超级军网驻伊美军铐住无辜妇孺并枪杀 空袭掩盖恶行(图)
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 19:34:43
驻伊美军铐住无辜妇孺并枪杀 空袭掩盖恶行(图)
2011年09月04日 来源：中国新闻网
![]()
据称，2006年美军在伊拉克展开行动时，枪杀了多名妇孺，其中包括5名5岁以下的儿童，及1名70多岁的老妇
中新网9月4日电 据香港《文汇报》网站4日报道，驻伊拉克美军再爆滥杀无辜平民的丑闻，报道指，5年前，驻伊美军曾枪杀至少10名无辜的妇孺。
联合国特别调查员奥尔斯顿揭露，美军2006年3月在伊拉克首都巴格达西北部城镇展开军事行动时，以手铐铐住10名妇女、儿童，逐一对准他们的头部射击进行枪杀，其后更用空袭来掩饰此前的恶行。
据报道，奥尔斯顿在信中提到，遇害者包括5名5岁以下的儿童，其中更有1名妇女已逾70岁。伊拉克政府做出回应称，将就事件展开调查。
报道中未提到美军对此事的反应。
http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2011/09-04/3305045.shtml
驻伊美军铐住无辜妇孺并枪杀 空袭掩盖恶行(图)
2011年09月04日 来源：中国新闻网
![]()
据称，2006年美军在伊拉克展开行动时，枪杀了多名妇孺，其中包括5名5岁以下的儿童，及1名70多岁的老妇
中新网9月4日电 据香港《文汇报》网站4日报道，驻伊拉克美军再爆滥杀无辜平民的丑闻，报道指，5年前，驻伊美军曾枪杀至少10名无辜的妇孺。
联合国特别调查员奥尔斯顿揭露，美军2006年3月在伊拉克首都巴格达西北部城镇展开军事行动时，以手铐铐住10名妇女、儿童，逐一对准他们的头部射击进行枪杀，其后更用空袭来掩饰此前的恶行。
据报道，奥尔斯顿在信中提到，遇害者包括5名5岁以下的儿童，其中更有1名妇女已逾70岁。伊拉克政府做出回应称，将就事件展开调查。
报道中未提到美军对此事的反应。
http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2011/09-04/3305045.shtml
2011年09月04日 来源：中国新闻网
据称，2006年美军在伊拉克展开行动时，枪杀了多名妇孺，其中包括5名5岁以下的儿童，及1名70多岁的老妇
中新网9月4日电 据香港《文汇报》网站4日报道，驻伊拉克美军再爆滥杀无辜平民的丑闻，报道指，5年前，驻伊美军曾枪杀至少10名无辜的妇孺。
联合国特别调查员奥尔斯顿揭露，美军2006年3月在伊拉克首都巴格达西北部城镇展开军事行动时，以手铐铐住10名妇女、儿童，逐一对准他们的头部射击进行枪杀，其后更用空袭来掩饰此前的恶行。
据报道，奥尔斯顿在信中提到，遇害者包括5名5岁以下的儿童，其中更有1名妇女已逾70岁。伊拉克政府做出回应称，将就事件展开调查。
报道中未提到美军对此事的反应。
http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2011/09-04/3305045.shtml
驻伊美军铐住无辜妇孺并枪杀 空袭掩盖恶行(图)
2011年09月04日 来源：中国新闻网
据称，2006年美军在伊拉克展开行动时，枪杀了多名妇孺，其中包括5名5岁以下的儿童，及1名70多岁的老妇
中新网9月4日电 据香港《文汇报》网站4日报道，驻伊拉克美军再爆滥杀无辜平民的丑闻，报道指，5年前，驻伊美军曾枪杀至少10名无辜的妇孺。
联合国特别调查员奥尔斯顿揭露，美军2006年3月在伊拉克首都巴格达西北部城镇展开军事行动时，以手铐铐住10名妇女、儿童，逐一对准他们的头部射击进行枪杀，其后更用空袭来掩饰此前的恶行。
据报道，奥尔斯顿在信中提到，遇害者包括5名5岁以下的儿童，其中更有1名妇女已逾70岁。伊拉克政府做出回应称，将就事件展开调查。
报道中未提到美军对此事的反应。
http://www.chinanews.com/gj/2011/09-04/3305045.shtml
召唤温*皮系列，急急如律令...
