啊三说我们被他们打败了所以现在很安分

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/27 14:51:54
China Defeated: The Nathu La skirmish:
The Nathu La skirmish:

After the debacle of 1962, nothing could have enhanced the self esteem of the Indian Army than the mauling that was given to the Chinese at Nathu La in Sikkim on 11th September 1967 and at Chola on 1st October 1967. It must have come as a rude shock to the Chinese Army and also its political leadership. And by a happy coincidence, the Indian Army leadership which got the better of this eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation was the same that went on to create Bangladesh in 1971. Maj Gen Sagat Singh was GOC Mountain Division in Sikkim, Lt Gen Jagjit Aurora was the Corps Commander and Sam Manekshaw was the Eastern Army Commander.

I too served in Nathu La. After finishing my young officer’s course, it was on 21 July 1967 that I reported to my Unit, a mule pack artillery regiment in Sikkim. Those days young officers were made to have their professional mailing by sending them on long-range patrols (LRP) for area familiarisation, take part in khad race to increase their stamina and sending them to remote observations ports on Sikkim-Tibet border for a month. Having done my share of LRPs and having taken part in the khad race, I was sent to the main Sabu La observation post on the Sikkim-Tibet Border. This observation post is about a kilometre south-west of Nathu La. It dominates Nathu La by virtue of taking on higher ground and commands an excellent view of the pass as also the Chinese defense on the feature known as North shoulder. There were two observation posts at Sabu La and had a good old radio set 62 and PRC-10 and of course line communications to the guns deployed in the rear.

Nathu La at 14200 feet is an important pass on the Tibet-Sikkim border through which passes the old Gangtok-Yatung-Lhasa Trade Route. Although the Sikkim-Tibet boundary is well defined by the Anglo-Chinese Convention of 17 March 1890, the Chinese were not comfortable with Sikkim being an Indian protectorate with the deployment of the Indian Army at that time. During the 1965 War between India and Pakistan, the Chinese gave an ultimatum to India to vacate both Nathu La and Jelep La passes on the Sikkim-Tibet border. For some strange reason, the Mountain Division, under whose jurisdiction Jelep La was at that time, vacated the pass. It remains under Chinese possession till date. However, Lt. Gen Sagat Singh, true to form, refused to vacate Nathu La. Incidentally it is at Nathu La where Chinese and Indian forces are deployed barely thirty yards apart, closest anywhere on the 4000 km Sino-Indian border and the border remains undemacrated. Chinese hold the northern shoulder of the pass while Indian Army holds the southern shoulder. Two dominating features south and north of Nathu La namely Sebu La and Camel’s back were held by the Indians. Artillery observation post officers deployed on these two features have an excellent observation into Chinese depth areas whereas from Northern shoulder, Chinese have very little observations into Indian depth areas. This factor proved crucial in the clash that ensued. At the time of the clash, 2 Grenadiers was holding Nathu La. This battalion was under the command of Lt Col (Later Brigadier) Rai Singh. The battalion was under the Mountain Brigade being commanded by Brig MMS Bakshi, MVC.

The daily routine at Nathu La used to start with patrolling by both sides along the perceived border which almost always resulted in arguments. The only one on the Chinese side who could converse in broken English was the Political Commissar who could be recognised by a red patch on his cap. Sentries of both the forces used to stand barely one meter apart in the centre of the Pass which is marked by Nehru Stone, commemorating Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru’s trek to Bhutan through Nathu La and Chumbi Valley in 1959. Argument between the two sides soon changed to pushing and shoving and on 6 September 1967 a scuffle took place in which Political Commissar fell down and broke his spectacles. These incidents only added to the excitement. I developed excellent rapport with Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and a few days before the clash we had gone to Gangtok together on “liberty” to see a movie. Little did I know that within a week, Dagar would be a martyr.

In order to de-escalate the situation it was decided by the Indian military hierarchy to lay a wire in the centre of the Pass from Nathu La to Sebu La to demarcate the perceived border. This task was to be carried out by the jawans of 70 Field Company of Engineers assisted by a company of 18 Rajput deployed at Yak La pass further north of Nathu La. The wire laying was to commence at first light on the fateful morning of 11 September 1967.

