翻译一下这个吧

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-17 15:52:35编辑过]

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-17 15:54:04编辑过]

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-17 15:54:54编辑过]

要休息一下了……[em11]

鱼MM你理他做甚？！  

你看看这个家伙的头像图片是哪里连接来的~这人肯定是混铁血的~

铁血的专长就是搞军事文学和军事理论~文字性的~学术性的东西~

这哥们不劳而获的嫌疑非常大~~~~

莫理他莫理他~~

呵呵~~~

鱼MM很不得了啊,  翻译的很好很好,  谢谢

我可不是铁血的,  头像可是我上传到王朝的,  哈哈,  超大贵宾眼神不好啊!!!

我觉得这篇东西不错,  翻译完了,    鱼MM把它放在空军论坛多好!

以下是引用ZhenZhong在2003-6-16 22:53:00的发言：
鱼MM很不得了啊,  翻译的很好很好,  谢谢

我可不是铁血的,  头像可是我上传到王朝的,  哈哈,  超大贵宾眼神不好啊!!!

我觉得这篇东西不错,  翻译完了,    鱼MM把它放在空军论坛多好!

[em12]
原来是子陵的军友啊！
----------------------------------------------------------
ZhenZhong


头衔：中华醒狮
  等级：空军上士
  文章：437
  积分：573
  注册：2003-4-18
-----------------------------------------------------------
走眼走眼！！！[em11][em11]

---------------------------------------------------
俺也是怕累着MM啊~看你注册这么长时间才发了三篇帖子~
哎~  错误错误~~~~~~~~~~

不打不成交,  哈哈

超大不常来,  子陵灌灌水,

顺便问一下,  大家都用什么翻译软件??  在哪可以下载? 我也可以做点贡献

呵呵呵……很好笑啊……

谢谢zhenzhou的夸奖……但是翻地实在有点粗糙……见笑了

另外你说的翻译软件，我觉得不好用－－机器讲的话太生硬了

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-8-4 23:17:28编辑过]

商量商量贴出去？

好的，可是还没译完，只能象连续剧一样一集一集地往上贴了

好久没来,  诸位辛苦了!

我现在就把我在航展照的照片贴到空军论坛, 也给超大作点贡献!

It was not until 1985 that the air force's military region air force boundaries completely coincided with the army's military region boundaries, and it took another four years for the military region air force commanders to be fully integrated into the military region command staff as the air component commanders

1985年后，空军在各军区的（地理上的）分界才完全与陆军的军区分界统一，四年后，军区空军指挥员才作为合成部队的一部分被完全组合进军区的指挥参谋机构。

staff是参谋部的意思，command staff究竟是指军区的什么机构，我不太确定
air component为合成部队中的空军部分

谢谢kilorocky，你终于出来了……

鱼MM：
command有命令的意思，staff也可以做“人员”讲。

因为涉及到解放军的一些机构名称，翻译务必要准确
否则连自己的名字都弄不对，就不好了
个人认为，在翻译中下得考证的工夫要足

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-17 22:12:03编辑过]

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-17 15:59:08编辑过]

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-16 11:22:26编辑过]
我简直想拍你的头！
连“楚楚动人的三个月假期”都出来了，你中文水平这么差吗？
回去好好给我认真的看，改好了再贴上来，再敢偷懒我揍你！
[em05]

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-16 11:22:26编辑过]

我简直想拍你的头！
连“楚楚动人的三个月假期”都出来了，你中文水平这么差吗？
回去好好给我认真的看，改好了再贴上来，再敢偷懒我揍你！
[em05]
[/quote]
[em11][em11]都是金山快译害的啦~这就改

翻译作：每年有三个月的假期，比较合适

以下是引用kilorocky在2003-7-20 5:51:00的发言：
翻译作：每年有三个月的假期，比较合适

哪就改[em09]

為何中間的Continuing Force Structure Limitations不見了?是翻過了嗎?沒看到阿.

