超级军网转凯迪社区的一篇文章
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 13:20:10
]]
这边看到凯迪二字。。。基本无视的
地震受害者有震死的，震残的，还有震傻的
转帖也要对转帖内容进行一下甄别然后再转比较好。
第一：我们缺大仙，没有大仙，预测不了地震
第二：地震是反贪局的，他们帮我们调查贪污犯
第三：西方救援队不是超人，他们不会飞到灾区。
第四：文章作者是被地震震傻的！
第二：地震是反贪局的，他们帮我们调查贪污犯
第三：西方救援队不是超人，他们不会飞到灾区。
第四：文章作者是被地震震傻的！
同2楼。
还有3楼，凯迪的不是震傻的，是本身就傻。震也震不醒。
对比下我常去的天涯国观，好几个“右派JY”都转变态度了，一两个是在314的时候就由自由主义者变成了民族主义者，还有几个是灾后由反对政府变为支持政府。
另几个又臭又硬的选择了消失。
还有3楼，凯迪的不是震傻的，是本身就傻。震也震不醒。
对比下我常去的天涯国观，好几个“右派JY”都转变态度了，一两个是在314的时候就由自由主义者变成了民族主义者，还有几个是灾后由反对政府变为支持政府。
另几个又臭又硬的选择了消失。
原帖由 看热闹的 于 2008-5-21 16:01 发表
同2楼。
还有3楼，凯迪的不是震傻的，是本身就傻。震也震不醒。
对比下我常去的天涯国观，好几个“右派JY”都转变态度了，一两个是在314的时候就由自由主义者变成了民族主义者，还有几个是灾后由反对政府变为支持 ...
在天涯ID是???
:victory: :victory: :victory: :victory:
一般转帖文章过来只有两种情况，一是赞同文章观点，二是觉得文章荒谬，转来给大家也笑笑，不知道LZ属于哪种，凯迪基本所有人都知道是个什么地方，而且文章里的问题在CD估计也回答过N+1次了吧，不知道此时还转此脑残集中营的文章过来干什么
楼主好兴致，居然有逛粪坑的嗜好！
不过你逛就逛吧，没必要把蛆虫们的大作弄到这儿来。
不过你逛就逛吧，没必要把蛆虫们的大作弄到这儿来。
凯迪:L
何必呢
何必呢
5月12日四川省北川县发生的致命地震之前的约10个月，一项科学报告就已经警告中国地区将面临一次大型地震。
科学家们通过仔细研究卫星图像，且对四川省的地壳断层的十年来的深度和活动研究之后，发出了以上警告。
在2007年7月中期的《地壳》杂志中，中国，欧洲和美国的科学家们写道：“断层的长度已经足以引发一次强烈的撼动地面的地震，它的潜力将成为爆发区域性地震的来源。
科学家的结论是，地壳撞击的能量在北川聚积，并将以地震的形式释放出来。
现在看来这个预言精确的甚至让人不寒而栗，当研究人员将活动的断层在北川的彩色地图上标示了出来时，那里正好这场地震的震中。
来自田纳西的孟菲斯大学的地震研究和信息中心的Micheal Ellis，同时也是这项研究的联合作者之一，表示“据我所知，这是对这些活跃断层的唯一调查。”
发生于5月12日的7.9级地震几乎将四川省的部分地区夷为平地。中国官方今天估测死亡人数将到达5万人，几乎5百万人将无家可归。
锁进了杂志
可以确信中国官方对2007年7月的报告完全没有察觉，否则事情绝不会沦为现在的局面。
“我们已经明确的标示出了这些活跃断层的潜力，”Ellis说到。“但这个信息事实上被锁进了一份学术期刊。”Ellis希望能用防震建筑替换如今已经塌陷的建筑，这样起码可以避免未来的悲剧。
“（地震前）我曾经去过这些小型村镇”，Ellis说，“大多数房屋都没有使用加固材料，而且那些地区几乎没有制砖厂。”
他补充说，“制造防震建筑成本相对较高，但四川省的绝大多数人民却十分贫困。”
地震背后的科学
北川的地震活动并不罕见。
“我们的证据显示从12000至13000年前开始，北川就始终伴随着使地表断裂的地震。”Ellis和同事在去年夏天的报告中写到。
在接受国家地理新闻的采访时，Ellis说到,“根本上说，（2008年）地震的原因是印度和亚洲地壳板块持续且不可阻挡的碰撞，其速率约为一年20-22毫米。”
此次碰撞起始于5千万年前，当时印度下方板块撞向了欧洲板块。
Ellis补充说“喜马拉雅和青藏高原便是从这个碰撞中产生的。”
随着印度板块持续缓慢的撞向亚洲，猛烈的时候就产生了地震，整个青藏高原都被向北推动。
“这次地震是西藏的山区向东边成都平原移动”，一位没有参与2007年7月报告的地质学家，科罗拉多大学的Roger Bilham说到。
问题不局限于四川, 报告的联合作者Ellis说，随着西藏高原北移，“西藏的中部地区正在塌陷，就像奶酪刚从烤箱中拿出来放到冷空气中一样。”
Ellis指出，西藏的南部边缘在断层一侧，其面对的地震威胁和四川一样大。
Ellis补充说:“喜马拉雅地区相关的财产和生命损失的风险非常之大，因为有大量的人口居住在哪里或者马上迁移过去。”“这风险几乎和四川一样高，因为人口，类似于印度尼泊尔的，相对劣质的建筑标准。”
而且，随着印度板块持续撞向西藏，“它正在制造新的断层”，同时也意味着新的危险。
本文来自于美国的国家地理杂志National Geographic
原文地址：
http://news.nationalgeographic.c ... uake-predicted.html
Study Warned of China Quake Risk Nearly a Year Ago
Kevin Holden Platt in Beijing
for National Geographic News
May 16, 2008
Just ten months before a deadly earthquake struck Sichuan Province's Beichuan county on May 12, a scientific study warned that the Chinese region was ripe for a major quake.