That morning dawned bright and sunny unlike the normal foggy days. The engineers and jawans started erecting long iron pickets from Nathu La to Sebu La along the perceived border while 2 Grenadiers and Artillery Observation Post Officers at Sebu La and Camel’s Back were on alert. Immediately the Chinese Political Commissar, with a section of Infantry came to the centre of the Pass where Lt. Col Rai Singh, CO 2 Grenadiers was standing with his commando platoon. The Commissar asked Lt Col Rai Singh to stop laying the wire. Orders to the Indian Army were clear. They were not to blink. An argument started which soon built up into a scuffle. In the ensuing melee, the commissar got roughed up. Thereafter the Chinese went up back to their bunkers and engineers resumed laying the wire.

Within a few minutes of this, a whistle was heard on the Chinese side followed by murderous medium machine gun fire from north shoulder. The pass is completely devoid of cover and the jawans of 70 Field Company and 18 Rajput were caught in the open and suffered heavy casualties which included Col Rai Singh who was wounded. He was awarded MVC later. Two brave officers – Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and Major Harbhajan Singh of 18 Rajput rallied a few troops and tried to assault the Chinese MMG but both died a heroic death. They were posthumously awarded Vir Chakra and MVC respectively. 2 Grenadier opened small arms fire on North shoulder but it was not very effective. Within the first ten minutes, there were nearly seventy dead and scores wounded lying in the open on the pass. Within half an hour, Chinese artillery opened up on the pass as well as in the depth areas but it was mostly prophylactic fire due to lack of observation and failed to do much damage. Meanwhile we as artillery observation post officers asked for artillery fire, permission for which came a little later. Because of excellent domination and observation from Sebu La and Camel’s back, artillery fire was most effective and most of the Chinese bunkers on North shoulder and in depth were completely destroyed and Chinese suffered very heavy casualties which by their own estimates were over 400. The artillery duel thereafter carried on day and night. For the next three days, the Chinese were taught a lesson. On 14 September, Chinese threatened use of Air Force if shelling did not stop. By then the lesson had been driven home and an uneasy ceasefire came about. The Chinese, true to form, had pulled over dead bodies to their side of the perceived border at night and accused us of violating the border. Dead bodies were exchanged on 15 September at which time: Sam Manekshaw, Aurora and Sagat were present on the Pass.

Every battle has its own share of heroism, faint heartedness, drama and humour. The Nathu La skirmish was no exception. 2 Grenadiers were initially shaken up due to the loss of Capt Dagar and injury to their CO but found their man of the moment in Lieutenant Atar Singh who went round from trench to trench to rally the troops and was later promoted as Captain on the spot. On the lighter side was one artillery observation post officer, my colleague at Sebu La whose radio set was damaged due to shelling and he was out of communication with his guns. He rightly decided to go back to the base at Sherathang in the depth to get another radio set. While he was on his way back, Commander Artillery Brigade was coming up. He stopped the young captain, accused him of running away from the battle and sent him back after reducing him to his substantive rank of a second lieutenant. Casualties could not be evacuated for three days and nights as any move to do so invited a hail of Chinese bullets. Some wounded may well have succumbed to cold and rain. There were awards for bravery as also court martial for cowardice. However, what stood out was the steadfastness of the commanders and bravery of the jawans and junior officers. Indians refused to blink and the mighty Chinese dragon was made to look ordinary.

The situation again flared up twenty days later when on 1 October 1967 a face-off between India and China took place at Cho La, another pass on the Sikkim-Tibet border a few kilometers north of Nathu La. Despite initial casualties, 7/11 GR and 10 JAK RIF stood firm and forced the Chinese to withdraw nearly three kilometers away to a feature named Kam Barracks where they remain deployed till date. Cho La Pass is firmly in Indian hands. Indian Army had got better of the Chinese yet again.

No wonder, Sino-Indian border has remained peaceful ever since to the extent that today Chinese soldiers come and ask their Indian counterparts at Nathu La for cigarettes, rum and tea, mail is exchanged twice in a week in a hut constructed specially for this purpose and border personnel meeting takes place there twice a year. It was my privilege to command the Nathu La Brigade many years later and conduct the first border personnel meeting at Nathu La is 1995China Defeated: The Nathu La skirmish:
The Nathu La skirmish:

After the debacle of 1962, nothing could have enhanced the self esteem of the Indian Army than the mauling that was given to the Chinese at Nathu La in Sikkim on 11th September 1967 and at Chola on 1st October 1967. It must have come as a rude shock to the Chinese Army and also its political leadership. And by a happy coincidence, the Indian Army leadership which got the better of this eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation was the same that went on to create Bangladesh in 1971. Maj Gen Sagat Singh was GOC Mountain Division in Sikkim, Lt Gen Jagjit Aurora was the Corps Commander and Sam Manekshaw was the Eastern Army Commander.

