三哥外交学院院长：中国雇佣军出现在果敢说明缅甸需要印 ...

缅甸曾经长期属于大英帝国印度殖民地，二战后印度独立时被英国人划分成单独国家，但是很多缅甸的少数民族，比如克钦族（中国叫景颇族）的地区却被英国人划给了印度。

印度著名的金达尔大学对外关系学院院长Sreeram Chaulia教授日前在多家印度大报发表文章，叫嚷中国雇佣军出现在果敢说明缅甸需要印度。

Chaulia院长说：
A political inferno has erupted in northern Myan-mar’s Shan state to expose the destabilising role of China in Asia’s strategic hinterland. Intense armed hostilities between rebels of the minority Kokang community, which lives just across the border from China’s Yunnan province, and the Myanmar Army have killed at least 100 people and displaced tens of thousands of civilians this month.

Myanmar’s citizens and government officials believe that the Kokang insurgency has been re-ignited and let loose by China, which is frustrated about Naypyidaw’s recent opening up to the rest of the world and its shift away from Beijing’s sphere of influence.
最近缅北的战乱显示出中国是破坏亚洲地区稳定的角色。缅甸人民和政府官员们坚信中国是果敢叛军的幕后黑手，因为中国失望的看到内比都最近开始疏远她而向世界其他地方开放靠拢。

Chaulia院长说：
After the Kokang clashes, I spoke to numerous Myanmarese educationists and civil society activists, who were unanimous that China is a prime hurdle limiting their country from achieving full democracy. I asked them if there is any ray of hope for Myanmar when a global superpower like China is obstructing their freedom. They replied in consensus that “India can make a difference.”
果敢开始内战后，他接触了不少缅甸的大学生。这些缅甸学生一致认为中国是缅甸皿煮化发展的主要障碍。我问那些学生们缅甸和超级大国中国作对会有一丝胜利的希望吗？缅甸学生们坚定的回答他：“有了印度我们就有胜利的希望”。

。。。

Chaulia院长最后总结到：
India need not be anti-China or compete against the West in Myanmar. Indians just have to be proactively themselves, i.e. accepted benevolent Asian neighbours who present a contrast to the hated China model.
印度不必在缅甸直接和中国作对或者与西方竞争。印度只需要主动的向那些憎恨中国模式的善良的亚洲邻居们展示其与中国完全不同的模式。


印度著名的金达尔大学对外关系学院（Jindal School of International Affairs）院长Sreeram Chaulia教授:





http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1 ... myanmar-needs-india
http://www.asianage.com/columnists/myanmar-needs-india-596

全文如下：

Myanmar needs India
Feb 24, 2015

A political inferno has erupted in northern Myan-mar’s Shan state to expose the destabilising role of China in Asia’s strategic hinterland. Intense armed hostilities between rebels of the minority Kokang community, which lives just across the border from China’s Yunnan province, and the Myanmar Army have killed at least 100 people and displaced tens of thousands of civilians this month.

Myanmar’s citizens and government officials believe that the Kokang insurgency has been re-ignited and let loose by China, which is frustrated about Naypyidaw’s recent opening up to the rest of the world and its shift away from Beijing’s sphere of influence.

Since 2011, when decades-long rule by an absolutist military junta that was a client of China ended, Myanmar’s nominally civilian regime has been courting foreign investment and diplomatic approval from far and wide. Its invitation to the international community has created a buzz about Myanmar as the new “frontier market” in Asia with immense potential for investors to tap into a hitherto isolated society with vast consumption potential.

Western states, as well as Japan and India, which are concerned about China’s expanding footprint, have entered Myanmar in a big way in the last four years by easing economic sanctions and offering Naypyidaw alternative, non-Chinese means for modernisation and economic growth.

As a corollary to the penetration of these new external forces, winds of change have gradually crept into domestic politics of Myanmar, particularly in the form of freer expression of opinions and a decline in state censorship. Previously suppressed and pent-up resentments of China’s role in monopolising and exploiting Myanmar’s natural wealth are now out in the public sphere. The utter rapacity and greed with which Chinese traders, miners and businesspersons have denuded Myanmar’s resources have propelled a nationwide anti-China backlash.

