超级军网揭美国高官向台湾建议攻击三峡大坝的谣言
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/28 14:48:49
从现有报道来看，所有的有关“台湾”-“三峡”的这类信息都来源于美国的<<国防新闻>>(Defense News),那么就来看看美国的国防新闻周刊是怎么说的：
<P>Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P>
<P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P>
<P>-------被爱国愤青所批判的所有的信息全部出自以上两句话，懂英文的愤青看看，何处有“建议”两字？这里两次出现“mighy",这是口气最强的可能之意(不可确定性最高)，第一个"mighit"后面还跟了个”consider",也就是可能考虑，这怎么能让愤青(包括愤青记者)借读出美国建议台湾攻击三峡来的？</P>
<P>要说最先提出可以攻击民用设施--三峡大霸的，要属于中国人民解放军空军的两个大校军官了，他们于1999年写出了<<超限战>>一书，受到广大的爱国愤青的好评，按照愤青们的逻辑，本-拉登炸楼也就是我军大校军官建议和策划的了。怎么一听说台湾可能会考虑借鉴一下超限战了，愤青们就狂犬起来了？己所不欲，勿施与人也。 </P>从现有报道来看，所有的有关“台湾”-“三峡”的这类信息都来源于美国的<<国防新闻>>(Defense News),那么就来看看美国的国防新闻周刊是怎么说的：
<P>Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P>
<P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P>
<P>-------被爱国愤青所批判的所有的信息全部出自以上两句话，懂英文的愤青看看，何处有“建议”两字？这里两次出现“mighy",这是口气最强的可能之意(不可确定性最高)，第一个"mighit"后面还跟了个”consider",也就是可能考虑，这怎么能让愤青(包括愤青记者)借读出美国建议台湾攻击三峡来的？</P>
<P>要说最先提出可以攻击民用设施--三峡大霸的，要属于中国人民解放军空军的两个大校军官了，他们于1999年写出了<<超限战>>一书，受到广大的爱国愤青的好评，按照愤青们的逻辑，本-拉登炸楼也就是我军大校军官建议和策划的了。怎么一听说台湾可能会考虑借鉴一下超限战了，愤青们就狂犬起来了？己所不欲，勿施与人也。 </P>
<P>Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P>
<P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P>
<P>-------被爱国愤青所批判的所有的信息全部出自以上两句话，懂英文的愤青看看，何处有“建议”两字？这里两次出现“mighy",这是口气最强的可能之意(不可确定性最高)，第一个"mighit"后面还跟了个”consider",也就是可能考虑，这怎么能让愤青(包括愤青记者)借读出美国建议台湾攻击三峡来的？</P>
<P>要说最先提出可以攻击民用设施--三峡大霸的，要属于中国人民解放军空军的两个大校军官了，他们于1999年写出了<<超限战>>一书，受到广大的爱国愤青的好评，按照愤青们的逻辑，本-拉登炸楼也就是我军大校军官建议和策划的了。怎么一听说台湾可能会考虑借鉴一下超限战了，愤青们就狂犬起来了？己所不欲，勿施与人也。 </P>从现有报道来看，所有的有关“台湾”-“三峡”的这类信息都来源于美国的<<国防新闻>>(Defense News),那么就来看看美国的国防新闻周刊是怎么说的：
<P>Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P>
<P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P>
<P>-------被爱国愤青所批判的所有的信息全部出自以上两句话，懂英文的愤青看看，何处有“建议”两字？这里两次出现“mighy",这是口气最强的可能之意(不可确定性最高)，第一个"mighit"后面还跟了个”consider",也就是可能考虑，这怎么能让愤青(包括愤青记者)借读出美国建议台湾攻击三峡来的？</P>
<P>要说最先提出可以攻击民用设施--三峡大霸的，要属于中国人民解放军空军的两个大校军官了，他们于1999年写出了<<超限战>>一书，受到广大的爱国愤青的好评，按照愤青们的逻辑，本-拉登炸楼也就是我军大校军官建议和策划的了。怎么一听说台湾可能会考虑借鉴一下超限战了，愤青们就狂犬起来了？己所不欲，勿施与人也。 </P>
这是美国国防周刊的原文，上面还有作者的电邮地址，愤青看不懂的话，就用金山词霸嘛。可别怀疑我拿了金山公司的好处费呵。
<P>Posted 07 June, 2004 12:00 EST Print-friendly version
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pentagon Outlines Ways Taiwan Can Deter China
By JASON SHERMAN
Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P><P>Released May 28, the 54-page look at China’s military strategy and modernization contains a review of Taiwanese offensive options in the face of Beijing’s much larger armed forces — a first for the Pentagon’s annual report to Congress. </P><P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P><P>Beijing’s military modernization, meanwhile, is steadily “eroding the spatial, temporal and distance challenges that have historically inhibited using force against Taiwan,” the report says. “The cross-Strait balance of power is steadily shifting in China’s favor.” </P><P>It hazards no guess as to when China’s military will surpass Taiwan’s in technological sophistication, but Taiwan’s deputy defense minister has said he believes the advantage will shift by 2012. </P><P>Each summer, the Pentagon is required to report on China’s current and future military strategy. Congress passed the law requiring the report in 1999, when China was perceived by many in Washington to be the most immediate military threat. </P><P>“I think this report tells us that China is continuing a slow, steady modernization of its military force,” said Bernard Cole, an expert on China’s military at the National Defense University. </P><P>The report outlines trends in each of the services that make up the People’s Liberation Army, as China’s military is called, as well as the Pentagon’s take on China’s strategy. </P><P>Beijing’s conventional modernization efforts focus on a potential war with Taiwan, and take into account possible U.S. military intervention. </P><P>The United States switched its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979. Over the next two decades, it helped arm Taiwan to deter military aggression from mainland China, but