美《航空周刊》:中国研发新型火箭发动机 长征六号或将 ...

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 04:14:02
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/g ... mp;amp;channel=awst

China Developing New Rocket Engines

Jan 10, 2011



China is advancing its space capabilities by developing staged combustion, an engine technology that is likely to offer greater performance for the Long March 6 and 7, two of a family of launchers that the country will field around the middle of the decade.

The smaller of the two, the Long March 6, may be the first to go into service, beating the flagship third member of the family, the Long March 5 heavy launcher.

A new 18-metric-ton-thrust engine “is a high-altitude liquid oxygen and kerosene engine with a staged combustion cycle and has been indigenously designed by China,” says national space contractor CASC.

If successfully executed, this technology would offer a high specific impulse, a key measure of rocket performance that compares the duration and level of thrust with the mass of fuel consumed in generating it. The practical result should be a greater payload to orbit for a launcher of a given size. The improved performance will probably be essential for China’s next generation of launchers to be competitive as the technology becomes increasingly common in the future.

As a liquid-fuel engine, the powerplant has limited meaning for China’s military capabilities. Modern missiles generally have solid propellants. But the development underscores the country’s ability to catch up with advanced foreign aerospace technology.

It can be assumed that development of the staged-combustion engine is going well, because CASC would not discuss a problem-ridden program that had hitherto received minimal attention, and because two rocket-building subsidiaries, SAST and CALT, are speaking optimistically of getting the related launchers into service within three or four years.

Shanghai-based SAST says its development of the Long March 6 is progressing smoothly and that the light launcher may become operational before the Long March 5.

The Long March 6 will be able to loft 1,000-kg. (2,200-lb.) payloads to an orbit of 600 km. (370 mi.) altitude, says SAST Vice President Meng Guang. The first launch of the Long March 5 heavy rocket is due in 2014 after a development program that began in 2007. Development of Long March 6 began in 2009, exploiting engines and stage modules already designed for the Long March 5.

The core of Long March 6 will use the standard 3.35-meter (11-ft.) diameter of the current Long March series, Meng and other SAST officials say. That means it will be based on the K3 stage module, the larger of two kerosene-fueled modules that SAST and CALT are developing for the launcher family.

A scheme for the family discussed in 2007 suggested that the smaller of its three launchers—now identified as Long March 6—would be based on the smallest, 2.25-meter-dia. module, K2, but the plan has obviously changed. The modules can serve as boosters or core stages.

Despite the rise in diameter, the first stage of Long March 6 will presumably be propelled by the single YF100 engine generating 120 metric tons (265,000 lb.) of thrust previously associated with the light rocket. The upper stage will have a smaller engine, says Meng, without giving details. CALT Vice President Hao Zhaoping has said that the medium-heavy Long March 7 will use an 18-ton engine for its second stage.

Since CASC says the staged-combustion engine will have a thrust of 18 tons and will be used on “new-generation launch vehicles,” it should be the powerplant for the second stages of Long March 6 and 7. One foreign rocket engineer calculates that the Long March 7 would need two of the 18-ton engines for its second stage.

The Long March 5 has core stages fed by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, another technology route to high specific impulse. Kerosene-fueled modules with YF100s serve as its boosters.

Staged combustion avoids the usual waste of fuel or oxygen used to drive the pumps in an engine with the conventional gas-generator cycle. To avoid overheating, the mixture in that process in any liquid-fuel rocket is deliberately not optimal. It must have either too much oxygen or too much fuel, one of which is therefore partly wasted as the exhaust is dumped overboard.

In staged combustion, that still-usable exhaust is instead fed into the main combustion chamber, driving up pressure and burning a second time to maximize impulse from the available tankage. The principle sounds simple, but in practice it presents great challenges in handling the hot, high-pressure exhaust. Staged combustion engines in service include the Russian RD-180, used on the Atlas V, and the Space Shuttle Main Engine.

Chinese engineers probably chose to use the technology first in a smaller engine because high specific impulses in upper stages have the greatest effect on payload, and because a smaller engine would be easier to develop. The foreign engineer estimates that the engine will offer 15-20% higher specific impulse than an otherwise equivalent kerosene engine, and 10-15% greater payload to low Earth orbit, although another rocket propulsion specialist, from the U.S., thinks that with only a second stage using staged combustion, the payload advantage is likely to be 5-10%.

