美帝开始为遭到核武攻击做准备。来看看美国网友咋说。

今日纽约时报头条《美国重新考虑遭遇不测……》

大意是：如果遭到核武袭击，美国人该咋办？政府、专家的推演和研究告诉公众：最好哪都别跑，就近卧倒，趴在任何能迅速抵达的掩体、地下室或者汽车里。 这样才能大幅减少伤亡。
随着朝鲜新铀浓缩工厂的曝光、朝鲜半岛危机的加剧，这个曾被视作夸大其辞而刻意回避的话题又被提上议事日程。除了对国民进行灾难动员、教育，美国甚至已着手安排紧急情况下联邦政府与州政府的联系渠道……

这条新闻很给力，下面是美国网友的发言：
LynnBob
Bozeman
December 15th,
20107:18 pm

Headline: “U.S. Thinks of Strategy for the populace”
Initial subtitle: “The Obama administration wants to convey how to react to a nuclear attack but is worried about seeming alarmist.”

The reasoned response for such times has already been provided, specifically, by Bush II with regard to the 9/11 attack: “Go shopping.” It worked for W; why not O? We’ve become a nation in which cognitive dissonance is the dominant behavior. (From Webster’s, cognitive dissonance: psychological conflict resulting from incongruous beliefs and attitudes held simultaneously). Further evidence for the existence of CD in our populace? Easy. Consider the ongoing (albeit largely amicable) “debate” over extending the Bush II-era tax cuts in the midst of our current budget deficits.

网友：LynnBob
蒙大拿州 博兹曼
大标题是“美国开始为国民考虑（遭到核武袭击的）应对策略”。第一小标题却是：“奥巴马想向公众传递遭到核武袭击后如何反应，又担心被视为杞人忧天。”
（政府）对遭遇这种情况（核武攻击）的可能反应其实早有先例。具体如，小布什在911后的话：“购物去吧！”这句话适出自布什，谁知道不会再出自奥巴马？
我们已经变成一个认知严重分化占据主导的国家（据韦伯大辞典：认知分化指同时存在的信仰与心态失衡所致的心理冲突）。
那么？在平民中存在“辐射”的进一步证据呢？很简单，想想正在进行的（尽管还算一团和气）关于在目前的预算赤字期间延长小布什减税方案的辩论吧。

Maria
NY
December 15th,
20107:21 pm
I was a young elementary school girl and lived through those days. Marched out into the hall to stand in perfect silence, away from doors and windows. It created a backdrop of anxiety that it was possible we could be blown away at any time.
网友Maria：
纽约
（911）那些天，我还是个在上小学的女生。我们从教室的门窗蜂拥而出，站在大厅里，一片死寂。那时我们焦虑的是，有可能（从此）随时都要跑的精疲力竭。
Reader
New York
December 15th, 2010
7:21 pm
Is this the solution for the Unemployment problem? Fake a nuclear attack, millions burrow underground for cover, only to learn of the deception decades later? By that time, there a jobs and/or at least a new president.
So were my grade school dive-under-the-desk exercises actually helpful?
匿名网友：
纽约
这就是失业问题的解决之道？所谓核攻击不过是为了掩人耳目。几百万人在地板上挖洞藏身，最后再像10年前那样上回当？
是不是那时我们就有工作了？或者至少有个新总统？
我们让小学生练习往课桌下扎猛子真的有意义么？
Alonso
NewYork, NY
December 15th, 2010
7:21 pm
This is definitely not a new advice and tactic from the US government. Pull out the "duck and cover" tape back from the 50's to see how this is just a reminder for all those who tried to forget, that this might be a possible scenario (the world should try to avoid by all means).
网友Alonso：
纽约
这并不是政府的新报告或者新策略。拖出50年代那些“闪开、掩蔽”的录音，就知道这会让人们回想起那些曾努力忘掉的一切，这一切都是可能再现的（尽管全世界都在全力避免）。

Darnell
Manhattan
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
Being prepared is not an alarmist position. If the threat exists, it is wise practice.

