超级军网最新火箭发射排名：俄美中欧，卫星排名：美俄欧中
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 15:17:46
这是一家美国公司对2002~2012的十年前航天发射的统计排名。但是在2012年中国的发射次数已经超过美国。
http://www.spacenews.com/civil/1 ... iveness-report.html
Space Competitiveness Report: U.S. Still Tops but Lead is Shrinking
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Debra Werner
ShareThis
SAN FRANCISCO — The United States remains the world’s dominant space power. Its position relative to its peers, however, has eroded steadily during the past five years in a market that is becoming increasingly competitive with the entrance of new players, according to a report released Oct. 3 by Futron Corp., a consulting firm based in Bethesda, Md.
In its fifth annual “2012 Space Competitiveness Index: A Comparative Analysis of How Countries Invest in and Benefit from Space Industry,” Futron assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of government and commercial programs as well as the work force needed to support those endeavors. While many other countries are expanding space capabilities, the U.S. space program is in a period of “transition” and “uncertainty,” the report said.
That uncertainty stems, in part, from the White House’s decision to hand off to private companies the job of ferrying astronauts and cargo to low Earth orbit while NASA refocuses its efforts on developing technology to explore more distant targets including asteroids and Mars. In addition, it is unclear what impact legislation aimed at reducing the U.S. federal deficit will have on military and civil space programs. Since NASA retired the space shuttle, “there is also uncertainty associated with NASA’s contractor workforce reductions and questions of long-term space vision and priorities,” Futron analyst David Vaccaro said by email. “Even after the introduction of the National Space Policy, the actual formal implementation of policy elements can still lag.”
Russia, meanwhile, leads the world in space launch, a role it “promises to retain” in the near future as its Progress and Soyuz rockets transport astronauts and cargo to and from the international space station, the report said. Russia’s ability, first demonstrated in October 2011, to launch Soyuz rockets from Europe’s Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana, will further cement that nation’s pre-eminent position in space transportation. “These strengths, however, are offset by [Russia’s] weaknesses in retention of human capital talent,” the report added.
The Futron report included an analysis of decade-long space trends. It noted, for example, that between 2002 and 2012, Russia conducted 255 of the 640 successful space launches worldwide, or 40 percent of the total. During the same period, the United States successfully launched 191 rockets to claim 30 percent of the market, China captured 14 percent of the market with 87 launches and Europe claimed 9 percent of the market with 61 launches.
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
For the first time in 2012, China performed more space launches than the United States, a fact that demonstrates the Chinese commitment to a vigorous space program. At the same time, the Chinese government increased its investment in space-related education programs and civilian research institutes, which further strengthens its national space program, the report said.
Europe as a whole is benefiting from the integrated approach to space activity adopted by its nations as well as “assertive space export financing” and national space initiatives, including those in the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Estonia, that complement the integrated European program, according to the report.
During the first four years it was produced, Futron’s Space Competitiveness Index focused exclusively on 10 space powers: the United States, Japan, China, Russia, India, Canada, Israel, Brazil, South Korea and Europe, which the index lists as a single competitor in the space market. The 2012 study includes five additional nations: Argentina, Australia, Iran, South Africa and Ukraine, which the report called “emerging space leaders.”
In that group, Iran has taken the lead. “Iran has made faster progress than any other newly emergent space nation,” the report said, adding that geopolitical concerns and the response of other nations are likely to influence the direction of Iranian space programs.
The report also predicted that South Korea will continue to strive for an independent spaceflight capability in spite of the Korea Space Launch Vehicle-1’s failure to reach orbit in June 2010 and August 2009. Those unsuccessful launches produced a setback for South Korea’s space program but did not diminish the determination of national leaders to establish a launch program, according to the report.
这是一家美国公司对2002~2012的十年前航天发射的统计排名。但是在2012年中国的发射次数已经超过美国。
http://www.spacenews.com/civil/1 ... iveness-report.html
Space Competitiveness Report: U.S. Still Tops but Lead is Shrinking
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Debra Werner
ShareThis
SAN FRANCISCO — The United States remains the world’s dominant space power. Its position relative to its peers, however, has eroded steadily during the past five years in a market that is becoming increasingly competitive with the entrance of new players, according to a report released Oct. 3 by Futron Corp., a consulting firm based in Bethesda, Md.
In its fifth annual “2012 Space Competitiveness Index: A Comparative Analysis of How Countries Invest in and Benefit from Space Industry,” Futron assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of government and commercial programs as well as the work force needed to support those endeavors. While many other countries are expanding space capabilities, the U.S. space program is in a period of “transition” and “uncertainty,” the report said.
That uncertainty stems, in part, from the White House’s decision to hand off to private companies the job of ferrying astronauts and cargo to low Earth orbit while NASA refocuses its efforts on developing technology to explore more distant targets including asteroids and Mars. In addition, it is unclear what impact legislation aimed at reducing the U.S. federal deficit will have on military and civil space programs. Since NASA retired the space shuttle, “there is also uncertainty associated with NASA’s contractor workforce reductions and questions of long-term space vision and priorities,” Futron analyst David Vaccaro said by email. “Even after the introduction of the National Space Policy, the actual formal implementation of policy elements can still lag.”
