西科斯基的科技人员看到杀拉登时坠毁的隐形直升机残骸， ...

美国论坛上的议论：
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[–]Druuseph 8 points 3 days ago
To be honest the helicopter is not really that important. The modifications to it were simply noise reducing, it's unlikely there was any kind of radar shielding besides a smoothed nose. It was more than likely nothing more than a Navy version of a Black Hawk with the tail replaced, it's not some super futuristic death-copter and as shown the modifications weren't exactly the best considering the damn thing lost balance when it went to hover. I know a few engineers who work for Sikorsky and when they were looking at that tail they nearly fell out of their chair wondering who though that was a good idea. A fifth blade and a covering on the middle completely changes the stabilizing capacity, it's not optimal for that body. If they really wanted a 'stealth' helicopter they should have looked into creating something similar to the Comanche which has a covered fan that provides more torque while reducing noise.
Now what they might want is the avionics that may have survived the explosion, that is true, but the 'stealth' tech is not nearly as high tech or incredible as it's being made out to be.

permalink
parent

诚实来讲，直升机还不值那么多钱。改装的直升机只是简单的减少了噪音。不可能有雷达干扰设备除开光滑的机头。跟海军的黑鹰直升机差别不大，只是尾翼被取代了。这并不是超级未来的牛逼直升机，只是简单的修改而且还没有考虑到特殊情况以至于盘旋的时候失去了平衡。我认识一些为SIKORSKY公司工作的工程师，当他们看到这个尾巴时，他们几乎离开了椅子想知道谁想的馊主意。第五个直升机的叶片和在中间的覆盖物彻底改变了直升机的稳定性，这并不是最佳的改造对于这款直升机来说。如果他们真的想要隐形直升机，他们应该创造一个类似于科曼奇能够覆盖住螺旋桨并能提供更大的扭矩而且能缩减噪音。
他们想要的只可能是在爆炸中幸免于难的航空电子设备，这是对的，但是隐形技术远非被制造成的那么高科技或者那么不可置信的。
我甚至怀疑他们能够得到航空电子设备，因为就我所看的消息，他们花了很多时间去破坏直升机，甚至超过他们寻找目标（这里的他们是指美国海军陆战队）美国论坛上的议论：
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[–]Druuseph 8 points 3 days ago
To be honest the helicopter is not really that important. The modifications to it were simply noise reducing, it's unlikely there was any kind of radar shielding besides a smoothed nose. It was more than likely nothing more than a Navy version of a Black Hawk with the tail replaced, it's not some super futuristic death-copter and as shown the modifications weren't exactly the best considering the damn thing lost balance when it went to hover. I know a few engineers who work for Sikorsky and when they were looking at that tail they nearly fell out of their chair wondering who though that was a good idea. A fifth blade and a covering on the middle completely changes the stabilizing capacity, it's not optimal for that body. If they really wanted a 'stealth' helicopter they should have looked into creating something similar to the Comanche which has a covered fan that provides more torque while reducing noise.
Now what they might want is the avionics that may have survived the explosion, that is true, but the 'stealth' tech is not nearly as high tech or incredible as it's being made out to be.

permalink
parent

诚实来讲，直升机还不值那么多钱。改装的直升机只是简单的减少了噪音。不可能有雷达干扰设备除开光滑的机头。跟海军的黑鹰直升机差别不大，只是尾翼被取代了。这并不是超级未来的牛逼直升机，只是简单的修改而且还没有考虑到特殊情况以至于盘旋的时候失去了平衡。我认识一些为SIKORSKY公司工作的工程师，当他们看到这个尾巴时，他们几乎离开了椅子想知道谁想的馊主意。第五个直升机的叶片和在中间的覆盖物彻底改变了直升机的稳定性，这并不是最佳的改造对于这款直升机来说。如果他们真的想要隐形直升机，他们应该创造一个类似于科曼奇能够覆盖住螺旋桨并能提供更大的扭矩而且能缩减噪音。
他们想要的只可能是在爆炸中幸免于难的航空电子设备，这是对的，但是隐形技术远非被制造成的那么高科技或者那么不可置信的。
我甚至怀疑他们能够得到航空电子设备，因为就我所看的消息，他们花了很多时间去破坏直升机，甚至超过他们寻找目标（这里的他们是指美国海军陆战队）