超级军网(翻译帖)美国人评价中国即将下水的航母，人畜无害小白兔 ...
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/29 08:17:55
西方媒体很可怕，老百姓对中国偏见深入骨髓，怎能不躺着中枪！！！
中国的航母就要游水了,请看美国人怎么议论的:
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:31 PM on 6/08/2011
I’’m a lot more worried about their fleet of container ships
我更担心他们的集装箱船队。
zephon 23 Fans
05:39 PM on 6/08/2011 Worry?
Since the Chinese economy almost by themselves saved the world from another great depression created from USA and particular-ly Bush/Reage-n policies..-. we should be thankful to the Chinese for bringing so many out of poverty.
中国经济几乎靠自身力量，又让世界避免了一次起源于美国的大萧条，（具体来说，是由于里根及布什的政策不当引起的），所以，我们应当感谢中国人才对，他们让很多人摆脱了贫困。
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Come to Ohio sometime. I’’ll show you where all the factories used to be before they moved to China.
啥时来俄亥俄吧，我带你看看那些工厂在搬到中国之前是个什么样子。
04:57 PM on 6/08/2011 hopefully it will hit some big big rocks and sink on its maiden voyage
但愿它处女航时就撞上大石头，沉了算了。
05:05 PMon 6/08/2011
or a giant iceberg.
或是撞上冰山吧。
05:40 PM on 6/08/2011
It’’s not like it’’s a threat anyway...
不怎么象是威胁
rbenjamin read their lips 292 Fans
04:46 PM on 6/08/2011 Refitting the ship is the easy part. Acquiring the skills to make it an effective naval aviation asset is going to be much harder.
改装不难，要获取相关技术，使其成为有效的海军巡航母舰就难多了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Ignorant comments by ignorant American consumers- with no knowledge of Chinese doctrine for littoral defense or (when combined with DF21D anti-ship missiles) the potent offensive capability this single ship will have against anybody questionin-g Chinese dominance of the Spratley or Paracel islands."How many WalMart containers will it hold"?
无知的美国消费者发表的脑殘的言论---这帮人怀疑中国对西沙和南沙控制能力。说什么：这艘航母能装多少个沃尔玛集装箱？这简直是对中国的近海防御原则，以及对该航母与DF21D反舰导弹结合时的潜在进攻能力一无所知，
DanSc 239 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s just another example of the Chinese ripping off the Russians, and doing it badly.
中国偷窃俄罗斯的又一例证，而且做得不怎的。
derspado He who speaks the least, hears the most. 164 Fans
05:23 PM on 6/08/2011 OK Barley Boy, we get it, you believe the Chinese and their nickel a day workforce is far superior to ours.
Now please put your head back in the sand
行啦，Barley Boy，我们整明白了，你认为中国人和他们5美分一天的劳动力比我们的强多了。
现在，请你再象鸵鸟一样把头埋到沙子里（装B）吧。
zephon 23 Fans
05:34 PM on 6/08/2011 So are you saying the USA should get rid of it’’s aircraft carriers and anti-ship missiles?
Or are you a hypocrite?
你是说美国应该把中国的航空母舰和反舰导弹都干掉？或者说，你是个伪君子？
hagagaga Sorry, I can’’t fit in that pidgeonhole. 314 Fans
05:41 PM on 6/08/2011 This has"potent offensive capability-?"
It’’s a Soviet ship from decades ago.
就这玩艺儿还有“潜在的进攻能力？”它只不过是几十年前苏联的一个老东东而已。
tksensei 131 Fans
11:34 PM on 6/10/2011 Your cheerleading for the potential of China’’s naval forces down plays the still vast distance between their military capabiliti-es and ours, and one used carrier and one missile system that has never been combat tested cannot comprise even the first island chain part of China’’s long-term defesne plans.
你为中国海军拉风，淡化了中美两国巨大的军事差距，一艘半拉子航母，加上从未经过实战检验的导弹系统，这在中国的长期防御计划中，就连第一岛链都保证不了。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr Anything to get out of work. 216 Fans
04:41 PM on 6/08/2011 Used? How is a used aircraft carrier, a great symbol of a great nation? And they are supposed to take over from us?>eye roll
一艘半拉子航母能怎么样？是大国的象征？就超过我们啦？哼！
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
05:02 PM on 6/08/2011 It is not. It just shows that there are pompous types on the other side of Pacific too.
不是的，只是表明，在太平洋那边，有了华而不实的航母而已。
Foscir 0 Fans
06:07 PM on 6/08/2011 The Chinese are very thrifty. They’’re not going to blow their savings on useless military hardware.
中国人可不是铺张的，他们不会把积蓄花在无用的军事硬件上的。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
06:26 PM on 6/08/2011 This I agree. I am surprised that they even spent money on this aircraft carrier. It serves no real purpose. The southeaste-rn nations are all running to the US already China does not need a aircraft carrier to scare them off.
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
DAE 347 Fans
08:35 PM on 6/08/2011 You really don’’t understand things. They basically bought a hull cheaper than they could have manufactur-ed one. I’’m sure they learned a lot about aircraft carrier constructi-on from it as well. It has been totally rebuilt and refitted, so for all intents, they built it.
你真是大大的不懂，他们买一个船壳比造一个可嫌多咧，肯定还学了不少航母建造技术，彻头彻尾重建重装。
tksensei 131 Fans
06:20 AMon 6/10/2011 If I buy a used car and fix it up (even if I fix it up a lot) I can’’t say that I built a car. Stop carrying water for the CCP.
