超级军网国产等离子屏将服务于最新一代。。。呵呵
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/01 04:30:14
国产等离子屏将用于最新一代。。。千真万确！！
是一家四川的公司叫"虹欧"，没想到吧，呵呵国产等离子屏将用于最新一代。。。千真万确！！
是一家四川的公司叫"虹欧"，没想到吧，呵呵
是一家四川的公司叫"虹欧"，没想到吧，呵呵国产等离子屏将用于最新一代。。。千真万确！！
是一家四川的公司叫"虹欧"，没想到吧，呵呵
忽悠![:a16:]
太好了，严重支持
LZ在天涯好像也有号啊
国家给那么多钱让长虹买进韩国等离子电视的核心技术企业，还招来大量韩国员工做技术。就为“军民2用”
我来接下去，胡乱猜的哈 :D
国产等离子屏将服务于最新一代......国产区域防空驱逐舰的指控中心或国产航妈飞行控制中心，至少50寸哈:D :D
国产等离子屏将服务于最新一代......国产区域防空驱逐舰的指控中心或国产航妈飞行控制中心，至少50寸哈:D :D
原帖由 龙芯 于 2009-1-24 15:24 发表
国家给那么多钱让长虹买进韩国等离子电视的核心技术企业，还招来大量韩国员工做技术。就为“军民2用”
敢问这位是从哪听说的啊？
长虹买韩国的技术？还是国家出钱？国家凭什么出钱扶持这种不公平竞争？
长虹早些年那么困难的时候咋没见国家拿过一分钱啊？
等离子的动态显示效果更好，但能耗比液晶稍大，不知道有没有影响。
ＰＤ电视功豪据说和液晶没多大区别．但飞机上装可有些麻烦．把气体等离子化的部分的安全问题可不好解决．
为什么不用液晶？
还是等OLED
等离子的单元自体发光，不容易做小，如果用在飞机上的话，分辨率就不怎么样了吧。
功耗的问题嘛，显示器几十瓦级别，但飞机上的雷达是几千瓦级别，几十瓦还用得着在乎么……
功耗的问题嘛，显示器几十瓦级别，但飞机上的雷达是几千瓦级别，几十瓦还用得着在乎么……
我不明白楼主的意思，但是等离子在欧洲已经没有市场了，功耗太大已经准备立法禁用。
等离子平板显示，东南大学做得很不错的我记得
用于军用的确比液晶有好多优势，就是费电
用于军用的确比液晶有好多优势，就是费电
长虹貌似引进的松下的技术吧
等离子费电是相对液晶来说的，超大屏幕的显示效果还是LCD比不了的
飞机上可能用者不合适，但军舰上用作大型综合显示屏应该很合适，新驱。。恩，不错:b
等离子费电是相对液晶来说的，超大屏幕的显示效果还是LCD比不了的
飞机上可能用者不合适，但军舰上用作大型综合显示屏应该很合适，新驱。。恩，不错:b
PDP分辨率相对LCD做不高，不知道所谓新一代的怎么样
忍不住要说了
等离子并不比LCD费电,但小屏分辨率确实低
等离子并不比LCD费电,但小屏分辨率确实低
PDP是长虹和咸阳彩虹(生产显像管CRT)一起搞的,彩虹技术入股,新公司好象叫什么世纪双虹!
彩虹的PDP技术主要是从日本先锋那里来的,在北京的分部消化了好几年,MS有点成就...:D :D
彩虹的PDP技术主要是从日本先锋那里来的,在北京的分部消化了好几年,MS有点成就...:D :D
液晶屏的制造技术也在日本和韩国手上，而且液晶在看动态画面上有托尾，静态有抖动。
等离子清晰度、耗电高的问题今年国际上已经解决，色彩也更逼真，动态无托尾，视角宽。。。适合军用。
等离子清晰度、耗电高的问题今年国际上已经解决，色彩也更逼真，动态无托尾，视角宽。。。适合军用。
其实OLED更好……
SED显示器好
原帖由 东方亮 于 2009-1-24 16:09 发表
我不明白楼主的意思，但是等离子在欧洲已经没有市场了，功耗太大已经准备立法禁用。
假新闻.
]]
原帖由 格兰肯 于 2009-1-24 18:00 发表
PDP是长虹和咸阳彩虹(生产显像管CRT)一起搞的,彩虹技术入股,新公司好象叫什么世纪双虹!
