谁是亚洲五强？

http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/east-asia-pacific/3729-who-top-5-superpowers-asia.html

Who are the top 5 superpowers in the Asia??
谁是亚洲前五的超级大国？？

Just a curious question, individually with no alliances who are the top 5 powers in Asia??
只是个好奇的问题，不包括联盟，就单独一个国家，谁是亚洲前五的超级大国？
龙腾

2、ajaybhutani：
i would say russia china india japan(all in no particular order as none is capable of completely subduing another).russia is stil a major military power.India & china are emerging powers with large economies (in PPP) and high gowth rates and a rapidly modernizing militaries.
Japan surely due to its advanced military and big economy. 龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com
After this group i'll say israel(ig u guys consider it in asia) and then pakistan,iran etc. Etc.
我会说俄罗斯 中国 印度 日本（所有入围国家没有特定的顺序，因为没有一个能完全征服另一个国家）。
俄罗斯仍然是一个主要的军事力量。
印度、中国是新兴大国与巨大经济体（以购买力平价），且有高增长率和高速现代化的军队。
日本当然归功于其先进的军事和经济大国地位。
这组名单后我会说是以色列（我猜各位会认为它在亚洲），然后是巴基斯坦，伊朗等。

3、Ironduke：
Probably Russia, China, Japan, India, Pakistan, in that order. I'd say the US has the most powerful military in Asia, but we don't quite have the presence there than we do in the Middle East or Europe. I'd say our military power is more than that of India, Pakistan, and Japan, however.
可能是俄罗斯，中国，日本，印度，巴基斯坦，在这一排序里。我要说美国在亚洲有最强大的军队，但我们在那儿不会比我们在中东或欧洲有存在感，然而我还是要说，我们的军事力量，比印度，巴基斯坦，和日本更强。

4、Praxus：
We have like 70,000 Troops in the Pacific if I'm not mistaken.
如果我没有弄错的话，我们在太平洋地区有大约70000的军队。

5、Jay：
india and China have around a Million men each.
印度和中国各自有大约100万的军队。

6、Jay：
At present most of the forces are concentrated in the Middle East. Even then, India, China, North Korea and Pakistan have bigger Armies in the region. Only USN's 7th Fleet changes the equation in favor of the US.
（回复3楼）目前（我们美国）大部分力量都集中在中东。即使这样，印度、中国、北朝鲜和巴基斯坦在这个地区有更多的军队，但只有美国海军第七舰队能改变这一地区的局势对美国才有利。

7、ajaybhutani：
we hve done a lot of china india china indian and china japan war comparisons and frankly none gave eitehr parties a clear edge. I wonder how can we rank them if one cannot outclass another unless of course if we start fromm the scratch comparing the militaries altogether.
About pakistn the AF is in a very bad shape .They done even have a BVR, No missile difences as all. Wont the iranis come comparble to pakistanis (except of course the nukes pakistan has, but now there might benukes in irna .. ).
I dont think it wil be a good idea to rate just militaries as a power need to have it all military economy diplomacy etc.
我们已经做了很多关于中印战争和中日战争的比较，坦率的说，他们中没有任何一方有明显的优势。我想知道，如果他们中一个不能远强于另一个，我们该如何排名，当然除非我们从零开始比较两军。
巴基斯坦的空军处于一个很糟的境况，他们甚至没有一个超视距导弹防御系统，根本是连导弹防御系统都没有，更不要去拿伊朗来和巴基斯坦比（当然除了巴基斯坦有核弹，伊朗现在也可能也有核武器）（译注：这段老外打了好多错别字，难翻=。=）
我不认为仅凭军事作为实力来评估是个好方法，而要军事经济外交等等（来评估）

8、Rahul：
What about the countries of S. East Asia? And is Australia a part of "Asia"?