After examining satellite images and conducting on-the-ground inspections of deep, active faults in Sichuan Province for more than a decade, scientists issued a warning.
China earthquake predicted (map)
"The faults are sufficiently long to sustain a strong ground-shaking earthquake, making them potentially serious sources of regional seismic hazard," the Chinese, European, and U.S. geoscientists wrote in the mid-July 2007 edition of the journal Tectonics.
They concluded that clashing tectonic forces were growing in Beichuan, ready to burst in an explosion of seismic energy.
With precision and what now seems like eerie foresight, the researchers charted the active faults on multicolored maps of Beichuan, which turned out to be the epicenter of the recent earthquake.
"As far as I know, this is the only investigation of these active faults," said study co-author Michael Ellis of the Center for Earthquake Research and Information at the University of Memphis in Tennessee.
(Related: "China Quake Delivered Seismic One-Two Punch" [May 15, 2008].)
The magnitude 7.9 quake that struck on May 12 almost entirely leveled parts of Sichuan Province. Chinese officials today estimated that the death toll would reach 50,000 and that nearly five million people are homeless.
(See photos of the earthquake's destruction.)
"Locked in a Journal"
There is little reason to believe Chinese officials were aware of the July 2007 report, or that it would have made much difference if they had been.
"We had certainly identified the potential of these active faults," Ellis said. "But that information was effectively locked in an academic journal."
Ellis hopes that replacing the collapsed buildings with earthquake-proof structures could prevent future tragedies.
"I've been to these little towns [before the quake]," Ellis said. "Most of the houses are built of unreinforced masonry, and you can see little brick factories all around this area.
China earthquake predicted (map)
"It is more expensive to build earthquake-proof structures," he added. And the vast majority of people in Sichuan Province are anything but rich.
The Science Behind the Quake
Earthquake activity is nothing new in Beichuan.
"We have shown evidence for surface-rupturing earthquakes along the Beichuan fault since 12,000-13,000 years ago," Ellis and colleagues reported last summer.
Speaking with National Geographic News, Ellis said, "Ultimately, the [2008] earthquake is related to the continuing and inexorable collision of India with Asia, which is occurring at a rate of about 20 to 22 milimeters [just under an inch] per year."
