超级军网澳大利亚国防部：澳军将去中国南海炫耀武力，军舰潜艇已 ...
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 06:15:45
昨天澳大利亚国防部秘书长发出了明确的信号，澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力。
在悉尼的会议上，Dennis Richardson 附和了奥巴马的论调，表示澳大利亚对于保卫中国声称拥有主权海域的航运自由权有着国家级别的兴趣。
他说澳大利亚政府对中国对南海区域史无前例的开拓表示非常担心。
国防部的匿名消息源告诉Fairfax 媒体说，澳大利亚政府和军队正在讨论该如何应对此事
资深军方人士告诉媒体，他们讨论了让澳大利亚空军和海军加入“自由航权任务”
澳大利亚军队可能会和美国一起进行一次人道主义或者军事演习。日本，马来西亚和新加坡也可能会加入到这一行动。
澳大利亚军队高级官员已经决定，澳大利亚将会表明，澳大利亚绝不承认中国在这些小岛上，声称的12海里的管辖权和专属经济区。
澳大利亚海军战舰，PERTH号，Rankin号和柯林斯级别潜艇，已经被部署在东南亚海域，随时可以开始对中国进行刺激行动。
作为交换的一部分，澳大利亚士兵可能已经加入美国的行动。
CNN上周泄露的美国海军飞机在中国南海空域飞行的的雷达广播录音显示，一名广播员带有明显的澳大利亚口音
发不了新闻链接
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
昨天澳大利亚国防部秘书长发出了明确的信号，澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力。
在悉尼的会议上，Dennis Richardson 附和了奥巴马的论调，表示澳大利亚对于保卫中国声称拥有主权海域的航运自由权有着国家级别的兴趣。
他说澳大利亚政府对中国对南海区域史无前例的开拓表示非常担心。
国防部的匿名消息源告诉Fairfax 媒体说，澳大利亚政府和军队正在讨论该如何应对此事
资深军方人士告诉媒体，他们讨论了让澳大利亚空军和海军加入“自由航权任务”
澳大利亚军队可能会和美国一起进行一次人道主义或者军事演习。日本，马来西亚和新加坡也可能会加入到这一行动。
澳大利亚军队高级官员已经决定，澳大利亚将会表明，澳大利亚绝不承认中国在这些小岛上，声称的12海里的管辖权和专属经济区。
澳大利亚海军战舰，PERTH号，Rankin号和柯林斯级别潜艇，已经被部署在东南亚海域，随时可以开始对中国进行刺激行动。
作为交换的一部分，澳大利亚士兵可能已经加入美国的行动。
CNN上周泄露的美国海军飞机在中国南海空域飞行的的雷达广播录音显示，一名广播员带有明显的澳大利亚口音
发不了新闻链接
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
欢迎光临，
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国对抗，知道澳对中国经济依赖有多大吗？力拓案后陆克文怎么下台的？得罪矿老板，澳总理分分钟下台。澳大利亚矿产旅游教育三大支柱都有赖中国。只要敢侵略中国主权，中国将让澳大利亚痛不欲生，阿博特在反对派攻势下必须下台。中国对付澳大利亚有的是手段,比对越南和菲的手段还多。要当出头鸟，正好杀鸡骇猴,看他的经济怎么撑.靠什么来撑军费。不对它动手，它以为你软弱可欺
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国对抗，知道澳对中国经济依赖有多大吗？力拓案后陆克文怎么下台的？得罪矿老板，澳总理分分钟下台。澳大利亚矿产旅游教育三大支柱都有赖中国。只要敢侵略中国主权，中国将让澳大利亚痛不欲生，阿博特在反对派攻势下必须下台。中国对付澳大利亚有的是手段,比对越南和菲的手段还多。要当出头鸟，正好杀鸡骇猴,看他的经济怎么撑.靠什么来撑军费。不对它动手，它以为你软弱可欺
新号没链接
澳大利亚躺着中枪...
新闻链接如下
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
新闻链接如下
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/28/aust-m28.html
八国联军又来了吗？
akan929 发表于 2015-5-29 13:49
八国联军又来了吗？
来了,可惜对手不是满清.
八国联军又来了吗？
来了,可惜对手不是满清.
