官僚主义处处有,美国大兵不免俗———刚看到的一笑话!

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/27 07:59:24


官僚主义处处有,美国大兵不免俗———刚在SC看到的一炮兵数尸体的笑话!

SC “矢车菊”:

http://www.hmm-364.org/warriors-web-site/body-count.html

http://www.sbanzu.com/topicdisplay.asp?BoardID=190&Page=1&TopicID=3637139



One of our three 105s manned by C/1/13 Marines.  Note condition of tires.  Also note ammo ready box in background.  Had a 120mm mortar round hit a ready box once.
The HE rounds did not explode - composition B is wonderfully stable stuff.  WP, however, did go off.  Hell of a mess, set parapet on fire.  Hot!  Melted tires, damaged gun.

One morning about mid-February, we were fogged in, C/1/13 Marine was in parapet alone, cleaning gun.  A 'valley' opened up in the fog, Marine cleaning gun looked out to the south and saw group of NVA climbing slope of ridge about 1 click to south, passed the word.  The trails of his gun were oriented that way, he depressed tube, slammed ready-box round in with a maximum  charge 7, sighted along tube using 'Kentucky windage'  (We always dismounted sights because they were easily damaged by incoming), and fired.  Scared hell out of troops in trench in front of him (Charge 7, depressed-tube direct fire is LOUD, especially when muzzle of gun is 25 feet behind you!), adjusted, fired three or four more rounds, said he hit right amongst NVA with point-detonating HE round.  Then the 'valley' closed in again, nothing but thick gray fog rest of the day.  Whole incident lasted perhaps 50-60 seconds.

We reported incident in just about those words to Khe Sanh.  They asked for 'body count'.  We said we didn't have a clue, could see nothing.  They asked again several times, we got tired of answering, told them C/1/13 Marine thought NVA were carrying a couple of what looked like tubes (remember this was a click away).  They asked again, Lt. Richard Foley told 'em, "If it's any help, it may have been NVA 82mm mortar section, and our order of battle book says 82mm section has 21 men.  But we can't see and don't have any idea how many we hit, if any."  That stopped the questions, I forgot about it.  About three months later, when I was Asst. G-3 OpsO in 3rd MarDiv COC, I looked up the SpotRep 26th Regiment had sent to Division.  SpotRep reported incident and claimed 21 NVA KIA (confirmed).  Now, WE didn't say that!

Shows how much 'body count' statistics were pushing everything.  Mr. McNamara's bean-counters at work again.  Drove tactics, skewed statistics, we wound up fooling ourselves into thinking we were winning.  All because President Johnson didn't want to be first democrat president to lose a war, surrounded himself with 'yes' men, didn't have sense (or maybe guts, since McNamara a JFK holdover appointment) to fire him and get someone for SecDef who had some common sense.  He needed a man who could  see forests, he had the world's leading expert at counting trees.

Submitted by:
    William H. "Bill" Dabney, Colonel USMC (Ret)

——————————————————————————————————————————————

大意是:

1968年2月中旬一天早上,陆战队第13炮兵团1营C连发现似乎有敌人在爬对面的高地,于是开火,先以最大射程的7号装药发射一发,又补射三到四发,报告击中北越军目标。

向上面汇报后,上面要求提供“尸体数”,大兵们傻眼了,报告说他们也不知道。上面继续追问多次,大兵实在疲于应付,告诉上面说“似乎看见那些北越军拿着两根管子”,于是 Richard Fole中尉告诉他们说“你们可能打中的是北越的82毫米迫击炮班,我们的作战手册写着敌人82迫击炮班有21人”。

3个月后,陆战3师的官方报告提到这次战斗,记载是“确认击毙北越军21人”。

官僚主义处处有,美国大兵不免俗———刚在SC看到的一炮兵数尸体的笑话!

SC “矢车菊”:

http://www.hmm-364.org/warriors-web-site/body-count.html

http://www.sbanzu.com/topicdisplay.asp?BoardID=190&Page=1&TopicID=3637139



One of our three 105s manned by C/1/13 Marines.  Note condition of tires.  Also note ammo ready box in background.  Had a 120mm mortar round hit a ready box once.
The HE rounds did not explode - composition B is wonderfully stable stuff.  WP, however, did go off.  Hell of a mess, set parapet on fire.  Hot!  Melted tires, damaged gun.

One morning about mid-February, we were fogged in, C/1/13 Marine was in parapet alone, cleaning gun.  A 'valley' opened up in the fog, Marine cleaning gun looked out to the south and saw group of NVA climbing slope of ridge about 1 click to south, passed the word.  The trails of his gun were oriented that way, he depressed tube, slammed ready-box round in with a maximum  charge 7, sighted along tube using 'Kentucky windage'  (We always dismounted sights because they were easily damaged by incoming), and fired.  Scared hell out of troops in trench in front of him (Charge 7, depressed-tube direct fire is LOUD, especially when muzzle of gun is 25 feet behind you!), adjusted, fired three or four more rounds, said he hit right amongst NVA with point-detonating HE round.  Then the 'valley' closed in again, nothing but thick gray fog rest of the day.  Whole incident lasted perhaps 50-60 seconds.

