关于EF2000大胜F-22的详细资料

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/27 12:04:56


关于英国皇家空军EF2000对抗演习大胜美国F-22的消息来源:

首先是国际空军力量2006年第20期,第45页(ISNB: 1-880588-91-9)的描述:

"more recently, there have been repeated reports that two RAF Typhoons deployed to the USA for OEU trails work have been flying against the F-22 at NAS China Lake, and have peformed better than was expected. There was little suprise that Typhoon, with its world-class agility and high off-boresight missile capability was able to dominate "Within Visual Range" flight, but the aircraft did cause a suprise by getting a radar lock on the F22 at a suprisingly long range. The F-22s cried off, claiming that they were "unstealthed" anyway, although the next day´s scheduled two vs. two BWR engagement was canceled, and "the USAF decided they didn´t want to play any more .

- When this incident was reported on a website frequented by front-line RAF aircrew a senior RAF officer urged an end to the converstaion on security grounds"


简要翻译:两架英国RAF(皇家空军)的EF2000在美国和F-22进行空中对抗演习。

EF2000在演习中表现超乎预期,毫无疑问,采用鸭式布局的EF2000在狗斗中毫无悬念地压倒F-22。最令人惊叹的是,EF2000还曾经在视距外锁定了F-22一次。

美军辩解,被击败的F-22是没有采取完全隐形措施的F-22,但不管美军如何辩解,美军还是单方面取消了原定次日举行的EF2000和F-22的对抗演习。

在一个皇家空军飞行员常去的网站上提到了此事,但此后不久,一位皇家空军的高官,处于安全考虑,要求飞行员们禁止继续公开讨论此事。

同年,2006年8月,英国BBC也简介报道了这次对抗演习:

This is very stealthy but costs twice the price of the Eurofighter, and reports suggest that RAF's Eurofighters have flown highly successful missions against the F-22 during recent exercises in the US.


(F-22)是非常隐身的飞机,但造价两倍于EF2000,而且报告显示,皇家空军的飞行员在和F-22的最近的对抗演习中取得巨大成功。

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1818077.stm


The Weapon System was evaluated thoroughly with seven 2v2 (i.e. two Eurofighter Typhoons against two 'enemies') Sensor Fusion flights, one 2v4 (against four enemies) Sensor Fusion flight and five dedicated DASS flights designed to fully test the avionics. The overall performance was encouraging considering the fairly aggressive operational testing conducted during the Mission Assessment, with the feedback from the operational pilots confirming their favourable impressions of the product.

In early 2005, Eurofighter Typhoon made its first transatlantic deployment. Under the 'Exercise High Rider' nickname, the Air Warfare Centre (AWC) conducts routine trials work on the United States western ranges, taking advantage of significant overland airspace, good weather and instrumented range infrastructure to maximise operational test and evaluation output from these facilities.

Exercise High Rider 10 took place at the United States Naval Air Weapons Range China Lake in California. Taking part in the deployment were the Harrier GR7 and Tornado GR4 aircraft of the AWC's Fast Jet and Weapons Operational Evaluation Unit (FJWOEU) based at RAF Coningsby and a Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft from the Typhoon combined test team.

The aircraft was deployed from BAE Systems Warton, crewed by a BAE Systems test pilot and a Typhoon Operational Evaluation Unit 17(R) Squadron pilot. BT005, a twin-seat series production aircraft, made the transatlantic crossing with the help of RAF VC10 and Tristar refuelling assets, before conducting an unaccompanied transit across the USA from Bangor Maine to China Lake, stopping to refuel at Little Rock Arkansas and Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. The Eurofighter Typhoon began flying again immediately after its arrival undertaking trials work to evaluate the aircraft's weapon system in an operational environment.

Exercise High Rider 10 recovered to the UK at the end of the deployment.



