我最欣赏的暴力火箭~

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 23:12:20
前苏联的登月火箭计划,N1是十分暴力的一款,发射四次,失败四次,最长一次飞行177秒……
作为前苏联的人类登月计划的关键部分而设计的巨型N1号火箭在它1969年8月3号第一次发射失败后,也就是美国的那次成功的“阿波罗11”号起程之前不到两周,就被放弃了。 N1号火箭最后的那次失败导致了惊天动地的大爆炸,死伤无数。
N1 or N-1 was the Soviet rocket intended to send Soviet astronauts to the moon, preferably ahead of the Americans. The Russian moon rocket program was first led by Sergei Korolev until his death in 1966 and later by Vasily Mishin. However, the project was not a success.
The overall rocket system actually bore the designation N1-L3: N1 was the boost rocket, while the L3 was mounted on top for the trip to lunar orbit and, it was hoped, lunar landing.
Incidentally, there is a great deal of confusion among Russian online sources as to whether it is N1-L3 (Russian: Н1-Л3) or N1-LZ (Russian: Н1-ЛЗ) because of the similarity of the Cyrillic letter for "Z" and the number "3". Sometimes both forms will be used within the same Russian website (or even the same article [1] (http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/240/21.shtml) [2] (http://www.buran.ru/htm/gud%2019.htm)). However, English sources refer only to N1-L3, and it seems clear it is a number because there were lunar projects with code names from L1 to L5. [3] (http://kuasar.narod.ru/history/ussr-moon-program/l3.htm)
In terms of size and lift capacity, the N1-L3 was massive. It was designed to send 95 tons of payload into lunar orbit, and stood over 100 meters tall — easily the tallest Soviet launch vehicle ever produced, even today. Unfortunately, it was also the most complex Soviet rocket ever produced, and in the rush to production, its NK-33 rocket motors (of which it carried over 30, see photo (http://www.myspacemuseum.com/n1-2.htm)) were never ground tested in combination, only as individual units. Because of this, the complex and destructive vibrational modes (which ripped apart piping and motors) as well as exhaust plume fluid dynamic problems were not discovered and worked out before flight. It is worth noting that the successful American Saturn V rocket had only five F-1 engines, rather than the 30 of the Russian design.
As a result of its technical difficulties, the N1 never successfully flew. All four test launches ended in failure, with the longest flight lasting only 107 seconds. Two test launches occurred in 1969, one in 1971 and the final one in 1972. The program was terminated in 1974 before a final test launch which the engineers believed would have been a success.
The program was followed by the "Vulkan" concept for a huge Proton like hypergolic fueled vehicle, and then in 1976 by the commencement of the Energia/Buran program.
The program left behind a large stockpile of — even by today's (2004) standards — quite advanced liquid oxygen/kerosene engines (the NK-33), which have survived the N1 cover-up hardware destruction. The U.S. company Kistler Aerospace Corporation continues to work on incorporating these engines into a new rocket design, with which Kistler seeks to eventually become able to offer commercial launch services.前苏联的登月火箭计划,N1是十分暴力的一款,发射四次,失败四次,最长一次飞行177秒……
作为前苏联的人类登月计划的关键部分而设计的巨型N1号火箭在它1969年8月3号第一次发射失败后,也就是美国的那次成功的“阿波罗11”号起程之前不到两周,就被放弃了。 N1号火箭最后的那次失败导致了惊天动地的大爆炸,死伤无数。
N1 or N-1 was the Soviet rocket intended to send Soviet astronauts to the moon, preferably ahead of the Americans. The Russian moon rocket program was first led by Sergei Korolev until his death in 1966 and later by Vasily Mishin. However, the project was not a success.
The overall rocket system actually bore the designation N1-L3: N1 was the boost rocket, while the L3 was mounted on top for the trip to lunar orbit and, it was hoped, lunar landing.
Incidentally, there is a great deal of confusion among Russian online sources as to whether it is N1-L3 (Russian: Н1-Л3) or N1-LZ (Russian: Н1-ЛЗ) because of the similarity of the Cyrillic letter for "Z" and the number "3". Sometimes both forms will be used within the same Russian website (or even the same article [1] (http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/240/21.shtml) [2] (http://www.buran.ru/htm/gud%2019.htm)). However, English sources refer only to N1-L3, and it seems clear it is a number because there were lunar projects with code names from L1 to L5. [3] (http://kuasar.narod.ru/history/ussr-moon-program/l3.htm)
In terms of size and lift capacity, the N1-L3 was massive. It was designed to send 95 tons of payload into lunar orbit, and stood over 100 meters tall — easily the tallest Soviet launch vehicle ever produced, even today. Unfortunately, it was also the most complex Soviet rocket ever produced, and in the rush to production, its NK-33 rocket motors (of which it carried over 30, see photo (http://www.myspacemuseum.com/n1-2.htm)) were never ground tested in combination, only as individual units. Because of this, the complex and destructive vibrational modes (which ripped apart piping and motors) as well as exhaust plume fluid dynamic problems were not discovered and worked out before flight. It is worth noting that the successful American Saturn V rocket had only five F-1 engines, rather than the 30 of the Russian design.
As a result of its technical difficulties, the N1 never successfully flew. All four test launches ended in failure, with the longest flight lasting only 107 seconds. Two test launches occurred in 1969, one in 1971 and the final one in 1972. The program was terminated in 1974 before a final test launch which the engineers believed would have been a success.
The program was followed by the "Vulkan" concept for a huge Proton like hypergolic fueled vehicle, and then in 1976 by the commencement of the Energia/Buran program.
The program left behind a large stockpile of — even by today's (2004) standards — quite advanced liquid oxygen/kerosene engines (the NK-33), which have survived the N1 cover-up hardware destruction. The U.S. company Kistler Aerospace Corporation continues to work on incorporating these engines into a new rocket design, with which Kistler seeks to eventually become able to offer commercial launch services.