如果我买辆旧车再修修，（哪怕是大修），也不能说我造了一辆车的。不要为共产党当挑夫好不。
Andman0121 266 Fans
04:37 PM on 6/08/2011 Why not just build one from scratch? The one they have here is a Soviet throwback and ultimately no match for conventional navies.
为什么不从头建一个呢？这个是苏联时代的产物，跟现在的常规海军根本不配套。
History| Permalink| Share it
Jacob Black 174 Fans
04:43 PMon 6/08/2011 I think the reasoning is that with this carrier, they will begin to build the kind of institutional knowledge that you have to have to run a carrier group. Then, when when there is enough of that knowledge built up, they will being to pair it with home-built carriers.
我想他们这么干，是为了积累打造航母编队所需的系统知识，完成积累后，他们就可以用来建造自己的航母了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 The’’re purchase of"throwback-"diesel submarines enabled one to surface - undetected-- in the middle of a U.S. Navy carrier strike force. UNDETECTED-.
Why build one from scratch when (as better money managers than the U.S. Pentagon) they can shop for what the Russian military used to call"Relative Sufficiency
中国人买了俄国人不用的柴油潜艇，能保证在美国的航母打击范围内浮出水面而美国人探测不到，听到没：探测不到！
他们把俄罗斯人用过的东西买过来，称之为“间接自给”，何苦要从头建起呢？（他们管钱袋子的人比五角大楼的人强多了）
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:47 PM on 6/08/2011 You must live at the Mall and you LOVED the new Pirates movie! You don’’t even know what conflicts might end up with a DF21D missile coming straight down on a U.S. Nimitz, punching a hole the side of a house thought it...and sinking your USA!USA!US-A! simple mindedness to the bottom of the South China Sea.
你的生活离不开购物中心，可又爱新海盗电影！（可能是说，想过平常生活，可又想寻找刺激），你不知道冲突的结果是个什么样儿，DF21D导弹径直落在尼米兹号上，或是在房子边穿个洞什么的，你想想看吧，….把你的美国！美国！美国！还有你们这些弱智一起炸沉到南中国海海底。
LIbislife 108 Fans
04:32 PM on 6/08/2011 I wonder if the sailors get chinese food on board or do they have to order take out?
不知道他们的水手是在舰上吃中国食品，还是订外卖。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:50 PM on 6/08/2011 The get their food on board. And your debt to China pays for it
他们在船上有得吃，而且是用你欠中国的钱来买单
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:20 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s"Defensive Strategy"is a pretty meaningles-s position when their claims of ownership of other countries are boundless. Those four little stars on China’’s imperial flag represent only a fraction of their governingParty’’s loony claims.
中国的“防御战略”毫无意义，他们宣称对别国领土享有无限的权力。中国帝国旗帜上的那四颗小星，只代表了执政党疯狂要求的小部分。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan I do not think about things that I do not think ab 332 Fans
04:38 PM on 6/08/2011
Like the loony Republic of Texas’’ claim of the Rio Grande boundary that led to our war with Mexico?
就象是德州共和党对格兰德河地区的疯狂要求一样，从而导致我们和墨西哥打起来？
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:48 PM on 6/08/2011 Yes, like that and any number of other examples from before, and after, the creation of internatio-nal law.
没错，是一样的，跟国际法颁布之前和之后的无数事例也是一样的。（讽刺国际法形同虚设）
107 Fans
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
待续------ 西方媒体很可怕，老百姓对中国偏见深入骨髓，怎能不躺着中枪！！！
中国的航母就要游水了,请看美国人怎么议论的:
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:31 PM on 6/08/2011
I’’m a lot more worried about their fleet of container ships
我更担心他们的集装箱船队。
zephon 23 Fans
05:39 PM on 6/08/2011 Worry?
Since the Chinese economy almost by themselves saved the world from another great depression created from USA and particular-ly Bush/Reage-n policies..-. we should be thankful to the Chinese for bringing so many out of poverty.
中国经济几乎靠自身力量，又让世界避免了一次起源于美国的大萧条，（具体来说，是由于里根及布什的政策不当引起的），所以，我们应当感谢中国人才对，他们让很多人摆脱了贫困。
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Come to Ohio sometime. I’’ll show you where all the factories used to be before they moved to China.
啥时来俄亥俄吧，我带你看看那些工厂在搬到中国之前是个什么样子。
04:57 PM on 6/08/2011 hopefully it will hit some big big rocks and sink on its maiden voyage
但愿它处女航时就撞上大石头，沉了算了。
05:05 PMon 6/08/2011
or a giant iceberg.
或是撞上冰山吧。
05:40 PM on 6/08/2011
It’’s not like it’’s a threat anyway...
不怎么象是威胁
rbenjamin read their lips 292 Fans
04:46 PM on 6/08/2011 Refitting the ship is the easy part. Acquiring the skills to make it an effective naval aviation asset is going to be much harder.
改装不难，要获取相关技术，使其成为有效的海军巡航母舰就难多了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Ignorant comments by ignorant American consumers- with no knowledge of Chinese doctrine for littoral defense or (when combined with DF21D anti-ship missiles) the potent offensive capability this single ship will have against anybody questionin-g Chinese dominance of the Spratley or Paracel islands."How many WalMart containers will it hold"?
