美国更高层拒绝吴胜利的邀请

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 08:25:26


对等的是海军司令员吴胜利和美国海军作战部长格林纳特
吴胜利指出,美舰机对中方的抵近侦察与中美双方共同致力于构建中美新型大国关系、新型大国海军关系的积极氛围极不相符。希望双方继续秉持“务实合作、和谐共进”的理念,切实维护两国两军关系大局。中方在南沙驻守岛礁进行相关建设,不会威胁南海的航行和飞越自由,反而会提高在这一海区进行气象预报、海上救助等方面的公共产品服务能力,履行维护国际海域安全的国际义务。欢迎国际组织和美国及相关国家在未来条件成熟时利用这些设施,开展人道主义救援减灾合作。

但美国国务院/外交部出面回应这件事。
5月1日美国国务院/外交部例行发布会
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/05/241412.htm
Jeff Rathke
Acting Deputy Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
May 1, 2015
QUESTION:  Just last one on this.  Today, there were reports that the Chinese naval chief said that the islands that it’s building might eventually be used for humanitarian work, and that the U.S. might be granted access to them when the time is right, I think was the phrasing he used.  Does that ease your concerns at all?  Does that give you any kind of peace of mind about China’s intentions?

MR RATHKE:  Well, building facilities on reclaimed land in disputed areas will not contribute to peace and stability in the region.

QUESTION:  Regardless of what (inaudible) --

MR RATHKE:  This is true even if, as some Chinese officials have stated, the facilities in question were used for civilian disaster response purposes.  Now we support all countries, including China, contributing to humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts, but building facilities on reclaimed land is not going to contribute to peace and stability.

Now, if there is a desire to reduce tensions, China could actively reduce them by taking concrete steps to halt land reclamation; clarify its nine-dash line claim in accordance with international law, as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention; and conclude a code of conduct on the South China Sea with ASEAN.  We also encourage China to work with existing multilateral mechanisms for humanitarian and disaster relief, such as the ASEAN Humanitarian Assistance Center, and – to increase the possibilities and the likelihood of regional cooperation.

QUESTION:  But would the U.S. accept that invitation?
说了那么多,到底美国接不接受邀请?
MR RATHKE:  Well, I think it’s quite clear.  Building – we do not see building facilities on reclaimed land in disputed areas as a way to contribute to peace and stability in the region.  I’m not aware of any invitation to make use of the facilities, but again, we’re talking about territory – about features that are disputed among many countries in the region.
嗨,我想这点非常明了。


QUESTION:  And also another issue, according to recent Reuters exclusive report, during Prime Minister Abe’s visit to the U.S., U.S.-Japan military are – is actually considering joining the U.S. air patrol to the South China Sea.  So was this a topic of discussion when President Obama or Secretary Kerry met with their Japanese counterpart?

MR RATHKE:  Well, of course, we had a series of meetings with Japanese officials, including with Prime Minister Abe, and just a couple of days before that we had the 2+2 meeting between Secretary Kerry and Secretary Carter with their Japanese counterparts.  We’ve put out extensive fact sheets on all of those meetings, including on the revised defense guidelines.  I can check to see whether that specific element is contained in them.  I don’t have that at my fingertips here at the moment.

Anything more on China, South China Sea?


对等的是海军司令员吴胜利和美国海军作战部长格林纳特
吴胜利指出,美舰机对中方的抵近侦察与中美双方共同致力于构建中美新型大国关系、新型大国海军关系的积极氛围极不相符。希望双方继续秉持“务实合作、和谐共进”的理念,切实维护两国两军关系大局。中方在南沙驻守岛礁进行相关建设,不会威胁南海的航行和飞越自由,反而会提高在这一海区进行气象预报、海上救助等方面的公共产品服务能力,履行维护国际海域安全的国际义务。欢迎国际组织和美国及相关国家在未来条件成熟时利用这些设施,开展人道主义救援减灾合作。

但美国国务院/外交部出面回应这件事。
5月1日美国国务院/外交部例行发布会
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/05/241412.htm
Jeff Rathke
Acting Deputy Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
May 1, 2015
QUESTION:  Just last one on this.  Today, there were reports that the Chinese naval chief said that the islands that it’s building might eventually be used for humanitarian work, and that the U.S. might be granted access to them when the time is right, I think was the phrasing he used.  Does that ease your concerns at all?  Does that give you any kind of peace of mind about China’s intentions?

MR RATHKE:  Well, building facilities on reclaimed land in disputed areas will not contribute to peace and stability in the region.

QUESTION:  Regardless of what (inaudible) --

MR RATHKE:  This is true even if, as some Chinese officials have stated, the facilities in question were used for civilian disaster response purposes.  Now we support all countries, including China, contributing to humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts, but building facilities on reclaimed land is not going to contribute to peace and stability.

Now, if there is a desire to reduce tensions, China could actively reduce them by taking concrete steps to halt land reclamation; clarify its nine-dash line claim in accordance with international law, as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention; and conclude a code of conduct on the South China Sea with ASEAN.  We also encourage China to work with existing multilateral mechanisms for humanitarian and disaster relief, such as the ASEAN Humanitarian Assistance Center, and – to increase the possibilities and the likelihood of regional cooperation.

