[视频新闻] 阿萨德刚才在foxnews电视台上亲自许诺将遵守 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/27 21:54:50


[视频新闻] 阿萨德刚才在foxnews电视台上亲自许诺将遵守销毁化武协定。销毁化武的过程十分复杂,将花费十亿美元,时间为一年。阿萨德在视频里逐点反驳了联合国化武报告里对其不利的细节。

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/ ... s-vows-to-abide-by/

Defiant Assad claims government did not use chem weapons, vows to abide by agreement

Syrian President Bashar Assad, in an exclusive interview with Fox News, claimed he is fully committed to carrying out a plan to turn over and destroy his government's chemical weapons -- while continuing to deny responsibility for last month's deadly chemical weapons attack despite new evidence that officials say implicates the Assad regime.

Assad acknowledged that his government has chemical weapons. "It's not a secret anymore," he said, referencing his government's decision to join the international Chemical Weapons Convention.

Assad also said that the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack, in which more than 1,000 people reportedly died, was a violation of international law. "That's self-evident," he said. "This is despicable. It's a crime."

Yet Assad adamantly denied that his government was behind the attack, continuing to push the theory that the opposition was behind the strike.

"We have evidence that terrorist groups (have) used sarin gas," he said. "The whole story (that the Syrian government used them) doesn't even hold together. ... We didn't use any chemical weapons."

The interview was conducted Tuesday in Damascus by Fox News' Greg Palkot. In the interview, Assad was confronted with the newly released findings of a United Nations report on the Aug. 21 attack. The report said there is conclusive evidence that the chemical attack occurred. It did not assign blame, but included findings about the type of rocket used which the U.S. and its allies claim point to Syrian government culpability.

Assad brushed off the allegation, suggesting the sarin gas could have been brought in by an outside government.

"The sarin gas (is) called kitchen gas. You know why? Because anyone can make sarin in his house," he said. "We know that all those rebels are supported by governments."   

He also brushed off the videos and pictures of victims that have surfaced online, saying "there is a lot of forgery on the Internet."

The U.S. government and its allies reject these claims, and say it is now clear that Assad's government launched the attack. "The technical details of the U.N. report make clear that only the regime could have carried out this large scale chemical weapons attack," U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power said Monday, calling this the "largest chemical weapons attack in 25 years."

Though Assad will not acknowledge culpability, the question now is whether his government will abide by a U.S.-Russia backed agreement to turn over his government's chemical weapons. The agreement was struck over the weekend, leading President Obama to shelve the threat of military action in retaliation for last month's attack.

Obama administration officials claim they are not taking the threat of force off the table, but will wait to see if Assad abides by the agreement, which is still being formally drafted at the U.N. level.

Assad told Fox News his government is "committed to the full requirements of this agreement."

Asked whether he would send the weapons anywhere to be destroyed, he said there are environmental risks in that task, but any country "ready to take the risk of those materials, let them take it."

"In general, whenever we join (an) agreement as Syria, we are always committed to those agreements," he said.

Fox News contributor and former Rep. Dennis Kucinich helped secure the interview with Assad, and was beside Palkot in Damascus while it was being conducted.

Assad also had a message for Obama, who faced opposition from both Congress and constituents over his initial push for a military strike. "Listen to your people. Follow the common sense of your people," he said.

Assad continued to downplay the tens of thousands of civilian casualties that have been reported in the country's civil war.  He claims many of the people killed were "terrorists."

"This is war. You don't have (a) clean war," he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/ ... e-by/#ixzz2fKVHdXaT




[视频新闻] 阿萨德刚才在foxnews电视台上亲自许诺将遵守销毁化武协定。销毁化武的过程十分复杂,将花费十亿美元,时间为一年。阿萨德在视频里逐点反驳了联合国化武报告里对其不利的细节。

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/ ... s-vows-to-abide-by/

Defiant Assad claims government did not use chem weapons, vows to abide by agreement

Syrian President Bashar Assad, in an exclusive interview with Fox News, claimed he is fully committed to carrying out a plan to turn over and destroy his government's chemical weapons -- while continuing to deny responsibility for last month's deadly chemical weapons attack despite new evidence that officials say implicates the Assad regime.

