谁能看出JSF的RCS是多少?原来是Visual RCS detection的 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 12:47:29
================================

Janicki Industries tapped F-35 model


Janicki Industries manufactured the Full Scale Pole Model of the F-35, used to test radar signature and other key performance data for the stealth fighter


Janicki Industries (Sedro-Woolley, Wash.) announced on June 17 that its expertise in building composite prototypes was tapped by Lockheed Martin in producing the Full Scale Pole Model for its F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter jet program. The model is now being used to test radar signature and other key performance data. High fidelity Radar Cross Section (RCS) testing of the Highly Accurate Low Observable (HALO) pole model has validated the accuracy of the predicted F-35 stealth signature performance over a broad elevation and frequency range.

Janicki Industries worked as a key partner with Lockheed Martin throughout the development and fabrication of the HALO pole model, beginning in 2006. The timeline for F-35 development drove several innovations during the project, including building a structural inner body in advance of final surface engineering. By building the center body concurrently with the aircraft engineering phase, the Janicki/Lockheed Martin team was able to start building the model more than a year in advance of receiving the final surface geometry.

Once the external shape of the model was established, Janicki Industries applied a surface to the center body, using a proprietary technology developed by its tooling engineers. This began by applying sprayable, expanding urethane foam to act as a foundation. The foam was machined, then covered with a material developed by Janicki specifically for the project. To address the entire surface of the model’s body in just two set-ups, Janicki’s largest machining center was used. The company’s custom 5-axis CNC machining centers are among the largest in the world, with envelopes of up to 100 ft by 20 ft by 8 ft (30.5m by 6.1m by 2.4m).

After completing the model’s body, the Janicki team began developing and producing composite external panels for the pole model. These panels were fastened to the finished body to replicate the F-35 aircraft for testing purposes. These panels required the strictest adherence to every design aspect so that the model would match the aircraft’s real production specifications. Janicki Industries produced highly accurate molds to fabricate the composite panels. After panel fabrication, Janicki converted the molds to specialized trim and drill fixtures, which resulted in significant cost savings for the F-35 project

During testing, the HALO model is rigged in a variety of orientations on the top of a test pole. The model is uniquely configured for either upright or inverted orientation on the pole. This requires it to be reconfigurable both structurally and cosmetically to accurately represent the airframe in either orientation.

Rather than address all pole-model assembly tasks at Lockheed Martin’s facilities as originally planned, the company tapped Janicki Industries’ extensive fabrication capabilities, entrusting the assembly of major portions of the final model to the Janicki team. The latter completed multiple technically complex assemblies, including wings, engine mounts, internal structure and inlet duct assembly.================================

Janicki Industries tapped F-35 model


Janicki Industries manufactured the Full Scale Pole Model of the F-35, used to test radar signature and other key performance data for the stealth fighter


Janicki Industries (Sedro-Woolley, Wash.) announced on June 17 that its expertise in building composite prototypes was tapped by Lockheed Martin in producing the Full Scale Pole Model for its F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter jet program. The model is now being used to test radar signature and other key performance data. High fidelity Radar Cross Section (RCS) testing of the Highly Accurate Low Observable (HALO) pole model has validated the accuracy of the predicted F-35 stealth signature performance over a broad elevation and frequency range.

Janicki Industries worked as a key partner with Lockheed Martin throughout the development and fabrication of the HALO pole model, beginning in 2006. The timeline for F-35 development drove several innovations during the project, including building a structural inner body in advance of final surface engineering. By building the center body concurrently with the aircraft engineering phase, the Janicki/Lockheed Martin team was able to start building the model more than a year in advance of receiving the final surface geometry.

Once the external shape of the model was established, Janicki Industries applied a surface to the center body, using a proprietary technology developed by its tooling engineers. This began by applying sprayable, expanding urethane foam to act as a foundation. The foam was machined, then covered with a material developed by Janicki specifically for the project. To address the entire surface of the model’s body in just two set-ups, Janicki’s largest machining center was used. The company’s custom 5-axis CNC machining centers are among the largest in the world, with envelopes of up to 100 ft by 20 ft by 8 ft (30.5m by 6.1m by 2.4m).