This collision started more than 50 million years ago, when the tectonic plate beneath India crashed into the Eurasian plate. (Watch how the plates slammed into each other.)
"The Himalayas and all of Tibet was created by this collision," Ellis added.
As the Indian plate continues its slow-motion crash into Asia—sometimes in jerks marked by earthquakes—it is pushing the entire Tibetan Plateau northward.
"This earthquake was the Tibetan mountains moving east over the plains of Chengdu [the capital of Sichuan Province]," said Roger Bilham, a geoscientist at the University of Colorado who was not involved in the July 2007 study.
Not Just Sichuan's Problem
Study co-author Ellis said that, as the Tibetan Plateau moves northward, "the interior parts of Tibet are collapsing, rather like a soufflé taken out of the oven into cold air."
Faults along the southern, Himalayan edge of Tibet present hazards as great as those underlying the Sichuan temblor, Ellis said.
"Risk associated with the loss of collateral and lives is very high along the Himalaya, because so many people live there or immediately downstream," Ellis added.
"The risk is similarly high in Sichuan [to the east], because of the population and, like India and Nepal, the relatively poor building standards," he said.
And as India continues to pound into Tibet, "it is still creating new fault lines"—and new dangers.
科学家们通过仔细研究卫星图像，且对四川省的地壳断层的十年来的深度和活动研究之后，发出了以上警告。
在2007年7月中期的《地壳》杂志中，中国，欧洲和美国的科学家们写道：“断层的长度已经足以引发一次强烈的撼动地面的地震，它的潜力将成为爆发区域性地震的来源。
科学家的结论是，地壳撞击的能量在北川聚积，并将以地震的形式释放出来。
现在看来这个预言精确的甚至让人不寒而栗，当研究人员将活动的断层在北川的彩色地图上标示了出来时，那里正好这场地震的震中。
来自田纳西的孟菲斯大学的地震研究和信息中心的Micheal Ellis，同时也是这项研究的联合作者之一，表示“据我所知，这是对这些活跃断层的唯一调查。”
发生于5月12日的7.9级地震几乎将四川省的部分地区夷为平地。中国官方今天估测死亡人数将到达5万人，几乎5百万人将无家可归。
锁进了杂志
可以确信中国官方对2007年7月的报告完全没有察觉，否则事情绝不会沦为现在的局面。
“我们已经明确的标示出了这些活跃断层的潜力，”Ellis说到。“但这个信息事实上被锁进了一份学术期刊。”Ellis希望能用防震建筑替换如今已经塌陷的建筑，这样起码可以避免未来的悲剧。
“（地震前）我曾经去过这些小型村镇”，Ellis说，“大多数房屋都没有使用加固材料，而且那些地区几乎没有制砖厂。”
他补充说，“制造防震建筑成本相对较高，但四川省的绝大多数人民却十分贫困。”
地震背后的科学
北川的地震活动并不罕见。
“我们的证据显示从12000至13000年前开始，北川就始终伴随着使地表断裂的地震。”Ellis和同事在去年夏天的报告中写到。
在接受国家地理新闻的采访时，Ellis说到,“根本上说，（2008年）地震的原因是印度和亚洲地壳板块持续且不可阻挡的碰撞，其速率约为一年20-22毫米。”
此次碰撞起始于5千万年前，当时印度下方板块撞向了欧洲板块。
Ellis补充说“喜马拉雅和青藏高原便是从这个碰撞中产生的。”
随着印度板块持续缓慢的撞向亚洲，猛烈的时候就产生了地震，整个青藏高原都被向北推动。
“这次地震是西藏的山区向东边成都平原移动”，一位没有参与2007年7月报告的地质学家，科罗拉多大学的Roger Bilham说到。
问题不局限于四川, 报告的联合作者Ellis说，随着西藏高原北移，“西藏的中部地区正在塌陷，就像奶酪刚从烤箱中拿出来放到冷空气中一样。”
Ellis指出，西藏的南部边缘在断层一侧，其面对的地震威胁和四川一样大。
Ellis补充说:“喜马拉雅地区相关的财产和生命损失的风险非常之大，因为有大量的人口居住在哪里或者马上迁移过去。”“这风险几乎和四川一样高，因为人口，类似于印度尼泊尔的，相对劣质的建筑标准。”
而且，随着印度板块持续撞向西藏，“它正在制造新的断层”，同时也意味着新的危险。
本文来自于美国的国家地理杂志National Geographic
原文地址：
http://news.nationalgeographic.c ... uake-predicted.html
Study Warned of China Quake Risk Nearly a Year Ago
Kevin Holden Platt in Beijing
for National Geographic News
May 16, 2008
Just ten months before a deadly earthquake struck Sichuan Province's Beichuan county on May 12, a scientific study warned that the Chinese region was ripe for a major quake.
