超级军网和平环境来之不易啊
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 10:15:57
因为没权限发链接，就不发了
先来看看为何亚努科维奇最后时刻拒绝签署和欧盟的伙伴关系协定。（Title：Ukraine does a U-turn on Europe）
摘录如下：From an economic viewpoint, Russia would have to protect its market from an inflow of cheap European goods through Ukraine into its territory and this would put an end to the free trade arrangement that currently exists between the two former Soviet neighbours. That is why Moscow did not want Kiev to sign an agreement that would, in Russia’s view, make Ukraine an economic and political appendage of Brussels.
But Mr Yanukovych’s refusal to sign the agreement was also rooted in fears for Ukraine’s economy, as those who read the full document realised. The deal gave full access to Ukraine’s market for European goods, but there was no reciprocal access to the European Union for Ukrainian products. Rather than free trade, Ukraine would be assigned strict quotas, particularly on agricultural produce. For example, Ukraine produces a total of 30,000 tons of cheese per year, but would be allowed to export only 5pc of it, or 1,500 tons, to Europe under the agreement.
The situation with poultry is even worse: Ukraine produces a million tons of chicken meat per year, but would be permitted by the agreement to export only 1pc, or 10,000 tons, to the EU, while being obliged to import 20,000 tons of poultry from Europe. Meanwhile, Russia has made clear that it would have to impose duties on Ukrainian exports, making them less competitive, as a result of any endiing of their free trade zone.
这几段的大意是欧盟提供给乌克兰的伙伴关系协定是完全不公平的。这个协定规定欧盟廉价的制成品可以没有阻碍的通过乌克兰进入俄罗斯（由于俄乌是关税同盟），而乌克兰具有比较优势的农产品，例如奶酪和家禽都将面临欧盟严格的出口配额措施。奶酪出口欧盟的配额只有如今乌克兰产量的5%，而家禽只有1%或者10000吨，更夸张的是欧盟可以反向乌克兰出口20000吨的家禽。另外若乌克兰加入欧盟将迫使俄罗斯对乌克兰的制成品征收关税，这对乌克兰的工业也将是重大的打击。因为众所周知的原因，乌克兰硕果仅存的工业体系承接前苏联，天然和欧盟标准就不相容，这代表签署协定之后，俄罗斯这个最后的市场都要对乌克兰说再见了。
再来是一个真正的NGO（和公知所言的那种从白宫和唐宁街领钱的所谓非政府组织不同，人家是完全靠募捐的）的网站上的一篇文章，其中分析了了从二战结束到今天，美国是如何策划和实施的针对那些所谓的威胁美国国家利益的国家的各种政变甚至军事介入的。（Ukraine: how America's coup machine has destroyed democracy worldwide since 1953，有兴趣的可以搜这个title）
摘录一段： Noam Chomsky calls William Blum's classic, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions since World War II, "Far and away the best book on the topic." If you're looking for historical context for what you are reading or watching on TV about the coup in Ukraine, Killing Hope will provide it. The title has never been more apt as we watch the hopes of people from all regions of Ukraine being sacrificed on the same altar as those of people in Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011). This list does not include a roughly equal number of failed coups, nor coups in Africa and elsewhere in which a US role is suspected but unproven.
简单翻译如下：（接前文）关于美国政府是如何通过政变来摧毁其他国家的，Noam Chomsky认为William Blum的经典著作“杀死希望：自二战以来美国军事和中情局的干涉行动”是该领域最好的图书。如果你为如今在乌克兰发动的政变寻找历史背景，这本书会提供。没有比“杀死希望”这个书名更适合描述乌克兰人民对于真正民主的希望是如何被牺牲掉的，就如同那些在 Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011)的人们一样。还要说明的是这个名单并没有包括差不多同样数量的失败的政变策划，以及在非洲和其它地方的那些未经证实的美国政府的嫌疑身份。
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
因为没权限发链接，就不发了
先来看看为何亚努科维奇最后时刻拒绝签署和欧盟的伙伴关系协定。（Title：Ukraine does a U-turn on Europe）
摘录如下：From an economic viewpoint, Russia would have to protect its market from an inflow of cheap European goods through Ukraine into its territory and this would put an end to the free trade arrangement that currently exists between the two former Soviet neighbours. That is why Moscow did not want Kiev to sign an agreement that would, in Russia’s view, make Ukraine an economic and political appendage of Brussels.