等等我來翻一些好了.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-22 2:24:15编辑过]

In addition, the PLAAF's close identification with Minister of Defense Lin Biao and leftist radicals during the Cultural Revolution left the air force politically suspect afterward. China's domestic turmoil shredded the PLAAF officer corps and severely disrupted the country's aviation manufacturing infrastructure. In essence, the Cultural Revolution cost the PLAAF almost two decades of development and sharply diminished its political influence. The air force is still struggling to overcome this legacy. All military forces are products of the "tyranny of the past" to some extent, and the PLAAF is an especially vivid example.

此外,解放軍空軍與國防部長林彪的親密認同以及在文化大革命中的左傾風讓空軍在之後遭到政治上的猜疑.中國國內的混亂切碎了解放軍空軍的軍官團,並且嚴重擾亂了國家的航空製造業基礎建設.本質上,文化大革命讓解放軍空軍付出了幾乎二十年的發展,並急速縮小其政治影響力.空軍還在掙扎以克服這個後遺症.所有的軍事武力在某些範疇內都是"過去餘毒"下的產物,解放軍空軍尤其是個鮮活的例子.

Although the PLAAF has begun purchasing advanced Russian equipment again, such as the Su-27 fighter, the SA-10 SAM system, and a limited number of Il-76 transports, it is unlikely that rapid modernization using Russian-built systems will occur during the latter half of the 1990s. Such purchases would require major infusions of scarce financial resources. China's defense purchasing power declined substantially during the 1980s, and inflation combined with changes in currency-conversion practices have limited the impact of recent increases in defense budgets. But the readiness of the Chinese leadership to allocate appreciable foreign exchange for these recent purchases demonstrates a growing realization of the severity of the PLAAF's modernization problems.

雖然解放軍空軍又開始購買像是Su-27戰鬥機,SA-10地空導彈系統,以及有限的IL-76運輸機等先進俄國裝備,使用俄製系統的快速現代化在1990年代後半不太像會發生.這些購買需要較多的珍貴財政資源挹注.中國的國防購買力在1980年代本質上是下降的,而且通膨以及貨幣兌換實務的改變侷限了近年來國防預算增加的衝擊.但是中國領導層願意指派可觀的外匯到這些購買上,顯示出解放軍空軍現代化問題的嚴重性漸漸得到認識.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-22 0:20:17编辑过]

航空工业部？

应该是 航空航天工业部

航空、航天工业部以前是分开的

One possible solution to China's airpower modernization dilemmas would be a coproduction agreement between China and Russia for a modern aircraft, in an arrangement comparable to transactions undertaken in the 1950s, or a codevelopment arrangement with Israel. Regardless of the specific aircraft in question--e.g., the Su-27, MiG-31, or a Chinese variant of the Israeli Lavi--there are major uncertainties about the long-term prospects for success in any such undertaking. These uncertainties include very long production lead times, the extent of China's budgetary commitment to any such project, the willingness of foreign suppliers to transfer the full spectrum of technologies involved in a modern combat aircraft, the prodigious development costs that would be associated with a full-scale program between China and a foreign supplier, and (perhaps most important) the ability of Chinese research and development personnel to assimilate and integrate newer technologies fully. Even assuming that all these uncertainties can be satisfactorily resolved, there are the equally daunting tasks of maintaining high-technology systems that are well beyond the sophistication of aircraft in the present PLAAF inventory and of the air force being able to utilize such capabilities fully in training and in combat.

解決中國空權現代化困境的一個可能方案是中蘇之間為一個現代化飛機達成一個可與1950年代間的交易相比的合作製造協議,或是與以色列合作發展安排.先不管正在詢問中諸如Su-27,Mig-31,或是中國改版的以色列幼獅等特定飛機,在任何這些保證的長程願景成功面上都有重大的不確定性在.這些不確定性包括很長的前導製造時間,中國對這些計畫的預算承諾範圍,外國支援者對全面轉移現代戰機所涉及技術的意願,中國與外國支援者間對全面計畫有關的巨大發展代價,以及(也許是最重要的)中國研發人員對完全消化及整合新技術的能力.甚至假定這些不確定性都能令人滿意的解決,對於維修這些精密度遠超過目前解放軍空軍裝備中戰機的高科技系統,以及空軍能在訓練及戰鬥中充分利用這些能力的作業同樣是令人氣餒的.

