帝国的野望——图说Napoleon

卡洛琳，缪拉

约瑟芬半身像（拿破仑第一任妻子）





约瑟芬用品，玳瑁盒，书籍，餐盘，梳妆台


马尔梅松城堡的条规

约瑟芬的扇子，头发


卡洛琳，缪拉

约瑟芬半身像（拿破仑第一任妻子）





约瑟芬用品，玳瑁盒，书籍，餐盘，梳妆台


马尔梅松城堡的条规

约瑟芬的扇子，头发

旗杆顶端的雕塑，阿尔卑斯雄鹰（独头鹰）源自古罗马

拿破仑加冕时用的脚垫


加冕时的权杖，法兰西帝国权利的象征
木质包天鹅绒，点缀30个黄铜镀金小蜜蜂
蜜蜂是普鲁士人的第一个王朝莫洛温王朝的象征，拿破仑是莫洛温的铁粉
所以用蜜蜂装饰，脚垫上也有


路易，波拿巴出生证

LZ用心，这是在哪个展览拍的啊？

LZ用心，这是在哪个展览拍的啊？

奥坦丝

塔列朗

塔列朗印章

拿破仑给仲马将军的信

圣克鲁德城堡的椅子和凳子

拿破仑礼服袖子，袖子沾了酱汁，拿破仑要求裁缝换掉，裁缝保存了下来


纪念币



鹰徽设计草图



拿破仑宝座设计图

加冕礼油画

毯子很大


加冕礼饰品，字母N是拿破仑皇室标志








加冕礼彩版画套图

拿破仑送给贝尔蒂埃的家具，丝绸不知道是不是中国产的
















加冕礼场景及人物彩版画
可见当年的盛况

拿破仑画像，杜伊勒里办公室，共济会藏手礼



卖掉路易斯安娜成了政绩，法国人价值观也是醉了

秘书公文包

拿破仑公文包

拿破仑纯金印章

卡鲁索凯旋门雕像设计图


拿破仑玻璃杯

拿破仑随笔画，比元首差了百万八千里

杜伊勒里宫门锁


拿破仑卧室门锁


皇宫账本

拿破仑画像，表现的是第六次反法同盟包围巴黎，元帅们拒绝接受拿破仑的调遣，拿破仑被迫在枫丹白露宫宣布退位



告别枫丹白露宫

枫丹白露宫拿破仑常用的手扶椅

路易十八猎枪，眼镜，猎枪挺长的

大封群臣

拿破仑给缪拉的信

帝国地图

布律纳元帅的猎枪

菲尔特雷公爵之剑

第93团掷弹兵军官军帽

军鼓挂毯

贝尔蒂埃元帅画像

乌迪诺元帅加冕外套


意大利军事行动

拿破仑首部战役军事宣言

开罗起义镇压令

法军进军米兰

埃及战役中的拿破仑


军鼓挂毯

贝尔蒂埃元帅画像

乌迪诺元帅加冕外套


意大利军事行动

拿破仑首部战役军事宣言

开罗起义镇压令

法军进军米兰

埃及战役中的拿破仑

这些西南欧的杂血假白人，真丑陋~~~~~~

波拿巴，资本家的狗，俄国农奴的手下败将~~~~~~

图不错，有一处译错了，应当是拿破仑的统帅缪啦，译成缪啦的统帅拿破仑了。还有，野望这个词太幼稚了。

图不错，有一处译错了，应当是拿破仑的统帅缪啦，译成缪啦的统帅拿破仑了。还有，野望这个词太幼稚了。

故意这么译的，整个展览围着拿破仑，分N多版块
比如帝国的皇帝拿破仑，缪拉的统帅拿破仑，玛丽的丈夫拿破仑等等

土伦战役作战计划

拿破仑斗篷残片


金字塔战役


乌尔姆城市的投降


特拉法加战役

奥斯特里茨战役的追击令


奥斯特里茨战役

奥斯特里茨战役战报

拿破仑给克拉克将军的信


英国船只通行许可

瓦格拉姆战役

埃劳战役

火烧莫斯科

从俄国败退

法国之役


维也纳会议

拿破仑登陆法国的公告

滑铁卢战役中被炮弹击中的胸甲


炮弹，霰弹










滑铁卢战役中被炮弹击中的胸甲


炮弹，霰弹

玛丽，路易丝半身像

三皇之战拿破仑获胜，神罗（奥地利）皇帝弗朗茨二世被迫将女儿嫁给拿破仑




拿破仑给路易丝的信

路易丝印章

怀表

玛丽，路易丝的婚姻公告书

篮子

书套

拿破仑之子，罗马王半身像（存世孤品），罗马王遗传了母系的结核病，21岁就死了


罗马王肖像，衣服

信件

降生纪念钟


拿破仑送给·罗马王的小人书，翻开的一页内容是中国的轿子
[attachimg]3860497[/attachimg
出生证



拿破仑之子，罗马王半身像（存世孤品），罗马王遗传了母系的结核病，21岁就死了


罗马王肖像，衣服

信件

降生纪念钟


拿破仑送给·罗马王的小人书，翻开的一页内容是中国的轿子
[attachimg]3860497[/attachimg
出生证

拿破仑遗容面具

双角帽

遗像

头发，经化验砷超标





藏书







拿破仑遗容面具

双角帽

遗像

头发，经化验砷超标





藏书

洗漱用品，香水瓶，领结，睡衣


遗书



遗嘱执行协议








洗漱用品，香水瓶，领结，睡衣


遗书



遗嘱执行协议

葬礼车队

葬礼饰品

棺木碎片

陵墓设计图

运送拿破仑尸体的航海日志

喜欢拿破仑的人，可以去玩玩拿破仑全面战争这款游戏，他的战役模式还是在游戏里面比较接近史实的。

法新社：如果滑铁卢之战逆转就不会有世界大战，拿破仑帝国将扩张到中国


据法新社最新的报道，欧洲德国、比利时等国的历史学家们经过多年的研究得出结论，如果滑铁卢之战的结果被逆转，就不会有第一次和第二次世界大战，拿破仑帝国将扩张到中国。

德国历史学家Helmut Stubbe da Luz和比利时专攻滑铁卢战役的历史学家Philippe Raxhon说，如果拿破仑一世在滑铁卢平原上战胜了威灵顿和布鲁切尔，拿破仑的大军将向德国北部进发，不莱梅、汉堡、吕贝克将被法国兼并。

