超级军网E-2C不进行大改也能在滑跃甲板上起飞？谁有这方面资料
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 04:23:01
11月的《舰载武器》刚到手，离子鱼在《从舰载固定翼战机的技术和应用看中国舰载机的发展方向》里谈到，美国已经在滑跃甲板上成功进行过E-2C的起飞，不知道哪位有更详细资料？顺便问一句，二战时候B-25从大黄蜂号航母起飞攻击东京，起飞距离和起飞重量是多少？11月的《舰载武器》刚到手，离子鱼在《从舰载固定翼战机的技术和应用看中国舰载机的发展方向》里谈到，美国已经在滑跃甲板上成功进行过E-2C的起飞，不知道哪位有更详细资料？顺便问一句，二战时候B-25从大黄蜂号航母起飞攻击东京，起飞距离和起飞重量是多少？
貌似基本没有。
有还是没有啊。
这个还真没有。;P
这个还真没有。;P
没资料，等三锅吧，三锅20年内应该可以实现这一目标
没资料，等三锅吧，三锅20年内应该可以实现这一目标
美軍早就做過E-2C利用滑躍起飛的實驗, 時間為1986年左右.不過, 資料沒有說明那次實驗中E-2C的起飛重量或帶油量有多少.......
Indeed STOBAR (Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) was suggested as compromise. The E-2C Hawkeye had demonstrated an ability to launch from a low incline ski-jump built ashore at NAS Patuxent River during the 1980s and it was thought that adding arrestor wires to the CVF design (i.e. changing it to a STOBAR configuration) might still allow its adoption for MASC given some modifications (e.g. strengthened nose wheel) - and the necessary finance. Also, a STOBAR carrier would have a lower cost than a full CTOL configuration while perhaps being able to operate both the F-35A and F-35C. If the F-35C was selected for the manned element of the RAF's Future Offensive Air System, then it would almost certainly be able to successfully operate from a STOBAR configured CVF. However the MOD showed no interest in the Hawkeye/STOBAR idea, perhaps sensibly as in 2004 and early 2005 Northrop Grumman did further research on a ski-jumping Hawkeye 2000 in the context of a proposal to the Indian Navy, and while insisting that this was perfectly feasible it had to admit that the required changes for STOBAR operations would reduce the aircraft's capabilities somewhat compared to the standard model. The Indian Navy decided that it was unconvinced about the concept, citing concerns such as the disastrous effect of a single engine failure during the full power take-off run.
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/masc.htm
Indeed STOBAR (Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) was suggested as compromise. The E-2C Hawkeye had demonstrated an ability to launch from a low incline ski-jump built ashore at NAS Patuxent River during the 1980s and it was thought that adding arrestor wires to the CVF design (i.e. changing it to a STOBAR configuration) might still allow its adoption for MASC given some modifications (e.g. strengthened nose wheel) - and the necessary finance. Also, a STOBAR carrier would have a lower cost than a full CTOL configuration while perhaps being able to operate both the F-35A and F-35C. If the F-35C was selected for the manned element of the RAF's Future Offensive Air System, then it would almost certainly be able to successfully operate from a STOBAR configured CVF. However the MOD showed no interest in the Hawkeye/STOBAR idea, perhaps sensibly as in 2004 and early 2005 Northrop Grumman did further research on a ski-jumping Hawkeye 2000 in the context of a proposal to the Indian Navy, and while insisting that this was perfectly feasible it had to admit that the required changes for STOBAR operations would reduce the aircraft's capabilities somewhat compared to the standard model. The Indian Navy decided that it was unconvinced about the concept, citing concerns such as the disastrous effect of a single engine failure during the full power take-off run.
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/masc.htm
我记得美帝还向阿三推销过E-2C，提供了它滑跃起飞的相关资料
这个应该有解决的办法。
假如有的话美帝为什么要公开? 告诉全世界其实航母不是那么难? 帮助中国俄国发展航母?
MS弹射起飞比滑越起飞对飞机的结构强度要求更高吧，这样的话确实不需要强度方面的改装就足以满足滑越起飞的强度要求。
至于能不能滑越起飞的问题，只要距离足够，肯定能够起飞，而航母上最紧张的就是空间和距离。说滑越比弹射好的，等到航母的长度达到400~500再说吧，当然宽度大幅增加也行。
至于能不能滑越起飞的问题，只要距离足够，肯定能够起飞，而航母上最紧张的就是空间和距离。说滑越比弹射好的，等到航母的长度达到400~500再说吧，当然宽度大幅增加也行。
从舰未开始满功率滑也许能飞起来
刚起飞5分钟，没油了……
E-2C还真能这样，美国向印度推销舰载预警机，就出示了80年代美国N多海军飞机滑越实验的资料
可惜阿三的兼容性太悲剧，那个维克拉马蒂亚没办法用E-2C
可惜阿三的兼容性太悲剧，那个维克拉马蒂亚没办法用E-2C
加上助推火箭应该可以缩短起降距离吧。
C-130、U-2都在航母上不用弹射器飞过
E-2C不能在阿三航母上使用的最重要原因有两个，一个是飞机降落时的冲击强度要超过舰体可承受强度，二是美式通讯指挥系统和俄式完全不兼容
当年法国的戴高乐为了适应E2上舰，还专门做了改动
smzg 发表于 2010-11-7 13:38 
加长了甲板，但戴高乐还是弹射。
加长了甲板，但戴高乐还是弹射。