EDIT: Economically, ASEAN is very powerful, giving the nations of S. East Asia "power" beyond what their small, individual lands and resources give them.
东南亚国家如何？澳大利亚算“亚洲”的一部分？
经济上，东盟很强大，这使这些国家的“力量”超过他们作为小的、单个领土和资源时给他们的力量。

9、ajaybhutani：
i think Australis nd NZ are considered outside.
And about asian its just a economic block. No military cooperation there.
我认为澳大利亚和新西兰被认为算亚洲之外，亚洲（对他们）只是个贸易板块，而没有军事合作。

10、tarek：
tHERE are 5 "super powers in Asia?? The rest of the world know this ??
有5个“超级大国”在亚洲？世界剩余地方的人知道这个吗？

12、tarek：
tsk, tsk - 5 "super powers" - I guess they must all be Pakistan - hai hai hai lootliya na
啧，啧 - 5个“超级大国” - 我想，他们都必须巴基斯坦 - 嗨嗨嗨

13、Srirangan：
The word ws obviously used in a regional proportion. Here's how I'ld rate'em:
- Russia
- Japan, China & India
- Israel, S. Korea, Pakistan and Taiwan
Oh **** I listed 9 countries, oh well 8 countries and Taiwan, oh well 7 countries and Taiwan and Israel (just a lil appeasement for our muslim friends). No wait, Israel is a country.
（回复楼上）这词明显是在一个区域范围内用，下面给出我如何比较他们
—俄罗斯
—日本，中国&印度
—以色列，南朝鲜，巴基斯坦和台湾
Oh ****我列了九个国家，哦好吧，是8个国家和台湾，哦好吧，7个国家和台湾及以色列（只是小小安抚下我们的MSL朋友）不，等等，以色列是一个国家。


14、PaulG：
I think for this discussion Australia and New Zealand should and are considered to be Asian members. You mentioned 'asian' but i'm guessing you meant ASEAN, which is more than just an economic block.
ASEAN also includes defence initiatives and targets as well as social and economic ones. Although you could argue that some of those above mentioned have varied importance. Security however, is a significant aspect of ASEAN, not just militarily but also politically and economically. This is because ASEAN is more of a reaction, or response to anglo (UK, Aus, NZ and US) and to a lesser extent European influence in the region. This is portrayed in the fully Asian (SE Asia and periphery) membership of ASEAN.
An important extension of ASEAN is the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) which includes around 25 member states, roughly the same as APEC member states. The ARF is in no way an alliance, but more of an active forum/thinktank that deals in many issues that are considered to be modern securit issues. From traditional security to more abstract ones such as people, drugs and arms right down to disease control and customs issues (border control).
The ARF is designed to deal with the complications in the various issues of internatinal relations between the many and varied nations/cultures that occupy this part of the world. One of its great strengths that i can see is that it is an Asian or ASEAN inspired project, created to deal with our varied and contentious issues, and not a anglo/European inspired one.
（回复9楼）我认为在这个讨论，澳大利亚和新西兰应被认为是亚洲成员。你提到“亚洲”，但我猜你是指东盟，它不仅仅是一个经济体。东盟还包括防御措施和目标，社会和经济方面。虽然你可能会争辩说，上述的提到的有不同的重要性。但安全问题是东盟一个重要的方面，不单是在军事上，还包括政治上和经济上，这是因为东盟相比英裔国家（英国，澳洲，新西兰和美国）有更多的互动或反馈，而相对于欧洲对地区的影响又要更小些。这些是描绘全亚洲（东南亚及周边）的东盟会员（关系）。
东盟地区论坛（ARF）作为一个重要的延伸。它包括周边25个成员国，笼统上讲有点像 APEC（亚太经济合作组织）成员国，ARF绝非同盟，而更像是一个处理很多被认为是现代安全问题的一个积极有效的论坛/智库，从传统安全问题到更多抽象的事物，诸如人，毒品和武器，一直到疾病控制和海关问题（边境控制）。
东盟地区论坛是专门用来处理这地区多样化的国家/文化间的各种问题纠纷。我能看到它其一个优势是，它是一个亚洲或者东盟用来处理多样化和有争议的问题的启发性的工程，而非英裔或者欧洲人那套。