It is not known whether the Chinese engineers have chosen an oxygen- or kerosene-rich mixture for the pre-combustion. The former has advantages but is considered harder to develop.

The Chinese staged-combustion engine “adopts many advanced technologies, such as forced start and optimal stage transfer,” says CASC, giving neither the engine’s name nor the identity of the institute that developed it. The engine can operate for a long time, it adds. “It can regulate the thrust mixture ratio, supply a working medium for tank pressurization and provide a power supply for the servomechanism,” the hydraulics.

Optimal stage transfer implies that the engine is just the right size to propel its stage. Forced starting may mean restarting, which an upper-stage engine will often have to do, while the regulated mixture ratio implies that the Chinese powerplant has an advanced capability to accept propellants at imperfect ratios—maximizing its use of tankage even if the oxygen supply is reduced by boiling off.

A second U.S. rocket engineer interprets the reference to servomechanism power as meaning that the engine feeds high-pressure kerosene from the pump outlet, uses it as a working fluid in the actuators, and then sends it back for combustion. Several Russian engines have such a function, instead of a completely separate hydraulic system.

The design of the engine in general shows signs of Russian practice. It is not known whether that is because Russia has helped China with the program or because Chinese engineers simply like Russian features.

Manufacture of the Long March 7 has not yet been assigned to either SAST (Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology) or CALT (China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology), both subsidiaries of CASC (China Aerospace Science & Technology Corp.).

Photo Credit: CASC
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/g ... mp;amp;channel=awst

China Developing New Rocket Engines

Jan 10, 2011



China is advancing its space capabilities by developing staged combustion, an engine technology that is likely to offer greater performance for the Long March 6 and 7, two of a family of launchers that the country will field around the middle of the decade.

The smaller of the two, the Long March 6, may be the first to go into service, beating the flagship third member of the family, the Long March 5 heavy launcher.

A new 18-metric-ton-thrust engine “is a high-altitude liquid oxygen and kerosene engine with a staged combustion cycle and has been indigenously designed by China,” says national space contractor CASC.

If successfully executed, this technology would offer a high specific impulse, a key measure of rocket performance that compares the duration and level of thrust with the mass of fuel consumed in generating it. The practical result should be a greater payload to orbit for a launcher of a given size. The improved performance will probably be essential for China’s next generation of launchers to be competitive as the technology becomes increasingly common in the future.

As a liquid-fuel engine, the powerplant has limited meaning for China’s military capabilities. Modern missiles generally have solid propellants. But the development underscores the country’s ability to catch up with advanced foreign aerospace technology.

It can be assumed that development of the staged-combustion engine is going well, because CASC would not discuss a problem-ridden program that had hitherto received minimal attention, and because two rocket-building subsidiaries, SAST and CALT, are speaking optimistically of getting the related launchers into service within three or four years.

Shanghai-based SAST says its development of the Long March 6 is progressing smoothly and that the light launcher may become operational before the Long March 5.

The Long March 6 will be able to loft 1,000-kg. (2,200-lb.) payloads to an orbit of 600 km. (370 mi.) altitude, says SAST Vice President Meng Guang. The first launch of the Long March 5 heavy rocket is due in 2014 after a development program that began in 2007. Development of Long March 6 began in 2009, exploiting engines and stage modules already designed for the Long March 5.

The core of Long March 6 will use the standard 3.35-meter (11-ft.) diameter of the current Long March series, Meng and other SAST officials say. That means it will be based on the K3 stage module, the larger of two kerosene-fueled modules that SAST and CALT are developing for the launcher family.

A scheme for the family discussed in 2007 suggested that the smaller of its three launchers—now identified as Long March 6—would be based on the smallest, 2.25-meter-dia. module, K2, but the plan has obviously changed. The modules can serve as boosters or core stages.

Despite the rise in diameter, the first stage of Long March 6 will presumably be propelled by the single YF100 engine generating 120 metric tons (265,000 lb.) of thrust previously associated with the light rocket. The upper stage will have a smaller engine, says Meng, without giving details. CALT Vice President Hao Zhaoping has said that the medium-heavy Long March 7 will use an 18-ton engine for its second stage.

Since CASC says the staged-combustion engine will have a thrust of 18 tons and will be used on “new-generation launch vehicles,” it should be the powerplant for the second stages of Long March 6 and 7. One foreign rocket engineer calculates that the Long March 7 would need two of the 18-ton engines for its second stage.

