所谓HQ-9土鸡国打靶的说法哪来的？

贵宾同学，你这算不算一句话帖子，要不举报下，听说有钱钱

贵宾同学带头一句话贴



贵宾同学带头一句话贴

还能透露点这次投标的消息么？

要能知道出处还叫谣言么

好像一开始是在小巴的论坛里有人说了打靶的事，然后就带到CD了，我记得是转了个翻译贴，具体记不清了。

嗯，“打靶第一，好像还出了点状况，据说是非红酒造成的”说的有鼻子有眼的……

空版看到的

这事我信你。毕竟家里有人跟这个有关系

那怎么评比？
雷达搜索？
那怎么比拦截弹

某人还是编辑一下...

hunsusu 发表于 2013-1-29 22:33
贵宾同学，你这算不算一句话帖子，要不举报下，听说有钱钱
问问版主吧

这种东西不可能公开试的，要试也是在国内演示给他们看
所以什么打靶第一是扯蛋

fifa8888 发表于 2013-1-29 23:04
这种东西不可能公开试的，要试也是在国内演示给他们看
所以什么打靶第一是扯蛋
哦，怪不得，北京最近有那么多土鸡出没。

正版红9没去土鸡，但猴版的呢，是否参加过？

hhhh83 发表于 2013-1-29 23:05
正版红9没去土鸡，但猴版的呢，是否参加过？
当然没有去打过。

hhhh83 发表于 2013-1-29 23:05
正版红9没去土鸡，但猴版的呢，是否参加过？
猴版的够呛，山寨版得到差不多

好啊，贵宾打假，假贴假消息太多了。

贵宾，红9胜出的机会大吗？

就冲你的土耳其软糖，我信你LZ

panglau 发表于 2013-1-29 23:11
贵宾，红9胜出的机会大吗？
不大，不过也没到认输的时候。

土方现在还确实没有放弃9。

贵宾就能违犯版规？特权都搞到论坛来了？

JCFERRET 发表于 2013-1-29 23:29
不大，不过也没到认输的时候。

土方现在还确实没有放弃9。
不是说只有土鳖才给技术么，这样土鸡也没大.....大兴趣?

banzhunc462 发表于 2013-1-29 23:43
不是说只有土鳖才给技术么，这样土鸡也没大.....大兴趣?
“不是说只有土鳖才给技术么”
不是。

美国应该是也同意了的。

JCFERRET 发表于 2013-1-29 23:45
“不是说只有土鳖才给技术么”
不是。
红酒能拖到现在，说明土鸡是想保持国防自主的，但北约的鸭梨让其很难决定。

看来这生意还得拖很长时间，直到中东局势明朗为止。

土鸡最后选谁？

土鸡评标到底谁领先？

咱那个陪太子读书的角色，到底能落个什么效果？

目前看来还不错啊

三人成虎

无稽之谈

外军坛上土耳其贵宾的回答比较不错 此土鸡是军方的

In direct order project model, The meetings were helding among government to goverment so The desicion to be taken would be under influence of NATO blocks. You know Sources typed it USA openly warn Turkey to order one of NATO missile system so If The program proceeded like that, The winner will be %90 Patriot PAC-3+.


New tender bid will oblige institutes to collaborate Turkish institutes to develop a new derivation of original one which intellectual and property rights belongs to Turkey and will be used/exported at every country Turkey demands without meeting any restrictions(I think.. based on sources).

It was known that China is willing to share technology of FD-2000 system with Turkey. With changing situation, I think China became the number one bidder who close to get the winner If Raytheon doesn't agree on sharing the technology of Patriot missiles to develop Turkey's own equivalent (They share their expertise to develop Israeli Arrow missiles but I don't suppose They accept givng critical tech for Turkey). EuroSAM Aster solution is also accepted tech. trasfer as well but They can't cope with Chinese cost-effective critical part technological collaboration solutions...
此人认为在原招标取消的情况下
TG的希望反而变大了，而且最大， 因为TG明确表示愿意技术转让合作生产
美帝虽然给以色列转让箭式的先例，但把关键技术给土耳其的可能性不大。
欧洲的性价比太低，即便转让也不如TG.
毛子提都沒题

JCFERRET 发表于 2013-1-29 23:45
“不是说只有土鳖才给技术么”
不是。

外军坛上土耳其贵宾的回答比较不错 此土鸡是军方的

In direct order project model, The meetings were helding among government to goverment so The desicion to be taken would be under influence of NATO blocks. You know Sources typed it USA openly warn Turkey to order one of NATO missile system so If The program proceeded like that, The winner will be %90 Patriot PAC-3+.


New tender bid will oblige institutes to collaborate Turkish institutes to develop a new derivation of original one which intellectual and property rights belongs to Turkey and will be used/exported at every country Turkey demands without meeting any restrictions(I think.. based on sources).

It was known that China is willing to share technology of FD-2000 system with Turkey. With changing situation, I think China became the number one bidder who close to get the winner If Raytheon doesn't agree on sharing the technology of Patriot missiles to develop Turkey's own equivalent (They share their expertise to develop Israeli Arrow missiles but I don't suppose They accept givng critical tech for Turkey). EuroSAM Aster solution is also accepted tech. trasfer as well but They can't cope with Chinese cost-effective critical part technological collaboration solutions...
此人认为在原招标取消的情况下
TG的希望反而变大了，而且最大， 因为TG明确表示愿意技术转让合作生产
美帝虽然给以色列转让箭式的先例，但把关键技术给土耳其的可能性不大。
欧洲的性价比太低，即便转让也不如TG.
毛子提都沒题

banzhunc462 发表于 2013-1-29 23:43
不是说只有土鳖才给技术么，这样土鸡也没大.....大兴趣?
   招标的条件写的很清楚，技术转让啊。要不然啥普通防空导弹12套要40亿美金那么贵。