But Mr Yanukovych’s refusal to sign the agreement was also rooted in fears for Ukraine’s economy, as those who read the full document realised. The deal gave full access to Ukraine’s market for European goods, but there was no reciprocal access to the European Union for Ukrainian products. Rather than free trade, Ukraine would be assigned strict quotas, particularly on agricultural produce. For example, Ukraine produces a total of 30,000 tons of cheese per year, but would be allowed to export only 5pc of it, or 1,500 tons, to Europe under the agreement.
The situation with poultry is even worse: Ukraine produces a million tons of chicken meat per year, but would be permitted by the agreement to export only 1pc, or 10,000 tons, to the EU, while being obliged to import 20,000 tons of poultry from Europe. Meanwhile, Russia has made clear that it would have to impose duties on Ukrainian exports, making them less competitive, as a result of any endiing of their free trade zone.
这几段的大意是欧盟提供给乌克兰的伙伴关系协定是完全不公平的。这个协定规定欧盟廉价的制成品可以没有阻碍的通过乌克兰进入俄罗斯（由于俄乌是关税同盟），而乌克兰具有比较优势的农产品，例如奶酪和家禽都将面临欧盟严格的出口配额措施。奶酪出口欧盟的配额只有如今乌克兰产量的5%，而家禽只有1%或者10000吨，更夸张的是欧盟可以反向乌克兰出口20000吨的家禽。另外若乌克兰加入欧盟将迫使俄罗斯对乌克兰的制成品征收关税，这对乌克兰的工业也将是重大的打击。因为众所周知的原因，乌克兰硕果仅存的工业体系承接前苏联，天然和欧盟标准就不相容，这代表签署协定之后，俄罗斯这个最后的市场都要对乌克兰说再见了。
再来是一个真正的NGO（和公知所言的那种从白宫和唐宁街领钱的所谓非政府组织不同，人家是完全靠募捐的）的网站上的一篇文章，其中分析了了从二战结束到今天，美国是如何策划和实施的针对那些所谓的威胁美国国家利益的国家的各种政变甚至军事介入的。（Ukraine: how America's coup machine has destroyed democracy worldwide since 1953，有兴趣的可以搜这个title）
摘录一段： Noam Chomsky calls William Blum's classic, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions since World War II, "Far and away the best book on the topic." If you're looking for historical context for what you are reading or watching on TV about the coup in Ukraine, Killing Hope will provide it. The title has never been more apt as we watch the hopes of people from all regions of Ukraine being sacrificed on the same altar as those of people in Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011). This list does not include a roughly equal number of failed coups, nor coups in Africa and elsewhere in which a US role is suspected but unproven.
简单翻译如下：（接前文）关于美国政府是如何通过政变来摧毁其他国家的，Noam Chomsky认为William Blum的经典著作“杀死希望：自二战以来美国军事和中情局的干涉行动”是该领域最好的图书。如果你为如今在乌克兰发动的政变寻找历史背景，这本书会提供。没有比“杀死希望”这个书名更适合描述乌克兰人民对于真正民主的希望是如何被牺牲掉的，就如同那些在 Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011)的人们一样。还要说明的是这个名单并没有包括差不多同样数量的失败的政变策划，以及在非洲和其它地方的那些未经证实的美国政府的嫌疑身份。
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
先来看看为何亚努科维奇最后时刻拒绝签署和欧盟的伙伴关系协定。（Title：Ukraine does a U-turn on Europe）
摘录如下：From an economic viewpoint, Russia would have to protect its market from an inflow of cheap European goods through Ukraine into its territory and this would put an end to the free trade arrangement that currently exists between the two former Soviet neighbours. That is why Moscow did not want Kiev to sign an agreement that would, in Russia’s view, make Ukraine an economic and political appendage of Brussels.