15、toetoe：
Should Vietnam among five? in the history, given having had many shortages but it has defeated American, France or China?
越南是不是该在前五？在其历史上，虽然有很多不足，但它曾击败美国，法国和中国？

16、Veni Vidi Vici：
Vietnam was another example of how the US was not effective in combat because its hands were tied behind its back. No Vietnam is not anywhere near the top 5.
PS. Defeating France is not great feat. [查看图片]
（回复楼上）越南仅是又一个说明米帝在作战中是如此不作为的例子，因为米帝的双手被绑在了背上。（所以）不，越南离前五差远了
PS：打败法国不是一个壮举。

[查看图片]
17、Igelstellung：
Russia
Japan
China
India
------Last country is hard to say, given that there are so many countries at that level who have similar capabilities.
俄国 日本 中国 印度
------最后一个国家很难说，因为有这么多国家在该级别有相近的能力。

18、Sohail：
What?
  There s only one superpower in the world : USA
  USSR was but Russia isnt.
  Asia has a futur superpower : China
Others are locals power.
什么？
这个世界上只有一个超级大国：米帝
苏联是，但俄罗斯不是
亚洲有一个成长中的超级大国：中国
其他都是地区力量

20、Tronic：
wtf??? 5 superpowers????? in asia?????
first of all theres only one superpower : America!!!
secondly the three Asian giants are: China, India and Russia
Russia is more like a crumbling country as China and India are flying high.
Russia was a superpower now crumbling and India and China rising, right about now all three are at the same level but most likely India and China will be on top with Russia struggling behind. As China has the largest growing economy (about 10% per year) and India has the second largest growing economy (about 8% per year), so don't really see Russia in the picture. And please don't even talk about Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Pakistan, etc who have to rely on aid from the U.S.
搞毛？超级力量？在亚洲？
首先，世界上只有一个超级大国：米帝！
其次，亚洲有三个巨人：中国，印度和俄罗斯
俄罗斯更像是个摇摇欲坠的国家，而中国和印度正在腾飞
俄罗斯过去是个超级力量，现在正在衰弱，印度河中国正在上升，现在这三个国家都在同一水平，但是印度和中国最有可能排前面，俄罗斯只能挣扎在后面。因为中国有最大的经济增长（每年约10%），印度有第二大的经济增长（每年约8%），所以别看俄罗斯的地图（那么大）。更不要谈论日本，韩国，台湾，巴基斯坦等这些必须依靠美国援助的国家。

21、antelope：
The five most powerful countries on the Asian landmass would be in my opinion (in order):
China: Nukes/population/economy/conventional force
India: Nukes/population
Russia: Nukes/population
Israel: Nukes/conventional force
Japan: Population/economy/conventional force/(nukes fast if they want them--may have a few in secret)
Iran/North Korea: Largest troublemakers and potential sources of instability
在我看来亚洲五个最强大的国家（按顺序）：
中国：核武器/人口/经济/常规部队
印度：核武器/人口
俄罗斯：核武器/人口
以色列：核武器/常规部队
日本：人口/经济/常规部队/（核武器，如果他们想要，他们能很快有——可能有一些秘密）
伊朗/北朝鲜：最大的麻烦制造者和潜在的不稳定因素

22、Tronic：
Firstly you should do some research on Indian economy, It's the second fastest growing economy after China. India has already made more progress in IT technology than China. Secondly, China's conventional power isn't really THAT great. It's about the same level as Russia and India. And 1 more thing for Russia i noticed you put "population", another correction, Russia's population is only about 145 million people. That isn't really a lot of population that would give them an advantage. America's population is almost twice as that of Russia (around 290 million people).
（回复楼上）首先你应该做些印度经济研究，它是继中国之后经济增长最快的。印度已经在IT行业取得比中国更快的进展。其次，中国的常规部队没那么好。俄罗斯和印度常规部队同一水平。我还注意到你说的一点：俄罗斯的“人口”，校正下，俄罗斯的人口只有约1.45E。这真不是一个能给它带来优势的人口。米帝人口几乎是俄罗斯两倍，（约2.9E）。