I too served in Nathu La. After finishing my young officer’s course, it was on 21 July 1967 that I reported to my Unit, a mule pack artillery regiment in Sikkim. Those days young officers were made to have their professional mailing by sending them on long-range patrols (LRP) for area familiarisation, take part in khad race to increase their stamina and sending them to remote observations ports on Sikkim-Tibet border for a month. Having done my share of LRPs and having taken part in the khad race, I was sent to the main Sabu La observation post on the Sikkim-Tibet Border. This observation post is about a kilometre south-west of Nathu La. It dominates Nathu La by virtue of taking on higher ground and commands an excellent view of the pass as also the Chinese defense on the feature known as North shoulder. There were two observation posts at Sabu La and had a good old radio set 62 and PRC-10 and of course line communications to the guns deployed in the rear.

Nathu La at 14200 feet is an important pass on the Tibet-Sikkim border through which passes the old Gangtok-Yatung-Lhasa Trade Route. Although the Sikkim-Tibet boundary is well defined by the Anglo-Chinese Convention of 17 March 1890, the Chinese were not comfortable with Sikkim being an Indian protectorate with the deployment of the Indian Army at that time. During the 1965 War between India and Pakistan, the Chinese gave an ultimatum to India to vacate both Nathu La and Jelep La passes on the Sikkim-Tibet border. For some strange reason, the Mountain Division, under whose jurisdiction Jelep La was at that time, vacated the pass. It remains under Chinese possession till date. However, Lt. Gen Sagat Singh, true to form, refused to vacate Nathu La. Incidentally it is at Nathu La where Chinese and Indian forces are deployed barely thirty yards apart, closest anywhere on the 4000 km Sino-Indian border and the border remains undemacrated. Chinese hold the northern shoulder of the pass while Indian Army holds the southern shoulder. Two dominating features south and north of Nathu La namely Sebu La and Camel’s back were held by the Indians. Artillery observation post officers deployed on these two features have an excellent observation into Chinese depth areas whereas from Northern shoulder, Chinese have very little observations into Indian depth areas. This factor proved crucial in the clash that ensued. At the time of the clash, 2 Grenadiers was holding Nathu La. This battalion was under the command of Lt Col (Later Brigadier) Rai Singh. The battalion was under the Mountain Brigade being commanded by Brig MMS Bakshi, MVC.

The daily routine at Nathu La used to start with patrolling by both sides along the perceived border which almost always resulted in arguments. The only one on the Chinese side who could converse in broken English was the Political Commissar who could be recognised by a red patch on his cap. Sentries of both the forces used to stand barely one meter apart in the centre of the Pass which is marked by Nehru Stone, commemorating Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru’s trek to Bhutan through Nathu La and Chumbi Valley in 1959. Argument between the two sides soon changed to pushing and shoving and on 6 September 1967 a scuffle took place in which Political Commissar fell down and broke his spectacles. These incidents only added to the excitement. I developed excellent rapport with Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and a few days before the clash we had gone to Gangtok together on “liberty” to see a movie. Little did I know that within a week, Dagar would be a martyr.

In order to de-escalate the situation it was decided by the Indian military hierarchy to lay a wire in the centre of the Pass from Nathu La to Sebu La to demarcate the perceived border. This task was to be carried out by the jawans of 70 Field Company of Engineers assisted by a company of 18 Rajput deployed at Yak La pass further north of Nathu La. The wire laying was to commence at first light on the fateful morning of 11 September 1967.

That morning dawned bright and sunny unlike the normal foggy days. The engineers and jawans started erecting long iron pickets from Nathu La to Sebu La along the perceived border while 2 Grenadiers and Artillery Observation Post Officers at Sebu La and Camel’s Back were on alert. Immediately the Chinese Political Commissar, with a section of Infantry came to the centre of the Pass where Lt. Col Rai Singh, CO 2 Grenadiers was standing with his commando platoon. The Commissar asked Lt Col Rai Singh to stop laying the wire. Orders to the Indian Army were clear. They were not to blink. An argument started which soon built up into a scuffle. In the ensuing melee, the commissar got roughed up. Thereafter the Chinese went up back to their bunkers and engineers resumed laying the wire.

