超级军网中国最大的错误就是她日渐强大
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 14:07:05
安德烈·弗尔切克 美国作家，电影导演，前战地记者
中国的快速发展让西方国家感受到了巨大的压力，被视为严重威胁。中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。对于西方国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
中国已经成为重要的国际经济与外交力量。1978年之后中国的经济增长，无疑是历史上最大的经济成就：数亿人口脱离了贫困，建成了最现代化的基础设施并发展了先进技术，等等。这一切让中国成为真正成功的社会主义国家。然而，中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。这种抹黑的目的非常明确：改变所有人对中国的看法。他们想要造成的舆论就是，如果中国取得了成功，那是因为她不是真正的社会主义，而如果中国失败了，那是因为她是社会主义。对于西方霸权主义国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
拿污染问题来说，就连美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔都在自己的书中明确承认，中国的污染程度比西方国家小得多，而且制定了严格的法律，但西方媒体一直以来宣传的是中国污染总量的绝对数据，而非人均污染程度。此外，将中国治理环境的努力与其他发展水平相似的国家，如印尼、菲律宾等相比较，也能清楚看出中国所取得的成绩。印尼首都雅加达几乎没有公共交通和绿地，而中国的主要城市都有十多条现代化的轨道交通线路，有供市民自由活动的公园和场所。即使去偏远的农村，人们会看到那些村庄里也有太阳能、沼气池等生产清洁能源的设施。但西方媒体对这些事实一直都不感兴趣，几乎完全漠视。去过中国的外国人会逐渐发现，中国的现状与西方媒体的宣传实在是大不相同。
西方国家对于腐败问题的宣传是别有用心、区别对待的。他们只让读者看到中国的腐败，对印度、菲律宾等他们的盟友惊人的腐败问题却只字不提。更何况，西方国家国内同样腐败盛行，他们自己却总是视而不见。这是因为他们知道，大多数西方人对于中国的了解来源于媒体报道，如果对中国的腐败问题进行持续不断的渲染，那么西方人对于中国的印象除了腐败以外就一无所知。这样一来，读者们就越来越好糊弄，只需要一个小事件，就能达到否定中国文化的效果。这是西方精英固有的傲慢与偏见，也是从经济、文化、意识形态多方面扼杀世界其他国家的卑劣手腕。
一个多元的、多极的世界对于人类生存来说至关重要，中国知道这一点，但西方国家却不明白。西方一直向别国植入他们的思想，让越来越多的国家和人民被洗脑。他们在亚洲只有一个目标，这个目标几个世纪以来都没变过，那就是加强控制以便对其进行开发利用。中国在西方国家眼中尤其可恨，西方积极利用英国历史悠久的分而治之的策略，对中国与印度、越南、日本等的旧有恩怨添油加醋地热炒，并使之不断发酵，还塑造出如菲律宾这样的中国新的强硬对手。美国为首的西方国家不遗余力地插手中国内政，资助和训练中国“反对派”，通过有毒的宣传破坏中国自己的社会主义道路，这正暴露出了他们热衷抹黑中国背后不可告人的目的。
当然，对于西方国家来说，中国的快速发展让他们感受到了巨大的压力，他们将中国视为严重威胁。中国与曾经受殖民的国家，如非洲、拉丁美洲国家的友好关系，越来越成为西方国家最大的噩梦，于是他们开动舆论机器巧妙地利用一些猜测和某些情绪来诋毁中国。说实在话，我有机会看到了中国在大洋洲、非洲、南美洲等地方的活动，总是被感动。中国人有良心、有头脑、有纪律。可是，还是会有媒体对中国进行源源不断的攻击，因为在西方媒体及其合作者眼中，中国从来就没有做对的事情。在他们看来，中国最大的错误，就在于她日渐强大。安德烈·弗尔切克 美国作家，电影导演，前战地记者
中国的快速发展让西方国家感受到了巨大的压力，被视为严重威胁。中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。对于西方国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
中国已经成为重要的国际经济与外交力量。1978年之后中国的经济增长，无疑是历史上最大的经济成就：数亿人口脱离了贫困，建成了最现代化的基础设施并发展了先进技术，等等。这一切让中国成为真正成功的社会主义国家。然而，中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。这种抹黑的目的非常明确：改变所有人对中国的看法。他们想要造成的舆论就是，如果中国取得了成功，那是因为她不是真正的社会主义，而如果中国失败了，那是因为她是社会主义。对于西方霸权主义国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
拿污染问题来说，就连美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔都在自己的书中明确承认，中国的污染程度比西方国家小得多，而且制定了严格的法律，但西方媒体一直以来宣传的是中国污染总量的绝对数据，而非人均污染程度。此外，将中国治理环境的努力与其他发展水平相似的国家，如印尼、菲律宾等相比较，也能清楚看出中国所取得的成绩。印尼首都雅加达几乎没有公共交通和绿地，而中国的主要城市都有十多条现代化的轨道交通线路，有供市民自由活动的公园和场所。即使去偏远的农村，人们会看到那些村庄里也有太阳能、沼气池等生产清洁能源的设施。但西方媒体对这些事实一直都不感兴趣，几乎完全漠视。去过中国的外国人会逐渐发现，中国的现状与西方媒体的宣传实在是大不相同。
西方国家对于腐败问题的宣传是别有用心、区别对待的。他们只让读者看到中国的腐败，对印度、菲律宾等他们的盟友惊人的腐败问题却只字不提。更何况，西方国家国内同样腐败盛行，他们自己却总是视而不见。这是因为他们知道，大多数西方人对于中国的了解来源于媒体报道，如果对中国的腐败问题进行持续不断的渲染，那么西方人对于中国的印象除了腐败以外就一无所知。这样一来，读者们就越来越好糊弄，只需要一个小事件，就能达到否定中国文化的效果。这是西方精英固有的傲慢与偏见，也是从经济、文化、意识形态多方面扼杀世界其他国家的卑劣手腕。
一个多元的、多极的世界对于人类生存来说至关重要，中国知道这一点，但西方国家却不明白。西方一直向别国植入他们的思想，让越来越多的国家和人民被洗脑。他们在亚洲只有一个目标，这个目标几个世纪以来都没变过，那就是加强控制以便对其进行开发利用。中国在西方国家眼中尤其可恨，西方积极利用英国历史悠久的分而治之的策略，对中国与印度、越南、日本等的旧有恩怨添油加醋地热炒，并使之不断发酵，还塑造出如菲律宾这样的中国新的强硬对手。美国为首的西方国家不遗余力地插手中国内政，资助和训练中国“反对派”，通过有毒的宣传破坏中国自己的社会主义道路，这正暴露出了他们热衷抹黑中国背后不可告人的目的。
当然，对于西方国家来说，中国的快速发展让他们感受到了巨大的压力，他们将中国视为严重威胁。中国与曾经受殖民的国家，如非洲、拉丁美洲国家的友好关系，越来越成为西方国家最大的噩梦，于是他们开动舆论机器巧妙地利用一些猜测和某些情绪来诋毁中国。说实在话，我有机会看到了中国在大洋洲、非洲、南美洲等地方的活动，总是被感动。中国人有良心、有头脑、有纪律。可是，还是会有媒体对中国进行源源不断的攻击，因为在西方媒体及其合作者眼中，中国从来就没有做对的事情。在他们看来，中国最大的错误，就在于她日渐强大。
中国的快速发展让西方国家感受到了巨大的压力，被视为严重威胁。中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。对于西方国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
中国已经成为重要的国际经济与外交力量。1978年之后中国的经济增长，无疑是历史上最大的经济成就：数亿人口脱离了贫困，建成了最现代化的基础设施并发展了先进技术，等等。这一切让中国成为真正成功的社会主义国家。然而，中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。这种抹黑的目的非常明确：改变所有人对中国的看法。他们想要造成的舆论就是，如果中国取得了成功，那是因为她不是真正的社会主义，而如果中国失败了，那是因为她是社会主义。对于西方霸权主义国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
拿污染问题来说，就连美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔都在自己的书中明确承认，中国的污染程度比西方国家小得多，而且制定了严格的法律，但西方媒体一直以来宣传的是中国污染总量的绝对数据，而非人均污染程度。此外，将中国治理环境的努力与其他发展水平相似的国家，如印尼、菲律宾等相比较，也能清楚看出中国所取得的成绩。印尼首都雅加达几乎没有公共交通和绿地，而中国的主要城市都有十多条现代化的轨道交通线路，有供市民自由活动的公园和场所。即使去偏远的农村，人们会看到那些村庄里也有太阳能、沼气池等生产清洁能源的设施。但西方媒体对这些事实一直都不感兴趣，几乎完全漠视。去过中国的外国人会逐渐发现，中国的现状与西方媒体的宣传实在是大不相同。
西方国家对于腐败问题的宣传是别有用心、区别对待的。他们只让读者看到中国的腐败，对印度、菲律宾等他们的盟友惊人的腐败问题却只字不提。更何况，西方国家国内同样腐败盛行，他们自己却总是视而不见。这是因为他们知道，大多数西方人对于中国的了解来源于媒体报道，如果对中国的腐败问题进行持续不断的渲染，那么西方人对于中国的印象除了腐败以外就一无所知。这样一来，读者们就越来越好糊弄，只需要一个小事件，就能达到否定中国文化的效果。这是西方精英固有的傲慢与偏见，也是从经济、文化、意识形态多方面扼杀世界其他国家的卑劣手腕。
一个多元的、多极的世界对于人类生存来说至关重要，中国知道这一点，但西方国家却不明白。西方一直向别国植入他们的思想，让越来越多的国家和人民被洗脑。他们在亚洲只有一个目标，这个目标几个世纪以来都没变过，那就是加强控制以便对其进行开发利用。中国在西方国家眼中尤其可恨，西方积极利用英国历史悠久的分而治之的策略，对中国与印度、越南、日本等的旧有恩怨添油加醋地热炒，并使之不断发酵，还塑造出如菲律宾这样的中国新的强硬对手。美国为首的西方国家不遗余力地插手中国内政，资助和训练中国“反对派”，通过有毒的宣传破坏中国自己的社会主义道路，这正暴露出了他们热衷抹黑中国背后不可告人的目的。
当然，对于西方国家来说，中国的快速发展让他们感受到了巨大的压力，他们将中国视为严重威胁。中国与曾经受殖民的国家，如非洲、拉丁美洲国家的友好关系，越来越成为西方国家最大的噩梦，于是他们开动舆论机器巧妙地利用一些猜测和某些情绪来诋毁中国。说实在话，我有机会看到了中国在大洋洲、非洲、南美洲等地方的活动，总是被感动。中国人有良心、有头脑、有纪律。可是，还是会有媒体对中国进行源源不断的攻击，因为在西方媒体及其合作者眼中，中国从来就没有做对的事情。在他们看来，中国最大的错误，就在于她日渐强大。安德烈·弗尔切克 美国作家，电影导演，前战地记者
中国的快速发展让西方国家感受到了巨大的压力，被视为严重威胁。中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。对于西方国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