Even the Myanmar military big shots, who once ate out of China’s hands, are now tut-tutting Chinese neo-imperialism and blackmail. Aung Min, a minister in the office of Myanmar’s President and a former major general, has candidly admitted that “We are afraid of China and don’t dare to have a row with the Chinese”, because “if they feel annoyed with the shutdown of their projects (in Myanmar) and resume their support to the Communists, the economy in border areas would backslide.”

The Kokang rebels under the leadership of a China-favoured veteran commander, Pheung Kya-shin, are former Communists-turned-ethnic entrepreneurs and cross-border smugglers who remain useful instruments for Beijing to wreak havoc in Myanmar if the latter shows signs of independence.

Adjoining the Kokang territory lies Myanmar’s largest ethnic minority militant movement with a standing force of 30,000 heavily equipped troops. The United Wa State Army (UWSA) shares a common ancestry with the Kokang fighters in the now defunct Myanmar Communist Party (BCP), which used to be Beijing’s proxy in Myanmar. The Wa army’s war preparedness, technical sophistication and heavy weaponry are of exceptional standards, thanks to its paymaster China, which is using Myanmar’s minority struggles for leverage against its shrinking domination in that country.

Like the Wa, the Kokangs are an ethnic Chinese-origin people who enjoy sympathy of ultra-nationalistic Chinese citizens. Despite the Chinese state’s denial that it is interfering in Myanmar’s internal affairs, the massive firepower and organisational abilities displayed by the Kokang raiders who crossed over from China and rattled the hilly terrain inside Myanmar, earlier in February, leave little doubt that Beijing is stoking minority violence in Myanmar to apply pressure on the Central government in Naypyidaw.

The dust-up in Kokang areas is so terrifying that prospects of the Myanmar government sealing a nationwide ceasefire with a multitude of ethnic minority guerrilla groups have been dashed. With the country headed for a scheduled general election later this year, wherein power is likely to be transferred to a genuinely civilian government, the upheaval in the Kokang region is a bad omen.

Settling lasting grievances of Myanmar’s multiple ethnic minorities through peaceful negotiation and constitutional changes to the unitary nature of the Myanmarese state will be impossible if rebellions keep recurring and the military responds with harsh counter-insurgency tactics.

The tragedy of Kokang civilians, who are victims of China’s geostrategic power play, poses an existential dilemma for Myanmar. The country can make progress in its slow transition to democracy only by keeping China at bay and by involving pro-democratic foreign players to guide its political and economic evolution. But the more Myanmar assays what one informed local lawyer (identity withheld for personal safety) labels as “a global game to counterbalance China”, the worse the ethnic problem becomes due to sabotage by violent Chinese proxies.

After the Kokang clashes, I spoke to numerous Myanmarese educationists and civil society activists, who were unanimous that China is a prime hurdle limiting their country from achieving full democracy. I asked them if there is any ray of hope for Myanmar when a global superpower like China is obstructing their freedom. They replied in consensus that “India can make a difference.”

One Myanmarese campaigner against racism and Buddhist fundamentalism said: “We have to learn from India how to forge acceptance of others in a diverse, multicultural society. We need Indian constitutional expertise to move towards a federal state structure.” A nervous Myanmarese journalist confided: “I am scared that the upcoming general elections will not be truly free and fair. Unless India and the rest of the international community assists us, we cannot cross the Rubicon.”

Spirited Myanmarese students passed the ultimate compliments: “While China robs us of our raw materials and dignity, India is an intellectual spur for our youth. Indian youngsters are more energetic than us because they are free, while we are still in a semi-authoritarian system that represses our full potential. Our goal is to become similar to Indian students who participate in movements to bring changes in society.”

The message for Indian diplomacy is clear. It has to consciously fill the aspirational space that is open in Myanmar, not just through routine economic means but by supporting human capital and strengthening moderate and tolerant social actors there. India need not be anti-China or compete against the West in Myanmar. Indians just have to be proactively themselves, i.e. accepted benevolent Asian neighbours who present a contrast to the hated China model.