Russia, meanwhile, leads the world in space launch, a role it “promises to retain” in the near future as its Progress and Soyuz rockets transport astronauts and cargo to and from the international space station, the report said. Russia’s ability, first demonstrated in October 2011, to launch Soyuz rockets from Europe’s Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana, will further cement that nation’s pre-eminent position in space transportation. “These strengths, however, are offset by [Russia’s] weaknesses in retention of human capital talent,” the report added.
The Futron report included an analysis of decade-long space trends. It noted, for example, that between 2002 and 2012, Russia conducted 255 of the 640 successful space launches worldwide, or 40 percent of the total. During the same period, the United States successfully launched 191 rockets to claim 30 percent of the market, China captured 14 percent of the market with 87 launches and Europe claimed 9 percent of the market with 61 launches.
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
For the first time in 2012, China performed more space launches than the United States, a fact that demonstrates the Chinese commitment to a vigorous space program. At the same time, the Chinese government increased its investment in space-related education programs and civilian research institutes, which further strengthens its national space program, the report said.
Europe as a whole is benefiting from the integrated approach to space activity adopted by its nations as well as “assertive space export financing” and national space initiatives, including those in the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Estonia, that complement the integrated European program, according to the report.
During the first four years it was produced, Futron’s Space Competitiveness Index focused exclusively on 10 space powers: the United States, Japan, China, Russia, India, Canada, Israel, Brazil, South Korea and Europe, which the index lists as a single competitor in the space market. The 2012 study includes five additional nations: Argentina, Australia, Iran, South Africa and Ukraine, which the report called “emerging space leaders.”
In that group, Iran has taken the lead. “Iran has made faster progress than any other newly emergent space nation,” the report said, adding that geopolitical concerns and the response of other nations are likely to influence the direction of Iranian space programs.
The report also predicted that South Korea will continue to strive for an independent spaceflight capability in spite of the Korea Space Launch Vehicle-1’s failure to reach orbit in June 2010 and August 2009. Those unsuccessful launches produced a setback for South Korea’s space program but did not diminish the determination of national leaders to establish a launch program, according to the report.
http://www.spacenews.com/civil/1 ... iveness-report.html
Space Competitiveness Report: U.S. Still Tops but Lead is Shrinking
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Debra Werner
ShareThis
SAN FRANCISCO — The United States remains the world’s dominant space power. Its position relative to its peers, however, has eroded steadily during the past five years in a market that is becoming increasingly competitive with the entrance of new players, according to a report released Oct. 3 by Futron Corp., a consulting firm based in Bethesda, Md.
In its fifth annual “2012 Space Competitiveness Index: A Comparative Analysis of How Countries Invest in and Benefit from Space Industry,” Futron assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of government and commercial programs as well as the work force needed to support those endeavors. While many other countries are expanding space capabilities, the U.S. space program is in a period of “transition” and “uncertainty,” the report said.
That uncertainty stems, in part, from the White House’s decision to hand off to private companies the job of ferrying astronauts and cargo to low Earth orbit while NASA refocuses its efforts on developing technology to explore more distant targets including asteroids and Mars. In addition, it is unclear what impact legislation aimed at reducing the U.S. federal deficit will have on military and civil space programs. Since NASA retired the space shuttle, “there is also uncertainty associated with NASA’s contractor workforce reductions and questions of long-term space vision and priorities,” Futron analyst David Vaccaro said by email. “Even after the introduction of the National Space Policy, the actual formal implementation of policy elements can still lag.”
Russia, meanwhile, leads the world in space launch, a role it “promises to retain” in the near future as its Progress and Soyuz rockets transport astronauts and cargo to and from the international space station, the report said. Russia’s ability, first demonstrated in October 2011, to launch Soyuz rockets from Europe’s Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana, will further cement that nation’s pre-eminent position in space transportation. “These strengths, however, are offset by [Russia’s] weaknesses in retention of human capital talent,” the report added.
The Futron report included an analysis of decade-long space trends. It noted, for example, that between 2002 and 2012, Russia conducted 255 of the 640 successful space launches worldwide, or 40 percent of the total. During the same period, the United States successfully launched 191 rockets to claim 30 percent of the market, China captured 14 percent of the market with 87 launches and Europe claimed 9 percent of the market with 61 launches.
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
For the first time in 2012, China performed more space launches than the United States, a fact that demonstrates the Chinese commitment to a vigorous space program. At the same time, the Chinese government increased its investment in space-related education programs and civilian research institutes, which further strengthens its national space program, the report said.
Europe as a whole is benefiting from the integrated approach to space activity adopted by its nations as well as “assertive space export financing” and national space initiatives, including those in the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Estonia, that complement the integrated European program, according to the report.
During the first four years it was produced, Futron’s Space Competitiveness Index focused exclusively on 10 space powers: the United States, Japan, China, Russia, India, Canada, Israel, Brazil, South Korea and Europe, which the index lists as a single competitor in the space market. The 2012 study includes five additional nations: Argentina, Australia, Iran, South Africa and Ukraine, which the report called “emerging space leaders.”
In that group, Iran has taken the lead. “Iran has made faster progress than any other newly emergent space nation,” the report said, adding that geopolitical concerns and the response of other nations are likely to influence the direction of Iranian space programs.
The report also predicted that South Korea will continue to strive for an independent spaceflight capability in spite of the Korea Space Launch Vehicle-1’s failure to reach orbit in June 2010 and August 2009. Those unsuccessful launches produced a setback for South Korea’s space program but did not diminish the determination of national leaders to establish a launch program, according to the report.