中国已经成为重要的国际经济与外交力量。1978年之后中国的经济增长，无疑是历史上最大的经济成就：数亿人口脱离了贫困，建成了最现代化的基础设施并发展了先进技术，等等。这一切让中国成为真正成功的社会主义国家。然而，中国越是成功，西方就越要抹黑中国。这种抹黑的目的非常明确：改变所有人对中国的看法。他们想要造成的舆论就是，如果中国取得了成功，那是因为她不是真正的社会主义，而如果中国失败了，那是因为她是社会主义。对于西方霸权主义国家来说，成功的社会主义国家是最难处理的情况，因此西方媒体热衷于宣传中国所谓的“污染”“腐败”“不平等”等问题，以败坏她的声誉。
拿污染问题来说，就连美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔都在自己的书中明确承认，中国的污染程度比西方国家小得多，而且制定了严格的法律，但西方媒体一直以来宣传的是中国污染总量的绝对数据，而非人均污染程度。此外，将中国治理环境的努力与其他发展水平相似的国家，如印尼、菲律宾等相比较，也能清楚看出中国所取得的成绩。印尼首都雅加达几乎没有公共交通和绿地，而中国的主要城市都有十多条现代化的轨道交通线路，有供市民自由活动的公园和场所。即使去偏远的农村，人们会看到那些村庄里也有太阳能、沼气池等生产清洁能源的设施。但西方媒体对这些事实一直都不感兴趣，几乎完全漠视。去过中国的外国人会逐渐发现，中国的现状与西方媒体的宣传实在是大不相同。
西方国家对于腐败问题的宣传是别有用心、区别对待的。他们只让读者看到中国的腐败，对印度、菲律宾等他们的盟友惊人的腐败问题却只字不提。更何况，西方国家国内同样腐败盛行，他们自己却总是视而不见。这是因为他们知道，大多数西方人对于中国的了解来源于媒体报道，如果对中国的腐败问题进行持续不断的渲染，那么西方人对于中国的印象除了腐败以外就一无所知。这样一来，读者们就越来越好糊弄，只需要一个小事件，就能达到否定中国文化的效果。这是西方精英固有的傲慢与偏见，也是从经济、文化、意识形态多方面扼杀世界其他国家的卑劣手腕。
一个多元的、多极的世界对于人类生存来说至关重要，中国知道这一点，但西方国家却不明白。西方一直向别国植入他们的思想，让越来越多的国家和人民被洗脑。他们在亚洲只有一个目标，这个目标几个世纪以来都没变过，那就是加强控制以便对其进行开发利用。中国在西方国家眼中尤其可恨，西方积极利用英国历史悠久的分而治之的策略，对中国与印度、越南、日本等的旧有恩怨添油加醋地热炒，并使之不断发酵，还塑造出如菲律宾这样的中国新的强硬对手。美国为首的西方国家不遗余力地插手中国内政，资助和训练中国“反对派”，通过有毒的宣传破坏中国自己的社会主义道路，这正暴露出了他们热衷抹黑中国背后不可告人的目的。
当然，对于西方国家来说，中国的快速发展让他们感受到了巨大的压力，他们将中国视为严重威胁。中国与曾经受殖民的国家，如非洲、拉丁美洲国家的友好关系，越来越成为西方国家最大的噩梦，于是他们开动舆论机器巧妙地利用一些猜测和某些情绪来诋毁中国。说实在话，我有机会看到了中国在大洋洲、非洲、南美洲等地方的活动，总是被感动。中国人有良心、有头脑、有纪律。可是，还是会有媒体对中国进行源源不断的攻击，因为在西方媒体及其合作者眼中，中国从来就没有做对的事情。在他们看来，中国最大的错误，就在于她日渐强大。
怎奈我大天朝有＂世人皆醉我独醒＂的美分存在
兔子的罪过在于太快就当上老二了
你说对了。哈哈。
匹夫无罪，怀璧其罪
老二真不好当
有个网友的id写得好：君子坦蛋蛋，小人藏鸡鸡
这篇文说的太对了 ！ 我们今天几乎所有的问题都来自西方媒体不断给国内没有独立思考能力的货洗脑！可惜，这种直戳要害的文也只有在超大才有人看！
maise5215 发表于 2014-5-12 22:10
兔子的罪过在于太快就当上老二了
不，慢了可能更倒霉
兔子的罪过在于太快就当上老二了
不，慢了可能更倒霉
这是他的另一篇关于中国的文章: 我为什么要歌颂中国
-------------------------------------------------------
西方用“显微镜”给中国找茬
在接受新华社专访时，弗尔切克说，中国的和平发展为世界其他国家树立了一个积极的民族发展典范，但西方总把中国放在“显微镜”下观察，中国犯的任何错误都会招致尖刻的抨击。弗尔切克表示，美国在人权、发展等问题上采用双重标准看待中国，并且使用片面的舆论诋毁中国，是因为中国走的是与西方不同的发展道路，而且取得了成功。
作为经常到访中国的观察家，弗尔切克认为，中国是一个关注民生、不断取得进步的国家，有强烈的意愿改善人民的生活。回忆起从北京乘动车到天津的经历，他说，在天津火车站不远处就是一个巨大的建筑工地，但这个工地不是建设别的，而是供市民休闲健身的公园。“同样的事情也发生在北京。从地铁、公园到幼儿园，中国城市和乡村的建设都是为了人民。”
弗尔切克说，冷战后，西方舆论宣扬西方制度是胜利者，认为全世界都应予以采纳。但中国凭借与西方不同的社会主义制度，即中国政府所说的“中国特色社会主义”，取得了巨大的成功，这对西方来说是一场噩梦。“中国成功的时候，西方试图将其描绘为资本主义，甚至比西方国家还要资本主义。但另一方面，当他们打算批评中国的时候，就把它归咎为共产党执政国家，西方的舆论是有双重标准的，”弗尔切克说。
他表示，在非洲，中国人帮助当地建设公路广受欢迎，为中国公司工作的当地人说他们“第一次被外国人当人看，拿到体面的工资，再不用受到呵斥和殴打”。然而，西方舆论却对这种友好视而不见，说中国人到非洲只是为了剥削当地人，获得廉价的原材料，事实并非如此。弗尔切克说，他曾在内罗毕与中国工程师住在同一幢楼里，他所感受到的中国人是满怀热忱，抱着开创一番事业的信念来到非洲，而不是为了攫取这片大陆的资源。
西方没有资格批评中国人权
对于美国以民主为由批判中国的做法，弗尔切克并不认同。他对新华社说，美国评判一个国家是否民主与古希腊人民治理国家的传统毫无关联。“民主只是某些国家玩的政治游戏，他们所谓的非民主国家其实是决定坚持自身发展道路，追求国家、民族发展的国家。”
关于人权问题，弗尔切克说，世界上最早的集中营是大英帝国在南非和肯尼亚建立的，美国人均囚犯数量高于中国，而且西方所有国家均不同程度存在政治犯。如果西方用轰炸机袭击巴基斯坦的村庄，指挥参与印度尼西亚上世纪60年代的大屠杀，而且在拉美造成数百万人死亡，那么“西方根本没有道德资格在人权方面批评中国”。弗尔切克说，中国有十几亿人口，有复杂的文化，有自己看待事情的方式。西方之所以总拿中国的人权说事而不反省自己践踏人权的罪行，就是要把中国描绘成一个邪恶的国家，以此证明只有他们制度的存在才是合理的。
弗尔切克认为，作为一个积极的民族发展典范，中国的成功对于即将迎来70亿人口的世界极具启发意义。他说，当今世界仍有一些地方面临水资源和食物短缺问题，而中国在为庞大的人口提供足够的食物和饮用水方面具有丰富经验；中国的独生子女政策对于印度尼西亚、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国也有借鉴意义，有助于他们实现可持续发展。
西方用金钱收买各地意见领袖
在人民网提出“反华”言论为何在西方占有如此大的市场时，弗尔切克介绍称，西方媒体和学术界都受过“专业训练”。 在碰到 “盟友”----泰国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚时，他们一贯是默不做声。而对中国、委内瑞拉、古巴和玻利维亚，西方媒体每天都充斥着批评这些国家的声音。西方记者们写的直接批评中国的文章不仅在区域内，甚至在全世界都十分流行。除了媒体遵守“规则”，英国或美国媒体、学校及机构还定期给某些非洲记者提供“培训”，提供免费旅行、大笔津贴以及其他类型的赞助，记者们则要以反华报道作为回报。这实际上已经是一种腐败行为，但每天都在发生。这种情况在东南亚国家同样发生。
中国日行一善难敌西方“脏水”
在谈到西方媒体的宣传攻势对当地读者的影响时，弗尔切克说，影响是中国人无法想象的。他曾在萨摩亚和肯尼亚遇到修建道路的中国工人，他们都坚信只要做了好事，就算远隔重洋也会赢得当地国家人民的支持。他们确实做到了，但却是暂时的。不久西方的媒体就来了，重复那一套宣传策略，一笔抹杀了中国所付出的努力。中国在非洲做了很多好事，如战胜疟疾、修建学校等，最终都被人们遗忘，人们看到的只是“中国需要资源”、“中国人向赞比亚矿工开枪”这样的内容。
中国的和谐理念令西方变本加厉
当人民网问及中国的“和谐世界”理念是否让西方对中国的态度好转，弗尔切克肯定地说绝对没有。他说，“和谐世界”意味着西方控制世界和掠夺资源的终结，所以被西方视为最大的威胁，并不断遭到诋毁。弗尔切克说，“和谐世界”意味着每个国家有权进行自决，坚持自己的道路，坚持将自己人民的利益放在首位，这正是西方国家最不希望看到的。它意味着不会再有伊拉克和阿富汗式的悲剧上演，不再有利比亚行动或推翻叙利亚政权的企图，没有受西方压迫的政变或结构性调整，它更意味着尊重和包容，这是华盛顿、伦敦和巴黎的“统治者”们最不能接受的。
中国力量让西方如鲠在喉
弗尔切克指出，中国是世界上人口最多的国家，第二大经济体，并且有着非常灵活的体制。
因而，中国是世界上唯一一个有能力抗衡西方对世界政治经济“独霸”的国家。尽管古巴、委内瑞拉和玻利维亚都付出了努力，但是他们的实力较弱。巴西和南美国家持观望态度。俄罗斯似乎也没有下定决心。因此中国就成为唯一的可能和希望，进而成为西方的心头恨。中国做的好事越多，批评来得更猛。
中国注重公共外交非常必要
在谈到中国如何赢得世界理解时，弗尔切克指出，中国现在注重公共外交是非常必要且可行的，应用各种方法让世界人民熟悉中国的思想、文化及梦想。
他建议，中国应充分利用媒体资源，让世界看到中国的电影，要开办文化中心，让西方人了解中国的古都和乡村，让全世界的孩子们为中国的神话故事着迷。他在澳大利亚看见孔子学院定期提供免费的中国戏剧表演、当代艺术作品展和园艺与景观展览等。现在，澳大利亚的人越来越了解中国、尊重中国。
注重民生应成为中国最好“名片”
弗尔切克指出，目前为止，中国并没能很好地展示自己。许多西方知识分子接受西方宣传灌输，相信中国只对商业感兴趣，让部分人富了起来。加拿大籍知识分子娜欧米•克莱因在《震荡定律：灾难资本主义的兴起》一书中声称，中国加入了西方野蛮的商业体制，并将其发挥到极致。这样的观点比直白的反华言论危害更大，因为她是一名正直的知识分子，并没有受人指使。因此，中国应该更多关注像娜欧米这样的知识分子和思想家，他们本应该是朋友而不是敌人。
要说服这些人，必须证明中国所作的努力不是单纯为了经济发展，而是为了中国人民乃至世界人民，尤其是贫穷国家的人民谋福利，而不是像西方那样将经济利益作为最终目的。因此，中国应强调社会议程。尽管国家还不富裕，但中国政府应加大投入建造社会保障房、完善公共交通等基础设施,公布改善医疗和教育条件的计划，如果目标是实现免费医疗和教育就更好了。这些计划和努力将会使得中国在世界更受欢迎。
中国不示弱才能赢得西方尊重
中国在国际社会的话语权不如西方，这是个公认的事实。对此，弗尔切克表示，在面对西方的无理指责，中国应当用证据说话，用数字、统计资料以及事实等回应。西方指责中国践踏人权，中国可以列举西方在多次战争、政变以及其他恶劣行径中导致数百万人死亡的数据，举出美国在比基尼环礁的原子弹实验基地利用穷人做实验、对利比亚采取军事行动等事例进行反击。总之，无论是电视广播还是印刷媒体，中国的声音应当更加坚定和尖锐。
他表示，权力才是西方人最看重的。在西方，妥协和退让是不会赢得尊重的。中国人强调有理有据，但是有理并不会打动西方人。在他们眼里，调停和解等战略通常被认为是弱点而不是优势。因此，中国的态度应当更坚定，要有决心并坚定地维护自己国家的立场，尤其是坚定维护人民的利益，才能赢得西方的理解和尊重
.