Source:  http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=147877 - Friday 10 June 2005
更多细节表明:
这次对抗代号High Rider 10,英国方面是皇家空军的一个EF2000评估部队的飞行员,还有英国BAE公司自己试飞团队的试飞员

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/09/12/2932307.htm

US deployment: The RAF's 17 Sqn OEU has routinely deployed two aircraft and around 30 personnel to the USA to operate alongside US fighters including the Lockheed MartinF-22A Raptor. "The vast majority of this work is about making sure that the integration of the two platforms is working," says Walker. Asked how the fighters compare, he says: "If you want to say that stealth is a determining factor then Typhoon stands second to the F-22. But I think that as we do more work, the Typhoon will more than hold its own. It's the balance of how you use it, rather than what it is."BAE Typhoon project test pilot Mark Bowman sees even less of a capability gap. "The F-22 is three times the cost, but you would struggle to see any advantage in the cockpit design - the cost is there to maintain stealth," he says. "Typhoon is most likely equivalent, if not better. Upcoming commitments for the UK Typhoon force include involvement in a UK combined qualified weapons instructor course and possible participation in a Red Flag exercise in the USA. "We want to integrate with a multinational package and are always looking for a way to challenge the aircraft and the pilots," says Atha


更多关于这次对抗的细节:

参加中国湖对抗的是英国皇家空军的第17中队,再次确认一共有2架EF2000和30人。

美国方面确认F-22参加,英国方面的飞行员对美国F-22评价是,除了隐形,其他性能均小于等于EF2000.

同时,世界著名的空军月刊2007年1月期确认了另外一次对抗
Air Forces Monthly - January 2007
http://www.airforcesmonthly.com/

The MoD said it would not be putting Typhoons up against the Indian Airforce Su-30s as a one on one fight. However, it did happen and there is HUD video to prove it. Apparently two inexperienced Typhoon pilots returned with big grins on their faces, the Su-30s were toasted, all the Su-30's air display antics amounted to nothing, the Typhoons proved too nimble and too powerful for the Russian aircraft. The Typhoons were also not clean configured.
During the Typhoon's visit to the US in 2005 it was pitted againt the F-22, this was not officially confirmed. The Typhoon could not see the F-22 but could detect that it was being painted by the F-22 and took "appropriate" measures with defensive aids. In one on one combat the Typhoon did the same job as on the Su-30, the F-22 could not handle the Typhoons close in and were shocked. It did not go all the Typhoon's way but the Americans had a sobering encounter, with the F-22 sacrificing much for stealth


空军月刊提到,在2005年EF2000和F-22的对抗演习中,F-22的隐形使EF2000的雷达在视距外无法看到F-22,但EF2000的电子设备能探测到F-22的雷达,EF2000的高机动性也能轻而易举地摆脱F-22的锁定。

但一旦到近距离格斗,F-22就根本无法对付EF2000,EF2000的高机动性使它在格斗上大占上风。

最后文章总结,美国的F-22为了隐形牺牲了太多其他飞行性能。。。


最后,最最搞笑的是,在欧洲人论坛上讨论这次EF2000大胜F-22的演习时,多位美国洛马公司职员还是假冒BAE公司职员在论坛搅混水,最后被欧洲那边的管理员查出IP,给封了。。。

http://eucitizens.eu/Forum/index.php?topic=166.0

中国湖对抗的EF2000和F-22


在中国湖的EF2000


关于英国皇家空军EF2000对抗演习大胜美国F-22的消息来源:

首先是国际空军力量2006年第20期,第45页(ISNB: 1-880588-91-9)的描述:

"more recently, there have been repeated reports that two RAF Typhoons deployed to the USA for OEU trails work have been flying against the F-22 at NAS China Lake, and have peformed better than was expected. There was little suprise that Typhoon, with its world-class agility and high off-boresight missile capability was able to dominate "Within Visual Range" flight, but the aircraft did cause a suprise by getting a radar lock on the F22 at a suprisingly long range. The F-22s cried off, claiming that they were "unstealthed" anyway, although the next day´s scheduled two vs. two BWR engagement was canceled, and "the USAF decided they didn´t want to play any more .