23、Srirangan：
Both Indian and Chinese military are considerably inferior to the Russian military.
印度和中国军事远不如俄罗斯

24、Sohail：
just an advise, dont let japan behind india, japan have an huge economy, india begin to leave from crap. [查看图片]
（回复20楼）只是个建议：日本不应该在印度后面，日本有巨大的经济，而印度才刚开始从废物国家行列里走出来

26、Tronic：
Obviously economy wise Japan has a HUGE economy but still just having a good economy doesn't mean you become one of the asian giants. Japan might have a HUGE economy but their military, HAHA. it's a joke. Have you seen their Mitsubishi F-2??? It's like a F-16 re-labelled. Japan vs. China, without any other country participating, lol. China will rape Japan badly with their huge numbers. Japan is nowhere in competition when it comes to military. Japan is like the Canada of Asia. I mean take Canada vs. Iran. Canada has a stronger economy but it comes nowhere close to beating Iran in a war.
（回复楼上）显然很有经济头脑的日本有很巨大的经济，但有好的经济并不能意味着你可以变成亚洲巨人。日本也许有很大经济，但是他们的军事，哈哈，就是个笑话。你见过他们的三菱F-2？它就像个重新标记的F-16。日本vs中国，如果没其他任何国家参与，lol，中国会狠狠的用他巨大尺寸的XX强X日本。日本在军事对比时毫无是处，就像是亚洲的加拿大，我的意思是拿加拿大对比伊朗，加拿大（对比伊朗）有更强大的经济，但它根本不可能在战争中击败伊朗。

27、Officer of Engineers：
You might want to rephrase everything you've said about Canada. Considering that I retired from the Canadian Forces as a Lieutenant-Colonel. Obviously, you have alot to learn about the Canadian Forces.
And about Japan too.
（回复楼上）你可能要改述你对加拿大说的每句话。考虑到我刚以中校的身份从加拿大军队退役，很显然，你需要去更多的了解下加拿大军队。
还有日本的。

http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/east-asia-pacific/3729-who-top-5-superpowers-asia.html

Who are the top 5 superpowers in the Asia??
谁是亚洲前五的超级大国？？

Just a curious question, individually with no alliances who are the top 5 powers in Asia??
只是个好奇的问题，不包括联盟，就单独一个国家，谁是亚洲前五的超级大国？
龙腾

2、ajaybhutani：
i would say russia china india japan(all in no particular order as none is capable of completely subduing another).russia is stil a major military power.India & china are emerging powers with large economies (in PPP) and high gowth rates and a rapidly modernizing militaries.
Japan surely due to its advanced military and big economy. 龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com
After this group i'll say israel(ig u guys consider it in asia) and then pakistan,iran etc. Etc.
我会说俄罗斯 中国 印度 日本（所有入围国家没有特定的顺序，因为没有一个能完全征服另一个国家）。
俄罗斯仍然是一个主要的军事力量。
印度、中国是新兴大国与巨大经济体（以购买力平价），且有高增长率和高速现代化的军队。
日本当然归功于其先进的军事和经济大国地位。
这组名单后我会说是以色列（我猜各位会认为它在亚洲），然后是巴基斯坦，伊朗等。

3、Ironduke：
Probably Russia, China, Japan, India, Pakistan, in that order. I'd say the US has the most powerful military in Asia, but we don't quite have the presence there than we do in the Middle East or Europe. I'd say our military power is more than that of India, Pakistan, and Japan, however.
可能是俄罗斯，中国，日本，印度，巴基斯坦，在这一排序里。我要说美国在亚洲有最强大的军队，但我们在那儿不会比我们在中东或欧洲有存在感，然而我还是要说，我们的军事力量，比印度，巴基斯坦，和日本更强。

4、Praxus：
We have like 70,000 Troops in the Pacific if I'm not mistaken.
如果我没有弄错的话，我们在太平洋地区有大约70000的军队。