网友Darnell：
曼哈顿
做好准备并不是杞人忧天，如果威胁真实存在，有所演练是明智之举。


RC
Minnesota
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
It seems likely that both North Korea and Iran will relatively soon develop the capability to deliver nuclear weapons to the US. Relevant questions are what will we do once this capability is acquired, and would it be better to act before their nuclear delivery systems are fully developed?
网友 RC:
明尼苏达
看起来朝鲜和伊朗都很快就有能力发起对纽约的核攻击。相应的问题是，如果他们获得这一能力，我们该咋整？是不是不等他们的攻击系统发展完备就采取行动要好点？
LoydEskildson
Phoenix
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
We should start by doing a much better job of reducing the likelihood - by stopping our one-sided support of Israel, removing our troops from Iraq, Afghanistan and any other Mid-East location, taking our Navy out of the Mid-East, and minding our own business.
网友LoydEskildson
凤凰城
我们应当着手为减少这种可能干点正事了——停止我们对以色列的一边倒支持；从伊拉克、阿富汗和其他中东地区撤军；从中东撤出海军；考虑考虑我们自己的问题。

Communithy Gardens
Plum Tree
December 15th, 2010
7:23 pm
This sound bad... Is this how he plans to stay in power? Perhaps the creation of a situation like this?
网友Communithy Gardens：
听来不妙……这是他恋栈（不放弃权力）的计划？ 也许这种情况下就可以做到？

Rodger New York N.Y.
December 15th, 2010
7:24 pm
I was born in 1941 so I grew up with TAKE COVER! drills in the NYC public schools. I must say I never heard a child in primary school or high school express the least bit of concern about a nuclear attack on America. It was as if young people somehow saw through this. No, they didn't think there was no danger, what they didn't fall for was that there was any protection from an atom bomb. I'm not happy this is evidently returning. I was never an optimist for the human race -- although I admire it greatly and am rather fond of it -- but the banality of again worrying about atomic war offends my sense of grandeur.

网友Rodger：
纽约
我出生在1941年，在纽约州立中学躲空袭演习中长大。我必须说我从没听过小学或者高中的孩子会表露出对美国可能遭到核武袭击的一丁点担心。年轻人好像有点看穿了这一点。其实不然，他们并不认为没有危险。他们不会轻信当原子弹袭来时会受到任何保护。我很难过，噩梦重现了。我对人类（的处境）并不乐观——尽管我对此（年轻人的认知）持赞赏态度——对核战争的陈腐担心论调还让我很不爽。
Tessa
Los Angeles
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
Hate to break the news, but the vast majority of homes in Los Angeles don't HAVE basements...shallow or otherwise. Guess we'd be looking at spending the fallout period in an interior bathroom or hallway to try and reduce exposure.

网友Tessa：
洛杉矶
我真是手欠啊，打开这条新闻。但大多数洛杉矶人的房子没有地下室……即使很浅的或者其他啥（可供藏身）的。想象一下，我们呆在浴室或者走廊里看着核灰尘扩散，还得努力减少（身体）曝露。

ShowMe
Missouri
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
The last straw!!! The lies that have been promulgated by many in government and the media make me believe that a little nuclear attack may be the strategy for the unthinkable, when free citizens of the USA are finally sheep-herded into complete control by the plutocracy.
网友ShowMe：
密苏里州
最后的（救命）稻草！政府官员和媒体的宣称让我坚信当自由的美国国民最终像羊一样被圈进财阀的完全控制，（人们才会发现）所谓小型核弹袭击可能是一个令人不寒而栗的阴谋。
Patrick
Long Island NY
December 15th, 20107:25 pm
I only fear a nuclear attack from our own military. They used them, didnt they? Good luck revolting if you are inclined. America is a lost cause. Dont stay here waiting to be attacked, live elsewhere, its a big world.

网友Patrick：
纽约 长岛
我只担心核弹会来自我们自己的军队。他们玩过核弹，不是吗？如果你们有意造反，祝你们心想事成。美国已经迷失。别呆在这里等待袭击了。赶紧移民吧，世界很大。

Anthony NY
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
I well remember the "air raid drills", as we called them, from this earlier era. There was nothing alarmist about them, despite far less reliable information than we possess today. Insofar as politicians don't want to discuss or even consider the issue, that's their problem, and indeed shortcoming. But maybe, perhaps because of their own ignorance, it's best they keep their mouths shut.
网友Anthony
纽约
我清楚记得那些“空袭演习”，我们那时都这么说。在这个时代的早期，啥都不是杞人忧天。我们那时掌握的可靠情报并不比今天少。至今我们的政客还不愿意讨论甚至考虑这个问题。这是他们的问题和缺点。也许正因其无知，他们最好闭嘴。
Scott
NY
December 15th, 2010
7:26 pm
I wonder how this issue can be used as a partisan cudgel by both sides.
网友Scott：
纽约
我想知道两党会围绕这个问题怎样互殴？

barbara
NYC
December 15th, 2010
7:27 pm
Oh, good more fear. I guess that will take our minds off the extension of tax cuts for the rich.
网友barbara
纽约
噢，好怕怕。我猜这消息会转移人们对富人增税计划的视线吧？