可惜俄罗斯人的火箭发动机不过关……
后来苏联不是搞了能源火箭吗?并成功了.
看这满身的横肉,确实够凶猛的。可惜啊!
老毛子的东西就是威猛~~~~~~~
真粗壮……
确实强悍啊
好,好粗啊~~~~
活活,那些个发动机
这家伙是用N个发动机捆绑搞出来的,设计路线有问题
呵呵欣赏他的发动机喷管够彪悍!
一个发射基地都毁了
是能源强还是这个强??
[B]以下是引用[I]B-2058[/I]在2005-10-1 12:30:00的发言:[/B][BR]是能源强还是这个强??

能源号(ЭНЕРГИЯ)是目前世界上起飞质量与推力最大的火箭。
想当然的产物,原以为发动机多了可靠性高,坏一两台没事。实际是发动机多了可靠性变得极其糟糕。有一台出问题就全报销了
N1可能是全世界可靠性最差的运载火箭了
我喜欢能源和质子
据说爆炸的同时顺便报销了不少工程师和将军,连元帅部长都有一个,不知道是不是真的。
看喷管就知道,不好惹啊!
霍霍,N台发动机并联,真敢想!还有,那么大个家伙整体起竖,重型机械、液压装置倒真不是盖的!
[B]以下是引用[I]从此[/I]在2005-10-6 18:54:00的发言:[/B][BR]据说爆炸的同时顺便报销了不少工程师和将军,连元帅部长都有一个,不知道是不是真的。
这个事件爆炸的不是N1而是另外一型号的火箭,全是因为赫鲁晓夫为了迎接十月革命放卫星式政治任务弄的,为了赶时间,火箭的燃料不泄完就去检修火箭,结果一个火星,砰……
100多台发动机的怪物
土星5第一级只有5个发动机。
不断的失误,造成了竞赛的失败,最后一次,几乎把发射场都毁了,既然晚了也就没必要再搞下去,太费钱了
记得以前看个回忆中说,当时关与第一级采用什么为动力原料,两个设计师有争论,但随着科廖络夫的去世,苏联损失很大。因为煤油/液氧的效率比不上液氢液氧,自然要用那么多台,呵,麻烦也就在这。
我们的神六,实际感觉太一般,第一级没用液氢液氧,其实液氢液氧的推力是很大很强悍的,看看那些鼎级的火箭吧,美国人的航天飞机,苏联的能源、质子。
个人感觉,苏联人的火箭还是很强的,某种程度是世界第一的。
全用液轻液氧的成本问题,当然还有技术水平的问题。
成本问题当然是很大的一个问题,尤其现在航天飞行成本很重要。
对许许多国家,更大的问题是没有设计能力制造出大推力的液轻液氧发动机。看看许多大型大推力运载工具,液轻液氧还是很有用的。
数了一下,第一级31台发动机,就算每个可靠率99%,31台也只有73%了。注定要失败。
[B]以下是引用[I]esart[/I]在2005-10-20 14:29:00的发言:[/B][BR]不断的失误,造成了竞赛的失败,最后一次,几乎把发射场都毁了,既然晚了也就没必要再搞下去,太费钱了
记得以前看个回忆中说,当时关与第一级采用什么为动力原料,两个设计师有争论,但随着科廖络夫的去世,苏联损失很大。因为煤油/液氧的效率比不上液氢液氧,自然要用那么多台,呵,麻烦也就在这。
我们的神六,实际感觉太一般,第一级没用液氢液氧,其实液氢液氧的推力是很大很强悍的,看看那些鼎级的火箭吧,美国人的航天飞机,苏联的能源、质子。
个人感觉,苏联人的火箭还是很强的,某种程度是世界第一的。