Within a few minutes of this, a whistle was heard on the Chinese side followed by murderous medium machine gun fire from north shoulder. The pass is completely devoid of cover and the jawans of 70 Field Company and 18 Rajput were caught in the open and suffered heavy casualties which included Col Rai Singh who was wounded. He was awarded MVC later. Two brave officers – Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and Major Harbhajan Singh of 18 Rajput rallied a few troops and tried to assault the Chinese MMG but both died a heroic death. They were posthumously awarded Vir Chakra and MVC respectively. 2 Grenadier opened small arms fire on North shoulder but it was not very effective. Within the first ten minutes, there were nearly seventy dead and scores wounded lying in the open on the pass. Within half an hour, Chinese artillery opened up on the pass as well as in the depth areas but it was mostly prophylactic fire due to lack of observation and failed to do much damage. Meanwhile we as artillery observation post officers asked for artillery fire, permission for which came a little later. Because of excellent domination and observation from Sebu La and Camel’s back, artillery fire was most effective and most of the Chinese bunkers on North shoulder and in depth were completely destroyed and Chinese suffered very heavy casualties which by their own estimates were over 400. The artillery duel thereafter carried on day and night. For the next three days, the Chinese were taught a lesson. On 14 September, Chinese threatened use of Air Force if shelling did not stop. By then the lesson had been driven home and an uneasy ceasefire came about. The Chinese, true to form, had pulled over dead bodies to their side of the perceived border at night and accused us of violating the border. Dead bodies were exchanged on 15 September at which time: Sam Manekshaw, Aurora and Sagat were present on the Pass.

Every battle has its own share of heroism, faint heartedness, drama and humour. The Nathu La skirmish was no exception. 2 Grenadiers were initially shaken up due to the loss of Capt Dagar and injury to their CO but found their man of the moment in Lieutenant Atar Singh who went round from trench to trench to rally the troops and was later promoted as Captain on the spot. On the lighter side was one artillery observation post officer, my colleague at Sebu La whose radio set was damaged due to shelling and he was out of communication with his guns. He rightly decided to go back to the base at Sherathang in the depth to get another radio set. While he was on his way back, Commander Artillery Brigade was coming up. He stopped the young captain, accused him of running away from the battle and sent him back after reducing him to his substantive rank of a second lieutenant. Casualties could not be evacuated for three days and nights as any move to do so invited a hail of Chinese bullets. Some wounded may well have succumbed to cold and rain. There were awards for bravery as also court martial for cowardice. However, what stood out was the steadfastness of the commanders and bravery of the jawans and junior officers. Indians refused to blink and the mighty Chinese dragon was made to look ordinary.

The situation again flared up twenty days later when on 1 October 1967 a face-off between India and China took place at Cho La, another pass on the Sikkim-Tibet border a few kilometers north of Nathu La. Despite initial casualties, 7/11 GR and 10 JAK RIF stood firm and forced the Chinese to withdraw nearly three kilometers away to a feature named Kam Barracks where they remain deployed till date. Cho La Pass is firmly in Indian hands. Indian Army had got better of the Chinese yet again.

No wonder, Sino-Indian border has remained peaceful ever since to the extent that today Chinese soldiers come and ask their Indian counterparts at Nathu La for cigarettes, rum and tea, mail is exchanged twice in a week in a hut constructed specially for this purpose and border personnel meeting takes place there twice a year. It was my privilege to command the Nathu La Brigade many years later and conduct the first border personnel meeting at Nathu La is 1995
adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
难怪在此之后,中国完全安静。因为他们没有胆量,这就是为什么他们需要他们的恐怖的狗奴才巴基斯坦。如果我们没有尼赫鲁和克里希纳梅农,双方最近的共产党员的和和平主义者。今天的西藏已回归印度或称为印度的保护国



15-09-11上午11 # 1 adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
中国战败的乃堆拉山口的冲突:
在乃堆拉山口的冲突:

