说一下strategypage在海外论坛上的地位

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 13:09:51
最近有很多CDER经常提起一篇叫做China's First Master Designer的文章。文章登在一个叫strategypage的军网上。虽然本人认为strategypage这一篇文章写的比较客观,它改变不了strategypage是一个美国“粪坑”的现实。这个网站在海外军事圈子(不光是华人圈子)里的名声很差。第一,这个网站特别喜欢贬低非西方军械。前一段时间我还看见过一篇把歼-10和F-5作对比的文章(最终结论是F-5要强与J-10,我晕)。第二,这个网页上大部分文章是抄袭别人(别的美国粪青)的。比如说这一片文章:

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/default.aspx

The J-20 Clarified
March 6, 2011: Two months after the impressive new Chinese fighter, the J-20, made its first flight, it's been possible to scrutinize the photos, videos and other evidence, and form a better idea of where the Chinese are with their new "stealth fighter." While the J-20 looks like the American F-22 when viewed head on, it's overall shape, weight and engine power is closer to the American F-15C. In other words, it's about 20 meters (62 feet) long, with a wing span of 13.3 meters (42 feet). J-20 has about the same wing area as the F-15C, which is about 25 percent less than the F-22 (which is a few percent larger than the F-15 in terms of length and wingspan). Worse, for the J-20, is the fact that it's engine power is about the same as the F-15C, while the F-22 has 65 percent more power. With the afterburner turned on, the J-20 has more power than the F-15C, and nearly as much as the F-22. But because the afterburner consumes so much fuel, you can't use more than a few minutes at a time. The F-22 is still one of only three aircraft (in service) that can supercruise (go faster than the speed of sound without using the afterburner.) In addition to the F-22, the Eurofighter and the Gripen can also supercruise.

The J-20 has some stealthiness when it's coming at you head on. But from any other aspect, the J-20 will light up the radar screen. For this reason, the J-20 is seen as a developmental aircraft, not the prototype of a new model headed for mass production. As such, it is only the fifth stealth fighter to fly, the others being the U.S. F-22 and F-35, plus the Russian T-50 and I.42. The older U.S. F-117 was actually a light bomber, and the B-2 was obviously a heavy bomber. Based on recent Chinese warplane development projects (J-11 in particular), the J-20 has a long development road ahead of it, and will likely change size and shape before it reaches the production design.

While the shape of the J-20 confers a degree of stealthiness (invisibility to radar), even more electronic invisibility comes from special materials covering the aircraft. It's not known how far along the Chinese are in creating, or stealing, these materials. Same with engines. The current J-20 engines are sufficient for early flight tests, but not capable of providing the supercruise, something that would be essential for the J-20. That's because China would most likely use the aircraft singly, or in small groups, to seek out and attack American carriers. As for F-22 class engines, that is being worked on. Two years ago, China announced it was developing the WS-15 engine, a more powerful beast well suited for the J-20. No date was given as to when the WS-15 would be available for use, or whether it would have the same vectoring (ability to move the hot jet exhaust in different directions in order to make the fighter more maneuverable) the F-22 uses.

For the J-20 to be a superior fighter, it would need electronics (including radars and defense systems) on a par with the F-35 and F-22. So far, the Chinese have not caught up with stuff used by current American fighters. But the gap is being closed, faster than it was during the Cold War and the Russians were creating, or stealing, their way to military tech equivalence with the West.

Work on the J-20 began in the late 1990s, and the Chinese knew that it could be 25 years or more before they had a competitive stealth fighter-bomber. The J-20 is being tested at an airfield near the Chengdu Aircraft Company (CAC), which builds the J-10 and JF-17. Located in central China, CAC was known to be working on the J-20.

The twin engine J-20 appears to be about the same weight as the 30 ton F-15C. The F-35A is a 31 ton, single engine fighter while the twin-engine F-22 is slightly larger at 38 tons. The I.42 was a 42 ton aircraft, and the T-50 weighed in at 37 tons.

China is also developing other support technologies, like the AESA radar, highly efficient cockpit, stealth and software to tie everything together. Developing, or even copying, this tech is not easy. But the Chinese already know that, having decades of experience adapting stolen technology to their needs. Thus it appears that China is planning on having the J-20, in some form, ready for service by the end of the decade. The key factor is their ability to develop or steal the needed technology by then. The J-20 appears to be a fighter-bomber, as this kind of aircraft would be most useful dealing with the U.S. Navy and key targets in Taiwan or Japan, In any event, the J-20 is an attempt to develop some kind of 5th generation aircraft, complete with stealth.

The only other competitor in this area is Russia, where fifth generation fighter developments were halted when the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991. Actually, all development work on new fighters, by everyone, slowed down in the 1990s. But work on the F-22, F-35, Eurofighter and Rafale continued, and those aircraft became, in roughly that order, the most advanced fighter aircraft available today. MiG resumed work on the I.42 in the 1990s, but had to stop after a few years because of a lack of money. Sukhoi has never stopped working on its T-50, funded by much higher sales of its Su-27/30 fighters. This fifth generation may come to be called the "last generation," after they are replaced by the second generation of pilotless combat aircraft (counting armed Predators and the like as the first).

