超级军网《经济学家》杂志每周将出中国专页
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/05 20:16:22
n a leader announcing the move, the magazine said it is the first time since 1942 - when the US section was introduced - that it is dedicating an entire section to a single country. It continued:
"The principal reason is that China is now an economic superpower and is fast becoming a military force capable of unsettling America.
But our interest in China lies also in its politics: it is governed by a system that is out of step with global norms.
In ways that were never true of post-war Japan and may never be true of India, China will both fascinate and agitate the rest of the world for a long time to come."
The magazine's Asian blog, Banyan, announced a competition to provide a name for its new blog on China.
By today, it had received more then 700 suggestions, stating: "We are still fiddling with the timing of the blog's launch, but will anyway welcome further submissions for the rest of this week
英国《经济学家》杂志每周将出中国专页以报道这个国家。该杂志在宣布这一决定的声明中说， 这是该刊自1942年起每周推出美国专页以来，首次为另一个国家每周开辟专页，其主要原因是中国目前已是一个超级经济大国，并在迅速成为一个能令美国不安的军事强国。
《经济学家》继续解释说，它还对中国的政治感兴趣，中国实行的是一套与全球常规不一致的政治体制，在今后很长一段时间内，中国将既令世界其他国家着迷，又令他们焦虑，而战后的日本从未带给世界这种体验，印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验。
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/ ... the-economist-chinan a leader announcing the move, the magazine said it is the first time since 1942 - when the US section was introduced - that it is dedicating an entire section to a single country. It continued:
"The principal reason is that China is now an economic superpower and is fast becoming a military force capable of unsettling America.
But our interest in China lies also in its politics: it is governed by a system that is out of step with global norms.
In ways that were never true of post-war Japan and may never be true of India, China will both fascinate and agitate the rest of the world for a long time to come."
The magazine's Asian blog, Banyan, announced a competition to provide a name for its new blog on China.
By today, it had received more then 700 suggestions, stating: "We are still fiddling with the timing of the blog's launch, but will anyway welcome further submissions for the rest of this week
英国《经济学家》杂志每周将出中国专页以报道这个国家。该杂志在宣布这一决定的声明中说， 这是该刊自1942年起每周推出美国专页以来，首次为另一个国家每周开辟专页，其主要原因是中国目前已是一个超级经济大国，并在迅速成为一个能令美国不安的军事强国。
《经济学家》继续解释说，它还对中国的政治感兴趣，中国实行的是一套与全球常规不一致的政治体制，在今后很长一段时间内，中国将既令世界其他国家着迷，又令他们焦虑，而战后的日本从未带给世界这种体验，印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验。
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/ ... the-economist-china
"The principal reason is that China is now an economic superpower and is fast becoming a military force capable of unsettling America.
But our interest in China lies also in its politics: it is governed by a system that is out of step with global norms.
In ways that were never true of post-war Japan and may never be true of India, China will both fascinate and agitate the rest of the world for a long time to come."
The magazine's Asian blog, Banyan, announced a competition to provide a name for its new blog on China.
By today, it had received more then 700 suggestions, stating: "We are still fiddling with the timing of the blog's launch, but will anyway welcome further submissions for the rest of this week
英国《经济学家》杂志每周将出中国专页以报道这个国家。该杂志在宣布这一决定的声明中说， 这是该刊自1942年起每周推出美国专页以来，首次为另一个国家每周开辟专页，其主要原因是中国目前已是一个超级经济大国，并在迅速成为一个能令美国不安的军事强国。
《经济学家》继续解释说，它还对中国的政治感兴趣，中国实行的是一套与全球常规不一致的政治体制，在今后很长一段时间内，中国将既令世界其他国家着迷，又令他们焦虑，而战后的日本从未带给世界这种体验，印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验。
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/ ... the-economist-chinan a leader announcing the move, the magazine said it is the first time since 1942 - when the US section was introduced - that it is dedicating an entire section to a single country. It continued:
"The principal reason is that China is now an economic superpower and is fast becoming a military force capable of unsettling America.
But our interest in China lies also in its politics: it is governed by a system that is out of step with global norms.
In ways that were never true of post-war Japan and may never be true of India, China will both fascinate and agitate the rest of the world for a long time to come."
The magazine's Asian blog, Banyan, announced a competition to provide a name for its new blog on China.
By today, it had received more then 700 suggestions, stating: "We are still fiddling with the timing of the blog's launch, but will anyway welcome further submissions for the rest of this week
英国《经济学家》杂志每周将出中国专页以报道这个国家。该杂志在宣布这一决定的声明中说， 这是该刊自1942年起每周推出美国专页以来，首次为另一个国家每周开辟专页，其主要原因是中国目前已是一个超级经济大国，并在迅速成为一个能令美国不安的军事强国。
《经济学家》继续解释说，它还对中国的政治感兴趣，中国实行的是一套与全球常规不一致的政治体制，在今后很长一段时间内，中国将既令世界其他国家着迷，又令他们焦虑，而战后的日本从未带给世界这种体验，印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验。
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/ ... the-economist-china
不知道他是打算忽悠中国掏钱还是把责任都甩给中国
中国是学好了《马克思主义政治经济学》之后进行资本主义发展的
建议他们也学学
建议他们也学学
这回轮到脚盆和三哥中枪了。
俺刚刚拿到这期杂志~~哈哈
这个是好事，无论是对中国或者对世界，还是对朋友或者对敌人，都是件好事。
英国似乎最近喜欢拼命捶打印度。。。。为虾米呢？因为印度不愿意拿牲口口粮换高贵冷艳的枕头们赌桌上的几个筹码？
“印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验”
英国也够可以的，非要捎带上印度和日本损几句。。。
看来他们最近杂志销量有些不好。。。那可是钱啊
悠悠我心 发表于 2012-2-1 23:09 ![]()
英国似乎最近喜欢拼命捶打印度。。。。为虾米呢？因为印度不愿意拿牲口口粮换高贵冷艳的枕头们赌桌上的几个 ...
我看是牛牛没有抢到印度的126架（可能现在是186架）战斗机的订单，所以耿耿于怀。
英国似乎最近喜欢拼命捶打印度。。。。为虾米呢？因为印度不愿意拿牲口口粮换高贵冷艳的枕头们赌桌上的几个 ...
我看是牛牛没有抢到印度的126架（可能现在是186架）战斗机的订单，所以耿耿于怀。
中国的体制如果有了完善的监督，那是非常逆天的！其它国家和中国竞争真的太被动了！
经济学家对中国的报道通常都充满了偏见
倒是他们的读者群很有些有识之士
倒是他们的读者群很有些有识之士
我倒是希望中国能好好发展下去，好让我也大康一下
战后的日本从未带给世界这种体验，印度则可能永远也不会给世界以这种体验
这话我爱听
这话我爱听
散步的小蚂蚁 发表于 2012-2-1 23:46 ![]()
中国的体制如果有了完善的监督，那是非常逆天的！其它国家和中国竞争真的太被动了！
稿件，统一。
中国的体制如果有了完善的监督，那是非常逆天的！其它国家和中国竞争真的太被动了！
稿件，统一。
这杂志估计是最近销量不好~~~