崩溃后的1962,已经没有什么能够增强自尊的印度军队比尤重,给予了中国在乃堆拉山口的锡金在九月第十一和十月第一1967朱罗王朝1967。它必须是一个粗鲁的冲击对中国军队和其政治领导。和一个愉快的巧合,印度军队领导,得到了更好的面对面的对抗这是一样的,形成了孟加拉1971。沙加特辛格少将是中国政府山地师在锡金,这创jagjit奥罗拉是兵团司令员和山姆马内克肖是东部军司令官。

我也曾在乃堆拉山口。在完成我的年轻军官的过程,它是在七月21 1967我报告我单位,骡子包炮兵团在锡金。那些日子,年轻军官是拥有专业的邮件发送远程巡逻(表达)地区熟习,参与khad比赛增加他们的体力和发送到远程观测的港口sikkim-tibet边界在一个月。有完成了我的极限参考点,并曾参与khad比赛,我被送到萨布拉观察主要在sikkim-tibet边境。这一观察后大约一公里,西南乃堆拉山口。它主宰乃堆拉凭借在高地和命令一个很好的观点,通过也是中国国防的特征被称为北肩。有两年在萨布拉和观察哨,有一个很好的老式收音机的62和prc-10当然线通信大炮部署在后方。

乃堆拉山口的14200脚是一个重要的通过对tibet-sikkim边境通过它传递的老gangtok-yatung-lhasa贸易路线。虽然sikkim-tibet边界是明确的中英会议17日1890时,中国人不舒服的锡金是印度保护国的部署,当时印度军队。在1965次大战期间,印度和巴基斯坦,中国发表了最后通牒,印度腾两乃堆拉山口和jelep拉传sikkim-tibet边境。一些奇怪的原因,山师,在其管辖jelep拉是当时,腾空传球。它仍然在中国占有直到日期。然而,创沙加特辛格中尉,真正形成,拒绝离开乃堆拉山口。顺便说一句,这是乃堆拉在中国和印度部队仅三十码远的地方,最近的4000公里的中印边境和边界依然undemacrated。中国持有的北肩的通行证,印度军队拥有南肩。主要特点,南方和北方的乃堆拉山口即sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上举行了印第安人。炮兵观察哨人员部署在这些特点有一个很好的观察到中国深度地区而从北肩,中国有非常少的观测到印度深度的地区。这证明在冲突接踵而至。在时间上的冲突,2个掷弹兵手持乃堆拉山口。这个营的指挥下,这关口(后来的陆军准将)莱·辛格。该营是山下旅指挥由准将彩信巴克什,中。

每日例行乃堆拉用来开始巡逻的两侧的知觉边界,几乎总是导致的论点。只有一对中方能逆向蹩脚的英语是政委,谁能确认的红色斑块在他的帽子。哨兵的力量都曾经站仅相隔一米的中心,通过它的特点是尼赫鲁纪念石,潘伟迪贾瓦哈拉尔·尼赫鲁的旅行到不丹通过乃堆拉山口和chumbi谷1959。之间的争论,双方很快就变成了推推搡搡,在九月6日1967混战发生在政委摔了下来,摔断了他的眼镜。这些事件只增加了兴奋。我很融洽上尉达加尔2掷弹兵和前几天我们去了甘托克的“自由”一起看电影。我不知道那一周内,将烈士达加尔。

为缓和局势已经决定由印度军事层次打线的中心,通过从乃堆拉山口到sebu洛杉矶划定认为边界。这个任务是进行的印度士兵的70场公司工程师协助公司18的拉其普特人部署在牦牛拉通过进一步北乃堆拉山口。该线是在破晓的致命九月11上午1967。

那天清晨的阳光明媚与正常的雾天。工程师和印度士兵开始架设铁尖从乃堆拉山口到sebu洛杉矶沿知觉边界的同时2个掷弹兵和炮兵观察哨官sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上警报。当下中国政治委员,一段步兵来到该中心的通过中校莱·辛格,共2个掷弹兵突击排站着。政委问那西莱·辛格停止铺设电线。印度军队被明确的命令。他们不眨眼。争论开始,很快建立成一个混战。在随后的混战,政委被打了。此后,中国走回到他们的掩体和工程师重新铺设电线。