Assad acknowledged that his government has chemical weapons. "It's not a secret anymore," he said, referencing his government's decision to join the international Chemical Weapons Convention.

Assad also said that the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack, in which more than 1,000 people reportedly died, was a violation of international law. "That's self-evident," he said. "This is despicable. It's a crime."

Yet Assad adamantly denied that his government was behind the attack, continuing to push the theory that the opposition was behind the strike.

"We have evidence that terrorist groups (have) used sarin gas," he said. "The whole story (that the Syrian government used them) doesn't even hold together. ... We didn't use any chemical weapons."

The interview was conducted Tuesday in Damascus by Fox News' Greg Palkot. In the interview, Assad was confronted with the newly released findings of a United Nations report on the Aug. 21 attack. The report said there is conclusive evidence that the chemical attack occurred. It did not assign blame, but included findings about the type of rocket used which the U.S. and its allies claim point to Syrian government culpability.

Assad brushed off the allegation, suggesting the sarin gas could have been brought in by an outside government.

"The sarin gas (is) called kitchen gas. You know why? Because anyone can make sarin in his house," he said. "We know that all those rebels are supported by governments."   

He also brushed off the videos and pictures of victims that have surfaced online, saying "there is a lot of forgery on the Internet."

The U.S. government and its allies reject these claims, and say it is now clear that Assad's government launched the attack. "The technical details of the U.N. report make clear that only the regime could have carried out this large scale chemical weapons attack," U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power said Monday, calling this the "largest chemical weapons attack in 25 years."

Though Assad will not acknowledge culpability, the question now is whether his government will abide by a U.S.-Russia backed agreement to turn over his government's chemical weapons. The agreement was struck over the weekend, leading President Obama to shelve the threat of military action in retaliation for last month's attack.

Obama administration officials claim they are not taking the threat of force off the table, but will wait to see if Assad abides by the agreement, which is still being formally drafted at the U.N. level.

Assad told Fox News his government is "committed to the full requirements of this agreement."

Asked whether he would send the weapons anywhere to be destroyed, he said there are environmental risks in that task, but any country "ready to take the risk of those materials, let them take it."

"In general, whenever we join (an) agreement as Syria, we are always committed to those agreements," he said.

Fox News contributor and former Rep. Dennis Kucinich helped secure the interview with Assad, and was beside Palkot in Damascus while it was being conducted.

Assad also had a message for Obama, who faced opposition from both Congress and constituents over his initial push for a military strike. "Listen to your people. Follow the common sense of your people," he said.

Assad continued to downplay the tens of thousands of civilian casualties that have been reported in the country's civil war.  He claims many of the people killed were "terrorists."

"This is war. You don't have (a) clean war," he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/ ... e-by/#ixzz2fKVHdXaT