妇女儿童就不是恐怖分子了？
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
{:soso__3806756340315439811_1:}
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
{:soso__3806756340315439811_1:}
r626 发表于 2011-9-4 17:58 ![]()
妇女儿童就不是恐怖分子了？
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
典型的有罪推定啊。 按照你的理论，那应该直接把伊拉克所有人都杀光，以绝后患啊
妇女儿童就不是恐怖分子了？
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
典型的有罪推定啊。 按照你的理论，那应该直接把伊拉克所有人都杀光，以绝后患啊
r626 发表于 2011-9-4 17:58 ![]()
妇女儿童就不是恐怖分子了？
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
依我看你才真是如假包换的恐怖分子。
妇女儿童就不是恐怖分子了？
伊拉克的男人都是恐怖分子，伊拉克的女人和儿童是不断增殖的恐怖分子
依我看你才真是如假包换的恐怖分子。
这个可是以色列的经典理论啊
这些都是以前的现在的将来的可能的恐怖份子
这些都是以前的现在的将来的可能的恐怖份子
这是民主力量把恐怖分子消灭在孩童时期！
不单要消灭恐怖分子，还要消灭其来源
随风飘涅槃归来 发表于 2011-9-4 19:20
典型的有罪推定啊。 按照你的理论，那应该直接把伊拉克所有人都杀光，以绝后患啊
要无罪推定吗？那就无罪推定美军击毙的恐怖分子，恐怖分子死在妇女儿童画皮里了。
用年龄和性别来掩盖身份么。
随风飘涅槃归来 发表于 2011-9-4 19:20
典型的有罪推定啊。 按照你的理论，那应该直接把伊拉克所有人都杀光，以绝后患啊
要无罪推定吗？那就无罪推定美军击毙的恐怖分子，恐怖分子死在妇女儿童画皮里了。
用年龄和性别来掩盖身份么。
调查将进行五至十年，最后将一执行任务责任人拘捕判处有期徒刑2年，其它人等均以三个月缓刑进行惩处！
It didn't necessarily look execution-style -- the shots were not all to the same place in the head, or anything like that -- but it looked like they were from fairly close range. His guess was that the bullets were from an M-16. The Iraqi police investigators, who had been trained by U.S. forces, said in their report that these had been execution-style killings by American forces.
Who was killed exactly?
There were five children under the age of five, the youngest being five months old. Then there was a mother, her sister, the grandmother and a visitor -- four women in all. The father, in his 20s, was killed as well.
What about the question of an alleged airstrike on the house?
The house was certainly rubble after the raid -- that's clear. When it collapsed is the question. The neighbors said that after the U.S. troops left, an airstrike was called in. At the time, they said it was helicopters. U.S. forces maintained that it collapsed during the firefight. I couldn't get to the site when I was in Iraq because at that time we couldn't get far out of Baghdad very safely. We relied on a stringer who we had worked with quite a bit in the past. He took a satellite phone and we did phone interviews with the coroner and the police and others.
What has the military said about the incident over the years?
The initial reaction was always that "this can't be true." In June 2006, the U.S. military finally said that nothing untoward had happened in Ishaqi. But there were questions about the military investigation. They weren't on the ground for a particularly long time. Again, we were not there when the investigation took place, but neighbors told us afterwards that investigators were on the scene for a total of 30 to 45 minutes. The military maintained that it had been thorough. Some Iraqi government officials have long maintained anger over the incident.
How did you end up covering the incident?
It was an almost insanely violent period. So we were trying to do some in-depth coverage of what was going on, a sort of day-in-the-life piece, instead of just letting the violence roll. On the day we had settled on this idea, news of the Ishaqi incident was released. We got a press release from the U.S. military that talked about five people who had been killed in collateral damage. So we started looking into it. After our stringer talked to the neighbors, he told us, 'Look, the version I'm getting doesn't jibe with the version you're getting from the military.' He said it's not five people, it's at least 10. After I went to the military with this, they then came back and acknowledged the higher body count was accurate.
What did we learn from the cable just released by WikiLeaks?
One, it shows different sources of information than what I was dealing with. It shows that officialdom was concerned about this. They were not admitting they were concerned when we were on the story back then. They gave much more credence to the story than they had suggested to the press at the time. Behind the scenes, there was a great deal of concern over what exactly had happened there.
The cable outlines pretty much exactly what the worst-case scenario was when we were reporting on it. I didn't really pursue the worse-cast scenario because I didn't believe it was possible. We looked into it and we reported on the allegations at the time, but we were always looking for other explanations, for other ways this could have happened. This cable seems focused on that worst-case scenario, which I found fascinating.
