[0324]英国《每日电讯报》十年内中国无法威胁到美国在太 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/30 15:31:15
Military Balance report: China 'won't threaten US in Pacific for a decade
By Damien McElroy 7:02PM GMT 08 Mar 2011

《每日电讯报》军力平衡报告显示:十年内中国无法威胁到美国在太平洋的地位。

China's military budget is the fastest growing in the world but it will not pose a serious challenge to US dominance of the Pacific for a decade, the think tank IISS said in its annual report on the world's armies on Tuesday.
周二,IISS智库在其年度世界军事报告上指出:虽然中国是世界上军费增长最快的国家,但它未来十年内还不能对美国的亚太主导地位构成严重挑战。

The respected International Institute for Strategic Studies said that despite the effects of the global financial crisis, the 7.5 per cent growth in the Chinese defence budget in 2010 was greater than most countries.
Such growth "continued to provoke concern", the London-based group said in its "Military Balance 2011" study.
著名的国际战略研究所IIS智库说,2010年,在世界金融危机影响下,中国百分之7。5的国防预算增长高于其他大部分国家。
这个总部位于伦敦的机构在其《2011年军力平衡》的研究报告中指出,“这样的增长幅度继续吸引了各界关注”。

Christian Le Miere, the IISS Naval expert said that Chinese missiles and naval forces would not be capable of denying US access to parts of the pacific with anti-ship missiles and assault forces for 10-20 years.
The report said China's primary focus was regional, pointing to the status of Taiwan – which Beijing still claims as part of its territory to be reunified by force if necessary – and disputes in the East and South China Seas as Beijing's overriding concerns.
"By and large, China remains a regional power with regional concerns, as demonstrated in 2010 by a series of exercises, construction projects and equipment purchases," it said.
But the report underlined that the world's military powers were watching China warily as it begins "tentatively to explore operations further afield".
IISS海军专家Le说,中国的导弹和海军装备在10到20年内还不可能具备阻止美军介入亚太地区的能力。
中国目前主要关注本地区事务,包括台湾以及中国东南海。北京认为台湾是其领土一部分,并表示如果需要不排除武力统一。
“总体而言,中国依然是一只地区性力量,着重于地区事务。这可以从2010年中国的一系列军事演习,项目建设和装备购买中得到印证”,报告说。
但报告也强调,中国正试探性向更远区域发展的举动引起了世界其它军事力量的审慎关注。

The report said the United States spent $693 billion on defence in 2010 – 4.7 per cent of its GDP – compared to China's $76 billion (1.3 percent/GDP) and Britain's $57 billion (2.5 percent/GDP).
Those concerns heightened on Friday when China announced a double-digit rise its defence budget in 2011, with spending to increase 12.7 per cent to 601.1 billion yuan ($91.5 billion).
That was a return to normal service for China – the 7.5 per cent rise last year broke with a multiyear trend of double-digit percentage increases in Chinese military spending.
周五中国宣布2011年国防预算增加12。7%,达到915亿美元,引发各方关注,中国军费多年来一直保持两位数的增长势头,虽然去年一度降到7。5%,这次的升幅重返过去的轨迹。
报告指出:美国在2010年国防花费大约6930亿美元,占GDP4。7%,对比中国则为760亿美元(GDP的1。3%),英国为570亿美元(GDP的2。5%)

The IISS said however that China's goal of closing the technological gap with the West could be undermined by "serious structural weaknesses".
"One overarching problem is the widespread duplication and Balkanisation of industrial and research facilities," it said.
Factories producing arms are scattered around the vast country "and often possess outdated manufacturing and research attributes", it said.
虽然中国期望缩小和西方的技术代沟,“但这个目标的实现面临着严重的结构性缺陷”, IIS表示。
“一个主要的问题是,中国工业和研究机构重复投资,并且地方割据严重。”
“装备制造分散于全国各地,很多厂家和研究机构技术陈旧落后。”

China was aiming to acquire such as the submarines and anti-ship missiles was designed to dent the dominance of U.S. aircraft carriers in nearby waters particularly the Taiwan Strait.
Beijing's military growth was itself driving other nearby Asian powers to ramp up their own purchases.
中国的目标是获取潜艇和反舰导弹之类的装备,以抵消美国航母群在中国周边海域,特别是台湾海峡的优势地位。
但在北京的军力增长的影响下,其它亚洲邻国也不得不大力增加他们的开支。