maintained limited contact. In the late 1990s, the Pentagon stepped up military cooperation with Taiwan. </P><P>Washington is encouraging Taipei to pursue a number of defense reforms, including weaving Taiwan’s militaries into a computer-networked force, increasing jointness across its services, and acquiring defenses against Chinese missiles. </P><P>Defense analysts who study the security situation across the Taiwan Strait believe that Beijing is planning a scenario where its air, sea and missile systems quickly decapitate Taiwan’s leadership and then deter U.S. military intervention. </P><P>John Tkacik Jr., a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, said it is important that the Pentagon now openly discusses Taiwan’s options for deterring China by developing the means to retaliate with attacks on cities or critical infrastructure like the Three Gorges Dam. </P><P>“I think it’s a perfectly good idea,” Tkacik said. “If Taiwan does not have a credible stand-off strike capability, in any kind of battle situation it will be the U.S. [military] that will have to take the battle to China. I think that makes any kind of a conflict much more manageable if those strikes are from Taiwan and not from the U.S.” </P><P>Cole questioned the effectiveness of such a strategy. </P><P>“China is so big and there are so many targets that I don’t see a target set that would convince Beijing to lay off if some sort of conflict broke out,” said Cole. </P><P>Peng Yuan, an expert in Sino-U.S. relations and visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution, said the focus on military modernization outside the context of China’s broader economic, industrial and cultural modernization gives a distorted view of an aggressive improvement program. </P><P>“The report is imbalanced,” said Peng, who is also deputy director and associate professor of the American Studies Center at Hubei University in Wuhan, China. </P><P>The report said the Chinese military took note of the 21-day U.S.-led operation in Iraq that toppled Saddam Hussein. </P><P>“The speed of coalition ground force advances and the role of special force in [Operation Iraqi Freedom] have caused PLA theorists to rethink their assumptions about the value of long-range precision strikes, independent of ground forces in any Taiwan conflict scenario,” it says. </P><P>Watching Iraq </P><P>The Pentagon also believes the swift operation in Iraq has reinforced China’s decision to accelerate acquisition of improved information technology and improvements to its weapons mobility, firepower and precision weapons capabilities.” </P><P>China’s military budget is far greater than the $25 billion announced by Beijing in March. The Pentagon put the figure between $50 billion and $70 billion, right behind the United States in military spending, and ahead of Japan. </P><P>In the last year, China has increased the number of short-range ballistic missiles deployed in the region across from Taiwan from 450 to 500. China is developing medium-range ballistic missiles that will be deployed “in the near future.” </P><P>Its military modernization continues to be closely tied to purchases from Russia, which climbed 7 percent in the last year. These deals include a $1 billion deal for 24 Su-30 fighter aircraft and $500 million for SA-20 surface-to-air missile systems. </P><P>China’s long-term defense industrial goal of domestically producing weapons on par with those of the industrialized world within the next decade will be met with uneven success “at best,” the report notes. </P><P>“With few exceptions, such as ballistic missile research, development and production, most of China’s domestic defense industries are inefficient and remain vulnerable to dependencies on foreign suppliers of technology,” the report says. </P><P>One recent success, however, is China’s space enterprise. In 2003, Beijing launched and recovered its first manned space mission. This civilian effort, the Pentagon argues, is part of a larger drive to advance military space capabilities including reconnaissance, navigation and communications.
