超级军网正中美国命门！中国要抛售美元？布什赶紧警告
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 23:55:04
]]
一个索罗斯可以把英镑 搞臭；
老共如果 大量抛售美元，大家都不好看。。。。
所以，大家 看着办事麻烦少。。。
老共如果 大量抛售美元，大家都不好看。。。。
所以，大家 看着办事麻烦少。。。
但是美元还是要换一些其他东西的
储备多元化也提过一嘴
储备多元化也提过一嘴
布什警告了?我怎么看到的是惊慌.
---------------------------------------------
国布什当天在美国财政部举行记者会，随后在接受福克斯新闻网采访时，针对英国媒体所报导的北京将会用抛售美元来报复华盛顿的消息发表了评论。布什说：“他们要是那样做将是鲁莽的。”
保尔森强调说，“我们的确关系紧张，我们双方不得不应付这些紧张关系，但总体看，两国应该致力于一种建设性经济关系。”
------------------------------------------------
老美居然提建设性的经济关系,不常见哦
---------------------------------------------
国布什当天在美国财政部举行记者会，随后在接受福克斯新闻网采访时，针对英国媒体所报导的北京将会用抛售美元来报复华盛顿的消息发表了评论。布什说：“他们要是那样做将是鲁莽的。”
保尔森强调说，“我们的确关系紧张，我们双方不得不应付这些紧张关系，但总体看，两国应该致力于一种建设性经济关系。”
------------------------------------------------
老美居然提建设性的经济关系,不常见哦
金融方面，美英不会 怕任何国家。
不过，现在的情况有些不一样，抛美元，美元贬，人民币升；而人民币升值一直是 美国要的结果。
不过，现在的情况有些不一样，抛美元，美元贬，人民币升；而人民币升值一直是 美国要的结果。
搂住真以为中国这么厉害，把美国一把捏住了，那就抛阿，登什么啊，
表明一种态度，一种宣誓 ，作用一样有的
别开玩笑了,美国和我们的经济是绑在一起的,他跨了我们的日子,对照苏联跨了北朝鲜是什么情况就知道了,全球贸易不是0和游戏
美国现在头疼的是次级抵押贷款问题，连中国的一些银行也买了一些次级抵押贷款债券，血本无归啊！
原帖由 myj16 于 2007-8-11 10:07 发表
美国现在头疼的是次级抵押贷款问题，连中国的一些银行也买了一些次级抵押贷款债券，血本无归啊！
这个你是怎么知道的？/:D
原帖由 zh020 于 2007-8-11 10:08 发表
这个你是怎么知道的？/:D
晕倒，你是不是从来不看财经版的新闻？
草！中国失业人口无论绝对值还是比例都比美国人多，为什么要听美国的
原帖由 myj16 于 2007-8-11 10:07 发表
美国现在头疼的是次级抵押贷款问题，连中国的一些银行也买了一些次级抵押贷款债券，血本无归啊！
你知道什么叫次级抵押贷款，新闻里有说中国的银行买了吗？把新闻内容贴出来
原帖由 myj16 于 2007-8-11 12:04 发表
晕倒，你是不是从来不看财经版的新闻？
那请你把看到的帖出来，我也看一下。。。。:)
原帖由 fengxiang 于 2007-8-11 13:06 发表
你知道什么叫次级抵押贷款，新闻里有说中国的银行买了吗？把新闻内容贴出来
http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20070807/01061586496.shtml
:@ TMD气死我了，老子要讲脏话了！败家玩意儿！ 自己不知道还比谁都横，这世道到底咋了？
中行工行卷入美国次按风暴 称投资少不影响利润http://www.sina.com.cn 2007年08月07日 01:06 东方早报
早报记者 毛明江 实习生 陈玉坤
美国次级按揭贷款危机爆发后，摩根大通及高盛等国外投行近日指称中国银行( 5.81,-0.01,-0.17%)有约20亿美元投资于美国的次级按揭贷款市场，预计将对中行产生财务影响。中行昨天公开澄清称，的确持有少量美国次级按揭相关投资，但金额微不足道，不会影响利润。
财务风险管理试金石