But Mr Yanukovych’s refusal to sign the agreement was also rooted in fears for Ukraine’s economy, as those who read the full document realised. The deal gave full access to Ukraine’s market for European goods, but there was no reciprocal access to the European Union for Ukrainian products. Rather than free trade, Ukraine would be assigned strict quotas, particularly on agricultural produce. For example, Ukraine produces a total of 30,000 tons of cheese per year, but would be allowed to export only 5pc of it, or 1,500 tons, to Europe under the agreement.
The situation with poultry is even worse: Ukraine produces a million tons of chicken meat per year, but would be permitted by the agreement to export only 1pc, or 10,000 tons, to the EU, while being obliged to import 20,000 tons of poultry from Europe. Meanwhile, Russia has made clear that it would have to impose duties on Ukrainian exports, making them less competitive, as a result of any endiing of their free trade zone.
这几段的大意是欧盟提供给乌克兰的伙伴关系协定是完全不公平的。这个协定规定欧盟廉价的制成品可以没有阻碍的通过乌克兰进入俄罗斯（由于俄乌是关税同盟），而乌克兰具有比较优势的农产品，例如奶酪和家禽都将面临欧盟严格的出口配额措施。奶酪出口欧盟的配额只有如今乌克兰产量的5%，而家禽只有1%或者10000吨，更夸张的是欧盟可以反向乌克兰出口20000吨的家禽。另外若乌克兰加入欧盟将迫使俄罗斯对乌克兰的制成品征收关税，这对乌克兰的工业也将是重大的打击。因为众所周知的原因，乌克兰硕果仅存的工业体系承接前苏联，天然和欧盟标准就不相容，这代表签署协定之后，俄罗斯这个最后的市场都要对乌克兰说再见了。
再来是一个真正的NGO（和公知所言的那种从白宫和唐宁街领钱的所谓非政府组织不同，人家是完全靠募捐的）的网站上的一篇文章，其中分析了了从二战结束到今天，美国是如何策划和实施的针对那些所谓的威胁美国国家利益的国家的各种政变甚至军事介入的。（Ukraine: how America's coup machine has destroyed democracy worldwide since 1953，有兴趣的可以搜这个title）
摘录一段： Noam Chomsky calls William Blum's classic, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions since World War II, "Far and away the best book on the topic." If you're looking for historical context for what you are reading or watching on TV about the coup in Ukraine, Killing Hope will provide it. The title has never been more apt as we watch the hopes of people from all regions of Ukraine being sacrificed on the same altar as those of people in Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011). This list does not include a roughly equal number of failed coups, nor coups in Africa and elsewhere in which a US role is suspected but unproven.
简单翻译如下：（接前文）关于美国政府是如何通过政变来摧毁其他国家的，Noam Chomsky认为William Blum的经典著作“杀死希望：自二战以来美国军事和中情局的干涉行动”是该领域最好的图书。如果你为如今在乌克兰发动的政变寻找历史背景，这本书会提供。没有比“杀死希望”这个书名更适合描述乌克兰人民对于真正民主的希望是如何被牺牲掉的，就如同那些在 Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011)的人们一样。还要说明的是这个名单并没有包括差不多同样数量的失败的政变策划，以及在非洲和其它地方的那些未经证实的美国政府的嫌疑身份。
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
因为没权限发链接，就不发了
先来看看为何亚努科维奇最后时刻拒绝签署和欧盟的伙伴关系协定。（Title：Ukraine does a U-turn on Europe）
摘录如下：From an economic viewpoint, Russia would have to protect its market from an inflow of cheap European goods through Ukraine into its territory and this would put an end to the free trade arrangement that currently exists between the two former Soviet neighbours. That is why Moscow did not want Kiev to sign an agreement that would, in Russia’s view, make Ukraine an economic and political appendage of Brussels.
