3月9日AF-4试飞中出现问题导致F-35停飞

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 12:55:39
貌似没人转这次球电出问题的报道

http://www.flightglobal.com/arti ... f-35-grounding.html

The Lockheed Martin F-35 is grounded while programme officials investigate a dual generator failure and oil leak on the AF-4 test aircraft on 9 March.

The in-flight power failure forced the test aircraft, which is dedicated to mission systems testing, to return and land at Edwards AFB, Lockheed says.

The joint programme office has “temporarily suspended” flights by the F-35 until a root cause is determined, the company adds.

“Once the cause is known, the appropriate repairs and improvements will be made before flight operations resume,” Lockheed says.

This is the second grounding order for the F-35 in six months. On 1 October, a software problem discovered in simulations caused the programme to park the test fleet for several days.

If not fixed, that glitch could have allowed a fuel pump to shut down at altitudes over 10,000ft.

At the same time as fuel pump problem was discovered, a weakness was also found in the hinge of the lift-fan auxiliary air inlet for the F-35B short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) variant. That problem forced Lockheed to halt all vertical landing tests for more than two months.

But the generator failure and oil leak on AF-4 marks the first in-flight issue for a conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) variant since the 19 test flight in May 2007 by the AA-1 test aircraft.

That issue also involved a power system failure. An electrical short disabled the flight controls in the horizontal stabilizer, but former chief test pilot Jon Beesley landed the aircraft without incident.

Lockheed also has had problems before with the generator on the carrier-based version of the F-35. In 2007, Lockheed acknowledged the generator was sized to support only 65% of the power requirement for the F-35C.貌似没人转这次球电出问题的报道

http://www.flightglobal.com/arti ... f-35-grounding.html

The Lockheed Martin F-35 is grounded while programme officials investigate a dual generator failure and oil leak on the AF-4 test aircraft on 9 March.

The in-flight power failure forced the test aircraft, which is dedicated to mission systems testing, to return and land at Edwards AFB, Lockheed says.

The joint programme office has “temporarily suspended” flights by the F-35 until a root cause is determined, the company adds.

“Once the cause is known, the appropriate repairs and improvements will be made before flight operations resume,” Lockheed says.

This is the second grounding order for the F-35 in six months. On 1 October, a software problem discovered in simulations caused the programme to park the test fleet for several days.

If not fixed, that glitch could have allowed a fuel pump to shut down at altitudes over 10,000ft.

At the same time as fuel pump problem was discovered, a weakness was also found in the hinge of the lift-fan auxiliary air inlet for the F-35B short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) variant. That problem forced Lockheed to halt all vertical landing tests for more than two months.

But the generator failure and oil leak on AF-4 marks the first in-flight issue for a conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) variant since the 19 test flight in May 2007 by the AA-1 test aircraft.

That issue also involved a power system failure. An electrical short disabled the flight controls in the horizontal stabilizer, but former chief test pilot Jon Beesley landed the aircraft without incident.