无知的美国消费者发表的脑殘的言论---这帮人怀疑中国对西沙和南沙控制能力。说什么：这艘航母能装多少个沃尔玛集装箱？这简直是对中国的近海防御原则，以及对该航母与DF21D反舰导弹结合时的潜在进攻能力一无所知，
DanSc 239 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s just another example of the Chinese ripping off the Russians, and doing it badly.
中国偷窃俄罗斯的又一例证，而且做得不怎的。
derspado He who speaks the least, hears the most. 164 Fans
05:23 PM on 6/08/2011 OK Barley Boy, we get it, you believe the Chinese and their nickel a day workforce is far superior to ours.
Now please put your head back in the sand
行啦，Barley Boy，我们整明白了，你认为中国人和他们5美分一天的劳动力比我们的强多了。
现在，请你再象鸵鸟一样把头埋到沙子里（装B）吧。
zephon 23 Fans
05:34 PM on 6/08/2011 So are you saying the USA should get rid of it’’s aircraft carriers and anti-ship missiles?
Or are you a hypocrite?
你是说美国应该把中国的航空母舰和反舰导弹都干掉？或者说，你是个伪君子？
hagagaga Sorry, I can’’t fit in that pidgeonhole. 314 Fans
05:41 PM on 6/08/2011 This has"potent offensive capability-?"
It’’s a Soviet ship from decades ago.
就这玩艺儿还有“潜在的进攻能力？”它只不过是几十年前苏联的一个老东东而已。
tksensei 131 Fans
11:34 PM on 6/10/2011 Your cheerleading for the potential of China’’s naval forces down plays the still vast distance between their military capabiliti-es and ours, and one used carrier and one missile system that has never been combat tested cannot comprise even the first island chain part of China’’s long-term defesne plans.
你为中国海军拉风，淡化了中美两国巨大的军事差距，一艘半拉子航母，加上从未经过实战检验的导弹系统，这在中国的长期防御计划中，就连第一岛链都保证不了。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr Anything to get out of work. 216 Fans
04:41 PM on 6/08/2011 Used? How is a used aircraft carrier, a great symbol of a great nation? And they are supposed to take over from us?>eye roll
一艘半拉子航母能怎么样？是大国的象征？就超过我们啦？哼！
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
05:02 PM on 6/08/2011 It is not. It just shows that there are pompous types on the other side of Pacific too.
不是的，只是表明，在太平洋那边，有了华而不实的航母而已。
Foscir 0 Fans
06:07 PM on 6/08/2011 The Chinese are very thrifty. They’’re not going to blow their savings on useless military hardware.
中国人可不是铺张的，他们不会把积蓄花在无用的军事硬件上的。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
06:26 PM on 6/08/2011 This I agree. I am surprised that they even spent money on this aircraft carrier. It serves no real purpose. The southeaste-rn nations are all running to the US already China does not need a aircraft carrier to scare them off.
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
DAE 347 Fans
08:35 PM on 6/08/2011 You really don’’t understand things. They basically bought a hull cheaper than they could have manufactur-ed one. I’’m sure they learned a lot about aircraft carrier constructi-on from it as well. It has been totally rebuilt and refitted, so for all intents, they built it.
你真是大大的不懂，他们买一个船壳比造一个可嫌多咧，肯定还学了不少航母建造技术，彻头彻尾重建重装。
tksensei 131 Fans
06:20 AMon 6/10/2011 If I buy a used car and fix it up (even if I fix it up a lot) I can’’t say that I built a car. Stop carrying water for the CCP.
如果我买辆旧车再修修，（哪怕是大修），也不能说我造了一辆车的。不要为共产党当挑夫好不。
Andman0121 266 Fans
04:37 PM on 6/08/2011 Why not just build one from scratch? The one they have here is a Soviet throwback and ultimately no match for conventional navies.
为什么不从头建一个呢？这个是苏联时代的产物，跟现在的常规海军根本不配套。
History| Permalink| Share it
Jacob Black 174 Fans
04:43 PMon 6/08/2011 I think the reasoning is that with this carrier, they will begin to build the kind of institutional knowledge that you have to have to run a carrier group. Then, when when there is enough of that knowledge built up, they will being to pair it with home-built carriers.
我想他们这么干，是为了积累打造航母编队所需的系统知识，完成积累后，他们就可以用来建造自己的航母了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 The’’re purchase of"throwback-"diesel submarines enabled one to surface - undetected-- in the middle of a U.S. Navy carrier strike force. UNDETECTED-.
Why build one from scratch when (as better money managers than the U.S. Pentagon) they can shop for what the Russian military used to call"Relative Sufficiency
中国人买了俄国人不用的柴油潜艇，能保证在美国的航母打击范围内浮出水面而美国人探测不到，听到没：探测不到！
他们把俄罗斯人用过的东西买过来，称之为“间接自给”，何苦要从头建起呢？（他们管钱袋子的人比五角大楼的人强多了）
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:47 PM on 6/08/2011 You must live at the Mall and you LOVED the new Pirates movie! You don’’t even know what conflicts might end up with a DF21D missile coming straight down on a U.S. Nimitz, punching a hole the side of a house thought it...and sinking your USA!USA!US-A! simple mindedness to the bottom of the South China Sea.
