超级军网Vacuum Tensor Drive，也许不是另一个EmDrive
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 14:25:02
As we know that Newton's law considers vacuum as empty, force between objects passing through action at a distance. But in Electromagnetism, vacuum is not considered as empty but considered as continuum, force between objects passing through vacuum. It means that Newton's law may not work if vacuum must be considered.
We know that on the electromagnetic wave propagation path, the direction of electric field at a point changes periodically. If there is a charged object at the point also changes its charge property periodically with the same frequency, then the electric field force direction on the object will not change. Therefore, the object will do directional movement. Based on this, it is possible to design a spacecraft does not follow Newton's law.
如果你相信上面那段话是正确的，那么你可以看下这篇文章：vixra.org/pdf/1512.0009v5.pdf
如果不信的话就别浪费时间了。
那篇文章是没有经过实验验证的，并且我实在找不出错误在哪。也许只是我智商不够，找不出错误而已。那篇文章我曾经向Nature投过稿。
Nature编辑给出的意见是：In the present case, although your discussion of vacuum tensor drive is intriguing, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics.
本来我这帖是发在果壳上，不过可惜没有收到什么有说服力的反对意见，所以我只好来超大试试。要喷我的人请指出具体的技术上的错误，不要只是笼统地说什么守恒定律。As we know that Newton's law considers vacuum as empty, force between objects passing through action at a distance. But in Electromagnetism, vacuum is not considered as empty but considered as continuum, force between objects passing through vacuum. It means that Newton's law may not work if vacuum must be considered.
We know that on the electromagnetic wave propagation path, the direction of electric field at a point changes periodically. If there is a charged object at the point also changes its charge property periodically with the same frequency, then the electric field force direction on the object will not change. Therefore, the object will do directional movement. Based on this, it is possible to design a spacecraft does not follow Newton's law.
如果你相信上面那段话是正确的，那么你可以看下这篇文章：vixra.org/pdf/1512.0009v5.pdf
如果不信的话就别浪费时间了。
那篇文章是没有经过实验验证的，并且我实在找不出错误在哪。也许只是我智商不够，找不出错误而已。那篇文章我曾经向Nature投过稿。
Nature编辑给出的意见是：In the present case, although your discussion of vacuum tensor drive is intriguing, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics.
本来我这帖是发在果壳上，不过可惜没有收到什么有说服力的反对意见，所以我只好来超大试试。要喷我的人请指出具体的技术上的错误，不要只是笼统地说什么守恒定律。
We know that on the electromagnetic wave propagation path, the direction of electric field at a point changes periodically. If there is a charged object at the point also changes its charge property periodically with the same frequency, then the electric field force direction on the object will not change. Therefore, the object will do directional movement. Based on this, it is possible to design a spacecraft does not follow Newton's law.
如果你相信上面那段话是正确的，那么你可以看下这篇文章：vixra.org/pdf/1512.0009v5.pdf
如果不信的话就别浪费时间了。
那篇文章是没有经过实验验证的，并且我实在找不出错误在哪。也许只是我智商不够，找不出错误而已。那篇文章我曾经向Nature投过稿。
Nature编辑给出的意见是：In the present case, although your discussion of vacuum tensor drive is intriguing, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics.
本来我这帖是发在果壳上，不过可惜没有收到什么有说服力的反对意见，所以我只好来超大试试。要喷我的人请指出具体的技术上的错误，不要只是笼统地说什么守恒定律。As we know that Newton's law considers vacuum as empty, force between objects passing through action at a distance. But in Electromagnetism, vacuum is not considered as empty but considered as continuum, force between objects passing through vacuum. It means that Newton's law may not work if vacuum must be considered.
We know that on the electromagnetic wave propagation path, the direction of electric field at a point changes periodically. If there is a charged object at the point also changes its charge property periodically with the same frequency, then the electric field force direction on the object will not change. Therefore, the object will do directional movement. Based on this, it is possible to design a spacecraft does not follow Newton's law.
如果你相信上面那段话是正确的，那么你可以看下这篇文章：vixra.org/pdf/1512.0009v5.pdf
如果不信的话就别浪费时间了。
那篇文章是没有经过实验验证的，并且我实在找不出错误在哪。也许只是我智商不够，找不出错误而已。那篇文章我曾经向Nature投过稿。
Nature编辑给出的意见是：In the present case, although your discussion of vacuum tensor drive is intriguing, I regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics.
本来我这帖是发在果壳上，不过可惜没有收到什么有说服力的反对意见，所以我只好来超大试试。要喷我的人请指出具体的技术上的错误，不要只是笼统地说什么守恒定律。