========================
 本文仅用于外语翻译训练,请勿用于商业目的,欢迎指正错误和缺陷,谢谢。
原文地址:
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8369442/Military-Balance-report-China-wont-threaten-US-in-Pacific-for-a-decade.html  
翻译备份:
  http://www.docin.com/zczfr
========================Military Balance report: China 'won't threaten US in Pacific for a decade
By Damien McElroy 7:02PM GMT 08 Mar 2011

《每日电讯报》军力平衡报告显示:十年内中国无法威胁到美国在太平洋的地位。

China's military budget is the fastest growing in the world but it will not pose a serious challenge to US dominance of the Pacific for a decade, the think tank IISS said in its annual report on the world's armies on Tuesday.
周二,IISS智库在其年度世界军事报告上指出:虽然中国是世界上军费增长最快的国家,但它未来十年内还不能对美国的亚太主导地位构成严重挑战。

The respected International Institute for Strategic Studies said that despite the effects of the global financial crisis, the 7.5 per cent growth in the Chinese defence budget in 2010 was greater than most countries.
Such growth "continued to provoke concern", the London-based group said in its "Military Balance 2011" study.
著名的国际战略研究所IIS智库说,2010年,在世界金融危机影响下,中国百分之7。5的国防预算增长高于其他大部分国家。
这个总部位于伦敦的机构在其《2011年军力平衡》的研究报告中指出,“这样的增长幅度继续吸引了各界关注”。

Christian Le Miere, the IISS Naval expert said that Chinese missiles and naval forces would not be capable of denying US access to parts of the pacific with anti-ship missiles and assault forces for 10-20 years.
The report said China's primary focus was regional, pointing to the status of Taiwan – which Beijing still claims as part of its territory to be reunified by force if necessary – and disputes in the East and South China Seas as Beijing's overriding concerns.
"By and large, China remains a regional power with regional concerns, as demonstrated in 2010 by a series of exercises, construction projects and equipment purchases," it said.
But the report underlined that the world's military powers were watching China warily as it begins "tentatively to explore operations further afield".
IISS海军专家Le说,中国的导弹和海军装备在10到20年内还不可能具备阻止美军介入亚太地区的能力。
中国目前主要关注本地区事务,包括台湾以及中国东南海。北京认为台湾是其领土一部分,并表示如果需要不排除武力统一。
“总体而言,中国依然是一只地区性力量,着重于地区事务。这可以从2010年中国的一系列军事演习,项目建设和装备购买中得到印证”,报告说。
但报告也强调,中国正试探性向更远区域发展的举动引起了世界其它军事力量的审慎关注。

The report said the United States spent $693 billion on defence in 2010 – 4.7 per cent of its GDP – compared to China's $76 billion (1.3 percent/GDP) and Britain's $57 billion (2.5 percent/GDP).
Those concerns heightened on Friday when China announced a double-digit rise its defence budget in 2011, with spending to increase 12.7 per cent to 601.1 billion yuan ($91.5 billion).
That was a return to normal service for China – the 7.5 per cent rise last year broke with a multiyear trend of double-digit percentage increases in Chinese military spending.
周五中国宣布2011年国防预算增加12。7%,达到915亿美元,引发各方关注,中国军费多年来一直保持两位数的增长势头,虽然去年一度降到7。5%,这次的升幅重返过去的轨迹。
报告指出:美国在2010年国防花费大约6930亿美元,占GDP4。7%,对比中国则为760亿美元(GDP的1。3%),英国为570亿美元(GDP的2。5%)

The IISS said however that China's goal of closing the technological gap with the West could be undermined by "serious structural weaknesses".
"One overarching problem is the widespread duplication and Balkanisation of industrial and research facilities," it said.
Factories producing arms are scattered around the vast country "and often possess outdated manufacturing and research attributes", it said.
虽然中国期望缩小和西方的技术代沟,“但这个目标的实现面临着严重的结构性缺陷”, IIS表示。
“一个主要的问题是,中国工业和研究机构重复投资,并且地方割据严重。”
“装备制造分散于全国各地,很多厂家和研究机构技术陈旧落后。”