这是一家美国公司对2002~2012的十年前航天发射的统计排名。但是在2012年中国的发射次数已经超过美国。
http://www.spacenews.com/civil/1 ... iveness-report.html
Space Competitiveness Report: U.S. Still Tops but Lead is Shrinking
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Debra Werner
ShareThis
SAN FRANCISCO — The United States remains the world’s dominant space power. Its position relative to its peers, however, has eroded steadily during the past five years in a market that is becoming increasingly competitive with the entrance of new players, according to a report released Oct. 3 by Futron Corp., a consulting firm based in Bethesda, Md.
In its fifth annual “2012 Space Competitiveness Index: A Comparative Analysis of How Countries Invest in and Benefit from Space Industry,” Futron assessed the relative strengths and weaknesses of government and commercial programs as well as the work force needed to support those endeavors. While many other countries are expanding space capabilities, the U.S. space program is in a period of “transition” and “uncertainty,” the report said.
That uncertainty stems, in part, from the White House’s decision to hand off to private companies the job of ferrying astronauts and cargo to low Earth orbit while NASA refocuses its efforts on developing technology to explore more distant targets including asteroids and Mars. In addition, it is unclear what impact legislation aimed at reducing the U.S. federal deficit will have on military and civil space programs. Since NASA retired the space shuttle, “there is also uncertainty associated with NASA’s contractor workforce reductions and questions of long-term space vision and priorities,” Futron analyst David Vaccaro said by email. “Even after the introduction of the National Space Policy, the actual formal implementation of policy elements can still lag.”
Russia, meanwhile, leads the world in space launch, a role it “promises to retain” in the near future as its Progress and Soyuz rockets transport astronauts and cargo to and from the international space station, the report said. Russia’s ability, first demonstrated in October 2011, to launch Soyuz rockets from Europe’s Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana, will further cement that nation’s pre-eminent position in space transportation. “These strengths, however, are offset by [Russia’s] weaknesses in retention of human capital talent,” the report added.
The Futron report included an analysis of decade-long space trends. It noted, for example, that between 2002 and 2012, Russia conducted 255 of the 640 successful space launches worldwide, or 40 percent of the total. During the same period, the United States successfully launched 191 rockets to claim 30 percent of the market, China captured 14 percent of the market with 87 launches and Europe claimed 9 percent of the market with 61 launches.
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
For the first time in 2012, China performed more space launches than the United States, a fact that demonstrates the Chinese commitment to a vigorous space program. At the same time, the Chinese government increased its investment in space-related education programs and civilian research institutes, which further strengthens its national space program, the report said.
Europe as a whole is benefiting from the integrated approach to space activity adopted by its nations as well as “assertive space export financing” and national space initiatives, including those in the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Estonia, that complement the integrated European program, according to the report.
During the first four years it was produced, Futron’s Space Competitiveness Index focused exclusively on 10 space powers: the United States, Japan, China, Russia, India, Canada, Israel, Brazil, South Korea and Europe, which the index lists as a single competitor in the space market. The 2012 study includes five additional nations: Argentina, Australia, Iran, South Africa and Ukraine, which the report called “emerging space leaders.”
In that group, Iran has taken the lead. “Iran has made faster progress than any other newly emergent space nation,” the report said, adding that geopolitical concerns and the response of other nations are likely to influence the direction of Iranian space programs.
The report also predicted that South Korea will continue to strive for an independent spaceflight capability in spite of the Korea Space Launch Vehicle-1’s failure to reach orbit in June 2010 and August 2009. Those unsuccessful launches produced a setback for South Korea’s space program but did not diminish the determination of national leaders to establish a launch program, according to the report.
还是这套把戏，年发射不行拼十年发射数，，，跟奥运奖牌一个道理。啥时候中国宣传的无耻度上才能赶上世界先进水平呢。
不过数据还是喜欢的。
不过数据还是喜欢的。
在轨可用卫星我朝已有80左右了，毛子在100-110之间，米帝在435-450之间
无心骑士的坐骑 发表于 2012-10-7 11:14 ![]()
在轨可用卫星我朝已有80左右了，毛子在100-110之间，米帝在435-450之间
你把美国说多了，俄国中国说少了。原文中
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
美国388，俄国216，欧洲187，中国99。
在轨可用卫星我朝已有80左右了，毛子在100-110之间，米帝在435-450之间
你把美国说多了，俄国中国说少了。原文中
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the world in satellite manufacturing from 2002 to 2012. The United States produced 388 spacecraft, 38 percent of the 1,086 manufactured worldwide. During the same period, Russia built 216 spacecraft to claim 20 percent of the market, Europe built 187 or 17 percent of the total, and China produced 99 spacecraft to claim 9 percent of the market, the report said.
美国388，俄国216，欧洲187，中国99。
你把美国说多了，俄国中国说少了。原文中 The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the ...
美国比想的少，毛子比想的多
美国比想的少，毛子比想的多
rongzhili.au 发表于 2012-10-7 13:04 ![]()
你把美国说多了，俄国中国说少了。原文中
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the ...
这是制造数量，无心说的是在轨可用数量
你把美国说多了，俄国中国说少了。原文中
The United States, Russia, Europe and China also led the ...