We reported incident in just about those words to Khe Sanh.  They asked for 'body count'.  We said we didn't have a clue, could see nothing.  They asked again several times, we got tired of answering, told them C/1/13 Marine thought NVA were carrying a couple of what looked like tubes (remember this was a click away).  They asked again, Lt. Richard Foley told 'em, "If it's any help, it may have been NVA 82mm mortar section, and our order of battle book says 82mm section has 21 men.  But we can't see and don't have any idea how many we hit, if any."  That stopped the questions, I forgot about it.  About three months later, when I was Asst. G-3 OpsO in 3rd MarDiv COC, I looked up the SpotRep 26th Regiment had sent to Division.  SpotRep reported incident and claimed 21 NVA KIA (confirmed).  Now, WE didn't say that!

Shows how much 'body count' statistics were pushing everything.  Mr. McNamara's bean-counters at work again.  Drove tactics, skewed statistics, we wound up fooling ourselves into thinking we were winning.  All because President Johnson didn't want to be first democrat president to lose a war, surrounded himself with 'yes' men, didn't have sense (or maybe guts, since McNamara a JFK holdover appointment) to fire him and get someone for SecDef who had some common sense.  He needed a man who could  see forests, he had the world's leading expert at counting trees.

Submitted by:
    William H. "Bill" Dabney, Colonel USMC (Ret)

——————————————————————————————————————————————

大意是:

1968年2月中旬一天早上,陆战队第13炮兵团1营C连发现似乎有敌人在爬对面的高地,于是开火,先以最大射程的7号装药发射一发,又补射三到四发,报告击中北越军目标。

向上面汇报后,上面要求提供“尸体数”,大兵们傻眼了,报告说他们也不知道。上面继续追问多次,大兵实在疲于应付,告诉上面说“似乎看见那些北越军拿着两根管子”,于是 Richard Fole中尉告诉他们说“你们可能打中的是北越的82毫米迫击炮班,我们的作战手册写着敌人82迫击炮班有21人”。

3个月后,陆战3师的官方报告提到这次战斗,记载是“确认击毙北越军21人”。
体制问题
lz的签名图是个神马情况?
马润是陆军?
同问LZ的签名图是什么情况
扩大战果好说服民众继续支持战争
车永学 发表于 2011-5-10 18:22

弄标题时为了顺口,没注意.:')谢谢指正!已经改正,不过不太顺口了
回复 7# papop


    搜索下Bureaucracy标题的图片,你就知道西方的官僚主义历史很悠久,是种文化
砍人头报军功的。。呵呵。。两根棍子当21个人头赚大了
一个炮班21人,还是迫击炮?存疑中……
官僚主义哪里都有的
中尉也是小偷公司培训出来的
这样也行?
TG战果统计可是很严的呀
你不会告诉我,MD的战果都是这么来的吧
这个战果确实那啥了点。。。
  官僚。
话说,考虑到越战期间一系列颓废和茫然,这类事情不会是个别现象
不知道抗美援朝时MD的战果是不是这么统计出来的。。。
确认击毙北越军21人
记得四星上将施瓦茨科普夫回忆录说过~当时在越南,轰炸北越一个桥梁四个桥墩炸毁一个,桥梁已经报废。结果在评估的时候结果是桥梁被摧毁25%。。。还要继续打击。。。。
还有那个一个盘子28美元,一瓶水多少美元来着...
一看就知道有猫腻,居然还能通过
没找他们数耳朵,看看两根棍还是得看的
阿富汗某地,塔利班进攻某驻地,士兵甲发现后开火。士兵乙丙也同时开火。一塔利班被当场打死。最后战果:甲乙丙各射杀塔利班一名
papop 发表于 2011-5-10 18:03


    其实不光是老美体制问题,猴子体制问题也够严重的了,一个炮班21人?开玩笑么这是
战争中间的统计数字还是有很多水分的
以前看狙击手那段视频。
其中有个XX秒击杀XX个北越士兵的,
当时我就在想,现场就他一个人,尸体又都掉河里,事后也无法清点,
那打中多少个人不都是随他自己说。
同问LZ签名
盯着lz签名看了好久
美军的官僚主义也是非常的严重,一点不比别的国家弱。
hhffcc 发表于 2011-5-11 19:27

狙击手很少单独作战,一般都有观察员的。
记得80年代一本书里说过,当时在中越边境作战中,一名狙击手击中一名越军,连续观察了2天没动过,才被记载为击毙。
juelian1992 发表于 2011-5-11 07:29

美国国防部,也就是五角大楼创造过的极致之一是一卷手纸八万美元,差不多就是一辆奥迪A6。
gzxin 发表于 2011-5-12 11:14

这个战例不一样,我记得是对方过河的时候射击,
对面的人都在河里,然后打完狙击手就撤了,
不可能留在那里观察。
racher 发表于 2011-5-12 11:33


    诶,真有此事?八万,就是把一百美元一张张卷起来,一般卷纸也没八百节啊。
被就业 发表于 2011-5-12 12:25

你只要知道,五角大楼一年的清洁费用,节省下来一部分,能给空军一架还是两架F22,就知道其中的猫腻了。
皿主JY只关心国内的天价茅台,不会关注人类的希望,阿妹例假的天价手纸的。
体制问题,绝对的体制问题
得知美利坚的80k刀手纸
突然觉得英帝的22胖子电灯泡实在算不上神马嘛

英国人真是能叽歪
lz的签名图
钱多不怕!俺们印钞厂开工还不足呢!
感觉楼主的签名图可能是发射者紧张了
还没开火就调转方向准备走了,结果就打到墙了
想起了"师旅对骂"和"陆空对喷"