都是怂了
非常明显,这一次国内有大批人和媒体在炒作参议院的“呼吁”和981撤离的日期,并且故意混淆视听以制造“中国被美国吓到马上第二日撤退”的舆论背景氛围。今天全国网络和CD等地,小将们暑期党们各种打鸡血上跳下窜,明显就是舆论战心理战的一环。从这方面来讲,不得不说,TG的舆论战水平的确不占上风
你就算不走,丫们也有话说。你要一走,不管是神马时候,丫们都会认为是美国的一纸命令的作用。
关于981的部分,决议本身用词是call on(呼吁),到咱们媒体口中怎么就变成“要求”甚至“勒令”了呢?
這是resolution而不是act啊,而且沒約束白宮採取具體行動。純表態
10号发的声明,然后到了15号981提前完成堪探后一股脑的来报道,现在国内的媒体要说自己没被外资收购我是真不信了
10号发的声明,然后到了15号981提前完成堪探后一股脑的来报道,现在国内的媒体要说自己没被外资收购我是真 ...
是时候整顿这些汉奸媒体了
coolcucumber 发表于 2014-7-16 14:58
关于981的部分,决议本身用词是call on(呼吁),到咱们媒体口中怎么就变成“要求”甚至“勒令”了呢?
我在想,我们的媒体跟政府到底是不是一条心?需要不需要大规模清洗?
cybbs 发表于 2014-7-16 17:08
是时候整顿这些汉奸媒体了
必须清洗,用自己人了。
尼玛,这是多恐怖的事情,我一直以为是在一天内发生的事情!
15号的话,还能找理由说真要撤没那么快1天就撤。现在10号岂不是更悲催。
新型大国关系就是这?
非常明显,这一次国内有大批人和媒体在炒作参议院的“呼吁”和981撤离的日期,并且故意混淆视听以制造“ ...
土共该组织水军了,不然真被动。舆论也太自由了,还被喷没自由,你妹...
1010101010 发表于 2014-7-16 23:07
土共该组织水军了,不然真被动。舆论也太自由了,还被喷没自由,你妹...
其实有时候就像某些人讽刺的,现在中国何止不是“没自由”,反倒是在这样国情下是“自由过头”了。满眼都是“用文革的方式反‘文革’,用独裁的思维要‘自由’”
美国声明合情合理,有力的保证了南海和平和稳定,梦帝也正好就坡下驴,搬走石油平台。
炒新闻,不炒作,怎么会有新闻呢!!!!
我在想,我们的媒体跟政府到底是不是一条心?需要不需要大规模清洗?
还用问么?当然不是一条心!舆论阵地丢失不是一天两天了。
世界警察啊,继续吧
Jim.R.B_(T.I.A. 发表于 2014-7-16 15:34
非常明显,这一次国内有大批人和媒体在炒作参议院的“呼吁”和981撤离的日期,并且故意混淆视听以制造“ ...
西沙在我们手里就行。
全国人大可以搞一个决心,勒令美国撤出驻日韩霉菌,撤出关塔那摩……
有用吗?来自: Android客户端
coolcucumber 发表于 2014-7-16 14:58
关于981的部分,决议本身用词是call on(呼吁),到咱们媒体口中怎么就变成“要求”甚至“勒令”了呢?
看来我理解的没错,我还在琢磨call on到底该咋理解呢
美国务院发言人早段时间指责中国在西沙开采石油是“挑衅〃,这还不够明白吗?
美元老院在钓岛问题,东海南海的反华议案还少吗?
今天奥黑巳公开指责亲俄武装击落马航机,而二毛说导弹是老毛子提供的,还未有任何调查结果,老美就如此立场不公,这个世界恶霸,同样在南海问题上不会公正。
所以我们不必再考究“call on”是什么,当它放屁就是。
看文回复,发现一股文革遗风。
看完回复,一股文革遗风,吓死个人啦