-------------------------------------------------------
西方用“显微镜”给中国找茬
在接受新华社专访时，弗尔切克说，中国的和平发展为世界其他国家树立了一个积极的民族发展典范，但西方总把中国放在“显微镜”下观察，中国犯的任何错误都会招致尖刻的抨击。弗尔切克表示，美国在人权、发展等问题上采用双重标准看待中国，并且使用片面的舆论诋毁中国，是因为中国走的是与西方不同的发展道路，而且取得了成功。
作为经常到访中国的观察家，弗尔切克认为，中国是一个关注民生、不断取得进步的国家，有强烈的意愿改善人民的生活。回忆起从北京乘动车到天津的经历，他说，在天津火车站不远处就是一个巨大的建筑工地，但这个工地不是建设别的，而是供市民休闲健身的公园。“同样的事情也发生在北京。从地铁、公园到幼儿园，中国城市和乡村的建设都是为了人民。”
弗尔切克说，冷战后，西方舆论宣扬西方制度是胜利者，认为全世界都应予以采纳。但中国凭借与西方不同的社会主义制度，即中国政府所说的“中国特色社会主义”，取得了巨大的成功，这对西方来说是一场噩梦。“中国成功的时候，西方试图将其描绘为资本主义，甚至比西方国家还要资本主义。但另一方面，当他们打算批评中国的时候，就把它归咎为共产党执政国家，西方的舆论是有双重标准的，”弗尔切克说。
他表示，在非洲，中国人帮助当地建设公路广受欢迎，为中国公司工作的当地人说他们“第一次被外国人当人看，拿到体面的工资，再不用受到呵斥和殴打”。然而，西方舆论却对这种友好视而不见，说中国人到非洲只是为了剥削当地人，获得廉价的原材料，事实并非如此。弗尔切克说，他曾在内罗毕与中国工程师住在同一幢楼里，他所感受到的中国人是满怀热忱，抱着开创一番事业的信念来到非洲，而不是为了攫取这片大陆的资源。
西方没有资格批评中国人权
对于美国以民主为由批判中国的做法，弗尔切克并不认同。他对新华社说，美国评判一个国家是否民主与古希腊人民治理国家的传统毫无关联。“民主只是某些国家玩的政治游戏，他们所谓的非民主国家其实是决定坚持自身发展道路，追求国家、民族发展的国家。”
关于人权问题，弗尔切克说，世界上最早的集中营是大英帝国在南非和肯尼亚建立的，美国人均囚犯数量高于中国，而且西方所有国家均不同程度存在政治犯。如果西方用轰炸机袭击巴基斯坦的村庄，指挥参与印度尼西亚上世纪60年代的大屠杀，而且在拉美造成数百万人死亡，那么“西方根本没有道德资格在人权方面批评中国”。弗尔切克说，中国有十几亿人口，有复杂的文化，有自己看待事情的方式。西方之所以总拿中国的人权说事而不反省自己践踏人权的罪行，就是要把中国描绘成一个邪恶的国家，以此证明只有他们制度的存在才是合理的。
弗尔切克认为，作为一个积极的民族发展典范，中国的成功对于即将迎来70亿人口的世界极具启发意义。他说，当今世界仍有一些地方面临水资源和食物短缺问题，而中国在为庞大的人口提供足够的食物和饮用水方面具有丰富经验；中国的独生子女政策对于印度尼西亚、巴基斯坦和孟加拉国也有借鉴意义，有助于他们实现可持续发展。
西方用金钱收买各地意见领袖
在人民网提出“反华”言论为何在西方占有如此大的市场时，弗尔切克介绍称，西方媒体和学术界都受过“专业训练”。 在碰到 “盟友”----泰国、菲律宾和印度尼西亚时，他们一贯是默不做声。而对中国、委内瑞拉、古巴和玻利维亚，西方媒体每天都充斥着批评这些国家的声音。西方记者们写的直接批评中国的文章不仅在区域内，甚至在全世界都十分流行。除了媒体遵守“规则”，英国或美国媒体、学校及机构还定期给某些非洲记者提供“培训”，提供免费旅行、大笔津贴以及其他类型的赞助，记者们则要以反华报道作为回报。这实际上已经是一种腐败行为，但每天都在发生。这种情况在东南亚国家同样发生。
中国日行一善难敌西方“脏水”
在谈到西方媒体的宣传攻势对当地读者的影响时，弗尔切克说，影响是中国人无法想象的。他曾在萨摩亚和肯尼亚遇到修建道路的中国工人，他们都坚信只要做了好事，就算远隔重洋也会赢得当地国家人民的支持。他们确实做到了，但却是暂时的。不久西方的媒体就来了，重复那一套宣传策略，一笔抹杀了中国所付出的努力。中国在非洲做了很多好事，如战胜疟疾、修建学校等，最终都被人们遗忘，人们看到的只是“中国需要资源”、“中国人向赞比亚矿工开枪”这样的内容。
中国的和谐理念令西方变本加厉
当人民网问及中国的“和谐世界”理念是否让西方对中国的态度好转，弗尔切克肯定地说绝对没有。他说，“和谐世界”意味着西方控制世界和掠夺资源的终结，所以被西方视为最大的威胁，并不断遭到诋毁。弗尔切克说，“和谐世界”意味着每个国家有权进行自决，坚持自己的道路，坚持将自己人民的利益放在首位，这正是西方国家最不希望看到的。它意味着不会再有伊拉克和阿富汗式的悲剧上演，不再有利比亚行动或推翻叙利亚政权的企图，没有受西方压迫的政变或结构性调整，它更意味着尊重和包容，这是华盛顿、伦敦和巴黎的“统治者”们最不能接受的。
中国力量让西方如鲠在喉
弗尔切克指出，中国是世界上人口最多的国家，第二大经济体，并且有着非常灵活的体制。
因而，中国是世界上唯一一个有能力抗衡西方对世界政治经济“独霸”的国家。尽管古巴、委内瑞拉和玻利维亚都付出了努力，但是他们的实力较弱。巴西和南美国家持观望态度。俄罗斯似乎也没有下定决心。因此中国就成为唯一的可能和希望，进而成为西方的心头恨。中国做的好事越多，批评来得更猛。
中国注重公共外交非常必要
在谈到中国如何赢得世界理解时，弗尔切克指出，中国现在注重公共外交是非常必要且可行的，应用各种方法让世界人民熟悉中国的思想、文化及梦想。
他建议，中国应充分利用媒体资源，让世界看到中国的电影，要开办文化中心，让西方人了解中国的古都和乡村，让全世界的孩子们为中国的神话故事着迷。他在澳大利亚看见孔子学院定期提供免费的中国戏剧表演、当代艺术作品展和园艺与景观展览等。现在，澳大利亚的人越来越了解中国、尊重中国。
注重民生应成为中国最好“名片”
弗尔切克指出，目前为止，中国并没能很好地展示自己。许多西方知识分子接受西方宣传灌输，相信中国只对商业感兴趣，让部分人富了起来。加拿大籍知识分子娜欧米•克莱因在《震荡定律：灾难资本主义的兴起》一书中声称，中国加入了西方野蛮的商业体制，并将其发挥到极致。这样的观点比直白的反华言论危害更大，因为她是一名正直的知识分子，并没有受人指使。因此，中国应该更多关注像娜欧米这样的知识分子和思想家，他们本应该是朋友而不是敌人。
要说服这些人，必须证明中国所作的努力不是单纯为了经济发展，而是为了中国人民乃至世界人民，尤其是贫穷国家的人民谋福利，而不是像西方那样将经济利益作为最终目的。因此，中国应强调社会议程。尽管国家还不富裕，但中国政府应加大投入建造社会保障房、完善公共交通等基础设施,公布改善医疗和教育条件的计划，如果目标是实现免费医疗和教育就更好了。这些计划和努力将会使得中国在世界更受欢迎。
中国不示弱才能赢得西方尊重
中国在国际社会的话语权不如西方，这是个公认的事实。对此，弗尔切克表示，在面对西方的无理指责，中国应当用证据说话，用数字、统计资料以及事实等回应。西方指责中国践踏人权，中国可以列举西方在多次战争、政变以及其他恶劣行径中导致数百万人死亡的数据，举出美国在比基尼环礁的原子弹实验基地利用穷人做实验、对利比亚采取军事行动等事例进行反击。总之，无论是电视广播还是印刷媒体，中国的声音应当更加坚定和尖锐。
他表示，权力才是西方人最看重的。在西方，妥协和退让是不会赢得尊重的。中国人强调有理有据，但是有理并不会打动西方人。在他们眼里，调停和解等战略通常被认为是弱点而不是优势。因此，中国的态度应当更坚定，要有决心并坚定地维护自己国家的立场，尤其是坚定维护人民的利益，才能赢得西方的理解和尊重
.