你的生活离不开购物中心，可又爱新海盗电影！（可能是说，想过平常生活，可又想寻找刺激），你不知道冲突的结果是个什么样儿，DF21D导弹径直落在尼米兹号上，或是在房子边穿个洞什么的，你想想看吧，….把你的美国！美国！美国！还有你们这些弱智一起炸沉到南中国海海底。
LIbislife 108 Fans
04:32 PM on 6/08/2011 I wonder if the sailors get chinese food on board or do they have to order take out?
不知道他们的水手是在舰上吃中国食品，还是订外卖。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:50 PM on 6/08/2011 The get their food on board. And your debt to China pays for it
他们在船上有得吃，而且是用你欠中国的钱来买单
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:20 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s"Defensive Strategy"is a pretty meaningles-s position when their claims of ownership of other countries are boundless. Those four little stars on China’’s imperial flag represent only a fraction of their governingParty’’s loony claims.
中国的“防御战略”毫无意义，他们宣称对别国领土享有无限的权力。中国帝国旗帜上的那四颗小星，只代表了执政党疯狂要求的小部分。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan I do not think about things that I do not think ab 332 Fans
04:38 PM on 6/08/2011
Like the loony Republic of Texas’’ claim of the Rio Grande boundary that led to our war with Mexico?
就象是德州共和党对格兰德河地区的疯狂要求一样，从而导致我们和墨西哥打起来？
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:48 PM on 6/08/2011 Yes, like that and any number of other examples from before, and after, the creation of internatio-nal law.
没错，是一样的，跟国际法颁布之前和之后的无数事例也是一样的。（讽刺国际法形同虚设）
107 Fans
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
待续------
中国的航母就要游水了,请看美国人怎么议论的:
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:31 PM on 6/08/2011
I’’m a lot more worried about their fleet of container ships
我更担心他们的集装箱船队。
zephon 23 Fans
05:39 PM on 6/08/2011 Worry?
Since the Chinese economy almost by themselves saved the world from another great depression created from USA and particular-ly Bush/Reage-n policies..-. we should be thankful to the Chinese for bringing so many out of poverty.
中国经济几乎靠自身力量，又让世界避免了一次起源于美国的大萧条，（具体来说，是由于里根及布什的政策不当引起的），所以，我们应当感谢中国人才对，他们让很多人摆脱了贫困。
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Come to Ohio sometime. I’’ll show you where all the factories used to be before they moved to China.
啥时来俄亥俄吧，我带你看看那些工厂在搬到中国之前是个什么样子。
04:57 PM on 6/08/2011 hopefully it will hit some big big rocks and sink on its maiden voyage
但愿它处女航时就撞上大石头，沉了算了。
05:05 PMon 6/08/2011
or a giant iceberg.
或是撞上冰山吧。
05:40 PM on 6/08/2011
It’’s not like it’’s a threat anyway...
不怎么象是威胁
rbenjamin read their lips 292 Fans
04:46 PM on 6/08/2011 Refitting the ship is the easy part. Acquiring the skills to make it an effective naval aviation asset is going to be much harder.
改装不难，要获取相关技术，使其成为有效的海军巡航母舰就难多了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Ignorant comments by ignorant American consumers- with no knowledge of Chinese doctrine for littoral defense or (when combined with DF21D anti-ship missiles) the potent offensive capability this single ship will have against anybody questionin-g Chinese dominance of the Spratley or Paracel islands."How many WalMart containers will it hold"?
无知的美国消费者发表的脑殘的言论---这帮人怀疑中国对西沙和南沙控制能力。说什么：这艘航母能装多少个沃尔玛集装箱？这简直是对中国的近海防御原则，以及对该航母与DF21D反舰导弹结合时的潜在进攻能力一无所知，
DanSc 239 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s just another example of the Chinese ripping off the Russians, and doing it badly.
中国偷窃俄罗斯的又一例证，而且做得不怎的。
derspado He who speaks the least, hears the most. 164 Fans
05:23 PM on 6/08/2011 OK Barley Boy, we get it, you believe the Chinese and their nickel a day workforce is far superior to ours.
Now please put your head back in the sand
行啦，Barley Boy，我们整明白了，你认为中国人和他们5美分一天的劳动力比我们的强多了。
现在，请你再象鸵鸟一样把头埋到沙子里（装B）吧。
zephon 23 Fans
05:34 PM on 6/08/2011 So are you saying the USA should get rid of it’’s aircraft carriers and anti-ship missiles?
Or are you a hypocrite?
你是说美国应该把中国的航空母舰和反舰导弹都干掉？或者说，你是个伪君子？
hagagaga Sorry, I can’’t fit in that pidgeonhole. 314 Fans
05:41 PM on 6/08/2011 This has"potent offensive capability-?"
It’’s a Soviet ship from decades ago.
就这玩艺儿还有“潜在的进攻能力？”它只不过是几十年前苏联的一个老东东而已。
tksensei 131 Fans
11:34 PM on 6/10/2011 Your cheerleading for the potential of China’’s naval forces down plays the still vast distance between their military capabiliti-es and ours, and one used carrier and one missile system that has never been combat tested cannot comprise even the first island chain part of China’’s long-term defesne plans.
你为中国海军拉风，淡化了中美两国巨大的军事差距，一艘半拉子航母，加上从未经过实战检验的导弹系统，这在中国的长期防御计划中，就连第一岛链都保证不了。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr Anything to get out of work. 216 Fans
04:41 PM on 6/08/2011 Used? How is a used aircraft carrier, a great symbol of a great nation? And they are supposed to take over from us?>eye roll
一艘半拉子航母能怎么样？是大国的象征？就超过我们啦？哼！
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
05:02 PM on 6/08/2011 It is not. It just shows that there are pompous types on the other side of Pacific too.
