声援 石库门 关于 李显龙 发言的解释，批评某些网友自大 ...

1.        仅就李显龙发言的原文而言，石库门的解释是比较接近原意的。石库门把文章的上下文联系起来看，思路是对的；有些人的视角过于狭窄，仅仅把一句话抽出来断章取义的看，显然是不对的。

下面一段话是一个整体，不应该割裂的看。
第一句：我们要和中国合作，中国本身也需要看到和平发展才能融入全球经济。（此后两句恰恰说明中国对此认识非常充分）
第二句：中国领导人经常说要做温和的大国，避免之前大国述诸武力的失败。
第三句：纪录片“大国崛起”描述了诸大国如何成功，最后如何因为扩张而导致失败。
第四句：在钓鱼岛和南海问题上，中国会在两者的所得，与在国际声望上的所失进行斟酌。
（很多人认为最后一句重点在结果上：中国得到钓鱼岛和南海，就会在国际声望上失分。其实根据整段话，这句话的重点在于取得的形式上，是通过武力硬取还是通过温和手段。承认领土有争议，争取通过外交手段解决争端或者搁置争议，都是中国目前阶段的外交主张。李显龙的话没有威胁中国的意思。）


We have to work with China and China itself has to see in its own interest to develop in a peaceful way which is not threatening to its neighbors and which enables it to integrate into the global economy.

I think their leaders understand this. You watch what they say to themselves. They often remind themselves that it is necessary for China to be a benign power and not to repeat the mistakes of previous powers which have tried to succeed through force of arms.

And some years ago, they had a television series entitled ‘The Rise of Great Powers’ and they listed all the countries, all the great powers, over the last several centuries, starting from the Portuguese, the Spanish, the Dutch, the British, the Americans, the Russians, the Japanese and showing the history of how they succeeded and when they went (to) try for expansion, it did not work. So I think at some level, they understand this.

And certainly, if they are taking a long-term approach, they will make this calculation that whether it is the Senkakus, whether it is the South China Sea, what you gain on the Senkakus or the South China Sea, but you lose in terms of your broader reputation and standing in the world, you have to make that calculation very carefully.

2.        我们把视角再放大一点，从李整个的发言来看，对中国是没有恶意的。即使在主持人的刻意引导之下，他还是比较明确的批评了日本反思二战不足的问题。
我们经常讲“得道多助”，我觉得这个道，不光是说要站在真理正义一边，还要讲求方法。要联合所有能够联合的力量，反对最主要的敌人。对于联盟，要包容，不要苛责，否则就把人吓跑了。

3.        某些网友和媒体抱着大国沙文主义的态度。对于小国或者比较落后的国家，带着嗤之以鼻的态度。今天棒子，阿三，明天鼻屎，越猴。这种思想我也有过，但是现在觉得是不对的。无论对于朋友还是敌人，我们都应该给以足够的尊重，保持谦虚诚恳的姿态，这样才是我们泱泱大国的气度和风范。

4.        现在国内某些媒体记者非常过分。报道的时候，不尽其所能的把事实和逻辑弄清楚，在新闻自由的幌子下，在炒作利益的引导下，随意报道，朝闻夕改，很难看到有深度有诚意的新闻报道。出错的时候，像被摸了屁股的老虎，上蹿下跳，横冲竖咬，没有起码的尊重事实的专业精神。


1.        仅就李显龙发言的原文而言，石库门的解释是比较接近原意的。石库门把文章的上下文联系起来看，思路是对的；有些人的视角过于狭窄，仅仅把一句话抽出来断章取义的看，显然是不对的。

下面一段话是一个整体，不应该割裂的看。
第一句：我们要和中国合作，中国本身也需要看到和平发展才能融入全球经济。（此后两句恰恰说明中国对此认识非常充分）
第二句：中国领导人经常说要做温和的大国，避免之前大国述诸武力的失败。
第三句：纪录片“大国崛起”描述了诸大国如何成功，最后如何因为扩张而导致失败。
第四句：在钓鱼岛和南海问题上，中国会在两者的所得，与在国际声望上的所失进行斟酌。
（很多人认为最后一句重点在结果上：中国得到钓鱼岛和南海，就会在国际声望上失分。其实根据整段话，这句话的重点在于取得的形式上，是通过武力硬取还是通过温和手段。承认领土有争议，争取通过外交手段解决争端或者搁置争议，都是中国目前阶段的外交主张。李显龙的话没有威胁中国的意思。）


We have to work with China and China itself has to see in its own interest to develop in a peaceful way which is not threatening to its neighbors and which enables it to integrate into the global economy.

I think their leaders understand this. You watch what they say to themselves. They often remind themselves that it is necessary for China to be a benign power and not to repeat the mistakes of previous powers which have tried to succeed through force of arms.

And some years ago, they had a television series entitled ‘The Rise of Great Powers’ and they listed all the countries, all the great powers, over the last several centuries, starting from the Portuguese, the Spanish, the Dutch, the British, the Americans, the Russians, the Japanese and showing the history of how they succeeded and when they went (to) try for expansion, it did not work. So I think at some level, they understand this.

And certainly, if they are taking a long-term approach, they will make this calculation that whether it is the Senkakus, whether it is the South China Sea, what you gain on the Senkakus or the South China Sea, but you lose in terms of your broader reputation and standing in the world, you have to make that calculation very carefully.

2.        我们把视角再放大一点，从李整个的发言来看，对中国是没有恶意的。即使在主持人的刻意引导之下，他还是比较明确的批评了日本反思二战不足的问题。
我们经常讲“得道多助”，我觉得这个道，不光是说要站在真理正义一边，还要讲求方法。要联合所有能够联合的力量，反对最主要的敌人。对于联盟，要包容，不要苛责，否则就把人吓跑了。

3.        某些网友和媒体抱着大国沙文主义的态度。对于小国或者比较落后的国家，带着嗤之以鼻的态度。今天棒子，阿三，明天鼻屎，越猴。这种思想我也有过，但是现在觉得是不对的。无论对于朋友还是敌人，我们都应该给以足够的尊重，保持谦虚诚恳的姿态，这样才是我们泱泱大国的气度和风范。

4.        现在国内某些媒体记者非常过分。报道的时候，不尽其所能的把事实和逻辑弄清楚，在新闻自由的幌子下，在炒作利益的引导下，随意报道，朝闻夕改，很难看到有深度有诚意的新闻报道。出错的时候，像被摸了屁股的老虎，上蹿下跳，横冲竖咬，没有起码的尊重事实的专业精神。