西方完善攻击中国的技术（全文）
2011年10月02日 人民日报
西方自己都在全世界各地做着践踏人权的事情，又怎么可能关心人权呢？人权问题是西方用来掩盖其对任何致力于与共产主义或社会主义国家进行对抗的组织提供支持的借口。
“支持人权”，往往是西方干涉别国内政甚至将某个国家引入内战的同义词。这已经在尼加拉瓜、古巴和智利等国家“实行”过，现在又被用来制造中国的不稳定。
“支持人权”，在苏联解体的过程中扮演了重要角色，也曾破坏了拉美所有的革命或群众运动（古巴除外），也曾为某些最可怕的干涉行动提供了借口，如对越南和老挝人民的屠杀罪行。
中国历来都是一个爱好和平的国家，与亚洲地区的一些西方盟友相比，中国的人权问题要小得多，也不同于西方本身对人权的侵犯。同时，中国希望通过自己善意的行动与和解的态度能够赢得别人的理解。但我们这个世界控制在殖民和后殖民帝国手中，这些帝国有着几百年的征服和镇压经验，善意与和平不会使它们减少冲突。
西方不少民众对中国越来越敌视，这并不是因为他们更加认识或了解了这个国家，而是因为他们被西方持续的“宣传炸弹”征服了。西方国家组织了来自媒体和大学的数以万计的男男女女，他们唯一的职业目标就是污蔑、诋毁中国，或绘制一幅中国的邪恶肖像。反华已经成为在美国和其他西方国家获得科研贷款或在新闻界向上爬的最佳途径之一。
实际上，全世界没有哪个地方逃得过西方开展的宣传。在非洲，很多人对中国深表感激。在肯尼亚，我就亲耳听到参与中资项目的数百名肯尼亚工作人员表示自己“第一次被外国人当人看”，“从来也不需要跟中国老板谈工资问题，因为他们提供的工资总是比你预想的高出三倍”。但中国在非洲（或大洋洲或世界其他地区）的形象越正面，就越要承受西方媒体的嘲讽和批评。
非洲和其他地区的不少报纸热衷于发表西方的反华文章。因为在这些地区，凡是愿意迎合西方反华媒体论调的记者们能够获得很多酬劳，包括到国外旅行、接受“培训”以及获得奖金或者西方国家的签证。在大洋洲和东南亚同样有这样的现象。这种酬劳诱惑很大，但那些抗拒这样做的人受到的惩罚也相当严厉。
肯尼亚前议员姆万达维罗·姆格汉加说：对于中国，人们有自己的看法。如果你到肯尼亚国内旅行，你会发现中国人在建造公路、大楼和体育场。这是一些非常好的项目。中国人非常有合作精神。人们看到中国人真正做了什么，并做出自己的评价。但肯尼亚政府也承受了巨大的压力，西方因为我们与中国的密切关系而惩罚我们。
印度尼西亚的苏哈托在1965年美国推动的政变之后，在印尼杀害了两三百万人，正是美国建造了这个集中营。大部分受害者是共产主义者、少数族裔华裔人士、反对派知识分子、无神论者和教师。
抵抗智利独裁的人们，也从来没成为诺贝尔奖的关注对象。皮诺切特的爪牙在西方的命令下奸杀掳掠，西方的机构又怎么会将百万美元的奖金授予那些想要终结这种屠杀的人呢？
西方的媒体只敢嘲讽穆斯林的圣人，却不敢取笑我们西方崇拜的对象！我们西方的媒体允许自己，甚至是被要求取笑中国、俄罗斯或拉美的所有人物和象征，甚至于革命歌曲。而在赞美我们的反共“英雄”时，则不断地为他们铺设红地毯，为他们贴上近乎神圣的标签。
卢旺达总统保罗·卡加梅多年以来都在刚果民主共和国杀人。以美国为首的西方把诺贝尔和平奖给了卢旺达的反对派了吗？根本没有这回事，尽管卢旺达的反对派领导人被谋杀、被关押，有的在总统大选之前就失踪了。因为保罗·卡加梅是我们美国的朋友，就像英国前首相托尼·布莱尔一样。也许布莱尔都能获得诺贝尔和平奖，但卢旺达的反对派不会。
我们是不是该把诺贝尔和平奖给泰国的反对派呢？我们的朋友泰国政权杀害了数百名反对派人士。下令进行大屠杀的泰国总理是在英国出生和学习的。他是一个真正的“绅士”，我们的“绅士”。能给泰国反对派诺贝尔奖吗？那是在开玩笑！
“人权”一词，已经被侵略、干涉、军事政变和随之出现的所有谋杀、酷刑和侵犯行为玷污了。如果我们想保留住这个概念，就应该对每个国家，在每种情况下都平等地使用它。那么我们就能清楚地看到谁才是最大的践踏人权者。我们也会看到，什么才是“人权”的真正含义，哪些才是最基本的人权。难道不应该是生命权和自决权吗？如果是这样，那么西方不就是过去和现在最大的践踏人权行为的罪魁祸首吗？
姆万达维罗曾经说过，很多非政府组织、“民间社会”和人权保护组织，常常直接服务于西方在穷国的帝国主义利益。他们也在委内瑞拉、古巴和中国形成了“第五纵队”。
如果西方真的对人权感兴趣，哪怕只有一点点的兴趣，也应该停止在国外的粗暴侵略和战争，停止在全世界支持那些最可恶的独裁政权，教训那些在全世界直接或间接犯下罪行的西方跨国公司，这些罪行大部分是针对手无寸铁的穷人，甚至更荒谬的是，针对当地那些真正的人权卫士。
西方的权力体系中根本不存在利他主义，要想期待出现这样的情况就太可笑了。西方的权力机器极度野蛮，只为自己的利益服务，已经引发了成百上千场战争和冲突，造成了数亿无辜者丧生。
作为和平大国的中国，对西方的扩张主义来说显然是一种威胁。西方对此感到害怕，这种害怕甚至发展到了歇斯底里的程度。西方已经不知道该怎么做了。西方的决策者们求助于1973年在智利和1965年在印度尼西亚采取的颠覆手段来对付中国；用对付苏联和古巴的方法来挑衅和挤压中国；企图通过宣传手段在国内外诋毁中国；还进行干涉和渗透，甚至进行贿赂；还寻求通过吸引蒙古及其邻国加入其势力范围来孤立中国；甚至企图说服越南对中国采取进攻性的态度。但是都没有奏效。
西方面对的中国是一个拥有五千多年历史、地球上最伟大的文化之一的国家。西方所面对的是以前从未遇到过的人和精神。最重要的是，中国厌恶冲突。中国礼貌地倾听但坚持自己的道路，坚信自己的选择。中国的选择所追求的主要目标是让所有中国人摆脱贫困，并向全世界展示中国是如何在屈服于西方殖民者几个世纪之后重新站起来的。
中国不会再听命于西方的摆布。大部分中国人不会再相信西方人。中国有自己的制度。他们不需要西方人告诉他们该怎么做，什么时候做。
西方的暴怒是可以理解的。西方的武器、宣传和颠覆战术第一次显得如此无效和无能。看来西方没有能力征服或分裂中国。这方面的尝试数不胜数，比如在西方出版的有关中国的书99%是“持不同政见者”写的。但这样仍然不奏效。
中国是很耐心的，出奇地耐心。想象一下，如果中国突然公开支持美国国内一个计划推翻美国政治制度的共产党组织，结果会怎么样？相反的是，在美国和欧洲，有数以百计的人因为有比这要轻得多的言行而入狱。再想象一下，如果中国积极地谋求孤立美国，收买和贿赂加拿大或墨西哥政府，结果又会怎么样；或者中国在距离别国首都不到一个小时航程的地方部署核弹会怎么样？
欧洲人和美国人已经习惯了在世界其他国家做出这种不公正的行为，但如果他们自己成为受害者就会大肆叫嚣。中国似乎意识到了西方这种精神上的病态，即无力抑制自己要控制世界的欲望。但是，必须有个界限。所有破坏中国稳定的企图都将遭遇中国的坚决抵抗，中国在必要时会毫不犹豫地捍卫自己的人民和领土。
2011年10月02日 人民日报
西方自己都在全世界各地做着践踏人权的事情，又怎么可能关心人权呢？人权问题是西方用来掩盖其对任何致力于与共产主义或社会主义国家进行对抗的组织提供支持的借口。
“支持人权”，往往是西方干涉别国内政甚至将某个国家引入内战的同义词。这已经在尼加拉瓜、古巴和智利等国家“实行”过，现在又被用来制造中国的不稳定。
“支持人权”，在苏联解体的过程中扮演了重要角色，也曾破坏了拉美所有的革命或群众运动（古巴除外），也曾为某些最可怕的干涉行动提供了借口，如对越南和老挝人民的屠杀罪行。
中国历来都是一个爱好和平的国家，与亚洲地区的一些西方盟友相比，中国的人权问题要小得多，也不同于西方本身对人权的侵犯。同时，中国希望通过自己善意的行动与和解的态度能够赢得别人的理解。但我们这个世界控制在殖民和后殖民帝国手中，这些帝国有着几百年的征服和镇压经验，善意与和平不会使它们减少冲突。
西方不少民众对中国越来越敌视，这并不是因为他们更加认识或了解了这个国家，而是因为他们被西方持续的“宣传炸弹”征服了。西方国家组织了来自媒体和大学的数以万计的男男女女，他们唯一的职业目标就是污蔑、诋毁中国，或绘制一幅中国的邪恶肖像。反华已经成为在美国和其他西方国家获得科研贷款或在新闻界向上爬的最佳途径之一。
实际上，全世界没有哪个地方逃得过西方开展的宣传。在非洲，很多人对中国深表感激。在肯尼亚，我就亲耳听到参与中资项目的数百名肯尼亚工作人员表示自己“第一次被外国人当人看”，“从来也不需要跟中国老板谈工资问题，因为他们提供的工资总是比你预想的高出三倍”。但中国在非洲（或大洋洲或世界其他地区）的形象越正面，就越要承受西方媒体的嘲讽和批评。
非洲和其他地区的不少报纸热衷于发表西方的反华文章。因为在这些地区，凡是愿意迎合西方反华媒体论调的记者们能够获得很多酬劳，包括到国外旅行、接受“培训”以及获得奖金或者西方国家的签证。在大洋洲和东南亚同样有这样的现象。这种酬劳诱惑很大，但那些抗拒这样做的人受到的惩罚也相当严厉。
肯尼亚前议员姆万达维罗·姆格汉加说：对于中国，人们有自己的看法。如果你到肯尼亚国内旅行，你会发现中国人在建造公路、大楼和体育场。这是一些非常好的项目。中国人非常有合作精神。人们看到中国人真正做了什么，并做出自己的评价。但肯尼亚政府也承受了巨大的压力，西方因为我们与中国的密切关系而惩罚我们。
印度尼西亚的苏哈托在1965年美国推动的政变之后，在印尼杀害了两三百万人，正是美国建造了这个集中营。大部分受害者是共产主义者、少数族裔华裔人士、反对派知识分子、无神论者和教师。
抵抗智利独裁的人们，也从来没成为诺贝尔奖的关注对象。皮诺切特的爪牙在西方的命令下奸杀掳掠，西方的机构又怎么会将百万美元的奖金授予那些想要终结这种屠杀的人呢？
西方的媒体只敢嘲讽穆斯林的圣人，却不敢取笑我们西方崇拜的对象！我们西方的媒体允许自己，甚至是被要求取笑中国、俄罗斯或拉美的所有人物和象征，甚至于革命歌曲。而在赞美我们的反共“英雄”时，则不断地为他们铺设红地毯，为他们贴上近乎神圣的标签。
卢旺达总统保罗·卡加梅多年以来都在刚果民主共和国杀人。以美国为首的西方把诺贝尔和平奖给了卢旺达的反对派了吗？根本没有这回事，尽管卢旺达的反对派领导人被谋杀、被关押，有的在总统大选之前就失踪了。因为保罗·卡加梅是我们美国的朋友，就像英国前首相托尼·布莱尔一样。也许布莱尔都能获得诺贝尔和平奖，但卢旺达的反对派不会。
我们是不是该把诺贝尔和平奖给泰国的反对派呢？我们的朋友泰国政权杀害了数百名反对派人士。下令进行大屠杀的泰国总理是在英国出生和学习的。他是一个真正的“绅士”，我们的“绅士”。能给泰国反对派诺贝尔奖吗？那是在开玩笑！
“人权”一词，已经被侵略、干涉、军事政变和随之出现的所有谋杀、酷刑和侵犯行为玷污了。如果我们想保留住这个概念，就应该对每个国家，在每种情况下都平等地使用它。那么我们就能清楚地看到谁才是最大的践踏人权者。我们也会看到，什么才是“人权”的真正含义，哪些才是最基本的人权。难道不应该是生命权和自决权吗？如果是这样，那么西方不就是过去和现在最大的践踏人权行为的罪魁祸首吗？
姆万达维罗曾经说过，很多非政府组织、“民间社会”和人权保护组织，常常直接服务于西方在穷国的帝国主义利益。他们也在委内瑞拉、古巴和中国形成了“第五纵队”。
如果西方真的对人权感兴趣，哪怕只有一点点的兴趣，也应该停止在国外的粗暴侵略和战争，停止在全世界支持那些最可恶的独裁政权，教训那些在全世界直接或间接犯下罪行的西方跨国公司，这些罪行大部分是针对手无寸铁的穷人，甚至更荒谬的是，针对当地那些真正的人权卫士。
西方的权力体系中根本不存在利他主义，要想期待出现这样的情况就太可笑了。西方的权力机器极度野蛮，只为自己的利益服务，已经引发了成百上千场战争和冲突，造成了数亿无辜者丧生。
作为和平大国的中国，对西方的扩张主义来说显然是一种威胁。西方对此感到害怕，这种害怕甚至发展到了歇斯底里的程度。西方已经不知道该怎么做了。西方的决策者们求助于1973年在智利和1965年在印度尼西亚采取的颠覆手段来对付中国；用对付苏联和古巴的方法来挑衅和挤压中国；企图通过宣传手段在国内外诋毁中国；还进行干涉和渗透，甚至进行贿赂；还寻求通过吸引蒙古及其邻国加入其势力范围来孤立中国；甚至企图说服越南对中国采取进攻性的态度。但是都没有奏效。
西方面对的中国是一个拥有五千多年历史、地球上最伟大的文化之一的国家。西方所面对的是以前从未遇到过的人和精神。最重要的是，中国厌恶冲突。中国礼貌地倾听但坚持自己的道路，坚信自己的选择。中国的选择所追求的主要目标是让所有中国人摆脱贫困，并向全世界展示中国是如何在屈服于西方殖民者几个世纪之后重新站起来的。
中国不会再听命于西方的摆布。大部分中国人不会再相信西方人。中国有自己的制度。他们不需要西方人告诉他们该怎么做，什么时候做。
西方的暴怒是可以理解的。西方的武器、宣传和颠覆战术第一次显得如此无效和无能。看来西方没有能力征服或分裂中国。这方面的尝试数不胜数，比如在西方出版的有关中国的书99%是“持不同政见者”写的。但这样仍然不奏效。
中国是很耐心的，出奇地耐心。想象一下，如果中国突然公开支持美国国内一个计划推翻美国政治制度的共产党组织，结果会怎么样？相反的是，在美国和欧洲，有数以百计的人因为有比这要轻得多的言行而入狱。再想象一下，如果中国积极地谋求孤立美国，收买和贿赂加拿大或墨西哥政府，结果又会怎么样；或者中国在距离别国首都不到一个小时航程的地方部署核弹会怎么样？