- When this incident was reported on a website frequented by front-line RAF aircrew a senior RAF officer urged an end to the converstaion on security grounds"


简要翻译:两架英国RAF(皇家空军)的EF2000在美国和F-22进行空中对抗演习。

EF2000在演习中表现超乎预期,毫无疑问,采用鸭式布局的EF2000在狗斗中毫无悬念地压倒F-22。最令人惊叹的是,EF2000还曾经在视距外锁定了F-22一次。

美军辩解,被击败的F-22是没有采取完全隐形措施的F-22,但不管美军如何辩解,美军还是单方面取消了原定次日举行的EF2000和F-22的对抗演习。

在一个皇家空军飞行员常去的网站上提到了此事,但此后不久,一位皇家空军的高官,处于安全考虑,要求飞行员们禁止继续公开讨论此事。

同年,2006年8月,英国BBC也简介报道了这次对抗演习:

This is very stealthy but costs twice the price of the Eurofighter, and reports suggest that RAF's Eurofighters have flown highly successful missions against the F-22 during recent exercises in the US.


(F-22)是非常隐身的飞机,但造价两倍于EF2000,而且报告显示,皇家空军的飞行员在和F-22的最近的对抗演习中取得巨大成功。

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1818077.stm


The Weapon System was evaluated thoroughly with seven 2v2 (i.e. two Eurofighter Typhoons against two 'enemies') Sensor Fusion flights, one 2v4 (against four enemies) Sensor Fusion flight and five dedicated DASS flights designed to fully test the avionics. The overall performance was encouraging considering the fairly aggressive operational testing conducted during the Mission Assessment, with the feedback from the operational pilots confirming their favourable impressions of the product.

In early 2005, Eurofighter Typhoon made its first transatlantic deployment. Under the 'Exercise High Rider' nickname, the Air Warfare Centre (AWC) conducts routine trials work on the United States western ranges, taking advantage of significant overland airspace, good weather and instrumented range infrastructure to maximise operational test and evaluation output from these facilities.

Exercise High Rider 10 took place at the United States Naval Air Weapons Range China Lake in California. Taking part in the deployment were the Harrier GR7 and Tornado GR4 aircraft of the AWC's Fast Jet and Weapons Operational Evaluation Unit (FJWOEU) based at RAF Coningsby and a Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft from the Typhoon combined test team.

The aircraft was deployed from BAE Systems Warton, crewed by a BAE Systems test pilot and a Typhoon Operational Evaluation Unit 17(R) Squadron pilot. BT005, a twin-seat series production aircraft, made the transatlantic crossing with the help of RAF VC10 and Tristar refuelling assets, before conducting an unaccompanied transit across the USA from Bangor Maine to China Lake, stopping to refuel at Little Rock Arkansas and Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. The Eurofighter Typhoon began flying again immediately after its arrival undertaking trials work to evaluate the aircraft's weapon system in an operational environment.

Exercise High Rider 10 recovered to the UK at the end of the deployment.



Source:  http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=147877 - Friday 10 June 2005
更多细节表明:
这次对抗代号High Rider 10,英国方面是皇家空军的一个EF2000评估部队的飞行员,还有英国BAE公司自己试飞团队的试飞员

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/09/12/2932307.htm

US deployment: The RAF's 17 Sqn OEU has routinely deployed two aircraft and around 30 personnel to the USA to operate alongside US fighters including the Lockheed MartinF-22A Raptor. "The vast majority of this work is about making sure that the integration of the two platforms is working," says Walker. Asked how the fighters compare, he says: "If you want to say that stealth is a determining factor then Typhoon stands second to the F-22. But I think that as we do more work, the Typhoon will more than hold its own. It's the balance of how you use it, rather than what it is."BAE Typhoon project test pilot Mark Bowman sees even less of a capability gap. "The F-22 is three times the cost, but you would struggle to see any advantage in the cockpit design - the cost is there to maintain stealth," he says. "Typhoon is most likely equivalent, if not better. Upcoming commitments for the UK Typhoon force include involvement in a UK combined qualified weapons instructor course and possible participation in a Red Flag exercise in the USA. "We want to integrate with a multinational package and are always looking for a way to challenge the aircraft and the pilots," says Atha


更多关于这次对抗的细节:

参加中国湖对抗的是英国皇家空军的第17中队,再次确认一共有2架EF2000和30人。

美国方面确认F-22参加,英国方面的飞行员对美国F-22评价是,除了隐形,其他性能均小于等于EF2000.