彩虹的PDP技术主要是从日本先锋那里来的,在北京的分部消化了好几年,MS有点成就...:D :D
韩国大宇的等离子下马后，几个高级工程师跑到彩虹，这几年彩虹做的就是仿照别人东西修改出专利来。和日本也有接触，最初彩虹的老总想全部引进技术，日本某公司正好准备不玩等离子了，老板飞到北京来签技术转移协议，刚好彩虹换了老总，新老总对等离子不感冒，认为CRT尚有很大潜力，就愣是不买等离子技术了，没几天这位仁兄也下台了，新上任的老总继续寻求国外技术支持，再往后，彩虹就投靠长虹了。
快来喝茶
原帖由 yylt 于 2009-1-24 19:39 发表
韩国大宇的等离子下马后，几个高级工程师跑到彩虹，这几年彩虹做的就是仿照别人东西修改出专利来。和日本也有接触，最初彩虹的老总想全部引进技术，日本某公司正好准备不玩等离子了，老板飞到北京来签技术转移协议 ...
CRT怎么可能有市场呢？
大尺寸（大于等于40）的LCD功耗并不比同尺寸的PDP小多少
]]
原帖由 xtidt 于 2009-1-24 15:41 发表
敢问这位是从哪听说的啊？
长虹买韩国的技术？还是国家出钱？国家凭什么出钱扶持这种不公平竞争？
长虹早些年那么困难的时候咋没见国家拿过一分钱啊？
等离子的动态显示效果更好，但能耗比液晶稍大，不知道 ...
彩电只是长虹的副业而已;P
等离子的静态分辨率确实比液晶低，但其响应速度远不是液晶能比的，所以其动态分辨率比液晶高得多，而液晶由于其显示原理所限响应速度无法达到理想的程度，其显示动态图像是无法消除拖尾的，导致其显示动态图像时比较模糊，远不能同等离子的比，而长时间看不清晰的动态图像是比较伤眼睛的。至于说能耗问题，就液晶的那种背光工作模式，不会比等离子节能到那里去。其实认真说来等离子和液晶都不是理想的平板显示技术，只是在现阶段相对而言等离子的显示效果要好一些，家用选等离子的为好，毕竟谁家买个平板电视专用来看静态图像啊？PS：TNND！前段时间为买平板电视恶补了一番平板电视的知识，结果还是被忽悠了，买了个液晶的，现在后悔死啦！:') :@
假的离谱
等离子除了动态显示优于液晶外，其余均不如
等离子除了动态显示优于液晶外，其余均不如
LCD的物理分辨率比较高,但从成像原理上来说，PDP的灰度等级，响应速度，暗部层次，色彩还原，视角要好于液晶.
这由两者工作原理决定的.
著名美国杂志Sound & VIsion刚刚结束了一个顶级等离子（先锋PDP-5010FD）与液晶高清电视机（三星LN-T4681F）的对比测试，两台电视机的零售价都在4000美元左右。等离子以不太多的优势继续胜出
LCD---PDP..等离子电视机是Pioneer Elite Kuro PDP-5010FD（50英寸），LCD是三星的LN-T4681F（46英寸）。三星的LN-T4681F使用了LED背光技术，号称大大改进黑暗场景表现。The Samsung LN-T5281F LCD and Pioneer Elite PRO-110FD Kuro plasma, face to face.
Three years ago, Sound & Vision staged the first of its HDTV technology face-offs when we put a 37-inch Samsung plasma alongside a like-sized Sharp LCD, tuned them to the hilt, then fed them the same programs to see which was king of the HDTV hill ("Plasma vs. LCD," February/March 2005). In those days, flat-panel TVs were still an expensive oddity. But even then, the question "Which is better: plasma or LCD?" burned hard in the hearts of our enthusiast readers. Not surprisingly, that's now the No. 1 question we're asked about HDTV.
The results of that first battle were decisive. The Samsung plasma beat the Sharp LCD in virtually every key area, including contrast, color accuracy, picture uniformity, and picture detail. But much has changed. While plasma has continued to advance, set-makers have also worked hard to address LCD's most serious shortcomings. One of these is motion lag — obvious trails on moving objects created by the panel's relatively slow response time to the video signal. Another major issue is LCD's inability to reproduce deep blacks — a critical element for delivering natural, saturated colors and striking, lifelike contrast that adds depth and dimension to the image.