5、Jay：
india and China have around a Million men each.
印度和中国各自有大约100万的军队。

6、Jay：
At present most of the forces are concentrated in the Middle East. Even then, India, China, North Korea and Pakistan have bigger Armies in the region. Only USN's 7th Fleet changes the equation in favor of the US.
（回复3楼）目前（我们美国）大部分力量都集中在中东。即使这样，印度、中国、北朝鲜和巴基斯坦在这个地区有更多的军队，但只有美国海军第七舰队能改变这一地区的局势对美国才有利。

7、ajaybhutani：
we hve done a lot of china india china indian and china japan war comparisons and frankly none gave eitehr parties a clear edge. I wonder how can we rank them if one cannot outclass another unless of course if we start fromm the scratch comparing the militaries altogether.
About pakistn the AF is in a very bad shape .They done even have a BVR, No missile difences as all. Wont the iranis come comparble to pakistanis (except of course the nukes pakistan has, but now there might benukes in irna .. ).
I dont think it wil be a good idea to rate just militaries as a power need to have it all military economy diplomacy etc.
我们已经做了很多关于中印战争和中日战争的比较，坦率的说，他们中没有任何一方有明显的优势。我想知道，如果他们中一个不能远强于另一个，我们该如何排名，当然除非我们从零开始比较两军。
巴基斯坦的空军处于一个很糟的境况，他们甚至没有一个超视距导弹防御系统，根本是连导弹防御系统都没有，更不要去拿伊朗来和巴基斯坦比（当然除了巴基斯坦有核弹，伊朗现在也可能也有核武器）（译注：这段老外打了好多错别字，难翻=。=）
我不认为仅凭军事作为实力来评估是个好方法，而要军事经济外交等等（来评估）

8、Rahul：
What about the countries of S. East Asia? And is Australia a part of "Asia"?

EDIT: Economically, ASEAN is very powerful, giving the nations of S. East Asia "power" beyond what their small, individual lands and resources give them.
东南亚国家如何？澳大利亚算“亚洲”的一部分？
经济上，东盟很强大，这使这些国家的“力量”超过他们作为小的、单个领土和资源时给他们的力量。

9、ajaybhutani：
i think Australis nd NZ are considered outside.
And about asian its just a economic block. No military cooperation there.
我认为澳大利亚和新西兰被认为算亚洲之外，亚洲（对他们）只是个贸易板块，而没有军事合作。

10、tarek：
tHERE are 5 "super powers in Asia?? The rest of the world know this ??
有5个“超级大国”在亚洲？世界剩余地方的人知道这个吗？

12、tarek：
tsk, tsk - 5 "super powers" - I guess they must all be Pakistan - hai hai hai lootliya na
啧，啧 - 5个“超级大国” - 我想，他们都必须巴基斯坦 - 嗨嗨嗨

13、Srirangan：
The word ws obviously used in a regional proportion. Here's how I'ld rate'em:
- Russia
- Japan, China & India
- Israel, S. Korea, Pakistan and Taiwan
Oh **** I listed 9 countries, oh well 8 countries and Taiwan, oh well 7 countries and Taiwan and Israel (just a lil appeasement for our muslim friends). No wait, Israel is a country.
（回复楼上）这词明显是在一个区域范围内用，下面给出我如何比较他们
—俄罗斯
—日本，中国&印度
—以色列，南朝鲜，巴基斯坦和台湾
Oh ****我列了九个国家，哦好吧，是8个国家和台湾，哦好吧，7个国家和台湾及以色列（只是小小安抚下我们的MSL朋友）不，等等，以色列是一个国家。