不是的，只是表明，在太平洋那边，有了华而不实的航母而已。
Foscir 0 Fans
06:07 PM on 6/08/2011 The Chinese are very thrifty. They’’re not going to blow their savings on useless military hardware.
中国人可不是铺张的，他们不会把积蓄花在无用的军事硬件上的。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
06:26 PM on 6/08/2011 This I agree. I am surprised that they even spent money on this aircraft carrier. It serves no real purpose. The southeaste-rn nations are all running to the US already China does not need a aircraft carrier to scare them off.
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
DAE 347 Fans
08:35 PM on 6/08/2011 You really don’’t understand things. They basically bought a hull cheaper than they could have manufactur-ed one. I’’m sure they learned a lot about aircraft carrier constructi-on from it as well. It has been totally rebuilt and refitted, so for all intents, they built it.
你真是大大的不懂，他们买一个船壳比造一个可嫌多咧，肯定还学了不少航母建造技术，彻头彻尾重建重装。
tksensei 131 Fans
06:20 AMon 6/10/2011 If I buy a used car and fix it up (even if I fix it up a lot) I can’’t say that I built a car. Stop carrying water for the CCP.
如果我买辆旧车再修修，（哪怕是大修），也不能说我造了一辆车的。不要为共产党当挑夫好不。
Andman0121 266 Fans
04:37 PM on 6/08/2011 Why not just build one from scratch? The one they have here is a Soviet throwback and ultimately no match for conventional navies.
为什么不从头建一个呢？这个是苏联时代的产物，跟现在的常规海军根本不配套。
History| Permalink| Share it
Jacob Black 174 Fans
04:43 PMon 6/08/2011 I think the reasoning is that with this carrier, they will begin to build the kind of institutional knowledge that you have to have to run a carrier group. Then, when when there is enough of that knowledge built up, they will being to pair it with home-built carriers.
我想他们这么干，是为了积累打造航母编队所需的系统知识，完成积累后，他们就可以用来建造自己的航母了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 The’’re purchase of"throwback-"diesel submarines enabled one to surface - undetected-- in the middle of a U.S. Navy carrier strike force. UNDETECTED-.
Why build one from scratch when (as better money managers than the U.S. Pentagon) they can shop for what the Russian military used to call"Relative Sufficiency
中国人买了俄国人不用的柴油潜艇，能保证在美国的航母打击范围内浮出水面而美国人探测不到，听到没：探测不到！
他们把俄罗斯人用过的东西买过来，称之为“间接自给”，何苦要从头建起呢？（他们管钱袋子的人比五角大楼的人强多了）
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:47 PM on 6/08/2011 You must live at the Mall and you LOVED the new Pirates movie! You don’’t even know what conflicts might end up with a DF21D missile coming straight down on a U.S. Nimitz, punching a hole the side of a house thought it...and sinking your USA!USA!US-A! simple mindedness to the bottom of the South China Sea.
你的生活离不开购物中心，可又爱新海盗电影！（可能是说，想过平常生活，可又想寻找刺激），你不知道冲突的结果是个什么样儿，DF21D导弹径直落在尼米兹号上，或是在房子边穿个洞什么的，你想想看吧，….把你的美国！美国！美国！还有你们这些弱智一起炸沉到南中国海海底。
LIbislife 108 Fans
04:32 PM on 6/08/2011 I wonder if the sailors get chinese food on board or do they have to order take out?
不知道他们的水手是在舰上吃中国食品，还是订外卖。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:50 PM on 6/08/2011 The get their food on board. And your debt to China pays for it
他们在船上有得吃，而且是用你欠中国的钱来买单
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:20 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s"Defensive Strategy"is a pretty meaningles-s position when their claims of ownership of other countries are boundless. Those four little stars on China’’s imperial flag represent only a fraction of their governingParty’’s loony claims.
中国的“防御战略”毫无意义，他们宣称对别国领土享有无限的权力。中国帝国旗帜上的那四颗小星，只代表了执政党疯狂要求的小部分。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan I do not think about things that I do not think ab 332 Fans
04:38 PM on 6/08/2011
Like the loony Republic of Texas’’ claim of the Rio Grande boundary that led to our war with Mexico?
就象是德州共和党对格兰德河地区的疯狂要求一样，从而导致我们和墨西哥打起来？
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:48 PM on 6/08/2011 Yes, like that and any number of other examples from before, and after, the creation of internatio-nal law.
没错，是一样的，跟国际法颁布之前和之后的无数事例也是一样的。（讽刺国际法形同虚设）
107 Fans
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
待续------ 西方媒体很可怕，老百姓对中国偏见深入骨髓，怎能不躺着中枪！！！
中国的航母就要游水了,请看美国人怎么议论的:
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:31 PM on 6/08/2011
I’’m a lot more worried about their fleet of container ships
我更担心他们的集装箱船队。
zephon 23 Fans
05:39 PM on 6/08/2011 Worry?
Since the Chinese economy almost by themselves saved the world from another great depression created from USA and particular-ly Bush/Reage-n policies..-. we should be thankful to the Chinese for bringing so many out of poverty.