After completing the model’s body, the Janicki team began developing and producing composite external panels for the pole model. These panels were fastened to the finished body to replicate the F-35 aircraft for testing purposes. These panels required the strictest adherence to every design aspect so that the model would match the aircraft’s real production specifications. Janicki Industries produced highly accurate molds to fabricate the composite panels. After panel fabrication, Janicki converted the molds to specialized trim and drill fixtures, which resulted in significant cost savings for the F-35 project

During testing, the HALO model is rigged in a variety of orientations on the top of a test pole. The model is uniquely configured for either upright or inverted orientation on the pole. This requires it to be reconfigurable both structurally and cosmetically to accurately represent the airframe in either orientation.

Rather than address all pole-model assembly tasks at Lockheed Martin’s facilities as originally planned, the company tapped Janicki Industries’ extensive fabrication capabilities, entrusting the assembly of major portions of the final model to the Janicki team. The latter completed multiple technically complex assemblies, including wings, engine mounts, internal structure and inlet duct assembly.
恍然大悟, 还是具有Visual RCS detection的人厉害啊。

Janicki Industries悲剧啊,钱不该赚。

LM悲剧, 钱多花了.............:D
--------------
HALO inverted on pole_web.jpg
LS的鸡鸡叫什么?
VV998 发表于 2010-6-26 20:06
请把3楼照片旋转180度好伐?


请问鸽蛋是不是比鸭蛋轻?要不要上分析天平

鹌鹑蛋和鸽蛋比较起来可能要一起,鸭蛋和鸽蛋是人都看得出来吧

请问鸽蛋是不是比鸭蛋轻?要不要上分析天平

鹌鹑蛋和鸽蛋比较起来可能要一起,鸭蛋和鸽蛋是人都看得出来吧
原来F-35的RCS现在才开始测..............:L
胡说,早在05年就有装在旗杆顶上的35测试了。{:jian:}
我晕。。。原来三楼的图是倒过来的。。。
JSTCVW09CD 发表于 2010-6-25 19:19


    这鸡鸡挂在哪?
球电的扇叶子在哪里??{:wu:}
VV998 发表于 2010-6-26 20:06


    汗一个。。。:D
我明白兰州的意思了   其实您不就是想说毛五的RCS小么;P
3b6e8d2612.jpg10061911233dc7889bd5175018.jpg

哎呀呀~这俩飞机隐身工艺真是不相上下呢~

哎呀呀~这俩飞机隐身工艺真是不相上下呢~
一牧月 发表于 2010-6-27 10:04

----------------------
我怎么没有看到那个巨大的进气道电风扇呀?另外35正面可没有毛5那么多的开口呀?要知道F35的正面看前缘机动襟翼裂缝左右只有2个,而可怜的毛5前缘裂缝竟然多达8个,这些裂缝可是客观的雷达衍射点呀{:3_98:}
哎呀呀~这俩飞机隐身工艺真是不相上下呢~
一牧月 发表于 2010-6-27 10:04

----------------------
我怎么没有看到那个巨大的进气道电风扇呀?另外35正面可没有毛5那么多的开口呀?要知道F35的正面看前缘机动襟翼裂缝左右只有2个,而可怜的毛5前缘裂缝竟然多达8个,这些裂缝可是客观的雷达衍射点呀{:3_98:}
pinjun 发表于 2010-6-27 10:29


    ;P人家是在说反话啊~毛五那个发动机叶片大家都看到了~
出了视觉RCS侦测党,这个就行了。


至少证明他们比LM的厉害.................
50的隐身与35明显不在一个档次--偶也是视觉党,哈哈
在没有丝毫根据的情况下盲目相信T50隐身性能优异的人不同样是视觉RCS党党徒么?既然是同道中人就别同行相轻;P
T50离服役还远着呢,现在对它作结论似乎早了点。
亚洲某机出来之后就有F-35哭的了
PLA 发表于 2010-6-27 11:56


    油漆桶刷kc中
毛5的RCS比35还悲剧
试验机上面传感器什么的看着很多有什么好奇怪的。。。。
看着一堆人对着一架T字头的飞机狂批毛五杯具,还真是一件非常有趣的事情。。。
等待AA 去偷F-35RCS 数据啊》。。。。。。。:D
hukehao111 发表于 2010-6-27 12:05
就现在毛五这架子摆在那   Cy字头的杯具只是时间问题;P