对抗中国海军保护中澳贸易线。
丫就不怕科特林坏半道上。
毛主席说：打的一拳开，免的百拳来。
假新闻。。。。。。。。。。。。。
美国还尊重12海里，袋鼠连12海里都不尊重了？
这种新闻真实性有多少？
澳大利亚：为嘛我也被列兵盯上了~~
sap233 发表于 2015-5-29 13:54
丫就不怕科特林坏半道上。
科特林那是毛子驱逐舰吧？科林斯这个放大的哥德堡，大洋作战能力澳军有自信吗？
丫就不怕科特林坏半道上。
科特林那是毛子驱逐舰吧？科林斯这个放大的哥德堡，大洋作战能力澳军有自信吗？
捞分捞分捞分捞分捞分
一个小屁孩，跑到你家门口，撒了一泡尿，边跑边喊：我赢咯我赢咯。
这个网站有意思，全世界社会主义者网站，言必称工人阶级。
Officials signal Australia will join US provocation in South China Sea
By James Cogan
28 May 2015
Remarks yesterday by Australian Department of Defence secretary Dennis Richardson are the clearest indication yet that Australia will actively participate in a US military show of force and violation of Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Addressing a meeting in Sydney, Richardson echoed the language of the Obama administration, declaring that Australia had a “national interest” in “freedom of navigation” through the Chinese-claimed areas. He asserted that the Australian government was “concerned about the unprecedented pace and scale of China’s land-reclamation in the South China Sea.” The Chinese government is building infrastructure, such as small ports and airstrips, on several islets and reefs.
Following Richardson’s comments, the Australian Financial Review editorialised today in support of Australia joining the US to assert “freedom of navigation” in the South China Sea, saying this would demonstrate that “China’s claims on sea and sky across this vital trade route are recognised by no-one else.”
In subsequent media coverage, unnamed sources within the Defence Department leaked details to Fairfax Media of discussions taking place within the Australian government and military.
According to a report today on the online Sydney Morning Herald, “Australian officials” have alleged that China “has moved weaponry onto artificial islands that it is building in contested areas of the South China Sea.” This accusation, for which no evidence or sources were provided, has been picked up and broadcast by other sections of the Australian media.
“Senior military circles” told Fairfax Media they had discussed Australian air force and naval personnel taking part in “freedom of navigation missions.”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott will reportedly receive a briefing within two weeks of “options, including fly-throughs, sail-throughs and exercises involving various regional partners.” Such options would be developed in the closest discussion with the Pentagon.
Citing “senior officers and officials,” the article asserted that “Australia could join a humanitarian or military exercise with the United States or one of several regional partners including Japan, Malaysia and Singapore.” Such a move, it stated, “has been discussed in Washington and key capitals in the region, but no proposal has yet been put to Canberra, it is understood.”
The report stated that Australian military officers have discussed the “need to demonstrate that they do not recognise any 12-mile territorial zone or a more expansive economic zone that China may unilaterally declare around its freshly-minted islands.”
An Australian frigate, HMAS Perth, and a Collins-class conventional submarine, HMAS Rankin, are currently deployed in South East Asia and thus available to participate in any such provocative operations.
Australian military personnel may already be deployed in the South China Sea as part of exchanges with the US military. The radio transmissions broadcast in CNN’s coverage of a US navy reconnaissance flight last week near Chinese-claimed islets featured a radio operator speaking with a distinctive Australian accent. The Pentagon invited a CNN news crew on board the flight as part of US efforts to intensify its pressure on China.
Such is the integration of the Australian armed forces with the US Pacific Command since the US “pivot to Asia” was announced in 2011 that dozens of Australian military personnel are embedded at any given time with American air force, navy, marine and army units throughout the region.
Even more critical for US military operations across the Indo-Pacific are the satellite and communications bases on Australian territory. The key “control and command” base at Pine Gap in central Australia provides targeting information for everything from US aircraft and drones, Aegis destroyers and other missile defence systems through to submarine-
By James Cogan
28 May 2015
Remarks yesterday by Australian Department of Defence secretary Dennis Richardson are the clearest indication yet that Australia will actively participate in a US military show of force and violation of Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Addressing a meeting in Sydney, Richardson echoed the language of the Obama administration, declaring that Australia had a “national interest” in “freedom of navigation” through the Chinese-claimed areas. He asserted that the Australian government was “concerned about the unprecedented pace and scale of China’s land-reclamation in the South China Sea.” The Chinese government is building infrastructure, such as small ports and airstrips, on several islets and reefs.