欧洲人和美国人已经习惯了在世界其他国家做出这种不公正的行为，但如果他们自己成为受害者就会大肆叫嚣。中国似乎意识到了西方这种精神上的病态，即无力抑制自己要控制世界的欲望。但是，必须有个界限。所有破坏中国稳定的企图都将遭遇中国的坚决抵抗，中国在必要时会毫不犹豫地捍卫自己的人民和领土。
Have no illusions: the Nobel Peace Prize that has been awarded this year (2010) to Liu Xiaobo, the primary drafter of Charter 08, has nothing to do with human rights. It is a direct attempt to harm the largest non-Western economy and socio-political system in the world.
The West has absolutely no interest in human rights in China or anywhere else. How could it, considering that it is violating them on basically all continents, worldwide? Human rights are camouflaging the West’s support for every group of people willing to antagonize, fight against or destroy any country or state that is Communist or Socialist by name or by deeds.
Support for human rights is often synonymous with direct intervention in internal affairs, a hostile act against sovereign nation or with actually oppressing human rights or forcing a country to the brink of civil war. This approach had been ‘perfected’ in Nicaragua, Cuba and Chile, among many other places and it is now being put to work in an attempt to destabilize China.
‘Support for human rights groups’ helped to bring down Soviet Union, it destroyed at one point almost all revolutions and popular movements in Latin America (except in Cuba) and it was used as justification for some of the most horrid interventions (by the West), that included acts of mass murder/genocide against people of Vietnam and Laos.
Tactics that were at work – to first discredit and then destroy all Communist and Socialist, progressive and nationalist states, governments and movements including Soviet Union, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Chile, Tanzania, and recently Venezuela – are considered useful until this day. Now they are more refined, (more people and technology are involved) and much more effective than anytime in the past. After all, the task that Western global dictatorship defined for itself is tremendous: China – the most populated nation on earth.
The fact that China is historically peaceful, non-confrontational and very successful makes the task much more difficult. On top of it, China violates human rights much lesser than all Western allies in Asia Pacific including Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand and definitely much lesser than the West itself. After all, the West is presently (indirectly) involved in massacres in Congo/DRC (at least 5 million have died there), in destabilizing entire Horn of Africa and parts of Latin America and in aggressive wars in Iraq, Afghanistan to name just a few lethal adventures.
To discredit China takes enormous effort, but it seems that no task is too great for those in the West who would happily sacrifice the entire earth for their unbridled desire to control and rule.
Equipped with the ‘world language’, limitless funds and absolute access to, and control over, the media, Western propaganda planners are managing to twist facts and manipulate global public opinion. In the meantime, China is playing clean and fair, hoping that its good intentions, deeds and non-confrontationist attitude will win friends and allies. But in our world controlled by colonial and post-colonial empires with hundreds of years of experience in conquering and oppressing the planet – being good and peaceful is not always a guarantee for avoiding confrontation, even for survival!
The Western population is increasingly hostile towards China and it is not because it knows about it or understands it, but because of propaganda by which it is being bombarded day and night. Tens of thousands of men and women in media and academia have no other purpose in professional life than to bash China; to discredit it, to make it appear as evil. China bashing is now an excellent career, one of the best ways to get academic or research grants or rise in media corporate ladder.
Public has almost no alternative sources of information. What Noam Chomsky calls “Manufacturing of Consensus” is now close to sad but ‘successful’ completion. Unless some people are very much determined to find alternative sources of information and unless they are fluent in searching for them (tiny minority of the population even in Europe and North America), they will be simply spoon-fed by thousand times repeated lies, manipulative half-truths and clichés about China, about non-Western and even Western (self proclaimed ‘democratic’) world. They will not have to search for their own world-view – it will be cooked and served to them as pre-cooked meal.
Almost no place on earth is free from propaganda produced by global Western regime. In Africa where China offers great alternative to Western plundering (by building schools, social centers, hospital, government buildings, roads and railways), many local people feel deep gratitude towards this enormous Communist country that says ‘it wants to be a friend to developing world’. In Kenya I heard testimonies of hundreds of workers on Chinese projects saying that they were ‘treated like human beings by foreigners for the first time’, and that they ‘never had to negotiate wages with the Chinese bosses as they were offered 3 times higher salaries than they expected right from the beginning’. However, more positively China gets involved in Africa (or in Oceania or in many other places in the world) more it has to face dark sarcasm and attacks of the Western media outlets that pervert and drag through dirt all attempts to create alternative world where solidarity and internationalism stands above pragmatic interests.