这是制造数量，无心说的是在轨可用数量
farocean3000 发表于 2012-10-7 13:16 ![]()
这是制造数量，无心说的是在轨可用数量
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北斗2设计寿命是8年，但是北斗1也有工作12年的。
这是制造数量，无心说的是在轨可用数量
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北斗2设计寿命是8年，但是北斗1也有工作12年的。
rongzhili.au 发表于 2012-10-7 13:28
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北 ...
米帝有工作了22年的GPS，1990年的有一颗现在还在用
Navstar GPS Constellation Status
(12-08-11)
Blk NORAD Orbit Launch
II PRN Internat. Catalog Plane Date
Seq SVN Code ID Number Pos'n (UT) Clock Available/Decommissioned
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block I
01 04 1978-020A 10684 78-02-22 78-03-29 85-07-17
02 07 1978-047A 10893 78-05-13 78-07-14 81-07-16
03 06 1978-093A 11054 78-10-06 78-11-13 92-05-18
04 08 1978-112A 11141 78-12-10 79-01-08 89-10-14
05 05 1980-011A 11690 80-02-09 80-02-27 83-11-28
06 09 1980-032A 11783 80-04-26 80-05-16 91-03-06
07 81-12-18 Launch failure
08 11 1983-072A 14189 83-07-14 83-08-10 93-05-04
09 13 1984-059A 15039 84-06-13 84-07-19 94-06-20
10 12 1984-097A 15271 84-09-08 84-10-03 95-11-18
11 03 1985-093A 16129 85-10-09 85-10-30 94-04-13
Block II
II-1 14 14 1989-013A 19802 89-02-14 89-04-15 00-04-14
II-2 13 02 1989-044A 20061 89-06-10 89-08-10 04-05-12
II-3 16 16 1989-064A 20185 89-08-18 89-10-14 00-10-13
II-4 19 19 1989-085A 20302 89-10-21 89-11-23 01-09-11
II-5 17 17 1989-097A 20361 89-12-11 90-01-06 05-02-22
II-6 18 18 1990-008A 20452 90-01-24 90-02-14 00-08-18
II-7 20 20 1990-025A 20533 90-03-26 90-04-18 96-05-10
II-8 21 21 1990-068A 20724 90-08-02 90-08-22 03-01-27
II-9 15 15 1990-088A 20830 90-10-01 90-10-15 07-03-14
Block IIA
II-10 23 32 1990-103A 20959 E5 90-11-26 Rb2 90-12-10 23:45 UT
II-11 24 24 1991-047A 21552 91-07-04 91-08-30 11-11-04
II-12 25 25 1992-009A 21890 92-02-23 92-03-24 09-12-18
II-13 28 28 1992-019A 21930 92-04-10 92-04-25 97-05
II-14 26 26 1992-039A 22014 F2-F 92-07-07 Rb2 92-07-23 19:43 UT
II-15 27 27 1992-058A 22108 A6 92-09-09 Cs4 92-09-30 20:08 UT
II-16 32 01 1992-079A 22231 92-11-22 92-12-11 08-03-17
II-17 29 29 1992-089A 22275 92-12-18 93-01-05 07-10-23
II-18 22 22 1993-007A 22446 93-02-03 93-04-04 03-08-06
II-19 31 31 1993-017A 22581 93-03-30 93-04-13 05-10-24
II-20 37 07 1993-032A 22657 93-05-13 93-06-12 07-12-20
II-21 39 09 1993-042A 22700 A1 93-06-26 Cs4 93-07-20 12:54 UT
II-22 35 30 1993-054A 22779 B1-F 93-08-30 Rb1 93-09-28 19:29 UT
II-23 34 04 1993-068A 22877 D4 93-10-26 Rb1 93-11-22 18:20 UT
II-24 36 06 1994-016A 23027 C5 94-03-10 Rb1 94-03-28 14:20 UT
II-25 33 03 1996-019A 23833 C2 96-03-28 Cs4 96-04-09 21:17 UT
II-26 40 10 1996-041A 23953 E6 96-07-16 Cs3 96-08-15 15:05 UT
II-27 30 30 1996-056A 24320 96-09-12 96-10-01 11-07-20
II-28 38 08 1997-067A 25030 A3 97-11-06 Cs4 97-12-18 15:24 UT
Block IIR
IIR-1 42 12 97-01-17 Launch failure
IIR-2 43 13 1997-035A 24876 F3 97-07-23 Rb1 98-01-31 00:57 UT
IIR-3 46 11 1999-055A 25933 D2-F 99-10-07 Rb1 00-01-03 15:02 UT
IIR-4 51 20 2000-025A 26360 E1 00-05-11 Rb1 00-06-01 16:09 UT
IIR-5 44 28 2000-040A 26407 B3 00-07-16 Rb2 00-08-17 13:51 UT
IIR-6 41 14 2000-071A 26605 F1 00-11-10 Rb1 00-12-10 21:12 UT
IIR-7 54 18 2001-004A 26690 E4 01-01-30 Rb1 01-02-15 15:51 UT
IIR-8 56 16 2003-005A 27663 B1-A 03-01-29 Rb3 03-02-18 15:53 UT
IIR-9 45 21 2003-010A 27704 D3 03-03-31 Rb3 03-04-12 05:27 UT
IIR-10 47 22 2003-058A 28129 E2 03-12-21 Rb3 04-01-12 16:50 UT
IIR-11 59 19 2004-009A 28190 C3 04-03-20 Rb3 04-04-05 17:06 UT
IIR-12 60 23 2004-023A 28361 F4 04-06-23 Rb2 04-07-09 16:07 UT
IIR-13 61 02 2004-045A 28474 D1 04-11-06 Rb1 04-11-22 16:23 UT
Block IIR-M