The writer is a professor and dean at the Jindal School of International Affairs




缅甸曾经长期属于大英帝国印度殖民地，二战后印度独立时被英国人划分成单独国家，但是很多缅甸的少数民族，比如克钦族（中国叫景颇族）的地区却被英国人划给了印度。

印度著名的金达尔大学对外关系学院院长Sreeram Chaulia教授日前在多家印度大报发表文章，叫嚷中国雇佣军出现在果敢说明缅甸需要印度。

Chaulia院长说：
A political inferno has erupted in northern Myan-mar’s Shan state to expose the destabilising role of China in Asia’s strategic hinterland. Intense armed hostilities between rebels of the minority Kokang community, which lives just across the border from China’s Yunnan province, and the Myanmar Army have killed at least 100 people and displaced tens of thousands of civilians this month.

Myanmar’s citizens and government officials believe that the Kokang insurgency has been re-ignited and let loose by China, which is frustrated about Naypyidaw’s recent opening up to the rest of the world and its shift away from Beijing’s sphere of influence.
最近缅北的战乱显示出中国是破坏亚洲地区稳定的角色。缅甸人民和政府官员们坚信中国是果敢叛军的幕后黑手，因为中国失望的看到内比都最近开始疏远她而向世界其他地方开放靠拢。

Chaulia院长说：
After the Kokang clashes, I spoke to numerous Myanmarese educationists and civil society activists, who were unanimous that China is a prime hurdle limiting their country from achieving full democracy. I asked them if there is any ray of hope for Myanmar when a global superpower like China is obstructing their freedom. They replied in consensus that “India can make a difference.”
果敢开始内战后，他接触了不少缅甸的大学生。这些缅甸学生一致认为中国是缅甸皿煮化发展的主要障碍。我问那些学生们缅甸和超级大国中国作对会有一丝胜利的希望吗？缅甸学生们坚定的回答他：“有了印度我们就有胜利的希望”。

。。。

Chaulia院长最后总结到：
India need not be anti-China or compete against the West in Myanmar. Indians just have to be proactively themselves, i.e. accepted benevolent Asian neighbours who present a contrast to the hated China model.
印度不必在缅甸直接和中国作对或者与西方竞争。印度只需要主动的向那些憎恨中国模式的善良的亚洲邻居们展示其与中国完全不同的模式。


印度著名的金达尔大学对外关系学院（Jindal School of International Affairs）院长Sreeram Chaulia教授:





http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1 ... myanmar-needs-india
http://www.asianage.com/columnists/myanmar-needs-india-596

全文如下：

Myanmar needs India
Feb 24, 2015

A political inferno has erupted in northern Myan-mar’s Shan state to expose the destabilising role of China in Asia’s strategic hinterland. Intense armed hostilities between rebels of the minority Kokang community, which lives just across the border from China’s Yunnan province, and the Myanmar Army have killed at least 100 people and displaced tens of thousands of civilians this month.

Myanmar’s citizens and government officials believe that the Kokang insurgency has been re-ignited and let loose by China, which is frustrated about Naypyidaw’s recent opening up to the rest of the world and its shift away from Beijing’s sphere of influence.

Since 2011, when decades-long rule by an absolutist military junta that was a client of China ended, Myanmar’s nominally civilian regime has been courting foreign investment and diplomatic approval from far and wide. Its invitation to the international community has created a buzz about Myanmar as the new “frontier market” in Asia with immense potential for investors to tap into a hitherto isolated society with vast consumption potential.

Western states, as well as Japan and India, which are concerned about China’s expanding footprint, have entered Myanmar in a big way in the last four years by easing economic sanctions and offering Naypyidaw alternative, non-Chinese means for modernisation and economic growth.

As a corollary to the penetration of these new external forces, winds of change have gradually crept into domestic politics of Myanmar, particularly in the form of freer expression of opinions and a decline in state censorship. Previously suppressed and pent-up resentments of China’s role in monopolising and exploiting Myanmar’s natural wealth are now out in the public sphere. The utter rapacity and greed with which Chinese traders, miners and businesspersons have denuded Myanmar’s resources have propelled a nationwide anti-China backlash.