The Long March 5 has core stages fed by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, another technology route to high specific impulse. Kerosene-fueled modules with YF100s serve as its boosters.

Staged combustion avoids the usual waste of fuel or oxygen used to drive the pumps in an engine with the conventional gas-generator cycle. To avoid overheating, the mixture in that process in any liquid-fuel rocket is deliberately not optimal. It must have either too much oxygen or too much fuel, one of which is therefore partly wasted as the exhaust is dumped overboard.

In staged combustion, that still-usable exhaust is instead fed into the main combustion chamber, driving up pressure and burning a second time to maximize impulse from the available tankage. The principle sounds simple, but in practice it presents great challenges in handling the hot, high-pressure exhaust. Staged combustion engines in service include the Russian RD-180, used on the Atlas V, and the Space Shuttle Main Engine.

Chinese engineers probably chose to use the technology first in a smaller engine because high specific impulses in upper stages have the greatest effect on payload, and because a smaller engine would be easier to develop. The foreign engineer estimates that the engine will offer 15-20% higher specific impulse than an otherwise equivalent kerosene engine, and 10-15% greater payload to low Earth orbit, although another rocket propulsion specialist, from the U.S., thinks that with only a second stage using staged combustion, the payload advantage is likely to be 5-10%.

It is not known whether the Chinese engineers have chosen an oxygen- or kerosene-rich mixture for the pre-combustion. The former has advantages but is considered harder to develop.

The Chinese staged-combustion engine “adopts many advanced technologies, such as forced start and optimal stage transfer,” says CASC, giving neither the engine’s name nor the identity of the institute that developed it. The engine can operate for a long time, it adds. “It can regulate the thrust mixture ratio, supply a working medium for tank pressurization and provide a power supply for the servomechanism,” the hydraulics.

Optimal stage transfer implies that the engine is just the right size to propel its stage. Forced starting may mean restarting, which an upper-stage engine will often have to do, while the regulated mixture ratio implies that the Chinese powerplant has an advanced capability to accept propellants at imperfect ratios—maximizing its use of tankage even if the oxygen supply is reduced by boiling off.

A second U.S. rocket engineer interprets the reference to servomechanism power as meaning that the engine feeds high-pressure kerosene from the pump outlet, uses it as a working fluid in the actuators, and then sends it back for combustion. Several Russian engines have such a function, instead of a completely separate hydraulic system.

The design of the engine in general shows signs of Russian practice. It is not known whether that is because Russia has helped China with the program or because Chinese engineers simply like Russian features.

Manufacture of the Long March 7 has not yet been assigned to either SAST (Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology) or CALT (China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology), both subsidiaries of CASC (China Aerospace Science & Technology Corp.).

Photo Credit: CASC
小地方的方言,太难懂,谁谁给翻译下
长征六是改进型吧
没啥新鲜的消息
另外,CZ-6和CZ-7怕是都要在CZ-5之前发射
纸飞机 发表于 2011-1-11 09:56


    yf-100性能可靠,应该不成问题
谷歌党


中国正在推进通过发展补燃,发动机技术,有可能提供长征6和7,一个发射器,该国将派出大约在十年中更好的性能及其家庭两个空间能力。

这两个小,长征6,可能是第一个进入服务,击败了旗舰的家庭,长期重3月5日发射的第三位成员。

一个新的18公吨的推力发动机“,是高海拔液态氧和煤油分阶段燃烧循环发动机,并已通过中国自行设计,说:”国家空间航天科技集团公司承办。

如果成功执行,这项技术将提供一个高比冲,火箭性能的关键措施,比作燃料发电它消耗大量的时间和推力的水平。实际结果应是一个更大的有效载荷为一个给定大小的发射轨道。改进后的表现可能会为中国的发射下一代的竞争力,随着技术变得越来越普遍,在未来至关重要。

由于液体燃料发动机,发动机为中国有限的军事能力的意义。现代一般固体推进剂导弹。但发展强调了国家有能力赶上国外先进航天技术的步伐。

可以设想,该上演的内燃机的发展很顺利,是因为航天科技集团公司将不讨论一个问题缠身的计划,迄今已收到极少注意,因为两个火箭建设的附属公司,先科和火箭院,是讲的越来越乐观投入使用的三,四年内相关发射器。