QUESTION:  But would the U.S. accept that invitation?
说了那么多,到底美国接不接受邀请?
MR RATHKE:  Well, I think it’s quite clear.  Building – we do not see building facilities on reclaimed land in disputed areas as a way to contribute to peace and stability in the region.  I’m not aware of any invitation to make use of the facilities, but again, we’re talking about territory – about features that are disputed among many countries in the region.
嗨,我想这点非常明了。


QUESTION:  And also another issue, according to recent Reuters exclusive report, during Prime Minister Abe’s visit to the U.S., U.S.-Japan military are – is actually considering joining the U.S. air patrol to the South China Sea.  So was this a topic of discussion when President Obama or Secretary Kerry met with their Japanese counterpart?

MR RATHKE:  Well, of course, we had a series of meetings with Japanese officials, including with Prime Minister Abe, and just a couple of days before that we had the 2+2 meeting between Secretary Kerry and Secretary Carter with their Japanese counterparts.  We’ve put out extensive fact sheets on all of those meetings, including on the revised defense guidelines.  I can check to see whether that specific element is contained in them.  I don’t have that at my fingertips here at the moment.

Anything more on China, South China Sea?
一个热线谈了断,断了谈,高层互访也是被拿来打了好些年嘴仗。
中米之间的事儿,从来不看桌子上的握手,所以这个所谓“高层拒绝”只能说明政治气候,不代表军队层面。
美国海军部长和中国海军哪个领导对等?
国务院不接受很正常,他不是NAVY
很多细节没上升到国家共识高度,对等部门有谅解就是好的
美帝不傻。接受就是承认中国的南海基地了。





不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这张图片
尽在不言中

0.jpg (111.78 KB, 下载次数: 4)

下载附件 保存到相册

2015-5-2 08:20 上传




不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这张图片
尽在不言中

随便吧, 我们继续填岛就是了

来或者不来我都在这里
留你在家吃饭你还想当真啊,米帝的智商还没低到这个程度
gmgm201 发表于 2015-5-2 08:09
美国海军部长和中国海军哪个领导对等?
美国海军的最高军事领导是海军作战部长,相当于其他国家的海军司令。
华府和美政客比美军对战胜中国更有兴趣和信心,未来10年对兔子来说是非常危险的时间窗口
这句话就是阳谋的典型,站在道义的制高点,美国接招不接招都是输
噬菌体的幽灵 发表于 2015-5-2 08:22
不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这两张图片
该说的图片里都说了
我也不知道还有什么要说了
第二张是什么时候的晚会?马云这还真的是穿的比较随和啊.....
意料之中的事情!米帝要的是你国再玩一百年空潜快,神马填岛、航妈、党费,那必须是只能米帝拥有,要取悦米帝,跪舔都要分三六九等,兔子按最初的规划,只能舔脚丫,现在居然想面对面的站着握手,能同意吗?威严何在!
不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这两张图片
该说的图片里都说了
我也不知道还有什么要说了

白衣服那男的谁?还有大胖脸是谁?那一堆自拍的除了闹太套,其他的我都不认识啊。
噬菌体的幽灵 发表于 2015-5-2 08:22
不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这两张图片
该说的图片里都说了
我也不知道还有什么要说了
尽管有名片成分,但还是好图,一目了然
这照片只能让人觉得马云不整容实在是对不起大众啊。。。
噬菌体的幽灵 发表于 2015-5-2 08:22
不知怎么的,我突然就想到了这两张图片
该说的图片里都说了
我也不知道还有什么要说了
把图片解释下呗,没看懂
main 发表于 2015-5-2 13:56
把图片解释下呗,没看懂
现在呢?
看懂了吗?
长空鹰击 发表于 2015-5-2 13:40
这照片只能让人觉得马云不整容实在是对不起大众啊。。。
请不要在意细节
fkcnn 发表于 2015-5-2 13:05
白衣服那男的谁?还有大胖脸是谁?那一堆自拍的除了闹太套,其他的我都不认识啊。
好吧,我发现大家的关注点有点不太对
改了一下
噬菌体的幽灵 发表于 2015-5-2 14:07
现在呢?
看懂了吗?
不懂,出了马云别的都不认识
main 发表于 2015-5-2 14:12
不懂,出了马云别的都不认识
??
就马云一个人啊
我改了,删了一张照片

行啊!意思就是说填起来的都不行?那好,等我有能力时把这里的全部拆了就是!到时莫翻天印。。。
未来只属于中囯,蛮夷只能在我们领导之下。


亚投行事情上美国大失颜面,当然要在其他地方找回尊严。

但是两国军方对南海造岛达成一定程度的理解,外交家、政治家们就掀不起多大的风浪。

中美海军高层对话绝对是中国得分,给了美国面子,中国拿到了里子。

放长远来看,中国掌控南海是必然之势,仅仅是时间问题。受威胁最大的是日本韩国。

亚投行事情上美国大失颜面,当然要在其他地方找回尊严。

但是两国军方对南海造岛达成一定程度的理解,外交家、政治家们就掀不起多大的风浪。

中美海军高层对话绝对是中国得分,给了美国面子,中国拿到了里子。

放长远来看,中国掌控南海是必然之势,仅仅是时间问题。受威胁最大的是日本韩国。


怂人怂命,典型的“千里送碧”被拒绝的经典案例。洒家早就说过这样的外交思维地球上就没有第二份!越南填的岛海了去了,哪个政客说说过那些岛屿可以与我鳖或者相关国家分享的?这帮窝囊废…