Following Richardson’s comments, the Australian Financial Review editorialised today in support of Australia joining the US to assert “freedom of navigation” in the South China Sea, saying this would demonstrate that “China’s claims on sea and sky across this vital trade route are recognised by no-one else.”
In subsequent media coverage, unnamed sources within the Defence Department leaked details to Fairfax Media of discussions taking place within the Australian government and military.
According to a report today on the online Sydney Morning Herald, “Australian officials” have alleged that China “has moved weaponry onto artificial islands that it is building in contested areas of the South China Sea.” This accusation, for which no evidence or sources were provided, has been picked up and broadcast by other sections of the Australian media.
“Senior military circles” told Fairfax Media they had discussed Australian air force and naval personnel taking part in “freedom of navigation missions.”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott will reportedly receive a briefing within two weeks of “options, including fly-throughs, sail-throughs and exercises involving various regional partners.” Such options would be developed in the closest discussion with the Pentagon.
Citing “senior officers and officials,” the article asserted that “Australia could join a humanitarian or military exercise with the United States or one of several regional partners including Japan, Malaysia and Singapore.” Such a move, it stated, “has been discussed in Washington and key capitals in the region, but no proposal has yet been put to Canberra, it is understood.”
The report stated that Australian military officers have discussed the “need to demonstrate that they do not recognise any 12-mile territorial zone or a more expansive economic zone that China may unilaterally declare around its freshly-minted islands.”
An Australian frigate, HMAS Perth, and a Collins-class conventional submarine, HMAS Rankin, are currently deployed in South East Asia and thus available to participate in any such provocative operations.
Australian military personnel may already be deployed in the South China Sea as part of exchanges with the US military. The radio transmissions broadcast in CNN’s coverage of a US navy reconnaissance flight last week near Chinese-claimed islets featured a radio operator speaking with a distinctive Australian accent. The Pentagon invited a CNN news crew on board the flight as part of US efforts to intensify its pressure on China.
Such is the integration of the Australian armed forces with the US Pacific Command since the US “pivot to Asia” was announced in 2011 that dozens of Australian military personnel are embedded at any given time with American air force, navy, marine and army units throughout the region.
