原来C17货仓只能载40吨最大重量呀

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/05/03 06:14:48
原来C17货仓只能载40吨最大重量呀
The Boeing C-17 (maiden flight on 15 Sept 1991) and Ilyushin Il-76 (is an older design, with 1st flight of the prototype on 25 March 1971) are the largest cargo jets in the world, with austere and short field capabilities. These jets have both seen their fair share of operating in rugged and remote areas. While there are larger cargo aircraft like the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy and Antonov An-225 Myria), but neither plane has operated in as rugged and remote locations as the Boeing and Ilyushin jet aircraft.

Let's take a closer look between the characteristics of the C-17 (click to see USAF fact sheet) and the IL-76 (with the IL-76 data in brackets), side by side below, as a starting point for further discussion:

General Characteristics
Wingspan.: 51.75 m .....................(50.50 m)
Length......: 53.00 m ......................(45.69 m)
Height.......: 16.79 m ......................(14.76 m)
Thrust.......: 40,440 pounds each...(26,500 pounds each*)
Crew.........: Three............................(Five?)

* The thrust figures on the Indian IL-76 may not tally, as I'm not sure about Indian modernization programmes (guys, please feel free to correct, if I've got my facts wrong on the IL-76)

I've not bothered to put in the max payload as the USAF uses a term called "Allowable Cabin Load" (ACL) for its transport aircraft. It is a planning figure used to determine the optimum average load its transport aircraft would carry during deployments. Although the C-17 can carry a maximum payload of 77 to tonnes, that figure is seldom reached because the ACL figure of 40 tonnes is lower than the maximum payload. In fact, the average C-17 load during both OEF and OIF averaged just around 18 tonnes (metric) on deployments.

As a newer design, I would expect that reliability and maintainability are benefits of the C-17 - which will in turn affect sortie generation. According to the USAF, the C-17 has an aircraft mission completion success probability rate of 92%, only 20 aircraft maintenance man-hours per flying hour, and full and partial mission availability rates of 74.7% and 82.5%, respectively. The Boeing warranty assures these figures will be met.原来C17货仓只能载40吨最大重量呀
The Boeing C-17 (maiden flight on 15 Sept 1991) and Ilyushin Il-76 (is an older design, with 1st flight of the prototype on 25 March 1971) are the largest cargo jets in the world, with austere and short field capabilities. These jets have both seen their fair share of operating in rugged and remote areas. While there are larger cargo aircraft like the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy and Antonov An-225 Myria), but neither plane has operated in as rugged and remote locations as the Boeing and Ilyushin jet aircraft.

Let's take a closer look between the characteristics of the C-17 (click to see USAF fact sheet) and the IL-76 (with the IL-76 data in brackets), side by side below, as a starting point for further discussion:

General Characteristics
Wingspan.: 51.75 m .....................(50.50 m)
Length......: 53.00 m ......................(45.69 m)
Height.......: 16.79 m ......................(14.76 m)
Thrust.......: 40,440 pounds each...(26,500 pounds each*)
Crew.........: Three............................(Five?)

* The thrust figures on the Indian IL-76 may not tally, as I'm not sure about Indian modernization programmes (guys, please feel free to correct, if I've got my facts wrong on the IL-76)

I've not bothered to put in the max payload as the USAF uses a term called "Allowable Cabin Load" (ACL) for its transport aircraft. It is a planning figure used to determine the optimum average load its transport aircraft would carry during deployments. Although the C-17 can carry a maximum payload of 77 to tonnes, that figure is seldom reached because the ACL figure of 40 tonnes is lower than the maximum payload. In fact, the average C-17 load during both OEF and OIF averaged just around 18 tonnes (metric) on deployments.