1年里面,有太多变数了
感觉没了这个md还会找理由。欲加之罪嘛来自: Android客户端
只要还没开打,一切都还没有确定,美的的战乎水平非常高
自废武功?
chinamod 发表于 2013-9-19 18:50
感觉没了这个md还会找理由。欲加之罪嘛
销毁叙利亚化武对于md来说不是理由而是他亲爹给他的必须完成的任务 犹太人的目的是不论未来的叙利亚谁来管都必须是虚弱的不能威胁到他的
10亿美元,哈哈,开价了开价了,给钱就销毁,给多少销毁多少,最快就是一年,最慢呢,慢慢再说…………大家一起来扯淡的节奏
销毁叙利亚化武对于md来说不是理由而是他亲爹给他的必须完成的任务 犹太人的目的是不论未来的叙利亚谁来 ...
你太小看犹太人了
一年有点扯,这又不是销毁地雷,和平时期都做不到,建个化武销毁工厂都得30亿美元,这还是10年前的价
一年有点扯,这又不是销毁地雷,和平时期都做不到,建个化武销毁工厂都得30亿美元,这还是10年前的价
这本身就是扯谈的资本,有这么回事就行了,大家都给个台阶下而已,本身化学武器现在威胁也不是那么大了,再说了美国自己都没销毁,而且是不多几个还在研究的,你看谁敢说它?!
超大这风气....什么都没学到,就学到了我党妈妈喉舌的那一套从一个胜利走向另外一个胜利的调调,反正什么都是胜利,无论是前进还是转进。
正常人都看得出这是叙利亚政府军被逼到一个不得不壮士断腕弃卒保车的地步了,怎么反而在你们最里就成了叙利亚政府军的棋子了?
核武之于北棒才叫棋子,至于这个化武却不是叙利亚政府军的棋子而是欧美的棋子。
Aotobus 发表于 2013-9-19 20:20
这本身就是扯谈的资本,有这么回事就行了,大家都给个台阶下而已,本身化学武器现在威胁也不是那么大了, ...
话虽这么说,但那个《禁止化学武器公约》对人类来说还是有巨大意义的,而且核大国也是乐见全球销毁化武的,号称穷人的原子弹,美俄自己也真的在销毁,只是进展慢而已,大部分毒气只能中和后深埋,斩草却除不了根,贻害无穷,真正的谁拥有谁难受
阿萨德表示,如果美方愿意出这笔费用,并且愿意接受这些有毒物质,叙方可以将这些化武交给美国处理!
美帝又一次展示了自己的实力
本来自由军都快被灭了,美帝只是动动嘴皮子立马就救回来了。。
PL-12D 发表于 2013-9-19 20:39
话虽这么说,但那个《禁止化学武器公约》对人类来说还是有巨大意义的,而且核大国也是乐见全球销毁化武的 ...
说是这么说,不过美国我只能呵呵。
Aotobus 发表于 2013-9-20 05:28
说是这么说,不过美国我只能呵呵。
美国怎么了?现在美国抓到了关键的舆论制高点,迫使叙利亚政府方面割肉自保,毛子也只能被动的表示如果叙利亚政府使用化武,那么他也不能排除同意通过安理会决议而动武。

这一次美国的攻势起码比打伊拉克高明多了,现在美国人只缺如何去证实叙利亚政府使用化武这一步,如果美国能够证实如此,就不但可以迫使叙利亚现政府彻底倒台,而且最重要的是在安理会决议上,中毛都将彻底失去主动权,别说一票否决必然要背上全世界的骂名,连弃权票搞不好都得掂量掂量副作用。

可笑的是楼上有那么一票人还当这是妙棋,我看是臭棋还差不多。

codemummy 发表于 2013-9-21 11:19
美国怎么了?现在美国抓到了关键的舆论制高点,迫使叙利亚政府方面割肉自保,毛子也只能被动的表示如果叙 ...


美国还舆论制高点?看看叙利亚国内一票反对派都是谁支持出来的吧,现在连吃人的反对派都不给力了,恐怖分子登台亮相了,美国一直坚定的支持挑起叙利亚内战,现在打了1年多,恐怖分子满地走,准备如何占领制高点?