Even more critical for US military operations across the Indo-Pacific are the satellite and communications bases on Australian territory. The key “control and command” base at Pine Gap in central Australia provides targeting information for everything from US aircraft and drones, Aegis destroyers and other missile defence systems through to submarine-
袋鼠说：为了保护中澳海上航线，我们必须有能力对付中国海军！
链接能打开，属实。大家也不要太过敏了。
根本不用理睬它们。把帐记下就好。
我国还需要至少十年的发展时间。十年之后，撑死进入新冷战。
根本不用理睬它们。把帐记下就好。
我国还需要至少十年的发展时间。十年之后，撑死进入新冷战。
superloong 发表于 2015-5-29 13:45
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国 ...
澳大利业海军就是防止共军在南海的新岛切断铁矿石的航线！
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国 ...
澳大利业海军就是防止共军在南海的新岛切断铁矿石的航线！
布衣之笑 发表于 2015-5-29 14:33
澳大利业海军就是防止共军在南海的新岛切断铁矿石的航线！
中国至今保持着澳大利亚的五个第一：第一大贸易伙伴，第一大出口市场，第一大进口来源地，第一大服务贸易出口的目的地，同时也是第一大旅游收入的来源。08经济危机后那几年，澳大利亚还能保持正的，全靠中澳贸易
为什么当年陆克文政府和中国闹翻时完全没办法？得罪矿老板后直接下台亲华或中立的吉拉德上台。中国对付澳大利亚，比对付菲越的手段要多得多，不仅是对付菲菲那样只是损失点香蕉芒果贸易。中国真的动手，阿博特下场和陆克文一样。
澳大利亚对华出口总额超过了澳大利亚对日本、韩国、美国和印度出口的总额
布衣之笑 发表于 2015-5-29 14:33
澳大利业海军就是防止共军在南海的新岛切断铁矿石的航线！
中国至今保持着澳大利亚的五个第一：第一大贸易伙伴，第一大出口市场，第一大进口来源地，第一大服务贸易出口的目的地，同时也是第一大旅游收入的来源。08经济危机后那几年，澳大利亚还能保持正的，全靠中澳贸易
为什么当年陆克文政府和中国闹翻时完全没办法？得罪矿老板后直接下台亲华或中立的吉拉德上台。中国对付澳大利亚，比对付菲越的手段要多得多，不仅是对付菲菲那样只是损失点香蕉芒果贸易。中国真的动手，阿博特下场和陆克文一样。
澳大利亚对华出口总额超过了澳大利亚对日本、韩国、美国和印度出口的总额
澳大利亚脑抽的政客很多，好像有个女的外交部长叫毕晓普的以前也大放阙词过，没必要太当真。
新加坡也一样。中国为新加坡第一大贸易伙伴、第一大出口市场和第一大进口来源地。机电产品一直是新加坡对中国出口的主力产品，2014年出口额为283.8亿美元，增长6.4%，占新加坡对中国出口总额的55.1%。塑料橡胶、化工产品和矿产品是新加坡对中国出口的第二至四大类商品。
新加坡2014年继续保持中国吸收外商直接投资第一大来源国地位。新加坡2013年在华投资已超过欧盟28国对华实际投入外资金额的总和。
要是中新闹翻，知道意味着什么吗？新加坡会失去大量生产基地和市场和出口贸易。更别说南海乱地其航运贸易的影响。中国对新加坡的筹码，比对缅甸越南的都要多得多，在新加坡作出危害中国举动时，可以对等没收或制裁，而对缅甸反而没有多少控制手段。
新加坡也一样。中国为新加坡第一大贸易伙伴、第一大出口市场和第一大进口来源地。机电产品一直是新加坡对中国出口的主力产品，2014年出口额为283.8亿美元，增长6.4%，占新加坡对中国出口总额的55.1%。塑料橡胶、化工产品和矿产品是新加坡对中国出口的第二至四大类商品。
新加坡2014年继续保持中国吸收外商直接投资第一大来源国地位。新加坡2013年在华投资已超过欧盟28国对华实际投入外资金额的总和。
要是中新闹翻，知道意味着什么吗？新加坡会失去大量生产基地和市场和出口贸易。更别说南海乱地其航运贸易的影响。中国对新加坡的筹码，比对缅甸越南的都要多得多，在新加坡作出危害中国举动时，可以对等没收或制裁，而对缅甸反而没有多少控制手段。
狐假虎威的典型，它那点军舰也好意思现眼，还说炫耀，不怕笑话。
炮兵之约 发表于 2015-5-29 13:58
美国还尊重12海里，袋鼠连12海里都不尊重了？
楼主是列兵，这贴虽然不是英国贴，可也是英联邦贴，这下淡定了吧。
美国还尊重12海里，袋鼠连12海里都不尊重了？
楼主是列兵，这贴虽然不是英国贴，可也是英联邦贴，这下淡定了吧。
澳大利亚嘴炮无敌，先把抱摔普京做实再说。上到总统下到议员都是这副屌样。
让环太平洋之弧来的更快一些吧
列兵，英国相关(这次是英联邦)新闻
很好，打击得就是你这个编造假新闻的惯犯~！
老习惯，首先，截屏，省得你赖
列兵，英国相关(这次是英联邦)新闻
很好，打击得就是你这个编造假新闻的惯犯~！
老习惯，首先，截屏，省得你赖
2.登录相关链接，World Socialist Web Site的这篇报道
作者：James Cogan，日期：28 May 2015
截图如下：
2.登录相关链接，World Socialist Web Site的这篇报道
作者：James Cogan，日期：28 May 2015
截图如下：
澳大利亚来的方向得经过我预测的u型战争争夺带
这个某种意义上的“英国病人”-这次是“英联邦病人”，造谣的方式很简单，大量篡改报道原文，断章取义，选择性翻译或选择性忽略，或者故意夹带私货。
举例：
楼主文字：澳大利亚海军战舰，PERTH号，Rankin号和柯林斯级别潜艇，已经被部署在东南亚海域，随时可以开始对中国进行刺激行动。