出了视觉RCS侦测党,这个就行了。


至少证明他们比LM的厉害.................
JSTCVW09CD 发表于 2010-6-27 11:24

----------------
还是给无知死硬的毛芬党摘录点专业文章南航的余雄庆老教授主编的《飞行器隐身设计》的上的外形隐身要求的片段节选吧:

消除产生雷达波衍射效应的外形组合,尽量减少飞机正面边缘、棱角、尖端的缺口裂缝等相交的界面;当雷达的无线电波射入两个交错面的缝隙时,由于无线电波的"衍射"效应,就会形成二次反射,最后以与入射波束相同的方向反射波束到雷达。从而在宽的视界角范围内返回强的电磁波能量到雷达。基于上述原因,飞行器在外形上采用了机翼、机身、尾翼连接处光滑过渡,机翼与机身高度融合的构型。减小雷达正面回波;{:3_98:}
看看杯具的毛5正面有多少个裂缝和缝隙。;P{:3_97:}
出了视觉RCS侦测党,这个就行了。


至少证明他们比LM的厉害.................
JSTCVW09CD 发表于 2010-6-27 11:24

----------------
还是给无知死硬的毛芬党摘录点专业文章南航的余雄庆老教授主编的《飞行器隐身设计》的上的外形隐身要求的片段节选吧:

消除产生雷达波衍射效应的外形组合,尽量减少飞机正面边缘、棱角、尖端的缺口裂缝等相交的界面;当雷达的无线电波射入两个交错面的缝隙时,由于无线电波的"衍射"效应,就会形成二次反射,最后以与入射波束相同的方向反射波束到雷达。从而在宽的视界角范围内返回强的电磁波能量到雷达。基于上述原因,飞行器在外形上采用了机翼、机身、尾翼连接处光滑过渡,机翼与机身高度融合的构型。减小雷达正面回波;{:3_98:}
看看杯具的毛5正面有多少个裂缝和缝隙。;P{:3_97:}


另外在给毛芬党科普一下,你们指望的那个涂有吸波材料百叶窗的雷达屏蔽器本身就是一个强雷达反射源,只不过雷达反射效果远没有那高速旋转的发动机叶片强罢了,例如18超级大马蜂的单个进气道雷达截面也达0.39平方米。所以向22或者35那样的真正纯隐身飞机是先大S进气道后里面才装雷达屏蔽器。这样经过入射雷达波经过层层反射吸收消耗,回波才降到最小。{:3_98:}

另外在给毛芬党科普一下,你们指望的那个涂有吸波材料百叶窗的雷达屏蔽器本身就是一个强雷达反射源,只不过雷达反射效果远没有那高速旋转的发动机叶片强罢了,例如18超级大马蜂的单个进气道雷达截面也达0.39平方米。所以向22或者35那样的真正纯隐身飞机是先大S进气道后里面才装雷达屏蔽器。这样经过入射雷达波经过层层反射吸收消耗,回波才降到最小。{:3_98:}
这鸡鸡简直美得一塌糊涂!那个光滑啊
一牧月 发表于 2010-6-27 10:04


    --
此图明显反映了MD比俄毛的4代机技术更先进这点看来毋庸置疑。不论从气动还是外型隐身方面看,F35更象是精深的工艺品,俄毛的T50更象是普通的3代半产品。可想而知俄毛真正的四代机要真正能用和成熟还早的很那,
hukehao111 发表于 2010-6-27 12:05
您这是少见多怪呀
回复 22# kaka22


    这个不用刷
PLA 发表于 2010-6-27 11:56


基本型号还是改进完善型号? 前者心里没底  虽然偶很看好611和成飞........
PLA 发表于 2010-6-27 11:56


    比较关心它哥哥哭不哭.....
hukehao111 发表于 2010-6-27 12:05


正面确实能看到叶片.........
回复 21# PLA


    同哭-----P版向来严谨,此言一出,令人内牛满面啊
pinjun 发表于 2010-6-27 15:13
所以向22或者35那样的真正纯隐身飞机是先大S进气道后里面才装雷达屏蔽器。----------------------------------------------------------------------求一幅22或35的大S进气道后加装雷达屏蔽器的图!:handshake
PLA 发表于 2010-6-27 11:56


    毛子的?棒子的?印度的?哎呀 好难猜哦{:3_97:}
PLA 发表于 2010-6-27 11:56


    这个是重点...[:a2:]