After examining satellite images and conducting on-the-ground inspections of deep, active faults in Sichuan Province for more than a decade, scientists issued a warning.
China earthquake predicted (map)
"The faults are sufficiently long to sustain a strong ground-shaking earthquake, making them potentially serious sources of regional seismic hazard," the Chinese, European, and U.S. geoscientists wrote in the mid-July 2007 edition of the journal Tectonics.
They concluded that clashing tectonic forces were growing in Beichuan, ready to burst in an explosion of seismic energy.
With precision and what now seems like eerie foresight, the researchers charted the active faults on multicolored maps of Beichuan, which turned out to be the epicenter of the recent earthquake.
"As far as I know, this is the only investigation of these active faults," said study co-author Michael Ellis of the Center for Earthquake Research and Information at the University of Memphis in Tennessee.
(Related: "China Quake Delivered Seismic One-Two Punch" [May 15, 2008].)
The magnitude 7.9 quake that struck on May 12 almost entirely leveled parts of Sichuan Province. Chinese officials today estimated that the death toll would reach 50,000 and that nearly five million people are homeless.
(See photos of the earthquake's destruction.)
"Locked in a Journal"
There is little reason to believe Chinese officials were aware of the July 2007 report, or that it would have made much difference if they had been.
"We had certainly identified the potential of these active faults," Ellis said. "But that information was effectively locked in an academic journal."
Ellis hopes that replacing the collapsed buildings with earthquake-proof structures could prevent future tragedies.
"I've been to these little towns [before the quake]," Ellis said. "Most of the houses are built of unreinforced masonry, and you can see little brick factories all around this area.
China earthquake predicted (map)
"It is more expensive to build earthquake-proof structures," he added. And the vast majority of people in Sichuan Province are anything but rich.
The Science Behind the Quake
Earthquake activity is nothing new in Beichuan.
"We have shown evidence for surface-rupturing earthquakes along the Beichuan fault since 12,000-13,000 years ago," Ellis and colleagues reported last summer.
Speaking with National Geographic News, Ellis said, "Ultimately, the [2008] earthquake is related to the continuing and inexorable collision of India with Asia, which is occurring at a rate of about 20 to 22 milimeters [just under an inch] per year."
This collision started more than 50 million years ago, when the tectonic plate beneath India crashed into the Eurasian plate. (Watch how the plates slammed into each other.)
"The Himalayas and all of Tibet was created by this collision," Ellis added.
As the Indian plate continues its slow-motion crash into Asia—sometimes in jerks marked by earthquakes—it is pushing the entire Tibetan Plateau northward.
"This earthquake was the Tibetan mountains moving east over the plains of Chengdu [the capital of Sichuan Province]," said Roger Bilham, a geoscientist at the University of Colorado who was not involved in the July 2007 study.
Not Just Sichuan's Problem
Study co-author Ellis said that, as the Tibetan Plateau moves northward, "the interior parts of Tibet are collapsing, rather like a soufflé taken out of the oven into cold air."
Faults along the southern, Himalayan edge of Tibet present hazards as great as those underlying the Sichuan temblor, Ellis said.
"Risk associated with the loss of collateral and lives is very high along the Himalaya, because so many people live there or immediately downstream," Ellis added.