Sipa
NYC
December 15th, 2010
7:28 pm
I'll be shopping in the Macy's basement.
网友Sipa
纽约
（如果核大战打起来的话）我就跑到梅西百货地下商场去购物。
Keyser Soze
Morgantown, West Virginia
December 15th, 2010
7:28 pm
Funny coincidence. New York Times talks about surviving nuclear armmageddon as Democratic Congress races to pass new START treaty. What is one of the major reasons of opposition to new START treaty? It limits our ability to deploy a ballistic missile defense system. The type of system that would prevent a rogue nation like North Korea or Iran from successfully launching a nuclear intercontinental missile against the US.
网友Keyser Soze：
摩根敦 西弗吉尼亚
真是巧合啊。纽约时报这篇如何在核攻击中幸存的报道正是国会全力冲刺通过新削减战略武器的时候。反对削减战略武器新协定的主要理由是啥？它限制了我们部署反导防卫系统，该系统可以反制朝鲜、伊朗等流氓国家成功发射洲际导弹攻击美国本土。
Valerie
Washington, DC
December 15th, 2010
7:29 pm
This is great news, especially for those of us who live here in Washington, DC,near anything considered of any importance to the federal government. After all, it was painfully apparent during 9/11 and afterward that if we wanted to flee in an emergency, we faced two choices: either we wouldn't be able to do so because many roads would be blocked randomly and eventually permanently (to limit access to federal buildings) or, if we could find a way out, we might not be allowed back to our homes (aforementioned reason). The daycare where my oldest child was could not even formulate an evacuation plan in case of an emergency because the federal government refused to say to residents exactly how the nearest main road would be used during an evacuation! At least this plan is more honest: every man, woman, and child is on their own. Good luck indeed.
网友Valerie：
华盛顿特区
这可是条大新闻。尤其别忘了，在911期间和其后，我们试图在紧急情况下逃离显然是艰难的。我们只有两条选择：或者我们无路可逃，因为所有主要的道路都被政府随机或者永久封锁了（为了限制进入联邦政府大楼）。或者我们夺路而逃，但却无法回到自己的家中（原因如前所述）。我们在托儿所的孩子甚至没有在紧急情况下的疏散预案。因为政府拒绝在疏散时准确告知居民距离最近的主要公路该怎么走。至少这个计划是诚实的：每个男人、女人和孩子只能自求多福！
Jack
MT
December 15th, 2010
7:30 pm
Although I supported Hillary, I did vote for Obama. In many ways I regret my decision. What the heck is this guy doing worrying about a nuclear attack? What he ought to worry about is his caving in to Republicans at every turn, behavior that will leave him losing the next election.
网友Jack：
尽管我支持希拉里，但当年我还是把票投给了奥巴马。我对这个决定相当后悔。为什么这家伙非要考虑核攻击？他应当考虑的是向共和党投降。直至他在下一次大选中彻底败北。
Ned
New York City
December 15th, 2010
7:30 pm
Considering how poorly - on the Fed, State, and City level - Civil Defense was during 9/11 - better safe than sorry later in practicing for Civilian evacuation and responses for both Biological, Chemical, and Nuclear attack, as The Bush Years have created several unstable areas - Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan - where Terrorists can grow and get resources for attacks.

We now live in dangerous times when doctors discuss how to place a bomb in a human body to avoid detection.