Local newspapers in Africa and elsewhere are overzealously printing pieces tailored for local consumption but designed and paid for from abroad. Journalists who join anti-Chinese choir get rewards – frequent trips abroad for ‘training’, awards and visas to the West. The same is happening in Oceania and in Southeast Asia. Temptations are too great, punishments for stepping out of line too harsh.
“People see concretely what China is doing”, explains Mwandawiro Mghanga, former Kenyan MP, member of Defense and Foreign Relations Committees, poet and prisoner of conscience under brutal pro-Western regime of former dictator Moi. “If you travel throughout the country, you’ll see Chinese constructing and building roads, stadiums and housing projects which are very good. They are also very closely involved with people in spite of all propaganda being spread by the West. The reality of what China is doing is being seen and appreciated by our citizens. But there is great pressure on Kenyan government not to cooperate with China. In fact, there is great hostility towards Kenya – the West is punishing this country for having relatively close ties with PRC.”
That’s the standard – the way we ‘democratically’ rule the world (we force, corrupt and if we find it necessary – depose the governments), but you hardly hear it from local politicians. And god forbid, do not associate these practices with violations of human rights or with infringing democracy abroad!
During Moi dictatorship, regime that can be described as politically and economically very ‘pro Western’), Mr. Mandawiro and tens of thousands of other Kenyan activists, opposition politicians and dissidents were savagely tortured. He stood firm, he fought for his country but he never received Nobel Peace Price.
Pramoedya Ananta Toer – the greatest Indonesian writer who spent more than ten years in Buru concentration camp – died without receiving Nobel Price for either peace or literature. Naturally, the concentration camp he was locked in was our own concentration camp – our ally Suharto who killed between 2 and 3 million people after 1965 US-sponsored coup built it. Most of those killed were Communists, people belonging to Chinese minority, opposition intellectuals, atheists and teachers! Before he passed away, Pramoedya shared with me his Marxist ideals and the fact that for decades he was defending people of Chinese minority in Indonesia. That had not qualified his for any Nobel Price. He was not even a member of ‘civil society’ or pro-Western NGO!
None of the men and women resisting beastly military dictatorship in Chile ever came close to receiving Novel Peace Price. Pinochet’s men were killing and raping on our (Western) orders. Why would one of our institutions give more than a million dollars to those who would want to stop the carnage? Instead, Nobel Peace Price was given to Henry Kissinger who was one of the masterminds of Chilean carnage.
Western institutions simply do not make mistakes, or at least not too many. The art of manipulation had been perfected throughout the centuries. Philosophy, logic and the language itself had all been twisted, while analytical thoughts were discouraged. Idols had been erected and analyzing them in depth was discouraged. Solzhenitsyn, former feudal lord Dalai Lama and now the new one: Liu Xiaobo! The same year the Nobel Price for Literature has been awarded to Maria Vargas Llosa, originally Peruvian, naturalized Spanish anti-Communist novelist who is definitely much more admired in Europe than in his native land.
And don’t you dare to ridicule the idols! Our press only dares to laugh at Muslim saints, not at our own. Manufacturing our heroes (read: ‘heroes’ who serve our political and economic interest) is sacred act that can never be ridiculed. Naturally, our media can and is expected to ridicule all iconic figures, symbols, even the songs of Latin American, Chinese or Russian revolution. In the meantime it wrapped our anti-Communist and anti-Left Wing ‘heroes’ in such velvety gowns and attach such divine auras and qualities to their existence that almost nobody who cares about his or her reputation, career or even safety would dare to analyze true motives behind actions of these saints!
You see, the President of Rwanda – Paul Kagame – is a good man and there can be no discussion about it. He did not attack his own country Rwanda from Uganda on several occasions; he did not kill hundreds of thousands of people in Congo and Rwanda (“Do you have proof – have you been there? Do you have footage of rapes and massacres?” Well, actually, I have some proof and some footage, but that is beside the point). If you disagree that Kagame is a good chap, you are ‘denying genocide’ of 1994. Why? – Well simply because he is our man; because his troops are for years killing on our behalf in DRC/Congo. Now that the UN Report claims that Rwanda and Uganda might have committed another genocide in Congo, we keep quiet, hoping that the storm will pass and that main ‘donors’ to the UN (us – the West – plus our former colony and present ‘ally’ – Japan) will manage to maneuver the UN to withdraw the document or at least to rephrase the findings – something that was already partially done, given that servile attitude of Secretary General of the UN – Ban Ki Moon. Do we give Nobel Peace prize to Rwandan opposition? Not in a blue moon, although their leaders were murdered, imprisoned and some disappeared before the recent Presidential elections. Mr Kagame is our friend and people like Tony Blair – former British PM – are his personal advisors! Mr. Tony Blair may one day get his Nobel Peace Prize, too, but definitely not Rwandan opposition.
Do we award Novel Peace Price to Thai dissidents? Our friendly Thai establishment recently murdered many of them – some were shot from the roofs by snipers; shot to their heads. (I have footage, I was there – do you want to see? Are you interested to see how friendly and peaceful were opposition Thai Red Shirts?) Of course, the Prime Minister who ordered the carnage is British-born and British-educated man. He is real gentleman, our gentleman. The US born Thai monarch may be, even according to the US press, the most corrupt king of 20th century, but he made sure that his country killed so many Communists and Leftists that we have no choice but to love him and to protect him from any criticism at home or abroad. He also helped us to bomb Vietnam and Laos, so who cares about human rights. Nobel Peace Price to Thai opposition? Get lost! Don’t make silly jokes!
Or maybe we should give Nobel Peace Price to poor indigenous Papuan freedom fighters? Their country was annexed by Indonesia with our help so our mining and logging companies could plunder it indefinitely, while Indonesian elites were and are building their mansions and employ dozens of drivers, gardeners and maids just for fun as they don’t know what to do with all that cash in their impoverished country. Even Western human rights organizations admit that more than 100 thousand Papuans were butchered so far. Suggesting one of them should be awarded Nobel Peace Price? Do you want to get on permanent blacklist of Western mass media, or what?
Then maybe we should consider giving Nobel Peace Price to defenders of democracy in Venezuela – to those people who heroically stood against military coup which was organized by the US and had one single purpose – to depose democratically elected President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez? Do you see it coming?
Let us seriously, once and for all, drop that ridiculous term – Human Rights! It is stained by invasions, interferences with internal affairs, by the military coups and consequent killing, torture and rape.
Or if we are not ready to drop it, let us apply it equally, to every state and to every situation. Let us determine who is the greatest violator of such rights! Let us also determine what the term ‘Human Rights’ means. What are the most basic human rights? Aren’t they those to life and to self-determination? And if they are, aren’t we the ones who violated most of them in an ancient and recent history?
Mr. Mwandawiro once declared that many of the NGOs, ‘civil societies’ and human rights organizations are often serving direct imperialist interests of the West in poor countries. They are Fifth Columns in Venezuela, in Cuba and in China – in fact in any country that we are failing to control. Naturally, not all of these organizations are some foreign implants, but many of them are and others are frequently bought and manipulated from outside.
It is natural that if the West would be at least fractionally serious about so called Human Rights, it would stop its own brutal aggressions and foreign wars, it would discontinue supporting the most appalling fascist dictatorships worldwide and it would restrain its companies that are regularly committing murder (direct and indirect) all over the planet – murder against mostly defenseless and poor people or, paradoxically, against the genuine defenders of local human rights.
To expect it would be, however, ludicrous! There is nothing altruistic in the Western system of power. The structure is extremely brutal and self-serving. It had no heart and no compassion – definitely no solidarity. It already triggered hundreds of wars and conflicts, taking lives of hundreds of millions of innocent people.
Peaceful and mighty China is naturally a danger to Western expansionism.
The West is panicking. Its panic borders hysteria. It does not clearly know what it is doing. Western planners are using the same tactics to break China as they used to break Chile in 1973 and Indonesia in 1965. They are provoking it and pushing it to the corner as they did with Soviet Union and with Cuba. They try to disseminate propaganda, to discredit the system at home and abroad. They try interventions and infiltrations; they try bribes. They are attempting to isolate China, by encompassing Mongolia and other neighbors to its sphere, even attempting to seduce Vietnam to confrontational attitude towards its enormous neighbor. Nothing seems to work!
It is open and extremely hostile game. Its purpose is to isolate China, provoke it and finally break it, preferably internally.
But the West is dealing with the greatest culture on earth, with over 5.000 years of history. It is dealing with tremendous minds, with intellectuals and strategists – people they never encountered as antagonists before.
The most significantly, the Chinese dragon refuses confrontation! It listens to all this frustrating barking down below, to provocateurs and manipulators who ruled the world for centuries and who suddenly feel that they may lose! Chinese dragon listens but keeps walking his own way, certain of its course. For him or for her, the main goal is to lift all of its citizens out of poverty and by doing this – to show example to the rest of oppressed world how it could get on its own feet after centuries of subservience to Western colonial rulers. Despite what is said in Western media, the Chinese Dragon’s skin is rough, but it is not only big but also gentle and caring creature.
Despite some errors, the Chinese experiment is based on solidarity. Great majority of its citizens are supporting it and that is in essence proof of democratic core of the process. That’s how majority of Chinese people see it and that’s all that matters.
China will never again move according to Western puppet-masters. It was already invaded, divided, plundered and raped. Majority of its people will never again trust Western formulas. China has its own system and if its people will believe that it has to be modified, they will make sure to change it at their own pace. They will not need Westerners to tell them how and when to do it. There is no need for it: Western system is morally corrupt as the rest of the planet could testify (if it would be allowed to) and those nations that are free to study it independently are not necessarily eager to face its deadly embrace any longer.
The fury of the West is understandable. For the first time its guns, propaganda and destabilizing tactics seem to be useless and impotent. They do not appear to be able to conquer or to break China. Attempts are plentiful: read Chinese books translated and published in the West: ‘dissidents’ write 99 percent of them (almost exclusively, dissidents are being published in English). Still it does not work – China is in one peace and united. Sour and increasingly irrelevant former colony – Hong Kong – is allowed (by the West) to shape opinion of foreigners about the country of 1.4 billion inhabitants. It is no secret that Hong Kong bookstores, particularly those at its airport are carrying exclusively anti-Chinese propaganda. In the light of that, Chinese people inside China (PRC) have access to the much more diverse views about their country than those folks living outside and relying on English-language sources (almost all negative and hostile).
Other frustrating factor for the West is that very few Chinese people are willing to commit treason. In PRC there is no Suharto, no Yeltcin and no Pinochet in sight – no ‘leader’ or some general willing to sell his country for cash, for booze or for power.