叙利亚有化学武器又不是什么秘密,以色列到现在也没批准那禁止化学武器公约,以色列不批准,你指望叙利亚,埃及这两邻国主动贴冷屁股?这次不过是毛子逼美国让步,大家各自找个台阶下罢了。实际上那点化学武器也就是个政治筹码,真的砸出去除了部分杀伤点平民以外真的没多少作用。

归根结底的原因是美国国内主战的政治集团没有获得足够的政治资本开战,当年打阿富汗是有巨大的民意支持的,打伊拉克的时候美国国内有强力的政治集团统一声音,而且当时认为地区强国里伊朗比中国算是个软柿子,想试试看在中东能不能一桶糨糊。今天提议出兵叙利亚,美国国内,不管是国内民调还是议会(两院)都得不到足够的支持,而头号小弟英国议会已经明确表示不支持开战,难道美国指望英国首相强行下令出兵?除了流程上的可能性,英国可能做这一步么?现在能有台阶下当然该退一步是一步。

叙利亚和利比亚结局的根本不同在于叙利亚自身实力够强,能顶住压力,反对派一直没法整合自身力量,建立一个强有力的组织和类似于班加西的大本营,而且叙利亚在国际上有国家帮忙说话,毛子给军火,黎巴嫩和伊朗出高级军官,中国和法国基本处于不表态看戏的地位。光靠英美吆喝,它们自己国内又不傻。
codemummy 发表于 2013-9-21 11:19
美国怎么了?现在美国抓到了关键的舆论制高点,迫使叙利亚政府方面割肉自保,毛子也只能被动的表示如果叙 ...


美国还舆论制高点?看看叙利亚国内一票反对派都是谁支持出来的吧,现在连吃人的反对派都不给力了,恐怖分子登台亮相了,美国一直坚定的支持挑起叙利亚内战,现在打了1年多,恐怖分子满地走,准备如何占领制高点?

叙利亚有化学武器又不是什么秘密,以色列到现在也没批准那禁止化学武器公约,以色列不批准,你指望叙利亚,埃及这两邻国主动贴冷屁股?这次不过是毛子逼美国让步,大家各自找个台阶下罢了。实际上那点化学武器也就是个政治筹码,真的砸出去除了部分杀伤点平民以外真的没多少作用。

归根结底的原因是美国国内主战的政治集团没有获得足够的政治资本开战,当年打阿富汗是有巨大的民意支持的,打伊拉克的时候美国国内有强力的政治集团统一声音,而且当时认为地区强国里伊朗比中国算是个软柿子,想试试看在中东能不能一桶糨糊。今天提议出兵叙利亚,美国国内,不管是国内民调还是议会(两院)都得不到足够的支持,而头号小弟英国议会已经明确表示不支持开战,难道美国指望英国首相强行下令出兵?除了流程上的可能性,英国可能做这一步么?现在能有台阶下当然该退一步是一步。

叙利亚和利比亚结局的根本不同在于叙利亚自身实力够强,能顶住压力,反对派一直没法整合自身力量,建立一个强有力的组织和类似于班加西的大本营,而且叙利亚在国际上有国家帮忙说话,毛子给军火,黎巴嫩和伊朗出高级军官,中国和法国基本处于不表态看戏的地位。光靠英美吆喝,它们自己国内又不傻。
Aotobus 发表于 2013-9-21 23:29
美国还舆论制高点?看看叙利亚国内一票反对派都是谁支持出来的吧,现在连吃人的反对派都不给力了,恐怖 ...
我首先想问一下,“法国基本处于不表态看戏的地位”这个观点你是从哪里得出来的?

至于美国是否要开战,和什么民意并无多大关系,60天足够从天上把叙利亚轰成渣,至今不打的原因无非是利益罢了,老美可没给老欧洲开路的兴趣。

而所谓的台阶,现在你该考虑的不是美国人的台阶,因为美国人的台阶已经由叙利亚政府提供的化武给找到了,现在需要台阶的反而是坚定支持叙利亚现政府的国家。

最后,美国人为自身利益考虑而不绕开联合国开战,但是并不代表美国人不会在联合国框架下积极求战,叙利亚问题实质是打击其内战双方背后的支持者,而联合国则是舞台。

顺便说一下,你根本就搞错了叙利亚和利比亚进展不同的原因,叙利亚拖到现在和它自身实力没有任何关系,而是因为背后大国的较力,而利比亚则没有。