By early 2007, we began seeing LCDs that could finally hold a candle to the better plasmas. New panels with fast response times, coupled in some cases with 120-Hz screen-refresh circuitry (twice the conventional 60-Hz rate), have virtually eliminated motion lag. And throughout last year, contrast seemed to improve on every LCD we tested. But none of them, frankly, suggested that they had finally caught up enough to the best plasmas to warrant another side-by-side look. Until now.
The Technologies
From the outside, flat-panel LCD and plasma displays look identical. But while the best of both breeds all have the 2 million or so pixels that constitute a "full HD" 1080p image, the similarities stop there.
Plasmas break those pixels into sealed red, green, and blue subpixels (or "cells") that contain an inert gas. When an electrical current — that is, a derivative of the video signal — excites the gas, it causes the colored phosphors in each subpixel to glow. By driving each subpixel to the desired level, the signal determines the pixel's exact color and brightness. Put enough of these pixels close enough together, and you get an image.
With an LCD (liquid-crystal display), a backlight — typically a fluorescent lamp — sits behind the pixel grid and shines through to the viewer. As with plasma, each pixel is broken into red, green, and blue subpixels, but the phosphors are replaced with colored filters. The video signal is processed to address each subpixel, causing its liquid-crystal structure to open and close like a shutter. This allows light to pass at the appropriate brightness and with the correct color to create the image
这由两者工作原理决定的.
著名美国杂志Sound & VIsion刚刚结束了一个顶级等离子（先锋PDP-5010FD）与液晶高清电视机（三星LN-T4681F）的对比测试，两台电视机的零售价都在4000美元左右。等离子以不太多的优势继续胜出
LCD---PDP..等离子电视机是Pioneer Elite Kuro PDP-5010FD（50英寸），LCD是三星的LN-T4681F（46英寸）。三星的LN-T4681F使用了LED背光技术，号称大大改进黑暗场景表现。The Samsung LN-T5281F LCD and Pioneer Elite PRO-110FD Kuro plasma, face to face.
Three years ago, Sound & Vision staged the first of its HDTV technology face-offs when we put a 37-inch Samsung plasma alongside a like-sized Sharp LCD, tuned them to the hilt, then fed them the same programs to see which was king of the HDTV hill ("Plasma vs. LCD," February/March 2005). In those days, flat-panel TVs were still an expensive oddity. But even then, the question "Which is better: plasma or LCD?" burned hard in the hearts of our enthusiast readers. Not surprisingly, that's now the No. 1 question we're asked about HDTV.
The results of that first battle were decisive. The Samsung plasma beat the Sharp LCD in virtually every key area, including contrast, color accuracy, picture uniformity, and picture detail. But much has changed. While plasma has continued to advance, set-makers have also worked hard to address LCD's most serious shortcomings. One of these is motion lag — obvious trails on moving objects created by the panel's relatively slow response time to the video signal. Another major issue is LCD's inability to reproduce deep blacks — a critical element for delivering natural, saturated colors and striking, lifelike contrast that adds depth and dimension to the image.
By early 2007, we began seeing LCDs that could finally hold a candle to the better plasmas. New panels with fast response times, coupled in some cases with 120-Hz screen-refresh circuitry (twice the conventional 60-Hz rate), have virtually eliminated motion lag. And throughout last year, contrast seemed to improve on every LCD we tested. But none of them, frankly, suggested that they had finally caught up enough to the best plasmas to warrant another side-by-side look. Until now.
The Technologies
From the outside, flat-panel LCD and plasma displays look identical. But while the best of both breeds all have the 2 million or so pixels that constitute a "full HD" 1080p image, the similarities stop there.
Plasmas break those pixels into sealed red, green, and blue subpixels (or "cells") that contain an inert gas. When an electrical current — that is, a derivative of the video signal — excites the gas, it causes the colored phosphors in each subpixel to glow. By driving each subpixel to the desired level, the signal determines the pixel's exact color and brightness. Put enough of these pixels close enough together, and you get an image.