But Mr Yanukovych’s refusal to sign the agreement was also rooted in fears for Ukraine’s economy, as those who read the full document realised. The deal gave full access to Ukraine’s market for European goods, but there was no reciprocal access to the European Union for Ukrainian products. Rather than free trade, Ukraine would be assigned strict quotas, particularly on agricultural produce. For example, Ukraine produces a total of 30,000 tons of cheese per year, but would be allowed to export only 5pc of it, or 1,500 tons, to Europe under the agreement.
The situation with poultry is even worse: Ukraine produces a million tons of chicken meat per year, but would be permitted by the agreement to export only 1pc, or 10,000 tons, to the EU, while being obliged to import 20,000 tons of poultry from Europe. Meanwhile, Russia has made clear that it would have to impose duties on Ukrainian exports, making them less competitive, as a result of any endiing of their free trade zone.
这几段的大意是欧盟提供给乌克兰的伙伴关系协定是完全不公平的。这个协定规定欧盟廉价的制成品可以没有阻碍的通过乌克兰进入俄罗斯（由于俄乌是关税同盟），而乌克兰具有比较优势的农产品，例如奶酪和家禽都将面临欧盟严格的出口配额措施。奶酪出口欧盟的配额只有如今乌克兰产量的5%，而家禽只有1%或者10000吨，更夸张的是欧盟可以反向乌克兰出口20000吨的家禽。另外若乌克兰加入欧盟将迫使俄罗斯对乌克兰的制成品征收关税，这对乌克兰的工业也将是重大的打击。因为众所周知的原因，乌克兰硕果仅存的工业体系承接前苏联，天然和欧盟标准就不相容，这代表签署协定之后，俄罗斯这个最后的市场都要对乌克兰说再见了。
再来是一个真正的NGO（和公知所言的那种从白宫和唐宁街领钱的所谓非政府组织不同，人家是完全靠募捐的）的网站上的一篇文章，其中分析了了从二战结束到今天，美国是如何策划和实施的针对那些所谓的威胁美国国家利益的国家的各种政变甚至军事介入的。（Ukraine: how America's coup machine has destroyed democracy worldwide since 1953，有兴趣的可以搜这个title）
摘录一段： Noam Chomsky calls William Blum's classic, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions since World War II, "Far and away the best book on the topic." If you're looking for historical context for what you are reading or watching on TV about the coup in Ukraine, Killing Hope will provide it. The title has never been more apt as we watch the hopes of people from all regions of Ukraine being sacrificed on the same altar as those of people in Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011). This list does not include a roughly equal number of failed coups, nor coups in Africa and elsewhere in which a US role is suspected but unproven.
简单翻译如下：（接前文）关于美国政府是如何通过政变来摧毁其他国家的，Noam Chomsky认为William Blum的经典著作“杀死希望：自二战以来美国军事和中情局的干涉行动”是该领域最好的图书。如果你为如今在乌克兰发动的政变寻找历史背景，这本书会提供。没有比“杀死希望”这个书名更适合描述乌克兰人民对于真正民主的希望是如何被牺牲掉的，就如同那些在 Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011)的人们一样。还要说明的是这个名单并没有包括差不多同样数量的失败的政变策划，以及在非洲和其它地方的那些未经证实的美国政府的嫌疑身份。
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
和平年代本身就是伪命题，世界哪天太平过
说再多都没用，人总是失去了才知道珍惜。
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
人同此心 心同此理 高度共鸣
最后讲讲自己的感受。我其实不喜欢谈爱国，我也不搞任何形式的抵制，只是当我不经意翻开历史的一角，我很无奈的发现，不爱国是不行的，甚至一定的民族主义也是需要的。因为当别的国家抱团和你竞争，甚至满含恶意时刻准备要弄死你的时候，你也只能选择抱团对抗。这种情况下，国即为民，民即为国。的确我们为爱因斯坦这种世界主义者欢呼，但可能没有人能说得清当爱因斯坦知道自己的同胞正被成批成批的集体屠杀时候的心情吧。你的各种身份注定裹挟你一生，从积极的角度你唯一能做的不过是尽力赋予你的身份以更多、更好的内涵。
感叹一切不易，我们能做的就是站定脚下的土地，心无旁骛的往前走。我进步，国进步。
人同此心 心同此理 高度共鸣