摩根大通证券(银行及金融服务研究部)副总裁陈舜近日表示，中行的境外债券投资组合规模约800亿美元，其中80亿美元为次按(次级按揭贷款)及其他资产作抵押的投资，次按相关投资部分为20亿美元左右。不过，他表示，中行该部分投资对象的评级高达“A”级及以上，发生全额损失的可能性较低。即使该部分投资被降级或“出事”，也只相当于中行7800亿美元总资产的0.25%左右，整体影响甚微。
高盛也表示，中资银行股，尤其是中资银行的H股，可能会涉及美国信贷市场风险，因为在H股上市之后，这些银行都进行了一些外汇投资。
高盛称，抵押担保证券潜在的损失预计会对中资银行产生一定财务影响，但是因资产规模不大，而且中资H股银行获利动力强，这种影响应当可以得到控制，也相信这可能成为对各个银行的财务和风险管理改革情况的试金石。
中行称金额微不足道
对此，中国银行有关负责人昨日表示，该行的确持有少量美国次级按揭相关投资，并已在上半年度业绩中作了拨备。他特别强调，目前对该项投资的拨备金额微不足道。
继中行之后，工商银行( 6.69,0.15,2.29%)也承认持有美国次级按揭资产，工行董事会秘书潘功胜也于近日承认，工行也有涉及美国次按资产的投资，但金额也非常少，不会影响公司利润。
延伸阅读
重创台湾保险商
早报记者 叶馥佳 实习生 娄璟
美国次级按揭风暴登陆台湾金融市场。由于投资了贝尔斯登旗下基金近1500万美元，台湾人寿保险股份有限公司成为台湾迄今为止受美国次级按揭危机影响最大的企业，上半年亏损新台币达4.28亿元(合1300万美元)。
美国当地时间5日，美国第五大投行贝尔斯登宣布，由于次级按揭市场危机拖累旗下两只基金倒闭，公司负责此项业务的共同总裁和共同首席运营官沃伦·斯佩克特当天辞职。
据分析，像台湾人寿这样直接对美国次级按揭投资的企业在台湾并不多，更多的企业则是选择间接地对“次级按揭债券”进行投资。例如，新光人寿保险股份有限公司的控股母公司新光金融控股股份有限公司就对“次级按揭债券”投资了约3亿美元。此外，国泰金融控股公司旗下的保险子公司也对这类债券投资了不到18亿元新台币。
早报记者 毛明江 实习生 陈玉坤
美国次级按揭贷款危机爆发后，摩根大通及高盛等国外投行近日指称中国银行( 5.81,-0.01,-0.17%)有约20亿美元投资于美国的次级按揭贷款市场，预计将对中行产生财务影响。中行昨天公开澄清称，的确持有少量美国次级按揭相关投资，但金额微不足道，不会影响利润。
财务风险管理试金石
摩根大通证券(银行及金融服务研究部)副总裁陈舜近日表示，中行的境外债券投资组合规模约800亿美元，其中80亿美元为次按(次级按揭贷款)及其他资产作抵押的投资，次按相关投资部分为20亿美元左右。不过，他表示，中行该部分投资对象的评级高达“A”级及以上，发生全额损失的可能性较低。即使该部分投资被降级或“出事”，也只相当于中行7800亿美元总资产的0.25%左右，整体影响甚微。
高盛也表示，中资银行股，尤其是中资银行的H股，可能会涉及美国信贷市场风险，因为在H股上市之后，这些银行都进行了一些外汇投资。
高盛称，抵押担保证券潜在的损失预计会对中资银行产生一定财务影响，但是因资产规模不大，而且中资H股银行获利动力强，这种影响应当可以得到控制，也相信这可能成为对各个银行的财务和风险管理改革情况的试金石。
中行称金额微不足道
对此，中国银行有关负责人昨日表示，该行的确持有少量美国次级按揭相关投资，并已在上半年度业绩中作了拨备。他特别强调，目前对该项投资的拨备金额微不足道。
继中行之后，工商银行( 6.69,0.15,2.29%)也承认持有美国次级按揭资产，工行董事会秘书潘功胜也于近日承认，工行也有涉及美国次按资产的投资，但金额也非常少，不会影响公司利润。
延伸阅读
重创台湾保险商
早报记者 叶馥佳 实习生 娄璟
美国次级按揭风暴登陆台湾金融市场。由于投资了贝尔斯登旗下基金近1500万美元，台湾人寿保险股份有限公司成为台湾迄今为止受美国次级按揭危机影响最大的企业，上半年亏损新台币达4.28亿元(合1300万美元)。
美国当地时间5日，美国第五大投行贝尔斯登宣布，由于次级按揭市场危机拖累旗下两只基金倒闭，公司负责此项业务的共同总裁和共同首席运营官沃伦·斯佩克特当天辞职。
据分析，像台湾人寿这样直接对美国次级按揭投资的企业在台湾并不多，更多的企业则是选择间接地对“次级按揭债券”进行投资。例如，新光人寿保险股份有限公司的控股母公司新光金融控股股份有限公司就对“次级按揭债券”投资了约3亿美元。此外，国泰金融控股公司旗下的保险子公司也对这类债券投资了不到18亿元新台币。
哈哈哈
生气了，你自己都看过了，次级市场是公开市场，有投资就有风险，正常的市场风险不承担，还开什么门，作什么生意。