With an LCD (liquid-crystal display), a backlight — typically a fluorescent lamp — sits behind the pixel grid and shines through to the viewer. As with plasma, each pixel is broken into red, green, and blue subpixels, but the phosphors are replaced with colored filters. The video signal is processed to address each subpixel, causing its liquid-crystal structure to open and close like a shutter. This allows light to pass at the appropriate brightness and with the correct color to create the image
]]
现在很多人还搞不清楚，显示器和电视在画面表现上的主要区别：一静一动。
这一点很关键，但是好像全国人民普遍都不了解这个关键点~！加上卖场销售人员的恶意引导、曲解，使很多人把等离子低档化了。
这也是等离子最大的悲哀~。:L
这一点很关键，但是好像全国人民普遍都不了解这个关键点~！加上卖场销售人员的恶意引导、曲解，使很多人把等离子低档化了。
这也是等离子最大的悲哀~。:L
用等离子做显示屏？嫌眼睛太灵光了？等离子的放静态画面时跳的那个厉害仅次于50Hz的CRT，特别是一些线条比较明显和高亮的画面时就更是明显[:a16:]
有没有专业人士啊?
我过完年要买电视,新房子用的,46寸
正在苦恼买LCD还是PDP
现在LCD大行其道,有资金有技术,大有全面压倒PDP的态势
在网上咨询,大家又众说纷纭,没有全面又通俗易懂的给我等家电白痴介绍各中优劣,真是让人举旗不定啊:')
水了,请版主留情,毕竟买个电视好多米的:handshake
我过完年要买电视,新房子用的,46寸
正在苦恼买LCD还是PDP
现在LCD大行其道,有资金有技术,大有全面压倒PDP的态势
在网上咨询,大家又众说纷纭,没有全面又通俗易懂的给我等家电白痴介绍各中优劣,真是让人举旗不定啊:')
水了,请版主留情,毕竟买个电视好多米的:handshake
如果要看电影的话，买PDP吧。光论对比度LCD是比不上PDP的。要多研究研究两者显示的原理
参考一下
如果以观看有线电视为主，选PDP
如果兼顾游戏用显示器，选LCD
PDP优势在于亮度大，运动画面拖尾小不模糊，典型如足球赛，灰度尚可；
LCD优势在于静止画面好，如图文电视，有个特例是动画片效果好，灰度较差；
PDP的缺点在于发热量大，风机噪声大，有灼屏痼疾，寿命较短等缺陷；
LCD的缺点在于运动画面拖尾严重，暗场画面较模糊，通透性较差等缺陷，功耗稍小于PDP而远大于CRT。
两者共同缺点是使用寿命较短以至于生产厂商坚决制抵三年质保。 无良:@
市场上合格电视不多，挑选时记得带上几张如枪战片、球赛之类暗场画面丰富，运动场紧多的DVD d9的碟片，在商场的碟机中用视频线（不能采用诸如色差端子、分量端子等）连接电视，那个看起来还凑合就选那个。
如果以观看有线电视为主，选PDP
如果兼顾游戏用显示器，选LCD
PDP优势在于亮度大，运动画面拖尾小不模糊，典型如足球赛，灰度尚可；
LCD优势在于静止画面好，如图文电视，有个特例是动画片效果好，灰度较差；
PDP的缺点在于发热量大，风机噪声大，有灼屏痼疾，寿命较短等缺陷；
LCD的缺点在于运动画面拖尾严重，暗场画面较模糊，通透性较差等缺陷，功耗稍小于PDP而远大于CRT。
两者共同缺点是使用寿命较短以至于生产厂商坚决制抵三年质保。 无良:@
市场上合格电视不多，挑选时记得带上几张如枪战片、球赛之类暗场画面丰富，运动场紧多的DVD d9的碟片，在商场的碟机中用视频线（不能采用诸如色差端子、分量端子等）连接电视，那个看起来还凑合就选那个。
为来属于液晶的！等离子以备市场淘汰！！！
原帖由 riverdance 于 2009-1-24 16:19 发表
等离子平板显示，东南大学做得很不错的我记得
用于军用的确比液晶有好多优势，就是费电
东南大学的叫SMPDP~~荫罩式:D
我们老师说大尺寸的PDP占优势，小尺寸的还是LCD，一般性42寸为界……
原帖由 大肥猫 于 2009-1-25 12:28 发表
有没有专业人士啊?
我过完年要买电视,新房子用的,46寸
正在苦恼买LCD还是PDP
现在LCD大行其道,有资金有技术,大有全面压倒PDP的态势
在网上咨询,大家又众说纷纭,没有全面又通俗易懂的给我等家电白痴介绍各中优劣, ...
还不如和我一样，买投影机加电视盒放在客厅里，卧室买了个小液晶挂墙上。 客厅那个反正用得少，一般来说都是用来打Wii的，嘿嘿，一堵墙那么大
对了，投影机才三千多，比电视机便宜多了