神六用的是老型号火箭长征二号F型火箭
1960年10月24日,刚刚成立不到一年的苏联战略火箭军,在拜科努尔航天发射场进行P-16(即SS-7)新型洲际核导弹的试验发射。发射前,技术人员违规操作,在装满燃料的火箭上进行排障,意外导致火箭第二级发动机提前点火,高温火柱烧穿第一级火箭燃料箱后发生巨大爆炸,结果导致268人丧命,其中包括国防部副部长、战略火箭军司令涅杰林元帅(炮兵主帅)。为保全面子,苏联政府以“空难事故”对涅杰林的死因进行伪装。与此同时,为慎重起见,苏联政府被迫决定推迟首名宇航员太空飞行计划。
1960年10月23日,苏联抢先发射金星探测器,但在倒计时数到0时,竖立在发射台上的火箭没有点火。按规定应洩掉推进剂、合上塔架,有关人员才能靠近火箭进行检查,排除故障。因当时苏联领导人赫鲁晓夫正在纽约参加联合国大会,为了政治的需要而抢时间,在发射现场的导弹部队司令涅杰林元帅决定不洩掉推进剂,合上勤务塔对火箭进行检查。结果,火箭突然自动点火,而火箭被塔架卡住,无法上升,因而发生大爆炸,包括涅杰林在内的100多名军人和科技人员丧生。
哪个准确,大家自己判断。
另外,推力最大的是土星5号,不是能源号。
土星5号,近地轨道139吨,月球轨道47吨。
能源号,近地轨道105吨,月球轨道32吨。
长2E,近地轨道9.5吨。因为直径只有3.2米,所以要建海南发射场,造直径5米的火箭,近地轨道可达25吨。全面赶超日本H2A近地轨道15吨、欧洲阿丽亚娜5型火箭近地轨道10-12吨。
[B]以下是引用[I]郭炜[/I]在2005-10-22 5:27:00的发言:[/B][BR]另外,推力最大的是土星5号,不是能源号。
土星5号,近地轨道139吨,月球轨道47吨。
能源号,近地轨道105吨,月球轨道32吨。
长2E,近地轨道9.5吨。因为直径只有3.2米,所以要建海南发射场,造直径5米的火箭,近地轨道可达25吨。全面赶超日本H2A近地轨道15吨、欧洲阿丽亚娜5型火箭近地轨道10-12吨。

能源的发射场纬度高影响了运载能力.
[B]以下是引用[I]esart[/I]在2005-10-20 14:29:00的发言:[/B][BR]不断的失误,造成了竞赛的失败,最后一次,几乎把发射场都毁了,既然晚了也就没必要再搞下去,太费钱了
记得以前看个回忆中说,当时关与第一级采用什么为动力原料,两个设计师有争论,但随着科廖络夫的去世,苏联损失很大。因为煤油/液氧的效率比不上液氢液氧,自然要用那么多台,呵,麻烦也就在这。
我们的神六,实际感觉太一般,第一级没用液氢液氧,其实液氢液氧的推力是很大很强悍的,看看那些鼎级的火箭吧,美国人的航天飞机,苏联的能源、质子。
个人感觉,苏联人的火箭还是很强的,某种程度是世界第一的。

液氢液氧是不错,但也不是唯一的选择。比如液氧煤油,或者在研的液氧甲烷也不错啊。新的宇宙神5和俄罗斯的安家拉芯级用的都是液氧煤油。而质子恰恰用的和我们的CZ-2F是一样的燃料,当然以后是不会有人用在运载火箭上了。
液氧煤油也可以很大的推力,看看RD-170/180。其他燃料也一样。N-1的问题是单台推力太小,导致台数太多。实际上多也可以有冗余作用。熄火几太也没事。但问题出在实际故障里,在系统可以关闭故障发动机前就发生了管道破裂这类事故,这就没办法了。发动机台数多,震动复杂,地面试验做得不充份
[B]以下是引用[I]shh[/I]在2005-10-22 15:04:00的发言:[/B][BR]。
液氢液氧是不错,但也不是唯一的选择。比如液氧煤油,或者在研的液氧甲烷也不错啊。新的宇宙神5和俄罗斯的安家拉芯级用的都是液氧煤油。而质子恰恰用的和我们的CZ-2F是一样的燃料,当然以后是不会有人用在运载火箭上了。
液氧煤油也可以很大的推力,看看RD-170/180。其他燃料也一样。N-1的问题是单台推力太小,导致台数太多。实际上多也可以有冗余作用。熄火几太也没事。但问题出在实际故障里,在系统可以关闭故障发动机前就发生了管道破裂这类事故,这就没办法了。发动机台数多,震动复杂,地面试验做得不充份

明朝的万户身帮47只火箭想上天,结果爆炸,应该是最早的例子吧(台数太多)?
[em07]
近地轨道可达25吨`````
直接登月恐怕不行啊
哇,这么多个助推火箭,猛的一塌糊涂。
[B]以下是引用[I]jsndz[/I]在2005-10-23 17:43:00的发言:[/B][BR]近地轨道可达25吨`````
直接登月恐怕不行啊

中国人还没说要登月,只是探月而已,是印度人说要登月。
[B]以下是引用[I]jsndz[/I]在2005-10-23 17:43:00的发言:[/B][BR]近地轨道可达25吨`````
直接登月恐怕不行啊

总也是要轨道结合的。
如果能采取分批分期建设,可以到还是可以,就是可靠性恐怕也够呛。
HO发动机是必然要搞的,否则我国的航天事业只能停留在近地轨道的水平,目前我国同步轨道运送能力太差了!
强人啊!大家都是强人!