China is patient. It is shockingly patient. The West would never tolerate such direct interventions. Imagine Communist China suddenly and openly supporting Communist Party of the United States that would be planning to overthrow the political system of the United States. In the US and in Europe hundreds of people end up in jail for much smaller ‘crimes’. Imagine China actively isolating the United States, bribing and antagonizing governments in Mexico and Canada. Or placing nuclear warheads just one hour flight from its capital!
It seems that citizens in Europe and North America are used to it when such injustice is done (by them) to any other country on earth, but would scream murder would it be directed against them. China seems to be aware of this pathological (Gustav Jung wrote many essays on the topic) mental state in the West – its inability to curb longing for control and dominance of the world. By all means, China is very patient and understanding, at least for now. It understands that the West has no way to control its longing for dominating the planet. But there should be a limit. All hostile attempts to destabilize the country should be met with determined resistance of the Dragon who should and will, would there be a need, defend its people and sovereignty.
http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/the ... a-by-andre-vltchek/
上一篇文章的英文版
The West has absolutely no interest in human rights in China or anywhere else. How could it, considering that it is violating them on basically all continents, worldwide? Human rights are camouflaging the West’s support for every group of people willing to antagonize, fight against or destroy any country or state that is Communist or Socialist by name or by deeds.
Support for human rights is often synonymous with direct intervention in internal affairs, a hostile act against sovereign nation or with actually oppressing human rights or forcing a country to the brink of civil war. This approach had been ‘perfected’ in Nicaragua, Cuba and Chile, among many other places and it is now being put to work in an attempt to destabilize China.
‘Support for human rights groups’ helped to bring down Soviet Union, it destroyed at one point almost all revolutions and popular movements in Latin America (except in Cuba) and it was used as justification for some of the most horrid interventions (by the West), that included acts of mass murder/genocide against people of Vietnam and Laos.
Tactics that were at work – to first discredit and then destroy all Communist and Socialist, progressive and nationalist states, governments and movements including Soviet Union, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Chile, Tanzania, and recently Venezuela – are considered useful until this day. Now they are more refined, (more people and technology are involved) and much more effective than anytime in the past. After all, the task that Western global dictatorship defined for itself is tremendous: China – the most populated nation on earth.
The fact that China is historically peaceful, non-confrontational and very successful makes the task much more difficult. On top of it, China violates human rights much lesser than all Western allies in Asia Pacific including Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand and definitely much lesser than the West itself. After all, the West is presently (indirectly) involved in massacres in Congo/DRC (at least 5 million have died there), in destabilizing entire Horn of Africa and parts of Latin America and in aggressive wars in Iraq, Afghanistan to name just a few lethal adventures.
To discredit China takes enormous effort, but it seems that no task is too great for those in the West who would happily sacrifice the entire earth for their unbridled desire to control and rule.
Equipped with the ‘world language’, limitless funds and absolute access to, and control over, the media, Western propaganda planners are managing to twist facts and manipulate global public opinion. In the meantime, China is playing clean and fair, hoping that its good intentions, deeds and non-confrontationist attitude will win friends and allies. But in our world controlled by colonial and post-colonial empires with hundreds of years of experience in conquering and oppressing the planet – being good and peaceful is not always a guarantee for avoiding confrontation, even for survival!
The Western population is increasingly hostile towards China and it is not because it knows about it or understands it, but because of propaganda by which it is being bombarded day and night. Tens of thousands of men and women in media and academia have no other purpose in professional life than to bash China; to discredit it, to make it appear as evil. China bashing is now an excellent career, one of the best ways to get academic or research grants or rise in media corporate ladder.
Public has almost no alternative sources of information. What Noam Chomsky calls “Manufacturing of Consensus” is now close to sad but ‘successful’ completion. Unless some people are very much determined to find alternative sources of information and unless they are fluent in searching for them (tiny minority of the population even in Europe and North America), they will be simply spoon-fed by thousand times repeated lies, manipulative half-truths and clichés about China, about non-Western and even Western (self proclaimed ‘democratic’) world. They will not have to search for their own world-view – it will be cooked and served to them as pre-cooked meal.
Almost no place on earth is free from propaganda produced by global Western regime. In Africa where China offers great alternative to Western plundering (by building schools, social centers, hospital, government buildings, roads and railways), many local people feel deep gratitude towards this enormous Communist country that says ‘it wants to be a friend to developing world’. In Kenya I heard testimonies of hundreds of workers on Chinese projects saying that they were ‘treated like human beings by foreigners for the first time’, and that they ‘never had to negotiate wages with the Chinese bosses as they were offered 3 times higher salaries than they expected right from the beginning’. However, more positively China gets involved in Africa (or in Oceania or in many other places in the world) more it has to face dark sarcasm and attacks of the Western media outlets that pervert and drag through dirt all attempts to create alternative world where solidarity and internationalism stands above pragmatic interests.
Local newspapers in Africa and elsewhere are overzealously printing pieces tailored for local consumption but designed and paid for from abroad. Journalists who join anti-Chinese choir get rewards – frequent trips abroad for ‘training’, awards and visas to the West. The same is happening in Oceania and in Southeast Asia. Temptations are too great, punishments for stepping out of line too harsh.
“People see concretely what China is doing”, explains Mwandawiro Mghanga, former Kenyan MP, member of Defense and Foreign Relations Committees, poet and prisoner of conscience under brutal pro-Western regime of former dictator Moi. “If you travel throughout the country, you’ll see Chinese constructing and building roads, stadiums and housing projects which are very good. They are also very closely involved with people in spite of all propaganda being spread by the West. The reality of what China is doing is being seen and appreciated by our citizens. But there is great pressure on Kenyan government not to cooperate with China. In fact, there is great hostility towards Kenya – the West is punishing this country for having relatively close ties with PRC.”
That’s the standard – the way we ‘democratically’ rule the world (we force, corrupt and if we find it necessary – depose the governments), but you hardly hear it from local politicians. And god forbid, do not associate these practices with violations of human rights or with infringing democracy abroad!
During Moi dictatorship, regime that can be described as politically and economically very ‘pro Western’), Mr. Mandawiro and tens of thousands of other Kenyan activists, opposition politicians and dissidents were savagely tortured. He stood firm, he fought for his country but he never received Nobel Peace Price.
Pramoedya Ananta Toer – the greatest Indonesian writer who spent more than ten years in Buru concentration camp – died without receiving Nobel Price for either peace or literature. Naturally, the concentration camp he was locked in was our own concentration camp – our ally Suharto who killed between 2 and 3 million people after 1965 US-sponsored coup built it. Most of those killed were Communists, people belonging to Chinese minority, opposition intellectuals, atheists and teachers! Before he passed away, Pramoedya shared with me his Marxist ideals and the fact that for decades he was defending people of Chinese minority in Indonesia. That had not qualified his for any Nobel Price. He was not even a member of ‘civil society’ or pro-Western NGO!
None of the men and women resisting beastly military dictatorship in Chile ever came close to receiving Novel Peace Price. Pinochet’s men were killing and raping on our (Western) orders. Why would one of our institutions give more than a million dollars to those who would want to stop the carnage? Instead, Nobel Peace Price was given to Henry Kissinger who was one of the masterminds of Chilean carnage.
Western institutions simply do not make mistakes, or at least not too many. The art of manipulation had been perfected throughout the centuries. Philosophy, logic and the language itself had all been twisted, while analytical thoughts were discouraged. Idols had been erected and analyzing them in depth was discouraged. Solzhenitsyn, former feudal lord Dalai Lama and now the new one: Liu Xiaobo! The same year the Nobel Price for Literature has been awarded to Maria Vargas Llosa, originally Peruvian, naturalized Spanish anti-Communist novelist who is definitely much more admired in Europe than in his native land.
And don’t you dare to ridicule the idols! Our press only dares to laugh at Muslim saints, not at our own. Manufacturing our heroes (read: ‘heroes’ who serve our political and economic interest) is sacred act that can never be ridiculed. Naturally, our media can and is expected to ridicule all iconic figures, symbols, even the songs of Latin American, Chinese or Russian revolution. In the meantime it wrapped our anti-Communist and anti-Left Wing ‘heroes’ in such velvety gowns and attach such divine auras and qualities to their existence that almost nobody who cares about his or her reputation, career or even safety would dare to analyze true motives behind actions of these saints!
You see, the President of Rwanda – Paul Kagame – is a good man and there can be no discussion about it. He did not attack his own country Rwanda from Uganda on several occasions; he did not kill hundreds of thousands of people in Congo and Rwanda (“Do you have proof – have you been there? Do you have footage of rapes and massacres?” Well, actually, I have some proof and some footage, but that is beside the point). If you disagree that Kagame is a good chap, you are ‘denying genocide’ of 1994. Why? – Well simply because he is our man; because his troops are for years killing on our behalf in DRC/Congo. Now that the UN Report claims that Rwanda and Uganda might have committed another genocide in Congo, we keep quiet, hoping that the storm will pass and that main ‘donors’ to the UN (us – the West – plus our former colony and present ‘ally’ – Japan) will manage to maneuver the UN to withdraw the document or at least to rephrase the findings – something that was already partially done, given that servile attitude of Secretary General of the UN – Ban Ki Moon. Do we give Nobel Peace prize to Rwandan opposition? Not in a blue moon, although their leaders were murdered, imprisoned and some disappeared before the recent Presidential elections. Mr Kagame is our friend and people like Tony Blair – former British PM – are his personal advisors! Mr. Tony Blair may one day get his Nobel Peace Prize, too, but definitely not Rwandan opposition.
Do we award Novel Peace Price to Thai dissidents? Our friendly Thai establishment recently murdered many of them – some were shot from the roofs by snipers; shot to their heads. (I have footage, I was there – do you want to see? Are you interested to see how friendly and peaceful were opposition Thai Red Shirts?) Of course, the Prime Minister who ordered the carnage is British-born and British-educated man. He is real gentleman, our gentleman. The US born Thai monarch may be, even according to the US press, the most corrupt king of 20th century, but he made sure that his country killed so many Communists and Leftists that we have no choice but to love him and to protect him from any criticism at home or abroad. He also helped us to bomb Vietnam and Laos, so who cares about human rights. Nobel Peace Price to Thai opposition? Get lost! Don’t make silly jokes!
Or maybe we should give Nobel Peace Price to poor indigenous Papuan freedom fighters? Their country was annexed by Indonesia with our help so our mining and logging companies could plunder it indefinitely, while Indonesian elites were and are building their mansions and employ dozens of drivers, gardeners and maids just for fun as they don’t know what to do with all that cash in their impoverished country. Even Western human rights organizations admit that more than 100 thousand Papuans were butchered so far. Suggesting one of them should be awarded Nobel Peace Price? Do you want to get on permanent blacklist of Western mass media, or what?