注意：标红是为了突出，并不违反版规。
原文英文文字：An Australian frigate, HMAS Perth, and a Collins-class conventional submarine, HMAS Rankin, are currently deployed in South East Asia and thus available to participate in any such provocative operations。
中文翻译：澳大利亚护卫舰，HMAS(Her Majesty's Australian Ship 澳大利亚皇家海军舰艇，后同) 佩斯号护卫舰，一艘科林斯级常规潜艇，HMAS 兰金号，目前正部署在东南亚，因此，可以加入以上的挑衅行动。
楼主故意将澳大利亚常态化的部署，故意模糊成奥政府已经做出了对策(而根据原文第一句，这仅是一个迹象( indication)，即作者James Cogan的某种猜测)，并针对此次“对策”，进行的针对性部署，通过弯曲原文，来误导大家产生澳大利亚对中国强硬====》英联邦国家对中国强硬=====>英国对中国强硬这种印象，来满足他/她/它或者他们/她们/它们扭曲的心灵。
这个某种意义上的“英国病人”-这次是“英联邦病人”，造谣的方式很简单，大量篡改报道原文，断章取义，选择性翻译或选择性忽略，或者故意夹带私货。
举例：
楼主文字：澳大利亚海军战舰，PERTH号，Rankin号和柯林斯级别潜艇，已经被部署在东南亚海域，随时可以开始对中国进行刺激行动。
注意：标红是为了突出，并不违反版规。
原文英文文字：An Australian frigate, HMAS Perth, and a Collins-class conventional submarine, HMAS Rankin, are currently deployed in South East Asia and thus available to participate in any such provocative operations。
中文翻译：澳大利亚护卫舰，HMAS(Her Majesty's Australian Ship 澳大利亚皇家海军舰艇，后同) 佩斯号护卫舰，一艘科林斯级常规潜艇，HMAS 兰金号，目前正部署在东南亚，因此，可以加入以上的挑衅行动。
楼主故意将澳大利亚常态化的部署，故意模糊成奥政府已经做出了对策(而根据原文第一句，这仅是一个迹象( indication)，即作者James Cogan的某种猜测)，并针对此次“对策”，进行的针对性部署，通过弯曲原文，来误导大家产生澳大利亚对中国强硬====》英联邦国家对中国强硬=====>英国对中国强硬这种印象，来满足他/她/它或者他们/她们/它们扭曲的心灵。
superloong 发表于 2015-5-29 13:45
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国 ...
要是真的就是给中国借口在不久的将来殖民它。
卖铁矿石的钱就用在这上面了？铁矿石还卖得掉吗。
一个列兵的恐吓造谣贴，澳要有多蠢才敢在这上面和中国 ...
要是真的就是给中国借口在不久的将来殖民它。
一条狗而已，还以为自己是个人物！呸
欠普京摔了吧
其实，楼主的第一句开篇就是无中生有，扭曲原文
楼主第一句：昨天澳大利亚国防部秘书长发出了明确的信号，澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力。
原文英文第一句：Remarks yesterday by Australian Department of Defence secretary Dennis Richardson are the clearest indication yet that Australia will actively participate in a US military show of force and violation of Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea.
中文翻译：澳大利亚国防部秘书长丹尼斯理查森昨天的言论是迄今最清晰的迹象，表明澳大利亚将积极参与美国的-以显示力量和侵犯中国对于南中国海领土主张-的军事展示中。
原文只是作者James Cogan的猜测，实际丹尼斯理查森并没有明确表示，“澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力”。目的无非是误导大家产生澳大利亚对中国强硬====》英联邦国家对中国强硬=====>英国对中国强硬这种印象，来满足他/她/它或者他们/她们/它们扭曲的心灵。可惜啊，帝国日已落，你再怎么造谣吹嘘，也改变不了鸦片国日薄西山，日暮途穷的最终归宿！
另：举报之！
其实，楼主的第一句开篇就是无中生有，扭曲原文
楼主第一句：昨天澳大利亚国防部秘书长发出了明确的信号，澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力。
原文英文第一句：Remarks yesterday by Australian Department of Defence secretary Dennis Richardson are the clearest indication yet that Australia will actively participate in a US military show of force and violation of Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea.
中文翻译：澳大利亚国防部秘书长丹尼斯理查森昨天的言论是迄今最清晰的迹象，表明澳大利亚将积极参与美国的-以显示力量和侵犯中国对于南中国海领土主张-的军事展示中。
原文只是作者James Cogan的猜测，实际丹尼斯理查森并没有明确表示，“澳大利亚将加入美国军队，一同进入中国声称拥有主权的南海区域炫耀武力”。目的无非是误导大家产生澳大利亚对中国强硬====》英联邦国家对中国强硬=====>英国对中国强硬这种印象，来满足他/她/它或者他们/她们/它们扭曲的心灵。可惜啊，帝国日已落，你再怎么造谣吹嘘，也改变不了鸦片国日薄西山，日暮途穷的最终归宿！
另：举报之！