So what happened with the U.N. investigation? It was essentially stymied?
Yes, it died. They sent questions out to the United States, and there was no response. They have said there was frequently no response from the United States on these matters. They sent questions to the Iraqi government, and they said these things also just tended to vanish because Iraq was a mess at the time. The investigator, Philip Alston, who is the U.N.'s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, told us this week that they just had nowhere left to go after these nonresponses.
So this incident has really never been addressed by the U.S. military in a comprehensive way?
It has not. The military has always been dismissive of this case. It may well be that it should be dismissed. But there's enough smoke there that it deserves a very thorough investigation. These are very disturbing allegations. The Iraqi cops who investigated this had U.S. training; they were not anti-American. They had respect for the training they had gotten. There has been and continues to be a desire for concrete answers.
Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin More: Justin Elliott
http://www.salon.com/news/politi ... aq_alleged_massacre
Who was killed exactly?
There were five children under the age of five, the youngest being five months old. Then there was a mother, her sister, the grandmother and a visitor -- four women in all. The father, in his 20s, was killed as well.
What about the question of an alleged airstrike on the house?
The house was certainly rubble after the raid -- that's clear. When it collapsed is the question. The neighbors said that after the U.S. troops left, an airstrike was called in. At the time, they said it was helicopters. U.S. forces maintained that it collapsed during the firefight. I couldn't get to the site when I was in Iraq because at that time we couldn't get far out of Baghdad very safely. We relied on a stringer who we had worked with quite a bit in the past. He took a satellite phone and we did phone interviews with the coroner and the police and others.
What has the military said about the incident over the years?
The initial reaction was always that "this can't be true." In June 2006, the U.S. military finally said that nothing untoward had happened in Ishaqi. But there were questions about the military investigation. They weren't on the ground for a particularly long time. Again, we were not there when the investigation took place, but neighbors told us afterwards that investigators were on the scene for a total of 30 to 45 minutes. The military maintained that it had been thorough. Some Iraqi government officials have long maintained anger over the incident.
How did you end up covering the incident?
It was an almost insanely violent period. So we were trying to do some in-depth coverage of what was going on, a sort of day-in-the-life piece, instead of just letting the violence roll. On the day we had settled on this idea, news of the Ishaqi incident was released. We got a press release from the U.S. military that talked about five people who had been killed in collateral damage. So we started looking into it. After our stringer talked to the neighbors, he told us, 'Look, the version I'm getting doesn't jibe with the version you're getting from the military.' He said it's not five people, it's at least 10. After I went to the military with this, they then came back and acknowledged the higher body count was accurate.
What did we learn from the cable just released by WikiLeaks?
One, it shows different sources of information than what I was dealing with. It shows that officialdom was concerned about this. They were not admitting they were concerned when we were on the story back then. They gave much more credence to the story than they had suggested to the press at the time. Behind the scenes, there was a great deal of concern over what exactly had happened there.
The cable outlines pretty much exactly what the worst-case scenario was when we were reporting on it. I didn't really pursue the worse-cast scenario because I didn't believe it was possible. We looked into it and we reported on the allegations at the time, but we were always looking for other explanations, for other ways this could have happened. This cable seems focused on that worst-case scenario, which I found fascinating.
So what happened with the U.N. investigation? It was essentially stymied?
Yes, it died. They sent questions out to the United States, and there was no response. They have said there was frequently no response from the United States on these matters. They sent questions to the Iraqi government, and they said these things also just tended to vanish because Iraq was a mess at the time. The investigator, Philip Alston, who is the U.N.'s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, told us this week that they just had nowhere left to go after these nonresponses.
So this incident has really never been addressed by the U.S. military in a comprehensive way?
It has not. The military has always been dismissive of this case. It may well be that it should be dismissed. But there's enough smoke there that it deserves a very thorough investigation. These are very disturbing allegations. The Iraqi cops who investigated this had U.S. training; they were not anti-American. They had respect for the training they had gotten. There has been and continues to be a desire for concrete answers.
Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin More: Justin Elliott
http://www.salon.com/news/politi ... aq_alleged_massacre
美国有战争罪行的传统。
9楼果然出现了！急急如律令！妖孽已现形！
尖端 发表于 2011-9-4 22:19 ![]()
这是民主力量把恐怖分子消灭在孩童时期！
与其追打到处乱飞的苍蝇,不如一壶开水烫死一堆蛆.