14、PaulG：
I think for this discussion Australia and New Zealand should and are considered to be Asian members. You mentioned 'asian' but i'm guessing you meant ASEAN, which is more than just an economic block.
ASEAN also includes defence initiatives and targets as well as social and economic ones. Although you could argue that some of those above mentioned have varied importance. Security however, is a significant aspect of ASEAN, not just militarily but also politically and economically. This is because ASEAN is more of a reaction, or response to anglo (UK, Aus, NZ and US) and to a lesser extent European influence in the region. This is portrayed in the fully Asian (SE Asia and periphery) membership of ASEAN.
An important extension of ASEAN is the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) which includes around 25 member states, roughly the same as APEC member states. The ARF is in no way an alliance, but more of an active forum/thinktank that deals in many issues that are considered to be modern securit issues. From traditional security to more abstract ones such as people, drugs and arms right down to disease control and customs issues (border control).
The ARF is designed to deal with the complications in the various issues of internatinal relations between the many and varied nations/cultures that occupy this part of the world. One of its great strengths that i can see is that it is an Asian or ASEAN inspired project, created to deal with our varied and contentious issues, and not a anglo/European inspired one.
（回复9楼）我认为在这个讨论，澳大利亚和新西兰应被认为是亚洲成员。你提到“亚洲”，但我猜你是指东盟，它不仅仅是一个经济体。东盟还包括防御措施和目标，社会和经济方面。虽然你可能会争辩说，上述的提到的有不同的重要性。但安全问题是东盟一个重要的方面，不单是在军事上，还包括政治上和经济上，这是因为东盟相比英裔国家（英国，澳洲，新西兰和美国）有更多的互动或反馈，而相对于欧洲对地区的影响又要更小些。这些是描绘全亚洲（东南亚及周边）的东盟会员（关系）。
东盟地区论坛（ARF）作为一个重要的延伸。它包括周边25个成员国，笼统上讲有点像 APEC（亚太经济合作组织）成员国，ARF绝非同盟，而更像是一个处理很多被认为是现代安全问题的一个积极有效的论坛/智库，从传统安全问题到更多抽象的事物，诸如人，毒品和武器，一直到疾病控制和海关问题（边境控制）。
东盟地区论坛是专门用来处理这地区多样化的国家/文化间的各种问题纠纷。我能看到它其一个优势是，它是一个亚洲或者东盟用来处理多样化和有争议的问题的启发性的工程，而非英裔或者欧洲人那套。

15、toetoe：
Should Vietnam among five? in the history, given having had many shortages but it has defeated American, France or China?
越南是不是该在前五？在其历史上，虽然有很多不足，但它曾击败美国，法国和中国？

16、Veni Vidi Vici：
Vietnam was another example of how the US was not effective in combat because its hands were tied behind its back. No Vietnam is not anywhere near the top 5.
PS. Defeating France is not great feat. [查看图片]
（回复楼上）越南仅是又一个说明米帝在作战中是如此不作为的例子，因为米帝的双手被绑在了背上。（所以）不，越南离前五差远了
PS：打败法国不是一个壮举。

[查看图片]
17、Igelstellung：
Russia
Japan
China
India
------Last country is hard to say, given that there are so many countries at that level who have similar capabilities.
俄国 日本 中国 印度
------最后一个国家很难说，因为有这么多国家在该级别有相近的能力。

18、Sohail：
What?
  There s only one superpower in the world : USA
  USSR was but Russia isnt.
  Asia has a futur superpower : China
Others are locals power.
什么？
这个世界上只有一个超级大国：米帝
苏联是，但俄罗斯不是
亚洲有一个成长中的超级大国：中国
其他都是地区力量

20、Tronic：
wtf??? 5 superpowers????? in asia?????
first of all theres only one superpower : America!!!
secondly the three Asian giants are: China, India and Russia
Russia is more like a crumbling country as China and India are flying high.
Russia was a superpower now crumbling and India and China rising, right about now all three are at the same level but most likely India and China will be on top with Russia struggling behind. As China has the largest growing economy (about 10% per year) and India has the second largest growing economy (about 8% per year), so don't really see Russia in the picture. And please don't even talk about Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Pakistan, etc who have to rely on aid from the U.S.
搞毛？超级力量？在亚洲？
首先，世界上只有一个超级大国：米帝！
其次，亚洲有三个巨人：中国，印度和俄罗斯
俄罗斯更像是个摇摇欲坠的国家，而中国和印度正在腾飞
俄罗斯过去是个超级力量，现在正在衰弱，印度河中国正在上升，现在这三个国家都在同一水平，但是印度和中国最有可能排前面，俄罗斯只能挣扎在后面。因为中国有最大的经济增长（每年约10%），印度有第二大的经济增长（每年约8%），所以别看俄罗斯的地图（那么大）。更不要谈论日本，韩国，台湾，巴基斯坦等这些必须依靠美国援助的国家。