中国经济几乎靠自身力量，又让世界避免了一次起源于美国的大萧条，（具体来说，是由于里根及布什的政策不当引起的），所以，我们应当感谢中国人才对，他们让很多人摆脱了贫困。
MajorKong If the pilot’’s good, see, I mean if he’’s reeeally 1353 Fans
05:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Come to Ohio sometime. I’’ll show you where all the factories used to be before they moved to China.
啥时来俄亥俄吧，我带你看看那些工厂在搬到中国之前是个什么样子。
04:57 PM on 6/08/2011 hopefully it will hit some big big rocks and sink on its maiden voyage
但愿它处女航时就撞上大石头，沉了算了。
05:05 PMon 6/08/2011
or a giant iceberg.
或是撞上冰山吧。
05:40 PM on 6/08/2011
It’’s not like it’’s a threat anyway...
不怎么象是威胁
rbenjamin read their lips 292 Fans
04:46 PM on 6/08/2011 Refitting the ship is the easy part. Acquiring the skills to make it an effective naval aviation asset is going to be much harder.
改装不难，要获取相关技术，使其成为有效的海军巡航母舰就难多了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:44 PM on 6/08/2011 Ignorant comments by ignorant American consumers- with no knowledge of Chinese doctrine for littoral defense or (when combined with DF21D anti-ship missiles) the potent offensive capability this single ship will have against anybody questionin-g Chinese dominance of the Spratley or Paracel islands."How many WalMart containers will it hold"?
无知的美国消费者发表的脑殘的言论---这帮人怀疑中国对西沙和南沙控制能力。说什么：这艘航母能装多少个沃尔玛集装箱？这简直是对中国的近海防御原则，以及对该航母与DF21D反舰导弹结合时的潜在进攻能力一无所知，
DanSc 239 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s just another example of the Chinese ripping off the Russians, and doing it badly.
中国偷窃俄罗斯的又一例证，而且做得不怎的。
derspado He who speaks the least, hears the most. 164 Fans
05:23 PM on 6/08/2011 OK Barley Boy, we get it, you believe the Chinese and their nickel a day workforce is far superior to ours.
Now please put your head back in the sand
行啦，Barley Boy，我们整明白了，你认为中国人和他们5美分一天的劳动力比我们的强多了。
现在，请你再象鸵鸟一样把头埋到沙子里（装B）吧。
zephon 23 Fans
05:34 PM on 6/08/2011 So are you saying the USA should get rid of it’’s aircraft carriers and anti-ship missiles?
Or are you a hypocrite?
你是说美国应该把中国的航空母舰和反舰导弹都干掉？或者说，你是个伪君子？
hagagaga Sorry, I can’’t fit in that pidgeonhole. 314 Fans
05:41 PM on 6/08/2011 This has"potent offensive capability-?"
It’’s a Soviet ship from decades ago.
就这玩艺儿还有“潜在的进攻能力？”它只不过是几十年前苏联的一个老东东而已。
tksensei 131 Fans
11:34 PM on 6/10/2011 Your cheerleading for the potential of China’’s naval forces down plays the still vast distance between their military capabiliti-es and ours, and one used carrier and one missile system that has never been combat tested cannot comprise even the first island chain part of China’’s long-term defesne plans.
你为中国海军拉风，淡化了中美两国巨大的军事差距，一艘半拉子航母，加上从未经过实战检验的导弹系统，这在中国的长期防御计划中，就连第一岛链都保证不了。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Puzzlr Anything to get out of work. 216 Fans
04:41 PM on 6/08/2011 Used? How is a used aircraft carrier, a great symbol of a great nation? And they are supposed to take over from us?>eye roll
一艘半拉子航母能怎么样？是大国的象征？就超过我们啦？哼！
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
05:02 PM on 6/08/2011 It is not. It just shows that there are pompous types on the other side of Pacific too.
不是的，只是表明，在太平洋那边，有了华而不实的航母而已。
Foscir 0 Fans
06:07 PM on 6/08/2011 The Chinese are very thrifty. They’’re not going to blow their savings on useless military hardware.
中国人可不是铺张的，他们不会把积蓄花在无用的军事硬件上的。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HanMeiRen Even my enemies are humans 17 Fans
06:26 PM on 6/08/2011 This I agree. I am surprised that they even spent money on this aircraft carrier. It serves no real purpose. The southeaste-rn nations are all running to the US already China does not need a aircraft carrier to scare them off.
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
DAE 347 Fans
08:35 PM on 6/08/2011 You really don’’t understand things. They basically bought a hull cheaper than they could have manufactur-ed one. I’’m sure they learned a lot about aircraft carrier constructi-on from it as well. It has been totally rebuilt and refitted, so for all intents, they built it.
你真是大大的不懂，他们买一个船壳比造一个可嫌多咧，肯定还学了不少航母建造技术，彻头彻尾重建重装。
tksensei 131 Fans
06:20 AMon 6/10/2011 If I buy a used car and fix it up (even if I fix it up a lot) I can’’t say that I built a car. Stop carrying water for the CCP.
如果我买辆旧车再修修，（哪怕是大修），也不能说我造了一辆车的。不要为共产党当挑夫好不。
Andman0121 266 Fans
04:37 PM on 6/08/2011 Why not just build one from scratch? The one they have here is a Soviet throwback and ultimately no match for conventional navies.
为什么不从头建一个呢？这个是苏联时代的产物，跟现在的常规海军根本不配套。
History| Permalink| Share it
Jacob Black 174 Fans
04:43 PMon 6/08/2011 I think the reasoning is that with this carrier, they will begin to build the kind of institutional knowledge that you have to have to run a carrier group. Then, when when there is enough of that knowledge built up, they will being to pair it with home-built carriers.