Lockheed also has had problems before with the generator on the carrier-based version of the F-35. In 2007, Lockheed acknowledged the generator was sized to support only 65% of the power requirement for the F-35C.
燃油和电力系统的问题?
没完全懂。不过要是真的话,还算是件好事。
谁翻译下!看了一知半解…晕!看来要给自己加油…
发电机问题
两个发电机全故障,燃油渗漏。
35B的供油泵有问题,升力风扇的辅助进气口铰链太弱
发电机问题在35C上也存在
谁能翻一下啊!!!
看来发电机的问题也是老大难了,咱的棍子高新战神也都出过类似问题。
电子设备这么多,APU功率超负荷的事肯定多
估计是基本设计的问题,要不怎么几个机型都存在而且一直解决不了?
其实台湾的悲剧恰恰是那个全套的美式训练,美式训练很牛吗?乍看好像是,美空军这些年来在历次战争中所向披靡,可细细一分析,好像不是那么回事,第一,美军修理的都是小国,这些国家的空军与美军根本不在一个档次上,战场上也表现出空战凤毛麟角,基本上都是轰炸再轰炸,好比大人欺负小孩根本没有太多的技术含量。第二,美军的训练是在其全面完整的C3I基础上的,其强大表现在体系的完整,既总是可以在战场上找到对方的短板,而形成以强击弱的态势,比如可以将敌人击毁在地面就不考虑在空中解决问题,能够在远距离隐蔽的干掉对手绝不把战斗引入格斗,美军训练很少考虑与对手平等的交手的情况,所谓的红旗军演也是意在暴露问题,从不以胜负作为考核的主要依据。这样象台湾这样的“小国”师从美军就暴露出几个问题,首先,美军这套训练打法凭以往的战绩不足以验证其先进性,某种意义上说伊拉克阿富汗战场美军单就战机来说就是开着二战的B-17,B-25,B-29,p-51,结果也不会有什么两样,这种训练打法在遇到势均力敌(起码是体系完整)的对手时还管不管用,还没有真正验证过。其次,台湾完全不具备美军的体系优势,这就决定了其在今后可能发生的战争中以往训练的许多内容根本是无的放矢,反到极可能被体系全面的对手以“欺负人”的手段修理,就像南联盟的MIG-29优秀飞行员所面临的,多数飞机被轰炸迟滞在地面飞不起来,好容易起飞了,可是连对手都没看到就被糊里糊涂的击落了,这里显然不能怪罪这个飞行员的技艺不精,实在是对手太不“局气”。最后,来说说所谓的训练时数问题,过去,评价一个飞行员好坏飞行时数确实是一大指标,所谓熟能生巧,那个卖油翁能够不洒油,不过“但手熟尔”,但这个指标在今天来说却不像过去那么重要了,1.三代机区别于二代一个重要指标就是“好飞”,许多高难度的技巧交给电传去解决了,飞行员要可虑的往往仅仅是结果,而过程都交给电脑了,比如拉个yoyo或殷麦曼,既不用考虑过载超限,也不用考虑掉高度,有点像现在的电脑,可以说越来越傻瓜了,飞行员空战越来越类似玩电脑游戏,其训练强度比之二代并不大,2.计算机模拟技术的发展使模拟器越来越接近现实飞行,从而使大量的基础飞行训练可在地面模拟器上进行,甚至随着网络技术的发展,多机战术协同训练也可以在地面上完成,既所谓的地面苦练,空中精飞,这样既节省了大量飞行经费,节省了昂贵的三代机寿命,也大大扩展了飞行时数,可以说这是现在飞行训练的趋势,而那种拘泥于所谓的年飞行时数的评价体系完全是过时的,是建立在过去一代二代机训练和格斗空战经验上的,与当今后三代机为主的现实已经有了代差。
多摔几架就不漏油了
洛马公司的F-35程序测试人员在AF-4试验机测试中发现有双联发电机故障和漏油两个问题,导致F-35停飞。

洛马公司表示,飞行中的电力故障迫使正在测试任务系统的试验机返回,并降落在爱德华兹空军基地,联合程序办公室在问题根源确定以前会暂时搁置F-35的试飞计划,一

旦原因查明,在试飞重新开始前会做适当的维修和改进。

这是在半年中F-35的第二次停飞,在去年十月一号,编程导致的软件模拟问题使测试团队歇了好几天。

如果弄不好,一点小故障就能使燃油泵在万米高空停车。

在燃油泵故障被发现的同时,F-35B用于短距和垂直起降的风扇辅助进气道铰链也出了问题,这个问题使洛马公司停止了所有垂直起降测试长达两个月。

但是早在2007年5月的AA-1传统起降测试机第19次飞行测试时,就已经出现了类似AF-4试验机发电机故障和漏油问题,那个也是有关动力系统故障的问题,一个电路短路使

得水平稳定器飞控系统失灵,主测试飞行员约翰比利斯成功安全降落。

在2007年,洛马公司的F-35舰载机版发电机出现问题。
洛马公司声称发电机被设计成只有F-35C的65%电力供给

翻译的我好晕
美帝这么配合兔子啊...修到20服役吧..
a dual generator failure



这个是主发动机上的发电机还是?
脉脉不语 发表于 2011-3-13 22:22
那你就找个比美式训练更牛的训练体系嘛
参考消息上说F135出问题了,不如换136吧{:jian:}
脉脉不语 发表于 2011-3-13 22:22


真是无知者无畏
回复 13# 脉脉不语


    翻得挺不错~~
回复 13# 脉脉不语
兄弟的见解入木三分啊