警察应该如何处理?各位讨论下。。

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/30 07:20:41
警察应该如何处理?各位讨论下。。警察应该如何处理?各位讨论下。。
据说司机当时处于神经极度紧张状态,接到的电话极大影响了他的驾驶心态。
酒后驾车会怎么处理?感觉他的状态和酒后驾车差不多了,不过情节要严重些
都是骗人的。推词罢了。。,对方玩命。要拦截他。还真是麻烦
第一次撞人,或者出事故,按普通交通事故+司机逃逸处理。之后的几次逃逸过程中事故,主要责任都在司机,有过失或者故意伤人致死的情节,有的属于能预见到危险而不去避免的,也有故意的行为(自己车大,撞了别人自己没事)但是后续的事故,都要追究刑事责任。
瞎说的:L
当官说的话。你能信吗?就伤亡数字来说!!七公里。你想想开部车撞了七公里。这七公里。就这么少人?有些路段还是红灯。肯定有不少人在等绿灯。。
没懂,当官的说什么了?
我仔细看了一下相关资料,有些话还是我来说吧:
事情的发生很令人遗憾,突发的事故有不可预料的方面,仅从我个人的角度,根据《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》我希望能惠州方面能详细公布这起事故的伤亡实际情况,做好事故的处理。
六点多是下班高锋期。路上怎么会没人?一撞过去。何止死伤这么少?用脑子想想就知道了
北京发生过类似案例,是大型货车在高速公路上逆行,撞了不少车。
直接击毙了。
剛看電視新聞報導.
據說是,據說,46歲的巴士司機接到電話,女兒被女婿殺害,理智大失,所以瘋狂駕駛發洩.

正常人不是先搞清楚女兒情況嗎?要報復都是找女婿呀?
奇怪.
上初中的时候碰到过这种事情.当地某学校的一小车司机因喝酒和人冲突被打,事后驾车在人行道碰撞一骑自行车行人后故意冲向某企业下班人群造成多人重伤.后被该企业一拉煤货车截住肇事司机被群众抓获没有造成更大的伤亡.这人啊头脑一热心里一狠什么事情都是敢作的.
个人认为应以故意杀人罪论处!
对了1911问怎么处理? 当时把肇事司机狠狠修理了一顿然后拷在办公楼的走廊扶手上.:D
林子大了什么鸟都有的
公交公司赔扯了
想杀人的,不一定都需要用枪,用别的工具可能效率更高。 无辜的路人最倒霉,飞来横祸啊。。。
相信在党委的领导下,一切都可以得到很好的解决。
大伙没明白我的意思。如果遇到像这样的事件。国外的警察会怎么做?
直接击毙
这不是故意杀人了,这就是以危险方法危害公共安全罪了。绝对应该是警告警告无效当场击毙,这已经不是单纯的故意杀人了这的目标是不特定人群了。
我喜欢1911手枪 发表于 2009-6-25 20:54
中外警察配鎗守則,都應該有類似說明:
制止嚴重罪案;
制止不合法傷害市民;
制止不合法損害市民利益;
即時可見的危險........
還要等嗎?
拔鎗......
當然,中外也是,老油條等新人去闖,新人等前輩指導,結果是貽誤時機.
前阵子不是说珠海的斗门出过类似的事吗?一辆泥头车,闯进学校,撞死学生,被警察当场击毙??
下班高峰期。路上人多。怕误伤
小型恐怖袭击呀,想想911就知道怎么处理了。
击毙。
我喜欢1911手枪 发表于 2009-6-25 07:54

应该是会开枪的,当然也要分清,刚撞第一个人时候,是不是因为刹车失灵等非司机本人能控制的可能。 下面这个是去年我们这里发生的一个小案子。 几个小混混破门而入,看见警察来了撒腿就跑,俩警察在后头追。 混混钻车里,想夺路而逃,就冲警察撞过去了。 警察把几发子弹送车里去(不是9毫米就是40的应该),打中眼睛膝盖居然还没死,还能下车跟警察练。 泰瑟伺候,一点没用,因为这小子穿了防弹衣。 最后当然逮住了,开枪的警察也被暂时停职,改做打杂,等候调查的结果。。。

出事的那个Brighton Park Apartments 公寓区离我住的地方很近,天天路过的。。。

--
Burglary suspect in critical condition
November 26, 2008 by indystar | Staff


A burglary on the Far Northside late Tuesday turned into a police-action shooting when the suspects tried to flee in a vehicle and run down officers with their car. The suspect was in critical condition.

Police were called to the 1900 block of Canary Court in the Brighton Park Apartments shortly after 11 p.m. by a resident who reported seeing several men kicking in the door of an apartment, said Lt. Jeff Duhamell, spokesman for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department.

As officers were trying to establish a perimeter around the building, they noticed two suspects running from the apartment.


Two officers chased the suspects, who got into a vehicle. Duhamell said the driver was attempting to get out of a parking area and slammed on his brakes, striking two other cars. As the officers attempted to get him to stop the vehicle, he gunned the vehicle toward them.

The officers fired several rounds at the suspects, striking the driver in the eye and knee. The driver continued to try to exit the parking area, nearly hitting the officers and knocking down a stop sign and carport support beams. Another officer arrived and pulled his patrol car in front of the suspects' vehicle to block them in.

The officers approached the suspects' vehicle, Duhamell said, and the injured driver began fighting with them. They tried to subdue the man with an electric jolt from a Taser, but had little success because he was wearing a bullet-proof vest. He also was wearing an ankle bracelet monitoring device, often placed on people who are on home detention, probation or parole.

Police identified the suspect at French Mason,19. He faces preliminary charges of burglary, resisting, using body armor in a felony and driving on a suspended license.

French was in critical, but stable condition, at Wishard Memorial Hospital.


A 17-year-old faces charges of burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary. He was not identified.


A third suspect was released.


Duhamell said under department policy, the officers involved will be placed on administrative duty while the incident is investigated.

http://www.indy.com/posts/police-wound-burglary-suspect-arrest-3
几个小混混破门而入,看见警察来了撒腿就跑,俩警察在后头追。 混混钻车里,想夺路而逃,就冲警察撞过去了。 警察把几发子弹送车里去
第一时间。肯定想开枪。。,想这么多。说不定结果是盖国旗
那司机为啥要这么做?!!!!这根本不是意外而是蓄意杀人吧!!!!!这根本是恐怖袭击!!!!!!!!
东风强劲 发表于 2009-6-24 18:44
这起案件中犯罪客体不是个人人身安全,而是2人以上的不特定群体生命安全,应该以危险方式危害公共安全罪从重论处,处以死刑。
     楼主是说Cop该怎么处理这事儿,处以何种刑罚,不是Cop的事儿。就算是确定罪名,其实也是以检方的意见为意见。当然了,如果非要把政法委牵扯进来,也说得过去。
小弟認為,樓主的意思,不是指事後檢控,是指事發時處理......
老實說,如果未有上司明確命令,誰會願意開鎗射擊那個司機?
谢谢还休