历史学家们下结论说，如果拿破仑·波拿巴打赢的话，他的野心绝对不会止步在欧洲。拿破仑的下一个目标还是俄罗斯。在打下寒冷的俄罗斯后，拿破仑大军的兵峰将继续指向中国大地，最后将兼并欧洲和中国，建立波拿巴超级大帝国。

历史学家们说，如果波拿巴得逞的话也有优点，就是欧洲都将讲法语，德国不会崛起，也就不会有第一次和第二次世界大战死这么多人。

拿破仑·波拿巴将占领俄罗斯和中国：




在德国领导下的欧盟下一步的扩张目标是建立一个西起里斯本、东至海参崴的欧罗巴大联邦，定都布鲁塞尔。中国目前还不在其视线之内：





有关消息来源：

Brussels (AFP) - It is the evening of June 18, 1815 and an exultant Napoleon Bonaparte surveys the field after winning the Battle of Waterloo, planning his next conquest.

Within years his empire will stretch as far as China, French will be spoken across the continent, and in the 20th century a global war between the great powers will be avoided because of the stability his rule created.

These are some of the alternate histories that writers and experts have envisaged had Napoleon really been victorious in the battle 200 years ago, which actually ended in his humiliating defeat and exile at the hands of British and Prussian forces.

Historian Helmut Stubbe da Luz said that had Napoleon beaten generals Wellington and Bluecher on the plain of Waterloo, he would have carried on his march as far as northern Germany.

"Bremen, Hamburg and Luebeck would have become French again," da Luz told AFP.

That scenario, however, should perhaps be taken with a pinch of salt, da Luz added, as the European monarchies of the time would not have let a defeat at Waterloo go unavenged.

As Belgian historian Philippe Raxhon, a specialist in the Battle of Waterloo, puts it: "Waterloo was a total victory for the allies but it would not have been a total victory for Napoleon."

- First Russia, then China -

But if one imagines that Bonaparte had eventually defeated his European enemies in the long-term, his ambitions afterwards would have been demonstrably larger, historians said.

"If Napoleon followed his original plans for 1810, he would have invaded Russia again and potentially extended his empire as far as China," Helmut Stubbe da Luz said.

An even more radical scenario was put forward in the 19th century by the French writer Louis Geoffroy. In his novel "Napoleon and the Conquest of the World, 1812-1832" he described how Napoleon was able to overrun China, turning it into a mere "Asian province".