主权领土都可以轻易送人,这踏马还有尊严吗?别反驳洒家我鳖没说过这样的话——会说的不如会听,如果美帝真的以打击南海子虚乌有的所谓海盗为名,要求在岛上驻军我鳖有脸拒绝吗?还好,美帝算是个要脸的人没接招,空遗我鳖一笑话耳…

怂人怂命,典型的“千里送碧”被拒绝的经典案例。洒家早就说过这样的外交思维地球上就没有第二份!越南填的岛海了去了,哪个政客说说过那些岛屿可以与我鳖或者相关国家分享的?这帮窝囊废…

主权领土都可以轻易送人,这踏马还有尊严吗?别反驳洒家我鳖没说过这样的话——会说的不如会听,如果美帝真的以打击南海子虚乌有的所谓海盗为名,要求在岛上驻军我鳖有脸拒绝吗?还好,美帝算是个要脸的人没接招,空遗我鳖一笑话耳…
怂人怂命,典型的“千里送碧”被拒绝的经典案例。洒家早就说过这样的外交思维地球上就没有第二份!越南填的 ...
你。。。。语文课睡觉了?
gmgm201 发表于 2015-5-2 08:09
美国海军部长和中国海军哪个领导对等?
国防部主管海军的副部长吧
38鞋扁踹.42臉 发表于 2015-5-2 15:02
怂人怂命,典型的“千里送碧”被拒绝的经典案例。洒家早就说过这样的外交思维地球上就没有第二份!越南填的 ...
军舰靠一靠,中国填的岛就易手了?战功彪炳史上最强人类第一的无敌美国海军也没有你这样自信吧
米帝已经自降身份到高一级才能对应TG了吗?
也是矫情,中国海军说了句“有空到我家坐坐”,美国海军回了句“有你这句话我就放心了”,至于这么紧张吗?
中新社北京4月30日电 (莫小亮)中国海军司令员吴胜利29日晚应约与美国海军作战部长格林纳特上将视频通话,就两国海军务实交流合作、美舰机抵近侦察、南沙岛礁建设等问题交换了意见。这是中美两国海军领导人首次进行视频通话。

以上就是对等,有关这点就不要质疑了吧?
军舰靠一靠,中国填的岛就易手了?战功彪炳史上最强人类第一的无敌美国海军也没有你这样自信吧
要不说本子就是死心眼呢,但凡有一丁点我鳖这“博大胸怀”也不至于为个钓岛闹的不可开交。分享钓岛不好吗?让我鳖的军舰停靠下能怎么滴,岛上的灯塔我鳖肯定保留,双赢不好吗?可踏马本子就是油盐不进的死扛,丫就不懂啥叫星辰海,真真的小国寡民也…

对了,还有南棒在苏岩礁上的平台是否也能与我鳖分享,共同“科考”不好吗?
也是矫情,中国海军说了句“有空到我家坐坐”,美国海军回了句“有你这句话我就放心了”,至于这么紧张吗?
说到这里洒家不禁又哀叹起大郎来,如果大郎当初敏锐的觉察到西门的意图果断放话:”为了消磨慢慢长夜,待时机成熟时可与西门及左邻右舍共同分享金莲”,何苦撕破脸皮被西门踹上一脚,因而喝了那碗药呢…

古人就是想不开,左右是个洞,捅也捅不漏,谁用不是用呢?踏马的不懂星辰腹黑下大棋活该丫命短永远被钉在耻辱柱上…
白沙瓦牧羊人 发表于 2015-5-2 12:18
这句话就是阳谋的典型,站在道义的制高点,美国接招不接招都是输
对,有点这个意思。阳谋。。。
贤成冬虫夏草 发表于 2015-5-2 14:50
亚投行事情上美国大失颜面,当然要在其他地方找回尊严。

但是两国军方对南海造岛达成一定程度的理解,外 ...
南海和韩国关系不大吧,和日本也没什么关系吧
楼上某人在现实生活中是不是极端无聊啊
下雨天打孩子——闲着也是闲着!
  
一群蝼蚁一样的怂货,处处事事为自己的无能下贱找借口、涂脂粉就别怪洒家下手重,本不想踩死你就踏马踩死你,逮着个大癞蛤蟆洒家定会把汝攥出尿来…
[img=494,367]http://img5.itiexue.net/1860/18602285.jpg[/img]想起这个图了
这句话就是阳谋的典型,站在道义的制高点,美国接招不接招都是输
感情尔等所谓的“制高点”就是脱裤子撅腚啊?即使这样美帝都没心情上你,为啥?嫌你恶心…