China was aiming to acquire such as the submarines and anti-ship missiles was designed to dent the dominance of U.S. aircraft carriers in nearby waters particularly the Taiwan Strait.
Beijing's military growth was itself driving other nearby Asian powers to ramp up their own purchases.
中国的目标是获取潜艇和反舰导弹之类的装备,以抵消美国航母群在中国周边海域,特别是台湾海峡的优势地位。
但在北京的军力增长的影响下,其它亚洲邻国也不得不大力增加他们的开支。


========================
 本文仅用于外语翻译训练,请勿用于商业目的,欢迎指正错误和缺陷,谢谢。
原文地址:
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8369442/Military-Balance-report-China-wont-threaten-US-in-Pacific-for-a-decade.html  
翻译备份:
  http://www.docin.com/zczfr
========================
电影“平津战役”台词:

傅 作 义 方 谈 判 代 表:请问贵军预计几时能攻下天津?
聂 荣 臻:3天。
傅方代表:3天?!哼,恕我直言,只怕30天也未必!
聂 荣 臻:30天不行就3个月,3个月不行就3年嘛 ...... 我们有时间。
那就10年零1个月嘛。我们不急。
10年以后呢⋯⋯不说
2020,美帝就要被动与TG分治太平洋,还说什么无能力威胁MD
什么意思准备在十年内灭掉TG?
我想也要10年,10年内各种新式武器服役,到时中美分治太平洋。
好红的裤衩
一年准备,两年反攻,三年成功。
好像军费增长的还是有点慢啊。。。。。。
我可以这么理解么?
十年之后,管他洪水滔天了是吧{:jian:}
不着急。时间有的是。就怕MD着急
10年不行?那就再加一袋烟工夫~~~{:3_84:}
这是事实, 10年真的不一定能。

  美国的势实力的确高过我们很多,,  而且再亚洲又有这么多干儿子
从现在起,各位抢钱抢肉得分兔子一勺
10年不行就二十年,我们不怕
十年内的变化 太大了   想想十年前我们有什么??何况 五年之内 我们 还有军事科技大爆发!!!!!
急什么?我们都不急,哪里轮得到他唧唧歪歪!
偶们小白兔,偶们从来没想过要去太平洋~~~{:wu:}{:wu:}{:wu:}
回复 2# 悍然锦帆贼
结果用了29个小时。。。
1百多年都等了,十年,不着急
20年也威胁不到
我怎么觉得好HKC?10年不行,20年嘛,有的是时间~
慢慢来,不过十年确实挺难的

回复  悍然锦帆贼
结果用了29个小时。。。
小白上军坛 发表于 2011-3-24 14:21


刘亚楼是按3天上报计划的,但陈长捷被刘亚楼忽悠瘸了, 瞎部署,结果速度就大大加快了。

186原来也没预料到3年就搞定常凯申校长,但国统区的自乱阵脚把这时间缩短了。

小兔子决定不了MD怎么折腾内耗,只需要避免自己折腾内耗,一步一脚印地扎实追赶就是了。
回复  悍然锦帆贼
结果用了29个小时。。。
小白上军坛 发表于 2011-3-24 14:21


刘亚楼是按3天上报计划的,但陈长捷被刘亚楼忽悠瘸了, 瞎部署,结果速度就大大加快了。

186原来也没预料到3年就搞定常凯申校长,但国统区的自乱阵脚把这时间缩短了。

小兔子决定不了MD怎么折腾内耗,只需要避免自己折腾内耗,一步一脚印地扎实追赶就是了。
百年海军!

从建国开始算起我们等了60年有余了,再等上三十年、四十年我们也等得起。

二十年以后就该MD寝食难安了。

一句话,看谁能笑到最后。

我们拭目以待。
满天飞傻货 发表于 2011-3-24 12:46


    不可能
只要再给我们20年..MD什么的
芭比 发表于 2011-3-24 13:00


    国军,你虾米时候上岸呀~
10年?这么快?这不是中国威胁论嘛~~