Dangerous Times, Indeed.
网友Ned
纽约
想想911时联邦、州、城市的民防有多脆弱。让国民演练遭遇生化武器和核武攻击以策安全总比事后后悔要好。拜布什政府所赐，（我们为自己）创造了伊拉克、阿富汗、巴基斯坦这几个恐怖分子和恐怖袭击之源。
当医生们讨论怎样让人体炸弹躲过探测，我们就是生活在危险中。这的确是个危险时期。真的。

今日纽约时报头条《美国重新考虑遭遇不测……》

大意是：如果遭到核武袭击，美国人该咋办？政府、专家的推演和研究告诉公众：最好哪都别跑，就近卧倒，趴在任何能迅速抵达的掩体、地下室或者汽车里。 这样才能大幅减少伤亡。
随着朝鲜新铀浓缩工厂的曝光、朝鲜半岛危机的加剧，这个曾被视作夸大其辞而刻意回避的话题又被提上议事日程。除了对国民进行灾难动员、教育，美国甚至已着手安排紧急情况下联邦政府与州政府的联系渠道……

这条新闻很给力，下面是美国网友的发言：
LynnBob
Bozeman
December 15th,
20107:18 pm

Headline: “U.S. Thinks of Strategy for the populace”
Initial subtitle: “The Obama administration wants to convey how to react to a nuclear attack but is worried about seeming alarmist.”

The reasoned response for such times has already been provided, specifically, by Bush II with regard to the 9/11 attack: “Go shopping.” It worked for W; why not O? We’ve become a nation in which cognitive dissonance is the dominant behavior. (From Webster’s, cognitive dissonance: psychological conflict resulting from incongruous beliefs and attitudes held simultaneously). Further evidence for the existence of CD in our populace? Easy. Consider the ongoing (albeit largely amicable) “debate” over extending the Bush II-era tax cuts in the midst of our current budget deficits.

网友：LynnBob
蒙大拿州 博兹曼
大标题是“美国开始为国民考虑（遭到核武袭击的）应对策略”。第一小标题却是：“奥巴马想向公众传递遭到核武袭击后如何反应，又担心被视为杞人忧天。”
（政府）对遭遇这种情况（核武攻击）的可能反应其实早有先例。具体如，小布什在911后的话：“购物去吧！”这句话适出自布什，谁知道不会再出自奥巴马？
我们已经变成一个认知严重分化占据主导的国家（据韦伯大辞典：认知分化指同时存在的信仰与心态失衡所致的心理冲突）。
那么？在平民中存在“辐射”的进一步证据呢？很简单，想想正在进行的（尽管还算一团和气）关于在目前的预算赤字期间延长小布什减税方案的辩论吧。

Maria
NY
December 15th,
20107:21 pm
I was a young elementary school girl and lived through those days. Marched out into the hall to stand in perfect silence, away from doors and windows. It created a backdrop of anxiety that it was possible we could be blown away at any time.
网友Maria：
纽约
（911）那些天，我还是个在上小学的女生。我们从教室的门窗蜂拥而出，站在大厅里，一片死寂。那时我们焦虑的是，有可能（从此）随时都要跑的精疲力竭。
Reader
New York
December 15th, 2010
7:21 pm
Is this the solution for the Unemployment problem? Fake a nuclear attack, millions burrow underground for cover, only to learn of the deception decades later? By that time, there a jobs and/or at least a new president.
So were my grade school dive-under-the-desk exercises actually helpful?
匿名网友：
纽约
这就是失业问题的解决之道？所谓核攻击不过是为了掩人耳目。几百万人在地板上挖洞藏身，最后再像10年前那样上回当？
是不是那时我们就有工作了？或者至少有个新总统？
我们让小学生练习往课桌下扎猛子真的有意义么？
Alonso
NewYork, NY
December 15th, 2010
7:21 pm
This is definitely not a new advice and tactic from the US government. Pull out the "duck and cover" tape back from the 50's to see how this is just a reminder for all those who tried to forget, that this might be a possible scenario (the world should try to avoid by all means).
网友Alonso：
纽约
这并不是政府的新报告或者新策略。拖出50年代那些“闪开、掩蔽”的录音，就知道这会让人们回想起那些曾努力忘掉的一切，这一切都是可能再现的（尽管全世界都在全力避免）。

Darnell
Manhattan
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
Being prepared is not an alarmist position. If the threat exists, it is wise practice.