Then maybe we should consider giving Nobel Peace Price to defenders of democracy in Venezuela – to those people who heroically stood against military coup which was organized by the US and had one single purpose – to depose democratically elected President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez? Do you see it coming?
Let us seriously, once and for all, drop that ridiculous term – Human Rights! It is stained by invasions, interferences with internal affairs, by the military coups and consequent killing, torture and rape.
Or if we are not ready to drop it, let us apply it equally, to every state and to every situation. Let us determine who is the greatest violator of such rights! Let us also determine what the term ‘Human Rights’ means. What are the most basic human rights? Aren’t they those to life and to self-determination? And if they are, aren’t we the ones who violated most of them in an ancient and recent history?
Mr. Mwandawiro once declared that many of the NGOs, ‘civil societies’ and human rights organizations are often serving direct imperialist interests of the West in poor countries. They are Fifth Columns in Venezuela, in Cuba and in China – in fact in any country that we are failing to control. Naturally, not all of these organizations are some foreign implants, but many of them are and others are frequently bought and manipulated from outside.
It is natural that if the West would be at least fractionally serious about so called Human Rights, it would stop its own brutal aggressions and foreign wars, it would discontinue supporting the most appalling fascist dictatorships worldwide and it would restrain its companies that are regularly committing murder (direct and indirect) all over the planet – murder against mostly defenseless and poor people or, paradoxically, against the genuine defenders of local human rights.
To expect it would be, however, ludicrous! There is nothing altruistic in the Western system of power. The structure is extremely brutal and self-serving. It had no heart and no compassion – definitely no solidarity. It already triggered hundreds of wars and conflicts, taking lives of hundreds of millions of innocent people.
Peaceful and mighty China is naturally a danger to Western expansionism.
The West is panicking. Its panic borders hysteria. It does not clearly know what it is doing. Western planners are using the same tactics to break China as they used to break Chile in 1973 and Indonesia in 1965. They are provoking it and pushing it to the corner as they did with Soviet Union and with Cuba. They try to disseminate propaganda, to discredit the system at home and abroad. They try interventions and infiltrations; they try bribes. They are attempting to isolate China, by encompassing Mongolia and other neighbors to its sphere, even attempting to seduce Vietnam to confrontational attitude towards its enormous neighbor. Nothing seems to work!
It is open and extremely hostile game. Its purpose is to isolate China, provoke it and finally break it, preferably internally.
But the West is dealing with the greatest culture on earth, with over 5.000 years of history. It is dealing with tremendous minds, with intellectuals and strategists – people they never encountered as antagonists before.
The most significantly, the Chinese dragon refuses confrontation! It listens to all this frustrating barking down below, to provocateurs and manipulators who ruled the world for centuries and who suddenly feel that they may lose! Chinese dragon listens but keeps walking his own way, certain of its course. For him or for her, the main goal is to lift all of its citizens out of poverty and by doing this – to show example to the rest of oppressed world how it could get on its own feet after centuries of subservience to Western colonial rulers. Despite what is said in Western media, the Chinese Dragon’s skin is rough, but it is not only big but also gentle and caring creature.
Despite some errors, the Chinese experiment is based on solidarity. Great majority of its citizens are supporting it and that is in essence proof of democratic core of the process. That’s how majority of Chinese people see it and that’s all that matters.
China will never again move according to Western puppet-masters. It was already invaded, divided, plundered and raped. Majority of its people will never again trust Western formulas. China has its own system and if its people will believe that it has to be modified, they will make sure to change it at their own pace. They will not need Westerners to tell them how and when to do it. There is no need for it: Western system is morally corrupt as the rest of the planet could testify (if it would be allowed to) and those nations that are free to study it independently are not necessarily eager to face its deadly embrace any longer.
The fury of the West is understandable. For the first time its guns, propaganda and destabilizing tactics seem to be useless and impotent. They do not appear to be able to conquer or to break China. Attempts are plentiful: read Chinese books translated and published in the West: ‘dissidents’ write 99 percent of them (almost exclusively, dissidents are being published in English). Still it does not work – China is in one peace and united. Sour and increasingly irrelevant former colony – Hong Kong – is allowed (by the West) to shape opinion of foreigners about the country of 1.4 billion inhabitants. It is no secret that Hong Kong bookstores, particularly those at its airport are carrying exclusively anti-Chinese propaganda. In the light of that, Chinese people inside China (PRC) have access to the much more diverse views about their country than those folks living outside and relying on English-language sources (almost all negative and hostile).
Other frustrating factor for the West is that very few Chinese people are willing to commit treason. In PRC there is no Suharto, no Yeltcin and no Pinochet in sight – no ‘leader’ or some general willing to sell his country for cash, for booze or for power.
China is patient. It is shockingly patient. The West would never tolerate such direct interventions. Imagine Communist China suddenly and openly supporting Communist Party of the United States that would be planning to overthrow the political system of the United States. In the US and in Europe hundreds of people end up in jail for much smaller ‘crimes’. Imagine China actively isolating the United States, bribing and antagonizing governments in Mexico and Canada. Or placing nuclear warheads just one hour flight from its capital!
It seems that citizens in Europe and North America are used to it when such injustice is done (by them) to any other country on earth, but would scream murder would it be directed against them. China seems to be aware of this pathological (Gustav Jung wrote many essays on the topic) mental state in the West – its inability to curb longing for control and dominance of the world. By all means, China is very patient and understanding, at least for now. It understands that the West has no way to control its longing for dominating the planet. But there should be a limit. All hostile attempts to destabilize the country should be met with determined resistance of the Dragon who should and will, would there be a need, defend its people and sovereignty.
http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/the ... a-by-andre-vltchek/
上一篇文章的英文版
渐强大是谁
因为中国最大的错误就是她殖民地化，
所以，总是弄些戏子在那干嚎中国最大的错误就是她日渐强大。
所以，总是弄些戏子在那干嚎中国最大的错误就是她日渐强大。
中国最大的错误是弱的时候美国打不赢，现在强了又不敢打
DJTesla 发表于 2014-5-12 22:59
渐强大是谁
泥垢了~
渐强大是谁
泥垢了~
赞！不断抢占舆论阵地，向国内和国外强力发出中国正能量的声音！这也是一场激烈的没有硝烟的战争！
最大的错误就是 块头太大 。
应该 分成 七块 或 11 块 。这和强不强无关。
应该 分成 七块 或 11 块 。这和强不强无关。
maise5215 发表于 2014-5-12 22:10
兔子的罪过在于太快就当上老二了
最关键的是挤啊挤，快把鹰酱从宝座上挤下来了，人家能不着急吗？
兔子的罪过在于太快就当上老二了
最关键的是挤啊挤，快把鹰酱从宝座上挤下来了，人家能不着急吗？
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的苗头！
从这篇文章来看，国外也有很多有良心够客观的媒体人，对于一些善意的建议或者批评，我们要理性面对。不要出现那种对方说兔子好话我们就点赞，对方批评中国我们就爆粗！众多网友最容易犯的就是这个毛病！这要搁在古代，就是有做昏君的潜质了。
我们应做到闻过则喜。就算对方是骗廷杖的，我们也要表现出大国风范！暴躁易怒的，那是棒子。喜欢阿谀奉承的，那是三哥
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的苗头！
从这篇文章来看，国外也有很多有良心够客观的媒体人，对于一些善意的建议或者批评，我们要理性面对。不要出现那种对方说兔子好话我们就点赞，对方批评中国我们就爆粗！众多网友最容易犯的就是这个毛病！这要搁在古代，就是有做昏君的潜质了。
我们应做到闻过则喜。就算对方是骗廷杖的，我们也要表现出大国风范！暴躁易怒的，那是棒子。喜欢阿谀奉承的，那是三哥
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！ 另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的 ...
有，绝不是很多，CNN、BBC之流简直呵呵。
有，绝不是很多，CNN、BBC之流简直呵呵。
告诫新一代年轻人，世界要用自己的眼光去发现，而不是仅仅从带有主观色彩的媒体获取。我们不盲从，也不畏惧发现。趁有生之年行走地球，你才会在离去的时候明白你生活的星球是什么样的。
一语中的！ 就是因为你变强大的太快了而且后劲十足，你看三哥就没人说人家威胁这个威胁那个的
美国最大的错误就是他坐拥超级大国的地位。来自: Android客户端
本文作者是一个长期在拉美,中东,非洲工作的一线作家
真是好笑，难道要当一辈子孙子？
说得好像西方多怕中国的发展速度似的，别再灌黄汤了，中国的崛起速度是不慢，可也没快到让人害怕的程度。美国南北战争之后进入重建时期，到一战之前，经济超出英德两者之合，也不过四十年。现在我们改革开放也三十多年了，我们的经济前景却远不如当时的美国那么乐观。
小模小样 发表于 2014-5-12 23:37
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的 ...
说得好！俺非常赞同。
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的 ...
说得好！俺非常赞同。
作为矛盾的综合体，无所不黑是心理失衡，无所不洗却也是妄自尊大，拒绝进步的表现。
外交部中宣部该好好学习这样的文章
宣传部门战五渣！没有硝烟的战场也是血肉横飞的残酷！
个人喜欢玩帝国时代2，每次都会选英法日。由于技术差只能每个单独一组，每个国家都可以相互攻击。每次得分最高的都会被其他国家打，我选的中国一直很小心，从不先惹事，先慢慢的出农民，慢慢的种地砍柴挖矿，尤其是石矿，在大本营周围建城堡，一边边的升级科技。等他们打的差不多了，我狂造军队，然后一个个灭了骚扰我屠杀我农民的国家
小模小样 发表于 2014-5-12 23:37
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的 ...
媒体要是真正的公正，批评是可以接受的，只是很多西方对中国一直在造谣，而且对贪官进行包庇，在一定程度上使反腐陷入困境。
这篇文章一针见血，很有见地！
另外，在反对国外对兔子的妖魔化的同时，我们也要警惕国内对外媒的妖魔化的 ...
媒体要是真正的公正，批评是可以接受的，只是很多西方对中国一直在造谣，而且对贪官进行包庇，在一定程度上使反腐陷入困境。
怒之新 发表于 2014-5-12 23:54
一语中的！ 就是因为你变强大的太快了而且后劲十足，你看三哥就没人说人家威胁这个威胁那个的
猪是没有威胁的，哪怕是小猪长成大肥猪
一语中的！ 就是因为你变强大的太快了而且后劲十足，你看三哥就没人说人家威胁这个威胁那个的
猪是没有威胁的，哪怕是小猪长成大肥猪