在几分钟,哨子听到中方其次是杀人的中型机枪火力从北肩。过去是完全缺乏盖和印度士兵的70场和18拉其普特被打开并遭受重大的伤亡,包括西莱·辛格谁受伤。他被授予事故后。2勇敢的上尉军官–达加尔2掷弹兵和主要harbhajan辛格18拉其普特人团结少数部队试图攻击中国最大肌力而壮烈牺牲。他们被追授维尔脉轮和分别。2个掷弹兵开了小武器对肩但这不是很有效。在第一个十分钟,有近七十人死亡,数十人受伤躺在空地上通。半小时内,中国炮兵开始传球以及在深度领域,但大多是预防火灾由于缺乏观察和没有损害。同时,我们作为炮兵观察所人员要求提供炮火,允许它来晚了一点。由于良好的统治和观察sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上,炮火是最有效和最中国的碉堡北肩深度被完全摧毁,中国遭受伤亡甚重,由他们自己的估计超过400。炮兵决斗之后进行白天和黑夜。在接下来的三天,中国的教训。在九月14日,中国威胁使用空军如果炮击并没有停止。那时的教训已经回家和停火了。在中国,真正形成,把在尸体的一侧的知觉边界在夜间和指责美国违反边界。死者的尸体交换了九月15届时:山姆马内克肖,极光和沙加特出席了传。

每一场战斗都有自己的英雄事迹,微弱的心,戏剧和幽默。在乃堆拉山口的冲突也不例外。2个掷弹兵最初被动摇了由于丧失上尉达加尔和伤害他们的公司却发现他们的男人的时刻在阿塔尔辛格绕从战壕战壕集合部队,后来晋升为上尉当场。在轻松的一面是一个炮兵观察哨官,我的同事在sebu洛杉矶的收音机被损坏由于炮击和他沟通了与他的枪。他决定回到基地sherathang在深度得到另一个收音机。当他在回来的路上,指挥炮兵旅来了。他拦住年轻的队长,指责他逃离战场,送他回去后减少他他的实质性军衔少尉。伤亡无法疏散了三天三夜,为任何移动这样做邀请冰雹中国子弹。一些受伤的很可能死于寒冷和下雨。有英勇勋章也军事法庭懦弱。然而,站出来的是坚定的指挥官和勇敢的印度士兵和下级军官。印度人不肯眨眼和强大的中国龙看起来是普通的。

形势再爆发了二十天之后,在十月1 1967对抗印度和中国之间发生在秋拉,另一个通过对sikkim-tibet边境以北几公里的乃堆拉山口。尽管最初的伤亡,7 / 11克和10激酶固定站和迫使中国撤离近三公里以外的一个功能命名锦兵营他们部署到日期。卓拉通过坚决在印度的手。印度军队已得到更好的中国再次。

难怪,中印边界一直和平自从的程度,今天的中国士兵来问他们的印度同行乃堆拉香烟,酒和茶,邮件交换每周两次在一个小屋建造专门为这个目的和边防人员会晤将有一年两次。这是我的特权命令乃堆拉山口大队多年之后,进行第一次边境的人员在1995 乃堆拉山口

地面战争研究中心(爪) sayareakd,南门,阿尔比与6人像这样吗。 回复 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-09-11上午12时35分 # 2 adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
难怪在此之后,中国完全安静。他们没有胆量,这就是为什么他们需要他们的恐怖的狗巴基斯坦。如果我们没有尼赫鲁和克里希纳梅农,双方最近的共产党员的和和平主义者。今天的西藏已被印度或保护国印度。 lethalforce,打带跑,毛毛与2人像这样吗。 回复 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-09-1107:05下午 # 3 deleteduser  
一个现实主义者


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15-09-11上午11 # 1 adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
中国战败的乃堆拉山口的冲突:
在乃堆拉山口的冲突:

崩溃后的1962,已经没有什么能够增强自尊的印度军队比尤重,给予了中国在乃堆拉山口的锡金在九月第十一和十月第一1967朱罗王朝1967。它必须是一个粗鲁的冲击对中国军队和其政治领导。和一个愉快的巧合,印度军队领导,得到了更好的面对面的对抗这是一样的,形成了孟加拉1971。沙加特辛格少将是中国政府山地师在锡金,这创jagjit奥罗拉是兵团司令员和山姆马内克肖是东部军司令官。