我想他们这么干，是为了积累打造航母编队所需的系统知识，完成积累后，他们就可以用来建造自己的航母了。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:49 PM on 6/08/2011 The’’re purchase of"throwback-"diesel submarines enabled one to surface - undetected-- in the middle of a U.S. Navy carrier strike force. UNDETECTED-.
Why build one from scratch when (as better money managers than the U.S. Pentagon) they can shop for what the Russian military used to call"Relative Sufficiency
中国人买了俄国人不用的柴油潜艇，能保证在美国的航母打击范围内浮出水面而美国人探测不到，听到没：探测不到！
他们把俄罗斯人用过的东西买过来，称之为“间接自给”，何苦要从头建起呢？（他们管钱袋子的人比五角大楼的人强多了）
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:47 PM on 6/08/2011 You must live at the Mall and you LOVED the new Pirates movie! You don’’t even know what conflicts might end up with a DF21D missile coming straight down on a U.S. Nimitz, punching a hole the side of a house thought it...and sinking your USA!USA!US-A! simple mindedness to the bottom of the South China Sea.
你的生活离不开购物中心，可又爱新海盗电影！（可能是说，想过平常生活，可又想寻找刺激），你不知道冲突的结果是个什么样儿，DF21D导弹径直落在尼米兹号上，或是在房子边穿个洞什么的，你想想看吧，….把你的美国！美国！美国！还有你们这些弱智一起炸沉到南中国海海底。
LIbislife 108 Fans
04:32 PM on 6/08/2011 I wonder if the sailors get chinese food on board or do they have to order take out?
不知道他们的水手是在舰上吃中国食品，还是订外卖。
John A Guthrie 2 Fans
04:50 PM on 6/08/2011 The get their food on board. And your debt to China pays for it
他们在船上有得吃，而且是用你欠中国的钱来买单
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:20 PM on 6/08/2011 It’’s"Defensive Strategy"is a pretty meaningles-s position when their claims of ownership of other countries are boundless. Those four little stars on China’’s imperial flag represent only a fraction of their governingParty’’s loony claims.
中国的“防御战略”毫无意义，他们宣称对别国领土享有无限的权力。中国帝国旗帜上的那四颗小星，只代表了执政党疯狂要求的小部分。
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan I do not think about things that I do not think ab 332 Fans
04:38 PM on 6/08/2011
Like the loony Republic of Texas’’ claim of the Rio Grande boundary that led to our war with Mexico?
就象是德州共和党对格兰德河地区的疯狂要求一样，从而导致我们和墨西哥打起来？
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT 341 Fans
04:48 PM on 6/08/2011 Yes, like that and any number of other examples from before, and after, the creation of internatio-nal law.
没错，是一样的，跟国际法颁布之前和之后的无数事例也是一样的。（讽刺国际法形同虚设）
107 Fans
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
待续------
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
============
我听说他们在锈蚀的地方用塑料打的补丁耶。
LIbislife:
probably done with cheap labor
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
============
扬基佬的脑残程度在加剧，可喜可贺
看到这些。。。
我心中大悦。。。如果所有美国人都这样
中国大国梦想 指日可待
{:soso__3335437674080810823_4:} 美国版 人人 TX
我心中大悦。。。如果所有美国人都这样
中国大国梦想 指日可待
{:soso__3335437674080810823_4:} 美国版 人人 TX
我们应该把这些小心贴上去，然后下次谁再说TG威胁论，就拿这个出来反驳
楼主把老美翻译成红裤衩啦
有关白兔的国防,总有以下三种论调
一种是中国有XX了,太邪恶鸟.咱米瘪死定了
第二是捡来的或山寨的破烂,不必畏惧
第三就是总要扯到廉价工厂那里去
一种是中国有XX了,太邪恶鸟.咱米瘪死定了
第二是捡来的或山寨的破烂,不必畏惧
第三就是总要扯到廉价工厂那里去
美帝是精英政治、精英社会。普通人接受的东西、社会规范都是精英们精心设计的。老百姓虽然受教育程度很高，但为国家的献计献策欲望没有，将过多的精力投入到自我沉迷的冥煮、柿油当中。自以为很有独立思考能力，但却局限在自我为中心的框框中无法自拔，所提建议多以如何让自己得到实利为出发点，目光短浅。这帮人选出来的议员们即时有清醒头脑也要假装和选民们一条心，所以美帝的脑残言论一点儿也不少。
修身、养性、格物、致知、正心、齐家、治国、平天下。此乃我中华读书人的思维惯性，非美帝小资所能敌也。
修身、养性、格物、致知、正心、齐家、治国、平天下。此乃我中华读书人的思维惯性，非美帝小资所能敌也。
感觉这个才是MD的主流啊， 超级大国就是有超级大国的派头！！！
jl-2 发表于 2011-7-9 03:51 
有关白兔的国防,总有以下三种论调
一种是中国有XX了,太邪恶鸟.咱米瘪死定了
第二是捡来的或山寨的破烂,不 ...
四就是 拉链大总统给的
有关白兔的国防,总有以下三种论调
一种是中国有XX了,太邪恶鸟.咱米瘪死定了
第二是捡来的或山寨的破烂,不 ...