只要，中行，工行的市场活动符合当地的规范，就没有问题，明白？？;P
生气了，你自己都看过了，次级市场是公开市场，有投资就有风险，正常的市场风险不承担，还开什么门，作什么生意。
只要，中行，工行的市场活动符合当地的规范，就没有问题，明白？？;P
购买次级按揭贷款类证券达95亿美元。
张健华认为，美国次级房地产按揭贷款证券也分为多个级别，只要买的是评级较高的如2A级、3A级之类，就没有什么问题。据相关信息，中行在美国投资的相关债券投资评级都在A级或以上。
在交行研发部仇高擎看来，美国次按对于中国金融市场的影响微弱，除非发生本质变化，引起美国经济动荡。
兴业银行( 47.96,-0.06,-0.12%)资金营运中心分析师鲁政委亦持此种观点，他认为除非有持续的全局性影响，比如导致美国GDP增长下降3个点以上，才会对中国有实质影响。
但在鲁政委看来，此事对中国可能还会有另一种反向影响，美国次按风波会挤压大量全球范围逐利的资金流向包括中国在内的新兴市场。而中国的房价在近一年来出现狂飚突进的趋势，中国政府的调控难度将更大。(相关报道见B2版)
张健华认为，美国次级房地产按揭贷款证券也分为多个级别，只要买的是评级较高的如2A级、3A级之类，就没有什么问题。据相关信息，中行在美国投资的相关债券投资评级都在A级或以上。
在交行研发部仇高擎看来，美国次按对于中国金融市场的影响微弱，除非发生本质变化，引起美国经济动荡。
兴业银行( 47.96,-0.06,-0.12%)资金营运中心分析师鲁政委亦持此种观点，他认为除非有持续的全局性影响，比如导致美国GDP增长下降3个点以上，才会对中国有实质影响。
但在鲁政委看来，此事对中国可能还会有另一种反向影响，美国次按风波会挤压大量全球范围逐利的资金流向包括中国在内的新兴市场。而中国的房价在近一年来出现狂飚突进的趋势，中国政府的调控难度将更大。(相关报道见B2版)
参见17楼。。。。
原帖由 zh020 于 2007-8-11 13:22 发表
哈哈哈
生气了，你自己都看过了，次级市场是公开市场，有投资就有风险，正常的市场风险不承担，还开什么门，作什么生意。
只要，中行，工行的市场活动符合当地的规范，就没有问题，明白？？;P
连标准普尔都承认自己评级有问题，你现在吃了亏还说愿意承担风险，真是无语。。。
不要忘记了，只要你还在用人民币，这几十亿美元的损失你也要分担！
我都说了，如果是正常的市场行为，没有违规，经营的风险是一定要承担的，不要拿那么大的帽子来压我。
It was an unusual presentation for Mr. Bush, both politically and economically. Presidents are usually advised not to wade into discussions of markets at a time when they are so unpredictable and anxiety-inducing.
Mr. Bush’s suggestion that the recent housing declines should be seen as a normal market correction from past excesses and that the government should avoid interfering with the process carries political risks at a time when some people are losing their homes, lending institutions are shaky and Democrats are demanding action.
Indeed, immediately after the president’s comments, Democrats excoriated him for saying that the economy was in sound shape, and many called on the administration to encourage federal housing agencies to step in and make more money available, perhaps by buying up troubled mortgages to avoid foreclosures.