"The risk is similarly high in Sichuan [to the east], because of the population and, like India and Nepal, the relatively poor building standards," he said.
And as India continues to pound into Tibet, "it is still creating new fault lines"—and new dangers.
<国家地理>说的都TM犬话，你TM就知道有地震，是人都知道有地震，有本事算出啥时候震阿！是你拉屎的时候震还是XX的时候震。自己国家连个飓风都算不准还有脸在这JJWW。想挑拨中国人民和政府之间的关系就直说，别再这假惺惺的装出一幅圣人的嘴脸。SB :@
这种垃圾贴锁了算了吧？
哀悼最后一天，不想骂畜生。
哀悼最后一天，不想骂畜生。
三、为什么第一时间国际救援队准备好了，拉好架子准备参与搜救，是那些人不同意开国门，迎救助者、以致大量待救灾民被拖死？
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
大量灾民被拖死？我想反问作者一句：“你那些宇宙第一天下无敌经验丰富训练有素，从珠穆朗玛到马里亚纳如履平地拥有天顶星科技的国外专业救援队能否携带着地球上最先进的救援装备用4个小时在川西崎岖的山路上强行军30公里？”
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
大量灾民被拖死？我想反问作者一句：“你那些宇宙第一天下无敌经验丰富训练有素，从珠穆朗玛到马里亚纳如履平地拥有天顶星科技的国外专业救援队能否携带着地球上最先进的救援装备用4个小时在川西崎岖的山路上强行军30公里？”
凯迪=22=香大漠=猪
豆腐渣还是要查办的
豆腐渣还是要查办的
要追查两种人的责任：
第一。在网上造谣者的责任
第二。豆腐渣工程参与者的责任（假如有的话）
第一。在网上造谣者的责任
第二。豆腐渣工程参与者的责任（假如有的话）
楼主，转哪里的文章不好转凯迪的............:L
LZ居然到厕所捞蛆玩，还带到CD来。[:a13:] [:a13:] [:a13:] [:a13:] [:a13:]
[:a3:] 吗的，快锁了吧，我是捞粉的
相对来说天涯都比凯迪好多了吧，前段时间凯迪上有文章说天涯死了，要死守阵地什么的。每次看各位网友说起凯迪，都去看一下，不过每次看后就后悔去看:L
抗议楼主发现垃圾后捡起来扔到超大.
建议LZ还嫌不够恶心的就去战沙玩
原帖由 fjzhjd 于 2008-5-21 16:52 发表
5月12日四川省北川县发生的致命地震之前的约10个月，一项科学报告就已经警告中国地区将面临一次大型地震。
科学家们通过仔细研究卫星图像，且对四川省的地壳断层的十年来的深度和活动研究之后，发出了以上警告。
...
这就是传说中的储备ID？8个贴子。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
中新社北京五月二十一日电 对于近期网路流传的关于“世界科学家一年前就对汶川地震发出预警”的说法，中国官方经调查于二十一日进行澄清，称有关“预警”之说只是关于汶川地质灾害的风险分析，并非一次地震预报。
据调查，美国《国家地理》刊文称，在二00七年七月中期的《地壳》杂志中，欧洲、美国和中国的科学家通过仔细研究得出结论，认为：“地壳冲击的能量在四川省汶川县积累，并将以地震的形式释放出来”，“科学家已明确表示出这些活跃断层的潜力，但被锁进了一份学术期刊”。
调查称，上文提及的《地壳》杂志中的文章，只是做了地质灾害风险方面的分析，其结论是北川附近某些断层是活跃断层，有导致严重地震灾害的潜在风险，而不是一次地震预报。
调查指出，作为该文作者之一的四川省地震局研究员周荣军表示，文章给出的只是背景性信息，其危险时间尺度可以是数年、上百年可能更长。
据知，地震短期临震预报至今仍是一项世界性难题，人类目前还无法做到精确预测地震的震级和时间。(完)
TMD！劳资是BKC，但是也耻与和这些BCBKC为伍:@
PU大好大的火气阿，这种不正常人类研究中心还是有存在的必要的:victory:
凯迪嘛！很正常！