21、antelope：
The five most powerful countries on the Asian landmass would be in my opinion (in order):
China: Nukes/population/economy/conventional force
India: Nukes/population
Russia: Nukes/population
Israel: Nukes/conventional force
Japan: Population/economy/conventional force/(nukes fast if they want them--may have a few in secret)
Iran/North Korea: Largest troublemakers and potential sources of instability
在我看来亚洲五个最强大的国家（按顺序）：
中国：核武器/人口/经济/常规部队
印度：核武器/人口
俄罗斯：核武器/人口
以色列：核武器/常规部队
日本：人口/经济/常规部队/（核武器，如果他们想要，他们能很快有——可能有一些秘密）
伊朗/北朝鲜：最大的麻烦制造者和潜在的不稳定因素

22、Tronic：
Firstly you should do some research on Indian economy, It's the second fastest growing economy after China. India has already made more progress in IT technology than China. Secondly, China's conventional power isn't really THAT great. It's about the same level as Russia and India. And 1 more thing for Russia i noticed you put "population", another correction, Russia's population is only about 145 million people. That isn't really a lot of population that would give them an advantage. America's population is almost twice as that of Russia (around 290 million people).
（回复楼上）首先你应该做些印度经济研究，它是继中国之后经济增长最快的。印度已经在IT行业取得比中国更快的进展。其次，中国的常规部队没那么好。俄罗斯和印度常规部队同一水平。我还注意到你说的一点：俄罗斯的“人口”，校正下，俄罗斯的人口只有约1.45E。这真不是一个能给它带来优势的人口。米帝人口几乎是俄罗斯两倍，（约2.9E）。

23、Srirangan：
Both Indian and Chinese military are considerably inferior to the Russian military.
印度和中国军事远不如俄罗斯

24、Sohail：
just an advise, dont let japan behind india, japan have an huge economy, india begin to leave from crap. [查看图片]
（回复20楼）只是个建议：日本不应该在印度后面，日本有巨大的经济，而印度才刚开始从废物国家行列里走出来

26、Tronic：
Obviously economy wise Japan has a HUGE economy but still just having a good economy doesn't mean you become one of the asian giants. Japan might have a HUGE economy but their military, HAHA. it's a joke. Have you seen their Mitsubishi F-2??? It's like a F-16 re-labelled. Japan vs. China, without any other country participating, lol. China will rape Japan badly with their huge numbers. Japan is nowhere in competition when it comes to military. Japan is like the Canada of Asia. I mean take Canada vs. Iran. Canada has a stronger economy but it comes nowhere close to beating Iran in a war.
（回复楼上）显然很有经济头脑的日本有很巨大的经济，但有好的经济并不能意味着你可以变成亚洲巨人。日本也许有很大经济，但是他们的军事，哈哈，就是个笑话。你见过他们的三菱F-2？它就像个重新标记的F-16。日本vs中国，如果没其他任何国家参与，lol，中国会狠狠的用他巨大尺寸的XX强X日本。日本在军事对比时毫无是处，就像是亚洲的加拿大，我的意思是拿加拿大对比伊朗，加拿大（对比伊朗）有更强大的经济，但它根本不可能在战争中击败伊朗。

27、Officer of Engineers：
You might want to rephrase everything you've said about Canada. Considering that I retired from the Canadian Forces as a Lieutenant-Colonel. Obviously, you have alot to learn about the Canadian Forces.
And about Japan too.
（回复楼上）你可能要改述你对加拿大说的每句话。考虑到我刚以中校的身份从加拿大军队退役，很显然，你需要去更多的了解下加拿大军队。
还有日本的。