As a newer design, I would expect that reliability and maintainability are benefits of the C-17 - which will in turn affect sortie generation. According to the USAF, the C-17 has an aircraft mission completion success probability rate of 92%, only 20 aircraft maintenance man-hours per flying hour, and full and partial mission availability rates of 74.7% and 82.5%, respectively. The Boeing warranty assures these figures will be met.
看不懂E文,求翻译。
注意单位换算。


看看这次有多少上钓的

看看这次有多少上钓的
发一张图就可以了。
无标题.JPG
回复 5# 淹死的鱼


    还是你省事儿  哈哈
打倒骗分滴~~~
请先理解ACL的概念。文中说C17的最大载重是77吨,但是实际上C17很多时候运载不会超过40吨,在持久自由行动中甚至是平均只运18吨。

ACL是许可装载量,这不是个定值,受到跑道长度、机场高度、气温、风向,再说复杂点还有起飞越障能力、路线计划和气象等影响。77吨是最理想状态下的载重,实际往往达不到。这只能说,C17是兼顾战略运输机和战术运输机的角色,一步运到位,不再用C141或者C130中转,直接降落到起降条件很差的前线机场。所以ACL少是必然的,你让C17去飞民用枢纽机场,ACL同样回到70吨以上。
淹死的鱼 发表于 2010-10-23 00:12

嗯,估计下一步楼会向“载着M1的C17航程还不如J7”的方向歪
人家有C5垫着呢
回复 8# leeone


    ACL应是货仓容载吧,并非是机场,风力特外部因素吧,另上面的图也没说是M1吧,我至凝的并非是C17设计最大载重吧,而是货仓可载重吧
别说了,反正这玩意载货量不如安225
回复 11# lflf_1

ACL 有两个条件,货舱容量也是一个条件,但是你看C17货舱像塞不进60吨货?
再问你一句,你以为海拔10米的机场和海拔1000米起飞运载能力能相同?好好去看看昆明的航班,相同条件,从21跑道起飞可以满载走,从03跑道走要卸货甚至乘客都要下一部分,为什么?凡事多动动脑,按你贴那文章,你的标题可以起得更轰动点,C17只能载18吨货,在持久自由行动中它的表现确实如此。
淹死的鱼 发表于 2010-10-23 00:12
简明扼要,最少60吨以上啊
v0v0v0v 发表于 2010-10-22 11:04

tonne已经是公吨的单位了。ton才是小吨
淹死的鱼 发表于 2010-10-23 00:12
善哉啊, 果然是有图有真相
那M1重多少
liu88716 发表于 2010-10-23 08:06


    57—62t,运输过程中车辆有多少载荷不清楚。
40吨还装不下一辆M1 啊
战略运输时,为了达到远航程,只能牺牲载重。
我看上面几位都解释的很清楚了
C-17的最大载重是接近80吨,这是理想情况,比如说在低海拔的设施完善跑道长度足够的条件良好的机场。
如果换成是野战条件恶劣跑道短海拔高温度高的野战机场,这个载重自然是达不到最大的。 这有什么疑问?

而且不要以为只有C17有这个问题,所有的飞机都有这个问题, 你看看运8飞高原简陋机场能载多少,能达到设计纸面指标的20来吨么?  你再看看直8,直9,到了条件恶劣时自己起飞都成问题吧。
淡定,要淡定
军迷们知道的每个数据   都是在一些保密的具体条件下实现的  说白了 广告数据和实际是不一样的 —

所谓某某战斗机的航程, 比如某某雷达的探测距离,比如某某隐身机的雷达反射截面积…  

都是伪概念 ,结果还为了这些伪概念吵成一团~   

一个说环球霸王其实只能载20吨,一个说环球霸王无论如何肯定能载70吨…

有本事能搞到C17的航行条件的具体约束条件,或者干脆飞行手册全本,才说明你有本事…:D
就算找来手册,也无法改变地球上的物理定律。ACL这个词又不是美国的军用俗语,民用航空里面基本词汇而已,每个商业航班飞行前都要计算的东西,难道C17这飞机外星造的,起飞前不用算这个?唯一的区别是不同的飞机,参数不同,某些机型要加多点条件而已。

PS:整天说淡定那个烦不烦,整个超大论坛不停刷这句话
看到标题就可以锁了
M1泪流满面