同时,世界著名的空军月刊2007年1月期确认了另外一次对抗
Air Forces Monthly - January 2007
http://www.airforcesmonthly.com/

The MoD said it would not be putting Typhoons up against the Indian Airforce Su-30s as a one on one fight. However, it did happen and there is HUD video to prove it. Apparently two inexperienced Typhoon pilots returned with big grins on their faces, the Su-30s were toasted, all the Su-30's air display antics amounted to nothing, the Typhoons proved too nimble and too powerful for the Russian aircraft. The Typhoons were also not clean configured.
During the Typhoon's visit to the US in 2005 it was pitted againt the F-22, this was not officially confirmed. The Typhoon could not see the F-22 but could detect that it was being painted by the F-22 and took "appropriate" measures with defensive aids. In one on one combat the Typhoon did the same job as on the Su-30, the F-22 could not handle the Typhoons close in and were shocked. It did not go all the Typhoon's way but the Americans had a sobering encounter, with the F-22 sacrificing much for stealth


空军月刊提到,在2005年EF2000和F-22的对抗演习中,F-22的隐形使EF2000的雷达在视距外无法看到F-22,但EF2000的电子设备能探测到F-22的雷达,EF2000的高机动性也能轻而易举地摆脱F-22的锁定。

但一旦到近距离格斗,F-22就根本无法对付EF2000,EF2000的高机动性使它在格斗上大占上风。

最后文章总结,美国的F-22为了隐形牺牲了太多其他飞行性能。。。


最后,最最搞笑的是,在欧洲人论坛上讨论这次EF2000大胜F-22的演习时,多位美国洛马公司职员还是假冒BAE公司职员在论坛搅混水,最后被欧洲那边的管理员查出IP,给封了。。。

http://eucitizens.eu/Forum/index.php?topic=166.0

中国湖对抗的EF2000和F-22


在中国湖的EF2000
旧闻了吧,楼下给答案
wwh840827 发表于 2011-8-16 12:17
旧闻了吧,楼下给答案
当初那新闻就是我第一个转到国内的。

这次我有补充了很多更详尽的资料,这种新闻有利于避免CD出现对F-22不着边际的吹嘘。
80010 发表于 2011-8-16 12:20
当初那新闻就是我第一个转到国内的。

这次我有补充了很多更详尽的资料,这种新闻有利于避免CD出现对F- ...
失敬失敬。。。但直到现在F22的具体参数还是个迷啊,大家还是只能从各个角度,各种渠道捕风捉影,期待四妹的表现
台风的航电跟敏捷性没的说,但是!娘娘后来到底肿么了?
这个确实得顶,娘娘无敌论确实要收了


结合昨天那个阵风贴 我真的晕了
http://lt.cjdby.net/thread-1207668-1-1.html

结合昨天那个阵风贴 我真的晕了
http://lt.cjdby.net/thread-1207668-1-1.html
但是我们不可否认的是,娘娘依然占据着较大的优势。
思路广一下:远藕鸭翼布局相对常规布局在机动性的优势,已经被EF-2000在演习中证实了,同样采用远藕鸭翼布局的奸两洞,完全可以在狗斗中压制F-22
处于安全考虑,要求飞行员们禁止继续公开讨论此事。
——————————————————————————
害怕扬基表弟杀人灭口?

F22的隐身性能根本不算好,也就是减少30%的探测距离而已,80公里最多变为50公里。

机动性能更是可笑,J10这样的家伙,打F22最好。F22中距离弹,J10可以机动贴地面摆脱。

然后拉起机头,仰角打F22,F22根本没办法跑。

所以F22根本就是垃圾。
楼上的,这是我想说的。被你抢了
问题是实际遭遇战里,F-22都不给其他机斗狗的机会
期待我们的J20跟J10的对抗。
加进自己的私货太多,就太酸了吧
你所引用的东西,有什么干货么? 全都是英国人在自吹自擂,唯一的一个数字是台风在2006年的这次演习中锁定过F22一回,但是美国人接着说的很清楚了,那架F22显然是没有处于隐身状态
    可笑的是,你的文字接着说美国随即取消了接下来的演习,是想制造一种假象对吧,让人觉得美国人备吓怕了,真是中国媒体的好学生啊,而更可笑的是,紧接着你又自己打自己嘴巴,因为跟着就是2007年的报告,台风根本看不见F22,看样子还是美国人说的对嘛
    于是你所引用的文字里继续就用含混不清的文字说虽然看不见,但是能察觉被F22锁定然后可以“应付”, 但是怎么个应付法?  对不起无可奉告, 然后呢,又来了个蒙太奇,直接跳到说近距离格斗,给人印象好像是F22雷达抓不住台风后台风就可以一路逼近到近距离格斗,可惜的是原文根本得不出这个结论, 因为你雷达根本就看不到对方,你怎么逼近?