四就是 拉链大总统给的
原来DF21D以经是享誉世界的大杀器阿
06:26 PM on 6/08/2011 This I agree. I am surprised that they even spent money on this aircraft carrier. It serves no real purpose. The southeaste-rn nations are all running to the US already China does not need a aircraft carrier to scare them off.
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
三锅啊...
On a side note India is currently building 3 more carriers according to wikipedia. I think the Indians do not have their priority sorted out.
同意，他们花钱搞这个，我很吃惊，这没什么用，东南亚国家都投靠了美国，所以中国用不着搞一个航母来吓他们。
根据维基百科网站消息，说印度正在打造三艘航母。我想印度人不会炫耀其优越感。
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
三锅啊...
三哥也中抢？
难道米国的执政者比普通人聪明一万倍？这些人的言论挺脑残的啊
bigbluetooth 发表于 2011-7-9 04:34
美帝是精英政治、精英社会。普通人接受的东西、社会规范都是精英们精心设计的。老百姓虽然受教育程度很高， ...
大蓝牙兄弟，读了你的帖子咱优越感陡升三级哈～～～
美帝是精英政治、精英社会。普通人接受的东西、社会规范都是精英们精心设计的。老百姓虽然受教育程度很高， ...
大蓝牙兄弟，读了你的帖子咱优越感陡升三级哈～～～
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
混蛋，泄露最高机密，拉出那啥到死！！！
混蛋，泄露最高机密，拉出那啥到死！！！
sonandme 发表于 2011-7-9 08:22
大蓝牙兄弟，读了你的帖子咱优越感陡升三级哈～～～
哈哈，我说的都是实话，就是有些极端。客观地说，中国读书人的社会责任感比西方世界要强些，这都是儒家文化传承的结果。
大蓝牙兄弟，读了你的帖子咱优越感陡升三级哈～～～
哈哈，我说的都是实话，就是有些极端。客观地说，中国读书人的社会责任感比西方世界要强些，这都是儒家文化传承的结果。
5美分一天的劳动力，很好，MD的鬼畜们就继续抱着这样的想法吧。
美帝是精英政治、精英社会。普通人接受的东西、社会规范都是精英们精心设计的。老百姓虽然受教育程度很高， ...
这个可以有，大才
这个可以有，大才
肯定是各种恶心。
难道米国的执政者比普通人聪明一万倍？这些人的言论挺脑残的啊
md愚民政策很nb的…
md愚民政策很nb的…
可以睡个安稳觉了，让他们继续BS小白兔吧
要是MD全是这种智商就好了
jbyyyyyyy 发表于 2011-7-9 02:00
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说 ...
希望都这么想
04:17 PM on 6/08/2011 I hear that they patched up the rusted sections with plastic.
我听说 ...
希望都这么想跟中华天涯很像呀，天下愤青是一家、、、河水 发表于 2011-7-9 10:41
md愚民政策很nb的…
那就是说md掌权的聪明，普通人知之甚少罗？
md愚民政策很nb的…
那就是说md掌权的聪明，普通人知之甚少罗？
他们在船上有得吃，而且是用你欠中国的钱来买单
===========时间快到了，只有民煮的灯塔，人类希望，MD，快还钱吧
===========时间快到了，只有民煮的灯塔，人类希望，MD，快还钱吧
估计MD愚民比咱TG更厉害/或者说，想让你知道，你才能知道
美國人老是DF-21D什麼的，一提航母就拿這個東西來說事情……
問題是，這玩意咱們自己都不怎麼提，怎麼美國人老是覺得這玩意對他們的航母威脅很大的樣子……？
問題是，這玩意咱們自己都不怎麼提，怎麼美國人老是覺得這玩意對他們的航母威脅很大的樣子……？
美國人老是DF-21D什麼的，一提航母就拿這個東西來說事情……
問題是，這玩意咱們自己都不怎麼提，怎麼美國人老是覺得這玩意對他們的航母威脅很大的樣子……？
問題是，這玩意咱們自己都不怎麼提，怎麼美國人老是覺得這玩意對他們的航母威脅很大的樣子……？
哎，天下FF是一家，看起来智商不必国内的高多少
我看到他们说5美分了，本来以为是5美分每条，感情是每天啊
qaiqai 发表于 2011-7-9 08:42
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
乃知道的太多了．．祈祷吧
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
乃知道的太多了．．祈祷吧
可能又是用廉价劳工做的
混蛋，泄露最高机密，拉出那啥到死！！！
错误，正版是：亚洲、美洲、欧洲、大洋洲。
错误，正版是：亚洲、美洲、欧洲、大洋洲。
qaiqai 发表于 2011-7-9 08:42
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
乃把大棋局给暴露鸟:D
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
乃把大棋局给暴露鸟:D
看完之后智商上的优越感油然而生
loong5 发表于 2011-7-9 02:52
我们应该把这些小心贴上去，然后下次谁再说TG威胁论，就拿这个出来反驳
对对，坚实有力的证据，米国人民的观点是非常正确的，望他们的各界政府都能真切关注民意，毕竟你好歹也是民选出来的嘛
我们应该把这些小心贴上去，然后下次谁再说TG威胁论，就拿这个出来反驳
对对，坚实有力的证据，米国人民的观点是非常正确的，望他们的各界政府都能真切关注民意，毕竟你好歹也是民选出来的嘛qaiqai 发表于 2011-7-9 08:42
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
我见过的最牛B泄密
五星红旗上四颗小星的含义：美国、俄罗斯、英国、法国。
我见过的最牛B泄密