关于日本代表联大发言涉及马关条约的问题，请CD版主或专 ...

儿玉和夫同志 为我兔总参二部一局天津分局 花费了巨大代价派驻脚盆的鼹鼠
这次挺身而出引出马关条约这个引子 另我兔牢牢占据制高点 牺牲了前途甚至可能危及安全
总参领导何等心痛啊！
谨此 向战斗在境内外情报一线的同志致敬。

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

额 以上是发癔症脸滚键盘无节操打字效果。


目前网上和很多官方半官方媒体都说泥盆代表在联大辩论中以《马关条约》为依据，证明占我钓鱼岛的合法性。
但是都没有准确的说明日方是怎么讲的。我觉得应该有个比较权威的判断，来确定日方是否以此为基础，然后才好谈有针对性的回应。

以下是联合国官网儿玉和夫发言全文:
引自联合国官方网站联大辩论发言稿http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2012/ga11295.doc.htm

The representative of Japan, responding to the statement by China’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, said his Prime Minister had stated that various issues of international society must be solved by reason rather than by force.  Underscoring the importance of the rule of law, he said any attempt to realize an ideology or claim by the unilateral use of force or threat of force would be in violation of the spirit of the Charter.

The Senkaku Islands were clearly inherent to Japan, he said, recalling that in January 1895, a Cabinet-level decision had been made to incorporate them, while Formosa (Taiwan) and its associated islands had been ceded to Japan in line with the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed in April that year.  The assertion that Japan had taken the islands from China could not logically stand, he said, adding that his country had conducted surveys of the islands since 1899, and they had shown no trace of having been inhabited by China or under Chinese control.

He said Japan had renounced its territorial claim over Formosa, and China had ceded the Pescadores Islands after the Sino-Japanese war, in accordance with article 2(b) of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which made it clear that the Senkaku Islands were not included.  Only since the 1970s had the Government of China and the Taiwanese authorities begun making territorial assertions about them.



以我1.5级英语水平目测，好像他的意思不是说根据《马关条约》钓鱼岛割让给了日本，而是根据《马关条约》日本获得了福摩萨（ww)和附属岛屿，二战后日本归还了《马关条约》获得的Formosa (Taiwan)及附属岛屿。照他的意思应该是说，钓鱼岛不是通过马关条约获得的，因此中国谈战后秩序、开罗、波茨坦等等没有理由。

因为是官方语言，这里面的严谨性远远超出了一般的翻译要求，请CD的大牛们尽可能的给出一个较为精准的翻译稿。以正视听。





儿玉和夫同志 为我兔总参二部一局天津分局 花费了巨大代价派驻脚盆的鼹鼠
这次挺身而出引出马关条约这个引子 另我兔牢牢占据制高点 牺牲了前途甚至可能危及安全
总参领导何等心痛啊！
谨此 向战斗在境内外情报一线的同志致敬。

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

额 以上是发癔症脸滚键盘无节操打字效果。


目前网上和很多官方半官方媒体都说泥盆代表在联大辩论中以《马关条约》为依据，证明占我钓鱼岛的合法性。
但是都没有准确的说明日方是怎么讲的。我觉得应该有个比较权威的判断，来确定日方是否以此为基础，然后才好谈有针对性的回应。

以下是联合国官网儿玉和夫发言全文:
引自联合国官方网站联大辩论发言稿http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2012/ga11295.doc.htm

The representative of Japan, responding to the statement by China’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, said his Prime Minister had stated that various issues of international society must be solved by reason rather than by force.  Underscoring the importance of the rule of law, he said any attempt to realize an ideology or claim by the unilateral use of force or threat of force would be in violation of the spirit of the Charter.

The Senkaku Islands were clearly inherent to Japan, he said, recalling that in January 1895, a Cabinet-level decision had been made to incorporate them, while Formosa (Taiwan) and its associated islands had been ceded to Japan in line with the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed in April that year.  The assertion that Japan had taken the islands from China could not logically stand, he said, adding that his country had conducted surveys of the islands since 1899, and they had shown no trace of having been inhabited by China or under Chinese control.

He said Japan had renounced its territorial claim over Formosa, and China had ceded the Pescadores Islands after the Sino-Japanese war, in accordance with article 2(b) of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which made it clear that the Senkaku Islands were not included.  Only since the 1970s had the Government of China and the Taiwanese authorities begun making territorial assertions about them.



以我1.5级英语水平目测，好像他的意思不是说根据《马关条约》钓鱼岛割让给了日本，而是根据《马关条约》日本获得了福摩萨（ww)和附属岛屿，二战后日本归还了《马关条约》获得的Formosa (Taiwan)及附属岛屿。照他的意思应该是说，钓鱼岛不是通过马关条约获得的，因此中国谈战后秩序、开罗、波茨坦等等没有理由。

因为是官方语言，这里面的严谨性远远超出了一般的翻译要求，请CD的大牛们尽可能的给出一个较为精准的翻译稿。以正视听。