说到底,不过是一堆文学性的语言,找不到一丝技术性的东西
naier 发表于 2011-8-16 13:07
这个确实得顶,娘娘无敌论确实要收了
就靠这么一篇起点文学作品就可以收了么? 嘿嘿
很奇怪啊,原文说EF2000是靠着头瞄才赢一次的啊。
这不就是吃软饭么


编辑掉,服务器又抽风了

编辑掉,服务器又抽风了
通篇都将台风比F22性能好,但从头到尾就愣是没说那次对抗的比分到底是多少?


编辑掉,服务器又抽风了

编辑掉,服务器又抽风了


编辑掉,服务器又抽风了

编辑掉,服务器又抽风了
不然不会有大大(包括hu大)爆。。尿说J20机动性比爱抚娘娘强的。
其实这本来没什么稀奇,只是爱抚娘娘被吹上天了,好多人都觉得不可能。
但是至于能到狗斗的概率有多大呢,那是另外一回事
F-22的隐身能力原来有开关的。。。。。想隐身的时候按一下隐身快捷键,不想隐身的时候按一下显形快捷键~对于别人身上的疑问刨根问底,对于自己身上的疑问却可以用来做冠冕堂皇的理由,美粉那么多年还是不长进啊~
其实不要说狗斗,主要是看F22会不会给你狗斗的机会。。。
我还是把隔壁几个大神的资料贴过来吧

这里是法国的媒体,清楚的承认了F22和阵风之间的演练, 阵风根本无法对抗F22,在超视距空战中看不到F22的存在,甚至F22开雷达它也无法察觉。 而在近距离格斗时也是完全被动

http://img.cjdby.com/attachments ... 8nf7l5e1lz8pc8d.jpg
这里是另一个报道,、

而且根据报道,台风只是在使用偷瞄的帮助下靠大离轴角格斗单才有机会击落F22(注意只是有机会),靠狗斗机动性是没指望的。

而且阵风曾经在超视距空战中7比1赢过台风, 真不知道你的台风是怎么能探测到F22的雷达还摆脱锁定的,莫非也是就出现过一次的偶然现象?{:soso_e120:}
台风的敏捷性还是不错的说,不过实际交战中恐怕都没机会去和22狗斗

隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:09
我还是把隔壁几个大神的资料贴过来吧

这里是法国的媒体,清楚的承认了F22和阵风之间的演练, 阵风根本无 ...


又开始YY ZWZ教主那断章取义的法文了?

当年ZWZ教主仗着没人懂法文,胡编烂造,把F-22都YY到天顶星上去了,结果去一台湾论坛,那坛主碰巧懂法文,才让大家对ZWZ教主的YY功力佩服得五体投地。。。

老子贴得好呆是英文原文,你拿段法语YY算啥呢?仗着这里没人学过法语?


隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:09
我还是把隔壁几个大神的资料贴过来吧

这里是法国的媒体,清楚的承认了F22和阵风之间的演练, 阵风根本无 ...


又开始YY ZWZ教主那断章取义的法文了?

当年ZWZ教主仗着没人懂法文,胡编烂造,把F-22都YY到天顶星上去了,结果去一台湾论坛,那坛主碰巧懂法文,才让大家对ZWZ教主的YY功力佩服得五体投地。。。

老子贴得好呆是英文原文,你拿段法语YY算啥呢?仗着这里没人学过法语?


隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 13:48
加进自己的私货太多,就太酸了吧
你所引用的东西,有什么干货么? 全都是英国人在自吹自擂,唯一的一个数字 ...