IIR-M-1 53 17 2005-038A 28874 C4 05-09-26 Rb3 05-12-16 23:30 UT
IIR-M-2 52 31 2006-042A 29486 A2 06-09-25 Rb3 06-10-12 22:53 UT
IIR-M-3 58 12 2006-052A 29601 B4 06-11-17 Rb3 06-12-13 03:07 UT
IIR-M-4 55 15 2007-047A 32260 F2-A 07-10-17 Rb3 07-10-31 22:46 UT
IIR-M-5 57 29 2007-062A 32384 C1 07-12-20 Rb3 08-01-02 20:41 UT
IIR-M-6 48 07 2008-012A 32711 A4 08-03-15 Rb3 08-03-24 20:08 UT
IIR-M-7 49 24 2009-014A 34661 09-03-24 11-05-06
IIR-M-8 50 05 2009-043A 35752 E3 09-08-17 Rb1 09-08-27 14:40 UT
Block IIF
IIF-1 62 25 2010-022A 36585 B2 10-05-28 Rb1 10-08-27 04:10 UT
IIF-2 63 01 2011-036A 37753 D2-A 11-07-16 Rb1 11-10-14 19:53 UT
IIF-3
对比毛子的格洛纳斯，都是在几年内集中完成，然后就是慢慢补网替换了
GLONASS Constellation Status
(12-07-16)
GLONASS M? Kosmos Internat. NORAD Plane Channel Almanac Launch Status
Numbers Number ID Catalog Number Date (Date
Number (Slot) (UTC) withdrawn)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80 786 2362 1998-077C 25595 30-Dec-98 20-Oct-03
81 784 2363 1998-077B 25594 30-Dec-98 19-Dec-03
82 779 2364 1998-077A 25593 30-Dec-98 8-Jul-02
83 783 2374 2000-063C 26566 13-Oct-00 23-Nov-07
84 787 2375 2000-063A 26564 13-Oct-00 16-Apr-07
85 788 2376 2000-063B 26565 13-Oct-00 29-Mar-06
86 790 2380 2001-053C 26989 1-Dec-01 19-Dec-03
87 789 2381 2001-053B 26988 1-Dec-01 11-Jan-08
88 711 M* 2382 2001-053A 26987 1-Dec-01 11-Jan-08
89 791 2394 2002-060A 27617 25-Dec-02 30-Nov-07
90 792 2395 2002-060C 27619 25-Dec-02 12-Jan-08
91 793 2396 2002-060B 27618 25-Dec-02 16-Apr-07
92 701 M 2404 2003-056A 28112 10-Dec-03 27-Feb-10
93 794 2402 2003-056B 28113 10-Dec-03 11-Jan-08
94 795 2403 2003-056C 28114 10-Dec-03 18-Aug-09
95 712 M 2413 2004-053B 28509 1 (7) 26-Dec-04 Res
96 797 2412 2004-053C 28510 26-Dec-04 16-Oct-08
97 796 2411 2004-053A 28508 26-Dec-04 18-Oct-08
98 798 2417 2005-050C 28917 25-Dec-05 12-Jan-08
99 713 M 2418 2005-050B 28916 25-Dec-05 28-Feb-10
100 714 M 2419 2005-050A 28915 3 (17) 25-Dec-05 Res
101 715 M 2424 2006-062C 29672 2 -7 14 25-Dec-06 OK
102 716 M 2425 2006-062A 29670 2 0 15 25-Dec-06 OK
103 717 M 2426 2006-062B 29671 2 -7 10 25-Dec-06 OK
104 718 M 2431 2007-052C 32277 26-Oct-07 20-Oct-11
105 719 M 2432 2007-052B 32276 3 2 20 26-Oct-07 OK
106 720 M 2433 2007-052A 32275 3 3 19 26-Oct-07 OK
107 721 M 2434 2007-065A 32393 2 -2 13 25-Dec-07 OK
108 722 M 2435 2007-065B 32394 2 (14) 25-Dec-07 Res
109 723 M 2436 2007-065C 32395 2 0 11 25-Dec-07 OK
110 724 M 2442 2008-046A 33378 3 -3 18 25-Sep-08 OK
111 725 M 2443 2008-046B 33379 3 4 21 25-Sep-08 OK
112 726 M 2444 2008-046C 33380 3 (22) 25-Sep-08 Main
113 727 M 2447 2008-067A 33466 1 (3) 25-Dec-08 Main
114 728 M 2448 2008-067C 33468 1 -4 2 25-Dec-08 OK
115 729 M 2449 2008-067B 33467 1 6 8 25-Dec-08 OK
116 730 M 2456 2009-070A 36111 1 1 1 14-Dec-09 OK
117 733 M 2457 2009-070B 36112 1 -4 6 14-Dec-09 OK
118 734 M 2458 2009-070C 36113 1 1 5 14-Dec-09 OK
119 731 M 2459 2010-007A 36400 3 -3 22 1-Mar-10 OK
120 732 M 2460 2010-007C 36402 3 3 23 1-Mar-10 OK
121 735 M 2461 2010-007B 36401 3 2 24 1-Mar-10 OK
122 736 M 2464 2010-041C 37139 2 -2 9 2-Sep-10 OK
123 737 M 2465 2010-041B 37138 2 -1 12 2-Sep-10 OK
124 738 M 2466 2010-041A 37137 2 -1 16 2-Sep-10 OK
125 701K K1 2471 2011-009A 37372 3 -5 (21) 26-Feb-11 CHK
126 742 M 2474 2011-055A 37829 1 6 4 2-Oct-11 OK
127 743 M 2475 2011-064C 37869 1 (2) 4-Nov-11 Res
128 744 M 2476 2011-064A 37867 1 5 3 4-Nov-11 OK
129 745 M 2477 2011-064B 37868 1 5 7 4-Nov-11 OK
130 746 M 2478 2011-071A 37938 3 4 17 28-Nov-11 OK
rongzhili.au 发表于 2012-10-7 13:28
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北 ...