我也曾在乃堆拉山口。在完成我的年轻军官的过程,它是在七月21 1967我报告我单位,骡子包炮兵团在锡金。那些日子,年轻军官是拥有专业的邮件发送远程巡逻(表达)地区熟习,参与khad比赛增加他们的体力和发送到远程观测的港口sikkim-tibet边界在一个月。有完成了我的极限参考点,并曾参与khad比赛,我被送到萨布拉观察主要在sikkim-tibet边境。这一观察后大约一公里,西南乃堆拉山口。它主宰乃堆拉凭借在高地和命令一个很好的观点,通过也是中国国防的特征被称为北肩。有两年在萨布拉和观察哨,有一个很好的老式收音机的62和prc-10当然线通信大炮部署在后方。

乃堆拉山口的14200脚是一个重要的通过对tibet-sikkim边境通过它传递的老gangtok-yatung-lhasa贸易路线。虽然sikkim-tibet边界是明确的中英会议17日1890时,中国人不舒服的锡金是印度保护国的部署,当时印度军队。在1965次大战期间,印度和巴基斯坦,中国发表了最后通牒,印度腾两乃堆拉山口和jelep拉传sikkim-tibet边境。一些奇怪的原因,山师,在其管辖jelep拉是当时,腾空传球。它仍然在中国占有直到日期。然而,创沙加特辛格中尉,真正形成,拒绝离开乃堆拉山口。顺便说一句,这是乃堆拉在中国和印度部队仅三十码远的地方,最近的4000公里的中印边境和边界依然undemacrated。中国持有的北肩的通行证,印度军队拥有南肩。主要特点,南方和北方的乃堆拉山口即sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上举行了印第安人。炮兵观察哨人员部署在这些特点有一个很好的观察到中国深度地区而从北肩,中国有非常少的观测到印度深度的地区。这证明在冲突接踵而至。在时间上的冲突,2个掷弹兵手持乃堆拉山口。这个营的指挥下,这关口(后来的陆军准将)莱·辛格。该营是山下旅指挥由准将彩信巴克什,中。

每日例行乃堆拉用来开始巡逻的两侧的知觉边界,几乎总是导致的论点。只有一对中方能逆向蹩脚的英语是政委,谁能确认的红色斑块在他的帽子。哨兵的力量都曾经站仅相隔一米的中心,通过它的特点是尼赫鲁纪念石,潘伟迪贾瓦哈拉尔·尼赫鲁的旅行到不丹通过乃堆拉山口和chumbi谷1959。之间的争论,双方很快就变成了推推搡搡,在九月6日1967混战发生在政委摔了下来,摔断了他的眼镜。这些事件只增加了兴奋。我很融洽上尉达加尔2掷弹兵和前几天我们去了甘托克的“自由”一起看电影。我不知道那一周内,将烈士达加尔。

为缓和局势已经决定由印度军事层次打线的中心,通过从乃堆拉山口到sebu洛杉矶划定认为边界。这个任务是进行的印度士兵的70场公司工程师协助公司18的拉其普特人部署在牦牛拉通过进一步北乃堆拉山口。该线是在破晓的致命九月11上午1967。

那天清晨的阳光明媚与正常的雾天。工程师和印度士兵开始架设铁尖从乃堆拉山口到sebu洛杉矶沿知觉边界的同时2个掷弹兵和炮兵观察哨官sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上警报。当下中国政治委员,一段步兵来到该中心的通过中校莱·辛格,共2个掷弹兵突击排站着。政委问那西莱·辛格停止铺设电线。印度军队被明确的命令。他们不眨眼。争论开始,很快建立成一个混战。在随后的混战,政委被打了。此后,中国走回到他们的掩体和工程师重新铺设电线。