The 1836 alternate history novel -- a literary genre that imagines parallel realities and includes classics such as Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle" about a United States beaten by Japan and Germany -- Geoffroy takes the story back to three years before Waterloo.

"I wrote the history of Napoleon from 1812 to 1832, from Moscow in flames to the universal monarchy and his death, 20 years of incessantly increasing glory which elevated him to an all-powerful level above whom there is only God," he wrote in the introduction to the novel.

But what would an all-powerful Napoleon have been like to live under?

For Stubbe da Luz, "Napoleon was a dictator but not a reactionary dictator like the Tsar of Russia."

Napoleonic rule across continental Europe, balanced by Britain's enduring maritime supremacy, would not necessarily have been that bad for the world, he said.

"The dictatorship that Napoleon exported to the countries under his domination was a regression compared to the progress of the French Revolution, but it wasn't bad for his new subjects in Germany, Holland, Italy and Spain," he said.

He cited the "equality of rights for religious minorities and rural populations, the right to vote for men, a new judicial system and an expanded economic area".

- A less-powerful Germany -

Cautiously looking further into the future, the historian imagines a "continental Europe dominated by France" throughout the 19th century.

Had that happened Germany would not have become  so strong during that period, he says.

"Germany would therefore probably not have been in a position to provoke a First and Second World War," he said.

But imagining parallel histories is risky business for historians.

"The causes of events are innumerable," said Raxhon, the Belgian historian, from the University of Liege.

He limited himself to scenarios directly linked to the fates of the main protagonists. For example, a defeated Duke of Wellington would no doubt have returned by sea to England via Ostend, because Wellington himself had "envisaged losing the battle", he said.

Novelists of course have freer rein. In his 1992 best-seller "Fatherland", British writer Robert Harris imagines a Germany in 1964 that is preparing for a visit of the American president "Joseph Peter Kennedy" (JFK's father) to Adolf Hitler, the winner of World War II.

That of course is a war that according to some scenarios would not have happened... if Napoleon had won at Waterloo.

http://news.yahoo.com/french-spe ... -won-053256366.html

皓月无双 发表于 2015-6-4 15:06
图不错，有一处译错了，应当是拿破仑的统帅缪啦，译成缪啦的统帅拿破仑了。还有，野望这个词太幼稚了。

法新社：如果滑铁卢之战逆转就不会有世界大战，拿破仑帝国将扩张到中国


据法新社最新的报道，欧洲德国、比利时等国的历史学家们经过多年的研究得出结论，如果滑铁卢之战的结果被逆转，就不会有第一次和第二次世界大战，拿破仑帝国将扩张到中国。

德国历史学家Helmut Stubbe da Luz和比利时专攻滑铁卢战役的历史学家Philippe Raxhon说，如果拿破仑一世在滑铁卢平原上战胜了威灵顿和布鲁切尔，拿破仑的大军将向德国北部进发，不莱梅、汉堡、吕贝克将被法国兼并。

历史学家们下结论说，如果拿破仑·波拿巴打赢的话，他的野心绝对不会止步在欧洲。拿破仑的下一个目标还是俄罗斯。在打下寒冷的俄罗斯后，拿破仑大军的兵峰将继续指向中国大地，最后将兼并欧洲和中国，建立波拿巴超级大帝国。

历史学家们说，如果波拿巴得逞的话也有优点，就是欧洲都将讲法语，德国不会崛起，也就不会有第一次和第二次世界大战死这么多人。

拿破仑·波拿巴将占领俄罗斯和中国：




在德国领导下的欧盟下一步的扩张目标是建立一个西起里斯本、东至海参崴的欧罗巴大联邦，定都布鲁塞尔。中国目前还不在其视线之内：





有关消息来源：

Brussels (AFP) - It is the evening of June 18, 1815 and an exultant Napoleon Bonaparte surveys the field after winning the Battle of Waterloo, planning his next conquest.

Within years his empire will stretch as far as China, French will be spoken across the continent, and in the 20th century a global war between the great powers will be avoided because of the stability his rule created.

These are some of the alternate histories that writers and experts have envisaged had Napoleon really been victorious in the battle 200 years ago, which actually ended in his humiliating defeat and exile at the hands of British and Prussian forces.

Historian Helmut Stubbe da Luz said that had Napoleon beaten generals Wellington and Bluecher on the plain of Waterloo, he would have carried on his march as far as northern Germany.