米帝有工作了22年的GPS，1990年的有一颗现在还在用
Navstar GPS Constellation Status
(12-08-11)
Blk NORAD Orbit Launch
II PRN Internat. Catalog Plane Date
Seq SVN Code ID Number Pos'n (UT) Clock Available/Decommissioned
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block I
01 04 1978-020A 10684 78-02-22 78-03-29 85-07-17
02 07 1978-047A 10893 78-05-13 78-07-14 81-07-16
03 06 1978-093A 11054 78-10-06 78-11-13 92-05-18
04 08 1978-112A 11141 78-12-10 79-01-08 89-10-14
05 05 1980-011A 11690 80-02-09 80-02-27 83-11-28
06 09 1980-032A 11783 80-04-26 80-05-16 91-03-06
07 81-12-18 Launch failure
08 11 1983-072A 14189 83-07-14 83-08-10 93-05-04
09 13 1984-059A 15039 84-06-13 84-07-19 94-06-20
10 12 1984-097A 15271 84-09-08 84-10-03 95-11-18
11 03 1985-093A 16129 85-10-09 85-10-30 94-04-13
Block II
II-1 14 14 1989-013A 19802 89-02-14 89-04-15 00-04-14
II-2 13 02 1989-044A 20061 89-06-10 89-08-10 04-05-12
II-3 16 16 1989-064A 20185 89-08-18 89-10-14 00-10-13
II-4 19 19 1989-085A 20302 89-10-21 89-11-23 01-09-11
II-5 17 17 1989-097A 20361 89-12-11 90-01-06 05-02-22
II-6 18 18 1990-008A 20452 90-01-24 90-02-14 00-08-18
II-7 20 20 1990-025A 20533 90-03-26 90-04-18 96-05-10
II-8 21 21 1990-068A 20724 90-08-02 90-08-22 03-01-27
II-9 15 15 1990-088A 20830 90-10-01 90-10-15 07-03-14
Block IIA
II-10 23 32 1990-103A 20959 E5 90-11-26 Rb2 90-12-10 23:45 UT
II-11 24 24 1991-047A 21552 91-07-04 91-08-30 11-11-04
II-12 25 25 1992-009A 21890 92-02-23 92-03-24 09-12-18
II-13 28 28 1992-019A 21930 92-04-10 92-04-25 97-05
II-14 26 26 1992-039A 22014 F2-F 92-07-07 Rb2 92-07-23 19:43 UT
II-15 27 27 1992-058A 22108 A6 92-09-09 Cs4 92-09-30 20:08 UT
II-16 32 01 1992-079A 22231 92-11-22 92-12-11 08-03-17
II-17 29 29 1992-089A 22275 92-12-18 93-01-05 07-10-23
II-18 22 22 1993-007A 22446 93-02-03 93-04-04 03-08-06
II-19 31 31 1993-017A 22581 93-03-30 93-04-13 05-10-24
II-20 37 07 1993-032A 22657 93-05-13 93-06-12 07-12-20
II-21 39 09 1993-042A 22700 A1 93-06-26 Cs4 93-07-20 12:54 UT
II-22 35 30 1993-054A 22779 B1-F 93-08-30 Rb1 93-09-28 19:29 UT
II-23 34 04 1993-068A 22877 D4 93-10-26 Rb1 93-11-22 18:20 UT
II-24 36 06 1994-016A 23027 C5 94-03-10 Rb1 94-03-28 14:20 UT
II-25 33 03 1996-019A 23833 C2 96-03-28 Cs4 96-04-09 21:17 UT
II-26 40 10 1996-041A 23953 E6 96-07-16 Cs3 96-08-15 15:05 UT
II-27 30 30 1996-056A 24320 96-09-12 96-10-01 11-07-20
II-28 38 08 1997-067A 25030 A3 97-11-06 Cs4 97-12-18 15:24 UT
Block IIR
IIR-1 42 12 97-01-17 Launch failure
IIR-2 43 13 1997-035A 24876 F3 97-07-23 Rb1 98-01-31 00:57 UT
IIR-3 46 11 1999-055A 25933 D2-F 99-10-07 Rb1 00-01-03 15:02 UT
IIR-4 51 20 2000-025A 26360 E1 00-05-11 Rb1 00-06-01 16:09 UT
IIR-5 44 28 2000-040A 26407 B3 00-07-16 Rb2 00-08-17 13:51 UT
IIR-6 41 14 2000-071A 26605 F1 00-11-10 Rb1 00-12-10 21:12 UT