For his part, Mr. Bush, in a verbal tour of the current economic scene, was eager both to calm the markets and knock down the Democratic calls for the administration to intervene, predicting that the turmoil in the housing sector would end with a “soft landing” and would not damage the larger economy.
“I believe that markets ultimately look at the fundamentals of any economy,” Mr. Bush said. “And the fundamentals of our economy are strong. Inflation is down. Real wages are increasing. The job market is a strong job market. People are working. Small businesses are flourishing.”
Mr. Bush, who has a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard, confidently used phrases like liquidity, risk assessment and market adjustment to describe complex economic conditions.
Asked about collapsing housing markets, and the risk of them declining further, Mr. Bush said: “In a way it’s a necessary reaction to a flood of liquidity that came into the market in the past couple years.” That was financial jargon referring to the past several years of easy money, some of it from overseas, at low interest rates.
Mr. Bush said that as a result of the deep pools of money available, “housing got really hot” and that a decline was inevitable. He added that “if the market functions normally” it will lead to a soft landing. “That’s kind of what it looks like so far,” he contended.
Democrats are reacting to the current situation less philosophically. Several are calling for the two big government-sponsored buyers of mortgages from lenders, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to provide more money for housing by buying more loans and holding them.
Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York who is chairman of the housing subcommittee of the Senate Finance Committee, said that if these agencies did not act, it would lead to a collapse of the market for sound mortgages, not just the deeply troubled subprime loans that were sold to new homebuyers and people with less-than-sterling credit.
“We need to allow Fannie and Freddie to put more credit into prime lending,” Mr. Schumer said. “This is favored by most Democrats and a good number of Republicans.”
But Mr. Bush appeared to resist that idea, saying that the agencies needed to overhaul their own practices after experiencing accounting scandals before jumping into the current crisis. “Let’s get them reformed first,” he said.
Mr. Bush’s suggestion that the recent housing declines should be seen as a normal market correction from past excesses and that the government should avoid interfering with the process carries political risks at a time when some people are losing their homes, lending institutions are shaky and Democrats are demanding action.
Indeed, immediately after the president’s comments, Democrats excoriated him for saying that the economy was in sound shape, and many called on the administration to encourage federal housing agencies to step in and make more money available, perhaps by buying up troubled mortgages to avoid foreclosures.
For his part, Mr. Bush, in a verbal tour of the current economic scene, was eager both to calm the markets and knock down the Democratic calls for the administration to intervene, predicting that the turmoil in the housing sector would end with a “soft landing” and would not damage the larger economy.
“I believe that markets ultimately look at the fundamentals of any economy,” Mr. Bush said. “And the fundamentals of our economy are strong. Inflation is down. Real wages are increasing. The job market is a strong job market. People are working. Small businesses are flourishing.”
Mr. Bush, who has a master’s degree in business administration from Harvard, confidently used phrases like liquidity, risk assessment and market adjustment to describe complex economic conditions.
Asked about collapsing housing markets, and the risk of them declining further, Mr. Bush said: “In a way it’s a necessary reaction to a flood of liquidity that came into the market in the past couple years.” That was financial jargon referring to the past several years of easy money, some of it from overseas, at low interest rates.
Mr. Bush said that as a result of the deep pools of money available, “housing got really hot” and that a decline was inevitable. He added that “if the market functions normally” it will lead to a soft landing. “That’s kind of what it looks like so far,” he contended.
Democrats are reacting to the current situation less philosophically. Several are calling for the two big government-sponsored buyers of mortgages from lenders, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to provide more money for housing by buying more loans and holding them.
Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York who is chairman of the housing subcommittee of the Senate Finance Committee, said that if these agencies did not act, it would lead to a collapse of the market for sound mortgages, not just the deeply troubled subprime loans that were sold to new homebuyers and people with less-than-sterling credit.
“We need to allow Fannie and Freddie to put more credit into prime lending,” Mr. Schumer said. “This is favored by most Democrats and a good number of Republicans.”
But Mr. Bush appeared to resist that idea, saying that the agencies needed to overhaul their own practices after experiencing accounting scandals before jumping into the current crisis. “Let’s get them reformed first,” he said.