"Bremen, Hamburg and Luebeck would have become French again," da Luz told AFP.

That scenario, however, should perhaps be taken with a pinch of salt, da Luz added, as the European monarchies of the time would not have let a defeat at Waterloo go unavenged.

As Belgian historian Philippe Raxhon, a specialist in the Battle of Waterloo, puts it: "Waterloo was a total victory for the allies but it would not have been a total victory for Napoleon."

- First Russia, then China -

But if one imagines that Bonaparte had eventually defeated his European enemies in the long-term, his ambitions afterwards would have been demonstrably larger, historians said.

"If Napoleon followed his original plans for 1810, he would have invaded Russia again and potentially extended his empire as far as China," Helmut Stubbe da Luz said.

An even more radical scenario was put forward in the 19th century by the French writer Louis Geoffroy. In his novel "Napoleon and the Conquest of the World, 1812-1832" he described how Napoleon was able to overrun China, turning it into a mere "Asian province".

The 1836 alternate history novel -- a literary genre that imagines parallel realities and includes classics such as Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle" about a United States beaten by Japan and Germany -- Geoffroy takes the story back to three years before Waterloo.

"I wrote the history of Napoleon from 1812 to 1832, from Moscow in flames to the universal monarchy and his death, 20 years of incessantly increasing glory which elevated him to an all-powerful level above whom there is only God," he wrote in the introduction to the novel.

But what would an all-powerful Napoleon have been like to live under?

For Stubbe da Luz, "Napoleon was a dictator but not a reactionary dictator like the Tsar of Russia."

Napoleonic rule across continental Europe, balanced by Britain's enduring maritime supremacy, would not necessarily have been that bad for the world, he said.

"The dictatorship that Napoleon exported to the countries under his domination was a regression compared to the progress of the French Revolution, but it wasn't bad for his new subjects in Germany, Holland, Italy and Spain," he said.

He cited the "equality of rights for religious minorities and rural populations, the right to vote for men, a new judicial system and an expanded economic area".

- A less-powerful Germany -

Cautiously looking further into the future, the historian imagines a "continental Europe dominated by France" throughout the 19th century.

Had that happened Germany would not have become  so strong during that period, he says.

"Germany would therefore probably not have been in a position to provoke a First and Second World War," he said.

But imagining parallel histories is risky business for historians.

"The causes of events are innumerable," said Raxhon, the Belgian historian, from the University of Liege.

He limited himself to scenarios directly linked to the fates of the main protagonists. For example, a defeated Duke of Wellington would no doubt have returned by sea to England via Ostend, because Wellington himself had "envisaged losing the battle", he said.

Novelists of course have freer rein. In his 1992 best-seller "Fatherland", British writer Robert Harris imagines a Germany in 1964 that is preparing for a visit of the American president "Joseph Peter Kennedy" (JFK's father) to Adolf Hitler, the winner of World War II.

That of course is a war that according to some scenarios would not have happened... if Napoleon had won at Waterloo.

http://news.yahoo.com/french-spe ... -won-053256366.html

图多杀猫啊，好不容易打开了。精彩！

这个展览在哪里啊？

梅川内裤 发表于 2015-6-9 15:06
法新社：如果滑铁卢之战逆转就不会有世界大战，拿破仑帝国将扩张到中国
法兰西能牢固守住天然疆界就不错了：比利牛斯山、阿尔卑斯山、莱茵河左岸、比利时-尼德兰

人的本性是贪婪的，只不过贪恋之物不同而已。象拿破仑、希特勒、亚历山大这样的超世之杰，得到法国，就想得到欧洲，得到欧洲就想控制世界，他们一是崇尚力量，二是对自己的文化高度自信。因此自认可以一直挑战极限，这种独孤求败的心理，导致他们最终必然会失败，因为似乎在他们心中没有适可而止的概念。但往深一想，英雄们也往往处于时不我予、不进则退的状态，正如曹操未纳司马懿之言，追求人心知足，结果一日纵敌，后患无穷。看来这还真是存在辩正的逻辑。那么真正的不败之法是什么？汉字的“止戈为武”，似乎说明战争的真正目的是为了平息战争，而不是创造新的战争，因此，终极的胜利必是属于软硬实力兼而有之、王霸之道兼而用之者。正所谓依道不依势、依志不依力。
睡前不清醒下的胡言乱语，纯为顶贴，诸公请无视。

呵呵  兄弟也去了南博?

你在湖北省愽拍的