就是抄袭一个叫Loren.B.Thompson的神论。大家还记得那个一开始说J-20是24米的轰炸机而后来又改口说J-20和F-22一样大小自抽嘴巴的人吗?他就是Loren.B.Thompson.Strategypage网一面抄袭这么一个砖家神棍的文章一面笑话中国山寨别人。我认为strategypage这种作风是相当无耻地。

我劝大家不要因为strategypage写了一篇夸奖中国的文章就把它当个宝。粪坑上偶而长一两朵鲜花改变不了它是一个粪坑的现实。最近有很多CDER经常提起一篇叫做China's First Master Designer的文章。文章登在一个叫strategypage的军网上。虽然本人认为strategypage这一篇文章写的比较客观,它改变不了strategypage是一个美国“粪坑”的现实。这个网站在海外军事圈子(不光是华人圈子)里的名声很差。第一,这个网站特别喜欢贬低非西方军械。前一段时间我还看见过一篇把歼-10和F-5作对比的文章(最终结论是F-5要强与J-10,我晕)。第二,这个网页上大部分文章是抄袭别人(别的美国粪青)的。比如说这一片文章:

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/default.aspx

The J-20 Clarified
March 6, 2011: Two months after the impressive new Chinese fighter, the J-20, made its first flight, it's been possible to scrutinize the photos, videos and other evidence, and form a better idea of where the Chinese are with their new "stealth fighter." While the J-20 looks like the American F-22 when viewed head on, it's overall shape, weight and engine power is closer to the American F-15C. In other words, it's about 20 meters (62 feet) long, with a wing span of 13.3 meters (42 feet). J-20 has about the same wing area as the F-15C, which is about 25 percent less than the F-22 (which is a few percent larger than the F-15 in terms of length and wingspan). Worse, for the J-20, is the fact that it's engine power is about the same as the F-15C, while the F-22 has 65 percent more power. With the afterburner turned on, the J-20 has more power than the F-15C, and nearly as much as the F-22. But because the afterburner consumes so much fuel, you can't use more than a few minutes at a time. The F-22 is still one of only three aircraft (in service) that can supercruise (go faster than the speed of sound without using the afterburner.) In addition to the F-22, the Eurofighter and the Gripen can also supercruise.

The J-20 has some stealthiness when it's coming at you head on. But from any other aspect, the J-20 will light up the radar screen. For this reason, the J-20 is seen as a developmental aircraft, not the prototype of a new model headed for mass production. As such, it is only the fifth stealth fighter to fly, the others being the U.S. F-22 and F-35, plus the Russian T-50 and I.42. The older U.S. F-117 was actually a light bomber, and the B-2 was obviously a heavy bomber. Based on recent Chinese warplane development projects (J-11 in particular), the J-20 has a long development road ahead of it, and will likely change size and shape before it reaches the production design.

While the shape of the J-20 confers a degree of stealthiness (invisibility to radar), even more electronic invisibility comes from special materials covering the aircraft. It's not known how far along the Chinese are in creating, or stealing, these materials. Same with engines. The current J-20 engines are sufficient for early flight tests, but not capable of providing the supercruise, something that would be essential for the J-20. That's because China would most likely use the aircraft singly, or in small groups, to seek out and attack American carriers. As for F-22 class engines, that is being worked on. Two years ago, China announced it was developing the WS-15 engine, a more powerful beast well suited for the J-20. No date was given as to when the WS-15 would be available for use, or whether it would have the same vectoring (ability to move the hot jet exhaust in different directions in order to make the fighter more maneuverable) the F-22 uses.

For the J-20 to be a superior fighter, it would need electronics (including radars and defense systems) on a par with the F-35 and F-22. So far, the Chinese have not caught up with stuff used by current American fighters. But the gap is being closed, faster than it was during the Cold War and the Russians were creating, or stealing, their way to military tech equivalence with the West.

Work on the J-20 began in the late 1990s, and the Chinese knew that it could be 25 years or more before they had a competitive stealth fighter-bomber. The J-20 is being tested at an airfield near the Chengdu Aircraft Company (CAC), which builds the J-10 and JF-17. Located in central China, CAC was known to be working on the J-20.

The twin engine J-20 appears to be about the same weight as the 30 ton F-15C. The F-35A is a 31 ton, single engine fighter while the twin-engine F-22 is slightly larger at 38 tons. The I.42 was a 42 ton aircraft, and the T-50 weighed in at 37 tons.

China is also developing other support technologies, like the AESA radar, highly efficient cockpit, stealth and software to tie everything together. Developing, or even copying, this tech is not easy. But the Chinese already know that, having decades of experience adapting stolen technology to their needs. Thus it appears that China is planning on having the J-20, in some form, ready for service by the end of the decade. The key factor is their ability to develop or steal the needed technology by then. The J-20 appears to be a fighter-bomber, as this kind of aircraft would be most useful dealing with the U.S. Navy and key targets in Taiwan or Japan, In any event, the J-20 is an attempt to develop some kind of 5th generation aircraft, complete with stealth.