在几分钟,哨子听到中方其次是杀人的中型机枪火力从北肩。过去是完全缺乏盖和印度士兵的70场和18拉其普特被打开并遭受重大的伤亡,包括西莱·辛格谁受伤。他被授予事故后。2勇敢的上尉军官–达加尔2掷弹兵和主要harbhajan辛格18拉其普特人团结少数部队试图攻击中国最大肌力而壮烈牺牲。他们被追授维尔脉轮和分别。2个掷弹兵开了小武器对肩但这不是很有效。在第一个十分钟,有近七十人死亡,数十人受伤躺在空地上通。半小时内,中国炮兵开始传球以及在深度领域,但大多是预防火灾由于缺乏观察和没有损害。同时,我们作为炮兵观察所人员要求提供炮火,允许它来晚了一点。由于良好的统治和观察sebu洛杉矶和骆驼的背上,炮火是最有效和最中国的碉堡北肩深度被完全摧毁,中国遭受伤亡甚重,由他们自己的估计超过400。炮兵决斗之后进行白天和黑夜。在接下来的三天,中国的教训。在九月14日,中国威胁使用空军如果炮击并没有停止。那时的教训已经回家和停火了。在中国,真正形成,把在尸体的一侧的知觉边界在夜间和指责美国违反边界。死者的尸体交换了九月15届时:山姆马内克肖,极光和沙加特出席了传。

每一场战斗都有自己的英雄事迹,微弱的心,戏剧和幽默。在乃堆拉山口的冲突也不例外。2个掷弹兵最初被动摇了由于丧失上尉达加尔和伤害他们的公司却发现他们的男人的时刻在阿塔尔辛格绕从战壕战壕集合部队,后来晋升为上尉当场。在轻松的一面是一个炮兵观察哨官,我的同事在sebu洛杉矶的收音机被损坏由于炮击和他沟通了与他的枪。他决定回到基地sherathang在深度得到另一个收音机。当他在回来的路上,指挥炮兵旅来了。他拦住年轻的队长,指责他逃离战场,送他回去后减少他他的实质性军衔少尉。伤亡无法疏散了三天三夜,为任何移动这样做邀请冰雹中国子弹。一些受伤的很可能死于寒冷和下雨。有英勇勋章也军事法庭懦弱。然而,站出来的是坚定的指挥官和勇敢的印度士兵和下级军官。印度人不肯眨眼和强大的中国龙看起来是普通的。

形势再爆发了二十天之后,在十月1 1967对抗印度和中国之间发生在秋拉,另一个通过对sikkim-tibet边境以北几公里的乃堆拉山口。尽管最初的伤亡,7 / 11克和10激酶固定站和迫使中国撤离近三公里以外的一个功能命名锦兵营他们部署到日期。卓拉通过坚决在印度的手。印度军队已得到更好的中国再次。

难怪,中印边界一直和平自从的程度,今天的中国士兵来问他们的印度同行乃堆拉香烟,酒和茶,邮件交换每周两次在一个小屋建造专门为这个目的和边防人员会晤将有一年两次。这是我的特权命令乃堆拉山口大队多年之后,进行第一次边境的人员在1995 乃堆拉山口

地面战争研究中心(爪) sayareakd,南门,阿尔比与6人像这样吗。 回复 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-09-11上午12时35分 # 2 adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
难怪在此之后,中国完全安静。他们没有胆量,这就是为什么他们需要他们的恐怖的狗巴基斯坦。如果我们没有尼赫鲁和克里希纳梅农,双方最近的共产党员的和和平主义者。今天的西藏已被印度或保护国印度。 lethalforce,打带跑,毛毛与2人像这样吗。 回复 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-09-1107:05下午 # 3 deleteduser  
一个现实主义者


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:2010日
职位:43
喜欢:4次
好读!谢谢,我不知道究竟发生了。任何的想法是什么,中国人说了(如果在所有)?  回复 .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-09-1107:59下午 # 4 agnostic_indian  
普通会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:2010日
位置:喀拉拉邦
职位:143
喜欢:17次
好的知道我们在东山再起……但是,这并不意味着中国是不能够直接攻击印度的。它有一个更好的和低风险的选择,通过巴基斯坦。




adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
难怪在此之后,中国完全安静。他们没有胆量,这就是为什么他们需要他们的恐怖的狗巴基斯坦。如果我们没有尼赫鲁和克里希纳梅农,双方最近的共产党员的和和平主义者。今天的西藏已被印度或保护国印度。
adux  
高级会员


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入日期:月2009日
职位:1975
喜欢:522次
难怪在此之后,中国完全安静。他们没有胆量,这就是为什么他们需要他们的恐怖的狗巴基斯坦。如果我们没有尼赫鲁和克里希纳梅农,双方最近的共产党员的和和平主义者。今天的西藏已被印度或保护国印度。