网友Darnell：
曼哈顿
做好准备并不是杞人忧天，如果威胁真实存在，有所演练是明智之举。


RC
Minnesota
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
It seems likely that both North Korea and Iran will relatively soon develop the capability to deliver nuclear weapons to the US. Relevant questions are what will we do once this capability is acquired, and would it be better to act before their nuclear delivery systems are fully developed?
网友 RC:
明尼苏达
看起来朝鲜和伊朗都很快就有能力发起对纽约的核攻击。相应的问题是，如果他们获得这一能力，我们该咋整？是不是不等他们的攻击系统发展完备就采取行动要好点？
LoydEskildson
Phoenix
December 15th, 2010
7:22 pm
We should start by doing a much better job of reducing the likelihood - by stopping our one-sided support of Israel, removing our troops from Iraq, Afghanistan and any other Mid-East location, taking our Navy out of the Mid-East, and minding our own business.
网友LoydEskildson
凤凰城
我们应当着手为减少这种可能干点正事了——停止我们对以色列的一边倒支持；从伊拉克、阿富汗和其他中东地区撤军；从中东撤出海军；考虑考虑我们自己的问题。

Communithy Gardens
Plum Tree
December 15th, 2010
7:23 pm
This sound bad... Is this how he plans to stay in power? Perhaps the creation of a situation like this?
网友Communithy Gardens：
听来不妙……这是他恋栈（不放弃权力）的计划？ 也许这种情况下就可以做到？

Rodger New York N.Y.
December 15th, 2010
7:24 pm
I was born in 1941 so I grew up with TAKE COVER! drills in the NYC public schools. I must say I never heard a child in primary school or high school express the least bit of concern about a nuclear attack on America. It was as if young people somehow saw through this. No, they didn't think there was no danger, what they didn't fall for was that there was any protection from an atom bomb. I'm not happy this is evidently returning. I was never an optimist for the human race -- although I admire it greatly and am rather fond of it -- but the banality of again worrying about atomic war offends my sense of grandeur.

网友Rodger：
纽约
我出生在1941年，在纽约州立中学躲空袭演习中长大。我必须说我从没听过小学或者高中的孩子会表露出对美国可能遭到核武袭击的一丁点担心。年轻人好像有点看穿了这一点。其实不然，他们并不认为没有危险。他们不会轻信当原子弹袭来时会受到任何保护。我很难过，噩梦重现了。我对人类（的处境）并不乐观——尽管我对此（年轻人的认知）持赞赏态度——对核战争的陈腐担心论调还让我很不爽。
Tessa
Los Angeles
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
Hate to break the news, but the vast majority of homes in Los Angeles don't HAVE basements...shallow or otherwise. Guess we'd be looking at spending the fallout period in an interior bathroom or hallway to try and reduce exposure.

网友Tessa：
洛杉矶
我真是手欠啊，打开这条新闻。但大多数洛杉矶人的房子没有地下室……即使很浅的或者其他啥（可供藏身）的。想象一下，我们呆在浴室或者走廊里看着核灰尘扩散，还得努力减少（身体）曝露。

ShowMe
Missouri
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
The last straw!!! The lies that have been promulgated by many in government and the media make me believe that a little nuclear attack may be the strategy for the unthinkable, when free citizens of the USA are finally sheep-herded into complete control by the plutocracy.
网友ShowMe：
密苏里州
最后的（救命）稻草！政府官员和媒体的宣称让我坚信当自由的美国国民最终像羊一样被圈进财阀的完全控制，（人们才会发现）所谓小型核弹袭击可能是一个令人不寒而栗的阴谋。
Patrick
Long Island NY
December 15th, 20107:25 pm
I only fear a nuclear attack from our own military. They used them, didnt they? Good luck revolting if you are inclined. America is a lost cause. Dont stay here waiting to be attacked, live elsewhere, its a big world.

网友Patrick：
纽约 长岛
我只担心核弹会来自我们自己的军队。他们玩过核弹，不是吗？如果你们有意造反，祝你们心想事成。美国已经迷失。别呆在这里等待袭击了。赶紧移民吧，世界很大。

Anthony NY
December 15th, 2010
7:25 pm
I well remember the "air raid drills", as we called them, from this earlier era. There was nothing alarmist about them, despite far less reliable information than we possess today. Insofar as politicians don't want to discuss or even consider the issue, that's their problem, and indeed shortcoming. But maybe, perhaps because of their own ignorance, it's best they keep their mouths shut.
网友Anthony
纽约
我清楚记得那些“空袭演习”，我们那时都这么说。在这个时代的早期，啥都不是杞人忧天。我们那时掌握的可靠情报并不比今天少。至今我们的政客还不愿意讨论甚至考虑这个问题。这是他们的问题和缺点。也许正因其无知，他们最好闭嘴。
Scott
NY
December 15th, 2010
7:26 pm
I wonder how this issue can be used as a partisan cudgel by both sides.
网友Scott：
纽约
我想知道两党会围绕这个问题怎样互殴？

barbara
NYC
December 15th, 2010
7:27 pm
Oh, good more fear. I guess that will take our minds off the extension of tax cuts for the rich.
网友barbara
纽约
噢，好怕怕。我猜这消息会转移人们对富人增税计划的视线吧？