这是民主力量把恐怖分子消灭在孩童时期！
与其追打到处乱飞的苍蝇,不如一壶开水烫死一堆蛆.
温砸皮 发表于 2011-9-5 08:46 ![]()
与其追打到处乱飞的苍蝇,不如一壶开水烫死一堆蛆.
你不是恐怖分子，你又是什么？
与其追打到处乱飞的苍蝇,不如一壶开水烫死一堆蛆.
你不是恐怖分子，你又是什么？
美国有战争罪行的传统。
===============
所以国际法庭要给美军豁免权。
===============
所以国际法庭要给美军豁免权。
看来阿拉伯世界，那些被美国压迫欺负到不惜以自己性命，去报复美国人的圣战者，对美国发动一次9.11，还远远不足以让美国人清醒。
看来阿拉伯世界，那些被美国压迫欺负到不惜以自己性命，去报复美国人的圣战者，对美国发动一次9.11，还远远不足以让美国人清醒。
随风飘涅槃归来 发表于 2011-9-5 12:03 ![]()
你不是恐怖分子，你又是什么？
你是我粉丝,我是你偶像?
你不是恐怖分子，你又是什么？
你是我粉丝,我是你偶像?
沉睡的人 发表于 2011-9-5 13:28 ![]()
看来阿拉伯世界，那些被美国压迫欺负到不惜以自己性命，去报复美国人的圣战者，对美国发动一次9.11，还 ...
伊拉克要冷静反思：
1，在伊拉克的阿拉伯多数民族是否有岐视美利坚少数民族的现象，在美军士兵心理播种了仇恨。
2，是否有伊拉克人袭击美军挑起美利坚民族和阿拉伯民族的民族矛盾。
3，美军士兵大多是穷人，这是个经济问题。富人是不会去当兵送死的，如果美国人人都富可敌国，谁去伊拉克呀。
4，阿拉伯人应当宽容心来加强与美利坚民族的团结，拒绝西方人奥尔斯顿的挑拔。
看来美国战士，那些被阿拉伯压迫恐怖到不惜以自己性命，去报复阿拉伯人的解放军，干掉十来个伊拉克画皮，还远远不足以让阿拉伯人清醒。
看来阿拉伯世界，那些被美国压迫欺负到不惜以自己性命，去报复美国人的圣战者，对美国发动一次9.11，还 ...
伊拉克要冷静反思：
1，在伊拉克的阿拉伯多数民族是否有岐视美利坚少数民族的现象，在美军士兵心理播种了仇恨。
2，是否有伊拉克人袭击美军挑起美利坚民族和阿拉伯民族的民族矛盾。
3，美军士兵大多是穷人，这是个经济问题。富人是不会去当兵送死的，如果美国人人都富可敌国，谁去伊拉克呀。
4，阿拉伯人应当宽容心来加强与美利坚民族的团结，拒绝西方人奥尔斯顿的挑拔。
看来美国战士，那些被阿拉伯压迫恐怖到不惜以自己性命，去报复阿拉伯人的解放军，干掉十来个伊拉克画皮，还远远不足以让阿拉伯人清醒。
温砸皮 发表于 2011-9-5 15:00 ![]()
你是我粉丝,我是你偶像?
你是我呕吐的对象
你是我粉丝,我是你偶像?
你是我呕吐的对象
随风飘涅槃归来 发表于 2011-9-5 20:36 ![]()
你是我呕吐的对象
你尽孝的伊拉克对象在一楼, 哈哈. 披麻戴孝办丧事, 天天顶个晦气帽.
真猪的妓院扩招处女是经常滴.
你是我呕吐的对象
你尽孝的伊拉克对象在一楼, 哈哈. 披麻戴孝办丧事, 天天顶个晦气帽.
真猪的妓院扩招处女是经常滴.
死则死尔，与吾等何干？
股民哭市场，房奴哭贷款，木媳妇的刷光棍，嫁不出去的哭着闹着找大款~~
闹心事太多了 没空看大胡子的死活~~
股民哭市场，房奴哭贷款，木媳妇的刷光棍，嫁不出去的哭着闹着找大款~~
闹心事太多了 没空看大胡子的死活~~
皿煮死全家的典型案例
死在冥猪的子弹之下
不过是美军滥杀无辜的冰山一角而已。