上海的先科说,它的长征6开发工作进展顺利,光发射器可能成为3月5日之前Long运作。

长征6将能够阁楼1000公斤。 (2,200磅)。有效载荷为600公里的轨道。 (370英里。)高度,先科说,副总统孟光。在长征火箭首次发射五个重金属是2014年以后到期的发展计划,在2007年开始的。长3月6日开发始于2009年,利用发动机和舞台模块已经3月5日在长设计。

长征6个核心将使用标准的3.35米的长征系列目前,孟,其他先科官员说,(11英尺)的直径。这意味着这将是舞台上的K3的模块为基础的较大的两个煤油为燃料的模块,即先科和发射火箭院是为家庭的发展。

一个在2007年讨论了家庭计划建议,它的三个发射较小现在确定为长征6将于最小,2.25米直径的基础。模块,K2的,但这一计划已经明显改变。这些模块可作为助推器或核心阶段。

尽管在直径上升,长征第一阶段大概是6将采用单YF100产生120吨的轻型火箭以前与相关推力(265,000磅)发动机推动。上面级将有一个更小的发动机,孟说,没有透露更多细节。火箭院副校长郝着凭曾表示,中重长征7将用于其第二阶段的一个18吨的发动机。

由于航天科技集团公司表示,上演的内燃机将有18吨推力,并将于使用“新一代运载火箭,”这应该是长征6日和7日第二阶段动力。一位外国火箭工程师的计算,长征7条将需要其第二阶段的18吨重的两个引擎。

长征5有由液态氢和液态氧,另一种技术路线,高比冲美联储的核心阶段。煤油为燃料的模块,YF100s作为其服务的助推器。

分级燃烧,避免了浪费燃料或氧气通常用于驱动发动机与传统的燃气发生器循环水泵。为了避免过热,因为在任何液体燃料火箭进程的混合物故意不理想。它必须有太多太多的氧气或燃料,其中一个部分,因此浪费的废气是倾倒海里。

在分级燃烧,仍然可再用废气,而不是送入主燃烧室,从而抬高了压力和燃烧第二次从可用储罐容量最大化的冲动。其原理听起来简单,但实际上它提出了在处理热点,高压排气很大的挑战。在服务分级燃烧发动机包括俄罗斯的RD - 180,阿特拉斯V上使用,航天飞机主发动机。

中国工程师可能选择使用更小的发动机技术的第一个阶段,因为在上高比脉冲对有效载荷的影响最大,因为一个小的发动机会更容易得到发展。外国工程师估计,该发动机将提供比其他同等煤油发动机15-20%的高比冲,更大的有效载荷和10-15%的低地球轨道,但另火箭推进专家,来自美国,认为只有一个第二阶段采用分级燃烧,有效载荷的优势很可能是5-10%。

目前还不知道是否中国工程师已经选择了一个氧或为预燃煤油丰富的混合物。前者的优点,但被认为难以发展。

在中国举行的内燃机“采用了许多先进的技术,例如启动和最佳时期被迫转移,说:”航天,使无论是引擎的名称,也不是该研究所的开发它的身份。该引擎可以工作很长一段时间,它增加了。 “它可以调节推力配合比,增压供应工作的坦克中,提供一个伺服系统,电力供应”水力学。

最佳时期转移意味着发动机的大小恰到好处推动其舞台。开始可能意味着被迫重新启动,这是上面级发动机,往往必须做的,而调节配比意味着中国发动机拥有先进的能力,接受不完美的比例推进剂最大化其储罐使用,即使氧气供应减少沸腾了。

第二个美国火箭工程师解释参考伺服权力意味着发动机泵出口供稿高压煤油,使用作为它的执行器的工作液,然后将燃烧回来。俄罗斯发动机有几个这样的功能,而不是一个完全独立的液压系统。

对一般的做法的迹象表明俄罗斯的引擎设计。目前尚不清楚这是否是因为俄罗斯已协助该程序或功能,因为俄中只希望中国工程师。

生产的龙3月7日尚未分配到先科(上海航天技术研究院)或火箭院(中国运载火箭技术研究院),这两家子公司的航天科技集团公司(中国航天科技公司)。

照片提供:航天科技集团公司
老这么跨越发展,不按常规出牌,特务们的饭碗要被砸个稀八乱了。