IIR-7 54 18 2001-004A 26690 E4 01-01-30 Rb1 01-02-15 15:51 UT
IIR-8 56 16 2003-005A 27663 B1-A 03-01-29 Rb3 03-02-18 15:53 UT
IIR-9 45 21 2003-010A 27704 D3 03-03-31 Rb3 03-04-12 05:27 UT
IIR-10 47 22 2003-058A 28129 E2 03-12-21 Rb3 04-01-12 16:50 UT
IIR-11 59 19 2004-009A 28190 C3 04-03-20 Rb3 04-04-05 17:06 UT
IIR-12 60 23 2004-023A 28361 F4 04-06-23 Rb2 04-07-09 16:07 UT
IIR-13 61 02 2004-045A 28474 D1 04-11-06 Rb1 04-11-22 16:23 UT
Block IIR-M
IIR-M-1 53 17 2005-038A 28874 C4 05-09-26 Rb3 05-12-16 23:30 UT
IIR-M-2 52 31 2006-042A 29486 A2 06-09-25 Rb3 06-10-12 22:53 UT
IIR-M-3 58 12 2006-052A 29601 B4 06-11-17 Rb3 06-12-13 03:07 UT
IIR-M-4 55 15 2007-047A 32260 F2-A 07-10-17 Rb3 07-10-31 22:46 UT
IIR-M-5 57 29 2007-062A 32384 C1 07-12-20 Rb3 08-01-02 20:41 UT
IIR-M-6 48 07 2008-012A 32711 A4 08-03-15 Rb3 08-03-24 20:08 UT
IIR-M-7 49 24 2009-014A 34661 09-03-24 11-05-06
IIR-M-8 50 05 2009-043A 35752 E3 09-08-17 Rb1 09-08-27 14:40 UT
Block IIF
IIF-1 62 25 2010-022A 36585 B2 10-05-28 Rb1 10-08-27 04:10 UT
IIF-2 63 01 2011-036A 37753 D2-A 11-07-16 Rb1 11-10-14 19:53 UT
IIF-3
对比毛子的格洛纳斯，都是在几年内集中完成，然后就是慢慢补网替换了
GLONASS Constellation Status
(12-07-16)
GLONASS M? Kosmos Internat. NORAD Plane Channel Almanac Launch Status
Numbers Number ID Catalog Number Date (Date
Number (Slot) (UTC) withdrawn)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
80 786 2362 1998-077C 25595 30-Dec-98 20-Oct-03
81 784 2363 1998-077B 25594 30-Dec-98 19-Dec-03
82 779 2364 1998-077A 25593 30-Dec-98 8-Jul-02
83 783 2374 2000-063C 26566 13-Oct-00 23-Nov-07
84 787 2375 2000-063A 26564 13-Oct-00 16-Apr-07
85 788 2376 2000-063B 26565 13-Oct-00 29-Mar-06
86 790 2380 2001-053C 26989 1-Dec-01 19-Dec-03
87 789 2381 2001-053B 26988 1-Dec-01 11-Jan-08
88 711 M* 2382 2001-053A 26987 1-Dec-01 11-Jan-08
89 791 2394 2002-060A 27617 25-Dec-02 30-Nov-07
90 792 2395 2002-060C 27619 25-Dec-02 12-Jan-08
91 793 2396 2002-060B 27618 25-Dec-02 16-Apr-07
92 701 M 2404 2003-056A 28112 10-Dec-03 27-Feb-10
93 794 2402 2003-056B 28113 10-Dec-03 11-Jan-08
94 795 2403 2003-056C 28114 10-Dec-03 18-Aug-09
95 712 M 2413 2004-053B 28509 1 (7) 26-Dec-04 Res
96 797 2412 2004-053C 28510 26-Dec-04 16-Oct-08
97 796 2411 2004-053A 28508 26-Dec-04 18-Oct-08
98 798 2417 2005-050C 28917 25-Dec-05 12-Jan-08
99 713 M 2418 2005-050B 28916 25-Dec-05 28-Feb-10
100 714 M 2419 2005-050A 28915 3 (17) 25-Dec-05 Res
101 715 M 2424 2006-062C 29672 2 -7 14 25-Dec-06 OK
102 716 M 2425 2006-062A 29670 2 0 15 25-Dec-06 OK
103 717 M 2426 2006-062B 29671 2 -7 10 25-Dec-06 OK
104 718 M 2431 2007-052C 32277 26-Oct-07 20-Oct-11
105 719 M 2432 2007-052B 32276 3 2 20 26-Oct-07 OK
106 720 M 2433 2007-052A 32275 3 3 19 26-Oct-07 OK
107 721 M 2434 2007-065A 32393 2 -2 13 25-Dec-07 OK
108 722 M 2435 2007-065B 32394 2 (14) 25-Dec-07 Res