The only other competitor in this area is Russia, where fifth generation fighter developments were halted when the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991. Actually, all development work on new fighters, by everyone, slowed down in the 1990s. But work on the F-22, F-35, Eurofighter and Rafale continued, and those aircraft became, in roughly that order, the most advanced fighter aircraft available today. MiG resumed work on the I.42 in the 1990s, but had to stop after a few years because of a lack of money. Sukhoi has never stopped working on its T-50, funded by much higher sales of its Su-27/30 fighters. This fifth generation may come to be called the "last generation," after they are replaced by the second generation of pilotless combat aircraft (counting armed Predators and the like as the first).

就是抄袭一个叫Loren.B.Thompson的神论。大家还记得那个一开始说J-20是24米的轰炸机而后来又改口说J-20和F-22一样大小自抽嘴巴的人吗?他就是Loren.B.Thompson.Strategypage网一面抄袭这么一个砖家神棍的文章一面笑话中国山寨别人。我认为strategypage这种作风是相当无耻地。

我劝大家不要因为strategypage写了一篇夸奖中国的文章就把它当个宝。粪坑上偶而长一两朵鲜花改变不了它是一个粪坑的现实。
手机党表示淡定的围观~
话说很多国人的HKC都需要外国人的言论支撑,这是一种要不得心态…
有自卑的嫌疑~
根本没有去过外国网站……也从不关心他们说些什么……
随他们去
LZ这是给这网占做广告呢
铁剑锋 发表于 2011-7-16 07:21
手机党表示淡定的围观~
话说很多国人的HKC都需要外国人的言论支撑,这是一种要不得心态…
有自卑的嫌疑~ ...
说的很对。

海外的专家评价中国军械要么鼓吹TG要么唱衰TG。我想告诉大家的是海外关于中国的军事评论大部分都有政治甚至经济上的”私活“。鼓吹J-20的专家,比如说澳洲的PeterGoon和CarloKopp,把J-20吹的天花乱坠的。根据他们的评论J-20就是一个无所不能的超级战机,秒杀F-18F-35。他们为什么这样吹捧J-20呢?中国威胁论。我建议会英文的CDer翻译一下Kopp最新的著作,”PeaceinOurtime"。

至于为什么很多人贬低J-20,我只想告诉大家军火商在美国有很大的影响。他们花钱雇佣几个员工在论坛上发一些有利与自己的文章,帖子,新闻,根本就不是什么麻烦事。
wid941 发表于 2011-7-16 08:04
LZ这是给这网占做广告呢
没错。做广告让广大的CDHKC看美国粪粪对中国军械和人种的评论。
上去看看 发表于 2011-7-16 07:57
随他们去
关键是有些人很关心:

http://lt.cjdby.net/thread-1184688-1-1.html

我不希望那一天在CD出现J-10还不如F-5,F-4,的神论而事后还有人说:看strategypage多公正。该批评就批评,该表扬就表扬。比你们这些整天YY的粪青强多了!
阅,就当练阅读了。
为什么我觉得挺中肯的呢?
相对于批评中国政策的文章,这个温和多了
hkedard 发表于 2011-7-16 08:42
阅,就当练阅读了。
为什么我觉得挺中肯的呢?
相对于批评中国政策的文章,这个温和多了
对于您这样的人国外的一切评论都是相当客观的。F-15J不是稳胜J-10A吗?
siegecrossbow 发表于 2011-7-16 09:11
对于您这样的人国外的一切评论都是相当客观的。F-15J不是稳胜J-10A吗?
有本事你去抢话语权,不要别人一讲不开心了,躲在CD跟一群整天喊中国藐视其他所有的人声讨
PS:我那帖子说的是F15没有不如J10A,没有说稳胜
hkedard 发表于 2011-7-16 09:28
有本事你去抢话语权,不要别人一讲不开心了,躲在CD跟一群整天喊中国藐视其他所有的人声讨
PS:我那帖子 ...
首先要申明一下我不是你所说的什么“中国藐视其他所有”党。我已经说过了我本人也十分反感Kopp,Goon,这两位F-35黑对J-20的吹捧。看见CD现在一堆嘲笑美国技术的帖子我也感到很可笑。我的立场是实事求是。

一个机体年龄差不多二三十年有余的F-15JF-15J居然“没有不如”J-10。这不是过分自卑又是什么?
siegecrossbow 发表于 2011-7-16 09:37
首先要申明一下我不是你所说的什么“中国藐视其他所有”党。我已经说过了我本人也十分反感Kopp,Goon,这两 ...
不争了,要争也移步去那个帖子说
hkedard 发表于 2011-7-16 09:47
**** 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽 ****
别转进。您说说看这片文章客观在那里。