原来连英国人都是YY了。。。

凡是说美国F-22不是无敌的就是YY,只有美粉教主YY出美国人都YY不出来的东西才不算YY(比如美粉教主们嘴中的F-22空重,推比,航程,作战半径等众多战术指标全面领先于美国LM官方数据。。。)。。。
隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 13:48
加进自己的私货太多,就太酸了吧
你所引用的东西,有什么干货么? 全都是英国人在自吹自擂,唯一的一个数字 ...


原来连英国人都是YY了。。。

凡是说美国F-22不是无敌的就是YY,只有美粉教主YY出美国人都YY不出来的东西才不算YY(比如美粉教主们嘴中的F-22空重,推比,航程,作战半径等众多战术指标全面领先于美国LM官方数据。。。)。。。
red197 发表于 2011-8-16 14:04
F-22的隐身能力原来有开关的。。。。。想隐身的时候按一下隐身快捷键,不想隐身的时候按一下显形快捷键~对于 ...
很可惜,F22还就是有这样的“开关”,  其机腹的角反射装置在需要隐藏隐身特性时就可以装上
隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:30
很可惜,F22还就是有这样的“开关”,  其机腹的角反射装置在需要隐藏隐身特性时就可以装上
那就给出当时他们装上了角反射器的证据吧。。。。。你们不是最讨厌口说无凭嘛,来个证据吧?
80010 发表于 2011-8-16 14:27
原来连英国人都是YY了。。。

凡是说美国F-22不是无敌的就是YY,只有美粉教主YY出美国人都YY不出来的 ...
我指出的你的引文里的诸多错误,你能否认一个不能?   被打了脸就最好老实呆着
你觉得英国人不是YY,那你也一定觉得法国是在YY咯,人家在认真的讨论F22和阵风的对抗,你说阵风根本没去,原来法国人是在编故事啊, 到底是你在编还是法国人在编?
F-22的的隐身能力跟角度有关,不在隐身状态也可以理解成当时台风正对着F-22的侧面,结果台风的飞行员雷达一开,直接抓住了F-22,如果非要用装角反射器来解释,只能说明美粉还真是不长进。。。
隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:37
我指出的你的引文里的诸多错误,你能否认一个不能?   被打了脸就最好老实呆着
你觉得英国人不是YY,那你 ...
什么错误啊?

另外,你学过法语吗? 懂法文不? 没学过你贴那是啥意思?
80010 发表于 2011-8-16 14:38
什么错误啊?

另外,你学过法语吗? 懂法文不? 没学过你贴那是啥意思?
关键是你也没学过法语。。。
扯淡论!F-22什么情况去迎战EF2000的?F-22演习中只是应付过场吧?全程没开主动雷达,被动攻击模式还不是零战绩哦!发动机好像也不是全工况工作,当然F-22很多技术问题还没真正解决,解决了的F-22你敢开EF2000再来比比?别忘了美军的升级计划!F-22未来的实力不会很逊!
隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:37
我指出的你的引文里的诸多错误,你能否认一个不能?   被打了脸就最好老实呆着
你觉得英国人不是YY,那你 ...

什么错误啊?跟你YY的东西不一致就是错的?

你真搞笑啊

法国人是英国人的EF2000的竞争对手,你自己动动脑子OK?

以美国人吹NB的个性,要是能把EF2000打下来,早YY到天顶星去了,事实就是,美国人在英国人泄露对抗细节后从来没透露过那次惨败的任何细节,反倒是LM公司派一群雇员到人家论坛去冒充英国人SPAM,哈哈

PS:你们指出错误? 你们不是还经常指出美国空军官方, LM官方,PW官方,美国兰德公司官方的众多”错误“吗? 终于YY出了美国人都YY不出来的美国武器来,你们很有成就哦{:soso_e105:}

另外,你学过法语吗? 懂法文不? 没学过你贴那是啥意思?
2011-8-16 14:46 上传


kekeyongxp 发表于 2011-8-16 14:43
扯淡论!F-22什么情况去迎战EF2000的?F-22演习中只是应付过场吧?全程没开主动雷达,被动攻击模式还不是零 ...
俅千丈被5绝日得满地把牙找齐后,轻蔑地笑道,今天上午拉肚,状态不好,等我20年后练成绝世武功,你们哪个也不是我的对手
楼主确定不是英国吹得?
隔夜茶 发表于 2011-8-16 14:47
你确定中国湖对抗时F-22装这个了?