109 723 M 2436 2007-065C 32395 2 0 11 25-Dec-07 OK
110 724 M 2442 2008-046A 33378 3 -3 18 25-Sep-08 OK
111 725 M 2443 2008-046B 33379 3 4 21 25-Sep-08 OK
112 726 M 2444 2008-046C 33380 3 (22) 25-Sep-08 Main
113 727 M 2447 2008-067A 33466 1 (3) 25-Dec-08 Main
114 728 M 2448 2008-067C 33468 1 -4 2 25-Dec-08 OK
115 729 M 2449 2008-067B 33467 1 6 8 25-Dec-08 OK
116 730 M 2456 2009-070A 36111 1 1 1 14-Dec-09 OK
117 733 M 2457 2009-070B 36112 1 -4 6 14-Dec-09 OK
118 734 M 2458 2009-070C 36113 1 1 5 14-Dec-09 OK
119 731 M 2459 2010-007A 36400 3 -3 22 1-Mar-10 OK
120 732 M 2460 2010-007C 36402 3 3 23 1-Mar-10 OK
121 735 M 2461 2010-007B 36401 3 2 24 1-Mar-10 OK
122 736 M 2464 2010-041C 37139 2 -2 9 2-Sep-10 OK
123 737 M 2465 2010-041B 37138 2 -1 12 2-Sep-10 OK
124 738 M 2466 2010-041A 37137 2 -1 16 2-Sep-10 OK
125 701K K1 2471 2011-009A 37372 3 -5 (21) 26-Feb-11 CHK
126 742 M 2474 2011-055A 37829 1 6 4 2-Oct-11 OK
127 743 M 2475 2011-064C 37869 1 (2) 4-Nov-11 Res
128 744 M 2476 2011-064A 37867 1 5 3 4-Nov-11 OK
129 745 M 2477 2011-064B 37868 1 5 7 4-Nov-11 OK
130 746 M 2478 2011-071A 37938 3 4 17 28-Nov-11 OK
还应该加一个总入轨重量的对比，毕竟伊朗打一颗卫星的规模和长2f差得老远，虽然都是一次发射。
南棒凭什么列入10强，乌克兰都比韩国够格吧。火箭地没有，卫星也不咋样，光靠做地面配套能和其他几国相提并论吗
无心骑士的坐骑 发表于 2012-10-7 14:22 ![]()
米帝有工作了22年的GPS，1990年的有一颗现在还在用
Navstar GPS Constellation Status
...
请看清楚你自己抄的东西，可用性只是说卫星上的授时功能，不是全部gps功能。
米帝有工作了22年的GPS，1990年的有一颗现在还在用
Navstar GPS Constellation Status
...
请看清楚你自己抄的东西，可用性只是说卫星上的授时功能，不是全部gps功能。
rongzhili.au 发表于 2012-10-7 15:06 ![]()
请看清楚你自己抄的东西，可用性只是说卫星上的授时功能，不是全部gps功能。
我的意思就是还没报废啊，按设计年限早就该报废了，当然这只是特例。我朝的北斗不是还有超期服役到12年的么。
请看清楚你自己抄的东西，可用性只是说卫星上的授时功能，不是全部gps功能。
我的意思就是还没报废啊，按设计年限早就该报废了，当然这只是特例。我朝的北斗不是还有超期服役到12年的么。
2006年，中國在軌34顆，俄羅斯87顆
2009年，中國在軌50多顆，俄羅斯91顆
2010年，中國在軌67顆，俄羅斯99顆，美國400顆以上。。。
2011年，中國在軌83顆，俄羅斯101顆，美國441
2011年的数据来自美国拿杀。。。其他几年数据是我自己找的。。。
仅供参考！
2009年，中國在軌50多顆，俄羅斯91顆
2010年，中國在軌67顆，俄羅斯99顆，美國400顆以上。。。
2011年，中國在軌83顆，俄羅斯101顆，美國441
2011年的数据来自美国拿杀。。。其他几年数据是我自己找的。。。
仅供参考！
2006年，中國在軌34顆，俄羅斯87顆
2009年，中國在軌50多顆，俄羅斯91顆
2010年，中國在軌67顆，俄羅斯99 ...
哦，这么多啊。
2009年，中國在軌50多顆，俄羅斯91顆
2010年，中國在軌67顆，俄羅斯99 ...
哦，这么多啊。
无心骑士的坐骑 发表于 2012-10-7 11:14 ![]()
在轨可用卫星我朝已有80左右了，毛子在100-110之间，米帝在435-450之间
鹅毛还有这么多在轨可用卫星？
在轨可用卫星我朝已有80左右了，毛子在100-110之间，米帝在435-450之间
鹅毛还有这么多在轨可用卫星？
rongzhili.au 发表于 2012-10-7 13:28 ![]()
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北 ...
12年是第二批次的GPS，第一批次的设计寿命是7年，降低工作负载，增加空闲时间后可以延长寿命
可用与否只有主人才清楚，但是大家的卫星可用性是差不多的，比如美国的gps2的设计寿命是12年。
中国的北 ...
12年是第二批次的GPS，第一批次的设计寿命是7年，降低工作负载，增加空闲时间后可以延长寿命
要注重质量
好强的既视感，想起奥运会金牌的统计法了。。。
强烈建议比较人均，中国准输！
强烈建议比较人均，中国准输！
tce 发表于 2012-10-8 14:35 ![]()
好强的既视感，想起奥运会金牌的统计法了。。。
强烈建议比较人均，中国准输！
比人均兔子妥妥的没戏啊，只有和阿三这种人口大国一起默默无闻两眼泪了
好强的既视感，想起奥运会金牌的统计法了。。。
强烈建议比较人均，中国准输！
比人均兔子妥妥的没戏啊，只有和阿三这种人口大国一起默默无闻两眼泪了再几年超毛子乐
航天领域，毛子甩TB几条街，呵呵~HKC们又酸了~
毛粉又为精神祖国高潮了。。