At the same time, to garner sufficient political and bureaucratic support within China, any such project must move from the coassembly phase to production with full domestic content. As with numerous joint-venture projects in China, this will be a slow process and might not reach fruition. This would leave the air force unable to modernize its force structure for many years to come while facing a serious block obsolescence problem (in particular, the need to replace the F-6 fighter aircraft, a Chinese-built MiG-19, which constitutes over half of the PLAAF and naval aviation force structure). If Chinese fighter and bomber production continues at its present rate, our estimates indicate the PLAAF will be roughly half its current size in ten years. Moreover, except for a small number of advanced fighters procured from Russia, the preponderance of China's force structure early in the next century will consist of fighters that today would be considered obsolescent.

同時,為在中國內部贏得足夠的政治及官僚支持,任何上述計畫都必須由協助組裝階段轉成國內全面製造.就像中國內無數的合資計畫,這可能進展緩慢而且不會有成就.這可能會導致空軍在未來許多年內面對嚴重的大批退役問題時無法現代化其武力結構(特別是替換佔了解放軍空軍以及海航武力架構中超過一半的中國製Mig-19殲六戰機).如果中國的戰機及轟炸機繼續目前的製造速率,我們的評估指出十年內解放軍空軍將大概只有目前規模的一半.此外,除了少數由俄國製造的先進戰機,下世紀初組成今日中國武力結構優勢的戰機將會認為已該廢棄.

Continuing Force Structure Limitations翻完了,這是Training Deficiencies的第二段.

Moreover, there are questions about the value of this training. Most fighter training sorties, for example, last about 45 minutes, and the majority of the flight time is spent on navigation. There is virtually no simulator training, except on very rudimentary systems. According to an internal Chinese assessment in 1990, the poor quality of the training has made the air force deficient in night combat and poor-weather flying, low-altitude attack tactics, mobility and deployment capabilities, and combat flying against dissimilar aircraft.

此外,對於這些訓練的價值也有疑問.舉例而言,絕大多數的單機訓練持續大約45分鐘,而且飛行時間的主要部分都花在導航上.除了非常初步的系統,基本上沒有模擬訓練.根據1990年中國內部評估,低品質訓練造成空軍在夜間戰鬥及惡劣天候飛行,低空攻擊戰術,移動及部署能力,與對抗異種飛機的戰鬥飛行上有缺陷.

Attempts to increase training time would be very costly and would also require the PLAAF to address its serious maintenance problems. In addition, there is a lack of combat experience. For example, probably no active-duty pilots are left with any wartime experience in air-to-air combat. Matters are rendered worse by the rigid structure imposed upon the pilots, such as strict ground-controlled intercept and lack of initiative, which will continue to restrict the air force's capabilities.

試圖增加訓練時間將會非常的花錢並且同樣需要解放軍空軍滿足其嚴重的保修問題.此外,戰鬥經驗也很缺乏.舉例來說,或許沒有現役飛行員保留有任何空對空戰鬥的戰時經驗.因為加在飛行員身上像是嚴格地面管控攔截以及缺乏主動等僵硬制度,將會持續限制空軍的能力而使事情變的更糟.

Prospects for the Future未來的展望第一段有幾個人名,所以留給各位.等這段翻完我再接手其他部分.

经过各位不断的努力，终于把这篇文章翻译完了！！！
大家庆祝庆祝哈！！
[em00]

祝贺, 祝贺!!!!

好几天没到大本营来,  成果显著,  可喜可贺!!

我又给你们送东西来了,  上个月最新美国国防部中国军力报告,  有没有兴趣啊??!!!!  50页!

连接在此: http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/20030730chinaex.pdf
PDF 文件