超级军网今天发现了一本书，很神奇。
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/06 17:57:53
书的作者是Sigrid Schmalzer。
简介如下：
"The People's Peking Man: Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-Century China"
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press | ISBN 10: 0226738590 | 2008 | 368 pages | 3.2 MB
In the 1920s an international team of scientists and miners unearthed the richest evidence of human evolution the world had ever seen: Peking Man. After the communist revolution of 1949, Peking Man became a prominent figure in the movement to bring science to the people. In a new state with twin goals of crushing “superstition” and establishing a socialist society, the story of human evolution was the first lesson in Marxist philosophy offered to the masses. At the same time, even Mao’s populist commitment to mass participation in science failed to account for the power of popular culture—represented most strikingly in legends about the Bigfoot-like Wild Man—to reshape ideas about human nature.
The People’s Peking Man is a skilled social history of twentieth-century Chinese paleoanthropology and a compelling cultural—and at times comparative—history of assumptions and debates about what it means to be human. By focusing on issues that push against the boundaries of science and politics, The People’s Peking Man offers an innovative approach to modern Chinese history and the history of science.
我没有下，关键是书名太牛了。
最关键的是封面：
书的作者是Sigrid Schmalzer。
简介如下：
"The People's Peking Man: Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-Century China"
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press | ISBN 10: 0226738590 | 2008 | 368 pages | 3.2 MB
In the 1920s an international team of scientists and miners unearthed the richest evidence of human evolution the world had ever seen: Peking Man. After the communist revolution of 1949, Peking Man became a prominent figure in the movement to bring science to the people. In a new state with twin goals of crushing “superstition” and establishing a socialist society, the story of human evolution was the first lesson in Marxist philosophy offered to the masses. At the same time, even Mao’s populist commitment to mass participation in science failed to account for the power of popular culture—represented most strikingly in legends about the Bigfoot-like Wild Man—to reshape ideas about human nature.
The People’s Peking Man is a skilled social history of twentieth-century Chinese paleoanthropology and a compelling cultural—and at times comparative—history of assumptions and debates about what it means to be human. By focusing on issues that push against the boundaries of science and politics, The People’s Peking Man offers an innovative approach to modern Chinese history and the history of science.
我没有下，关键是书名太牛了。
最关键的是封面：
简介如下：
"The People's Peking Man: Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-Century China"
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press | ISBN 10: 0226738590 | 2008 | 368 pages | 3.2 MB
In the 1920s an international team of scientists and miners unearthed the richest evidence of human evolution the world had ever seen: Peking Man. After the communist revolution of 1949, Peking Man became a prominent figure in the movement to bring science to the people. In a new state with twin goals of crushing “superstition” and establishing a socialist society, the story of human evolution was the first lesson in Marxist philosophy offered to the masses. At the same time, even Mao’s populist commitment to mass participation in science failed to account for the power of popular culture—represented most strikingly in legends about the Bigfoot-like Wild Man—to reshape ideas about human nature.
The People’s Peking Man is a skilled social history of twentieth-century Chinese paleoanthropology and a compelling cultural—and at times comparative—history of assumptions and debates about what it means to be human. By focusing on issues that push against the boundaries of science and politics, The People’s Peking Man offers an innovative approach to modern Chinese history and the history of science.
我没有下，关键是书名太牛了。
最关键的是封面：
书的作者是Sigrid Schmalzer。
简介如下：
"The People's Peking Man: Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-Century China"
Publisher: University Of Chicago Press | ISBN 10: 0226738590 | 2008 | 368 pages | 3.2 MB
In the 1920s an international team of scientists and miners unearthed the richest evidence of human evolution the world had ever seen: Peking Man. After the communist revolution of 1949, Peking Man became a prominent figure in the movement to bring science to the people. In a new state with twin goals of crushing “superstition” and establishing a socialist society, the story of human evolution was the first lesson in Marxist philosophy offered to the masses. At the same time, even Mao’s populist commitment to mass participation in science failed to account for the power of popular culture—represented most strikingly in legends about the Bigfoot-like Wild Man—to reshape ideas about human nature.
The People’s Peking Man is a skilled social history of twentieth-century Chinese paleoanthropology and a compelling cultural—and at times comparative—history of assumptions and debates about what it means to be human. By focusing on issues that push against the boundaries of science and politics, The People’s Peking Man offers an innovative approach to modern Chinese history and the history of science.
我没有下，关键是书名太牛了。
最关键的是封面：
The People\'s Peking Man Popular Science and Human Identity in Twentieth-.jpg (9.58 KB, 下载次数: 0)
下载附件 保存到相册
人民的北京毛。
意译应该就是 人民的毛主席。。。。
好红啊
意译应该就是 人民的毛主席。。。。
好红啊
peking man不是peking mao
北京人头盖骨据说在阿波丸号里？
THE PEOPLE’可以理解为“人民共和国的”.标题可以理解为“人民共和国的‘北京人’”.
2012-3-13 21:52 上传
Cathay 发表于 2012-3-13 21:48
THE PEOPLE’可以理解为“人民共和国的”.标题可以理解为“人民共和国的‘北京人’”.
这个是一语双关，作者用这个词来强调49后TG使用群众运动（people's的涵义）进行科学普及（Peking Man），也就是摘要中的“mass participation in science"的办法。如果我没有估计错的话，作者是通过这个CASE分析科学和政治在49年后的关系……
Cathay 发表于 2012-3-13 21:48
THE PEOPLE’可以理解为“人民共和国的”.标题可以理解为“人民共和国的‘北京人’”.
这个是一语双关，作者用这个词来强调49后TG使用群众运动（people's的涵义）进行科学普及（Peking Man），也就是摘要中的“mass participation in science"的办法。如果我没有估计错的话，作者是通过这个CASE分析科学和政治在49年后的关系……
“北京人”指的是那个考古学上的北京人，考那个介绍，大概说的是TG怎么利用“北京人”向民众普及什么吧，没仔细看
机械猴子啊 发表于 2012-3-13 21:53 ![]()
毛泽东思想和科学对人的定义不同？
封面有什么神奇的地方？？？
不是定义不同的问题，而是因为相对于比方说苏联，MZD思想被认为较多地强调政治，而不是“科学”，所以“政治”和“科学”之间的关系，或者说张力……
毛泽东思想和科学对人的定义不同？
封面有什么神奇的地方？？？
不是定义不同的问题，而是因为相对于比方说苏联，MZD思想被认为较多地强调政治，而不是“科学”，所以“政治”和“科学”之间的关系，或者说张力……
机械猴子啊 发表于 2012-3-13 21:53 ![]()
毛泽东思想和科学对人的定义不同？
封面有什么神奇的地方？？？
北京人头盖骨呀。
毛泽东思想和科学对人的定义不同？
封面有什么神奇的地方？？？
北京人头盖骨呀。