Sipa
NYC
December 15th, 2010
7:28 pm
I'll be shopping in the Macy's basement.
网友Sipa
纽约
（如果核大战打起来的话）我就跑到梅西百货地下商场去购物。
Keyser Soze
Morgantown, West Virginia
December 15th, 2010
7:28 pm
Funny coincidence. New York Times talks about surviving nuclear armmageddon as Democratic Congress races to pass new START treaty. What is one of the major reasons of opposition to new START treaty? It limits our ability to deploy a ballistic missile defense system. The type of system that would prevent a rogue nation like North Korea or Iran from successfully launching a nuclear intercontinental missile against the US.
网友Keyser Soze：
摩根敦 西弗吉尼亚
真是巧合啊。纽约时报这篇如何在核攻击中幸存的报道正是国会全力冲刺通过新削减战略武器的时候。反对削减战略武器新协定的主要理由是啥？它限制了我们部署反导防卫系统，该系统可以反制朝鲜、伊朗等流氓国家成功发射洲际导弹攻击美国本土。
Valerie
Washington, DC
December 15th, 2010
7:29 pm
This is great news, especially for those of us who live here in Washington, DC,near anything considered of any importance to the federal government. After all, it was painfully apparent during 9/11 and afterward that if we wanted to flee in an emergency, we faced two choices: either we wouldn't be able to do so because many roads would be blocked randomly and eventually permanently (to limit access to federal buildings) or, if we could find a way out, we might not be allowed back to our homes (aforementioned reason). The daycare where my oldest child was could not even formulate an evacuation plan in case of an emergency because the federal government refused to say to residents exactly how the nearest main road would be used during an evacuation! At least this plan is more honest: every man, woman, and child is on their own. Good luck indeed.
网友Valerie：
华盛顿特区
这可是条大新闻。尤其别忘了，在911期间和其后，我们试图在紧急情况下逃离显然是艰难的。我们只有两条选择：或者我们无路可逃，因为所有主要的道路都被政府随机或者永久封锁了（为了限制进入联邦政府大楼）。或者我们夺路而逃，但却无法回到自己的家中（原因如前所述）。我们在托儿所的孩子甚至没有在紧急情况下的疏散预案。因为政府拒绝在疏散时准确告知居民距离最近的主要公路该怎么走。至少这个计划是诚实的：每个男人、女人和孩子只能自求多福！
Jack
MT
December 15th, 2010
7:30 pm
Although I supported Hillary, I did vote for Obama. In many ways I regret my decision. What the heck is this guy doing worrying about a nuclear attack? What he ought to worry about is his caving in to Republicans at every turn, behavior that will leave him losing the next election.
网友Jack：
尽管我支持希拉里，但当年我还是把票投给了奥巴马。我对这个决定相当后悔。为什么这家伙非要考虑核攻击？他应当考虑的是向共和党投降。直至他在下一次大选中彻底败北。
Ned
New York City
December 15th, 2010
7:30 pm
Considering how poorly - on the Fed, State, and City level - Civil Defense was during 9/11 - better safe than sorry later in practicing for Civilian evacuation and responses for both Biological, Chemical, and Nuclear attack, as The Bush Years have created several unstable areas - Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan - where Terrorists can grow and get resources for attacks.

We now live in dangerous times when doctors discuss how to place a bomb in a human body to avoid detection.

Dangerous Times, Indeed.
网友Ned
纽约
想想911时联邦、州、城市的民防有多脆弱。让国民演练遭遇生化武器和核武攻击以策安全总比事后后悔要好。拜布什政府所赐，（我们为自己）创造了伊拉克、阿富汗、巴基斯坦这几个恐怖分子和恐怖袭击之源。
当医生们讨论怎样让人体炸弹躲过探测，我们就是生活在危险中。这的确是个危险时期。真的。