Even the Myanmar military big shots, who once ate out of China’s hands, are now tut-tutting Chinese neo-imperialism and blackmail. Aung Min, a minister in the office of Myanmar’s President and a former major general, has candidly admitted that “We are afraid of China and don’t dare to have a row with the Chinese”, because “if they feel annoyed with the shutdown of their projects (in Myanmar) and resume their support to the Communists, the economy in border areas would backslide.”

The Kokang rebels under the leadership of a China-favoured veteran commander, Pheung Kya-shin, are former Communists-turned-ethnic entrepreneurs and cross-border smugglers who remain useful instruments for Beijing to wreak havoc in Myanmar if the latter shows signs of independence.

Adjoining the Kokang territory lies Myanmar’s largest ethnic minority militant movement with a standing force of 30,000 heavily equipped troops. The United Wa State Army (UWSA) shares a common ancestry with the Kokang fighters in the now defunct Myanmar Communist Party (BCP), which used to be Beijing’s proxy in Myanmar. The Wa army’s war preparedness, technical sophistication and heavy weaponry are of exceptional standards, thanks to its paymaster China, which is using Myanmar’s minority struggles for leverage against its shrinking domination in that country.

Like the Wa, the Kokangs are an ethnic Chinese-origin people who enjoy sympathy of ultra-nationalistic Chinese citizens. Despite the Chinese state’s denial that it is interfering in Myanmar’s internal affairs, the massive firepower and organisational abilities displayed by the Kokang raiders who crossed over from China and rattled the hilly terrain inside Myanmar, earlier in February, leave little doubt that Beijing is stoking minority violence in Myanmar to apply pressure on the Central government in Naypyidaw.

The dust-up in Kokang areas is so terrifying that prospects of the Myanmar government sealing a nationwide ceasefire with a multitude of ethnic minority guerrilla groups have been dashed. With the country headed for a scheduled general election later this year, wherein power is likely to be transferred to a genuinely civilian government, the upheaval in the Kokang region is a bad omen.

Settling lasting grievances of Myanmar’s multiple ethnic minorities through peaceful negotiation and constitutional changes to the unitary nature of the Myanmarese state will be impossible if rebellions keep recurring and the military responds with harsh counter-insurgency tactics.

The tragedy of Kokang civilians, who are victims of China’s geostrategic power play, poses an existential dilemma for Myanmar. The country can make progress in its slow transition to democracy only by keeping China at bay and by involving pro-democratic foreign players to guide its political and economic evolution. But the more Myanmar assays what one informed local lawyer (identity withheld for personal safety) labels as “a global game to counterbalance China”, the worse the ethnic problem becomes due to sabotage by violent Chinese proxies.

After the Kokang clashes, I spoke to numerous Myanmarese educationists and civil society activists, who were unanimous that China is a prime hurdle limiting their country from achieving full democracy. I asked them if there is any ray of hope for Myanmar when a global superpower like China is obstructing their freedom. They replied in consensus that “India can make a difference.”

One Myanmarese campaigner against racism and Buddhist fundamentalism said: “We have to learn from India how to forge acceptance of others in a diverse, multicultural society. We need Indian constitutional expertise to move towards a federal state structure.” A nervous Myanmarese journalist confided: “I am scared that the upcoming general elections will not be truly free and fair. Unless India and the rest of the international community assists us, we cannot cross the Rubicon.”

Spirited Myanmarese students passed the ultimate compliments: “While China robs us of our raw materials and dignity, India is an intellectual spur for our youth. Indian youngsters are more energetic than us because they are free, while we are still in a semi-authoritarian system that represses our full potential. Our goal is to become similar to Indian students who participate in movements to bring changes in society.”

The message for Indian diplomacy is clear. It has to consciously fill the aspirational space that is open in Myanmar, not just through routine economic means but by supporting human capital and strengthening moderate and tolerant social actors there. India need not be anti-China or compete against the West in Myanmar. Indians just have to be proactively themselves, i.e. accepted benevolent Asian neighbours who present a contrast to the hated China model.

The writer is a professor and dean at the Jindal School of International Affairs