E-mail: jsherman@defensenews.com.
</P>
<P>Posted 07 June, 2004 12:00 EST Print-friendly version
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pentagon Outlines Ways Taiwan Can Deter China
By JASON SHERMAN
Taiwan might consider deterring mainland China from flexing its military muscle by targeting urban populations or high-value infrastructure such as the Three Gorges Dam, a new Pentagon report says. </P><P>Released May 28, the 54-page look at China’s military strategy and modernization contains a review of Taiwanese offensive options in the face of Beijing’s much larger armed forces — a first for the Pentagon’s annual report to Congress. </P><P>The self-governing island, regarded by Beijing as a maverick state to be brought under control, might also attack China’s computer networks, crippling airports, communications nodes and command-and-control centers, the report says. </P><P>Beijing’s military modernization, meanwhile, is steadily “eroding the spatial, temporal and distance challenges that have historically inhibited using force against Taiwan,” the report says. “The cross-Strait balance of power is steadily shifting in China’s favor.” </P><P>It hazards no guess as to when China’s military will surpass Taiwan’s in technological sophistication, but Taiwan’s deputy defense minister has said he believes the advantage will shift by 2012. </P><P>Each summer, the Pentagon is required to report on China’s current and future military strategy. Congress passed the law requiring the report in 1999, when China was perceived by many in Washington to be the most immediate military threat. </P><P>“I think this report tells us that China is continuing a slow, steady modernization of its military force,” said Bernard Cole, an expert on China’s military at the National Defense University. </P><P>The report outlines trends in each of the services that make up the People’s Liberation Army, as China’s military is called, as well as the Pentagon’s take on China’s strategy. </P><P>Beijing’s conventional modernization efforts focus on a potential war with Taiwan, and take into account possible U.S. military intervention. </P><P>The United States switched its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing in 1979. Over the next two decades, it helped arm Taiwan to deter military aggression from mainland China, but maintained limited contact. In the late 1990s, the Pentagon stepped up military cooperation with Taiwan. </P><P>Washington is encouraging Taipei to pursue a number of defense reforms, including weaving Taiwan’s militaries into a computer-networked force, increasing jointness across its services, and acquiring defenses against Chinese missiles. </P><P>Defense analysts who study the security situation across the Taiwan Strait believe that Beijing is planning a scenario where its air, sea and missile systems quickly decapitate Taiwan’s leadership and then deter U.S. military intervention. </P><P>John Tkacik Jr., a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, said it is important that the Pentagon now openly discusses Taiwan’s options for deterring China by developing the means to retaliate with attacks on cities or critical infrastructure like the Three Gorges Dam. </P><P>“I think it’s a perfectly good idea,” Tkacik said. “If Taiwan does not have a credible stand-off strike capability, in any kind of battle situation it will be the U.S. [military] that will have to take the battle to China. I think that makes any kind of a conflict much more manageable if those strikes are from Taiwan and not from the U.S.” </P><P>Cole questioned the effectiveness of such a strategy. </P><P>“China is so big and there are so many targets that I don’t see a target set that would convince Beijing to lay off if some sort of conflict broke out,” said Cole. </P><P>Peng Yuan, an expert in Sino-U.S. relations and visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution, said the focus on military modernization outside the context of China’s broader economic, industrial and cultural modernization gives a distorted view of an aggressive improvement program. </P><P>“The report is imbalanced,” said Peng, who is also deputy director and associate professor of the American Studies Center at Hubei University in Wuhan, China. </P><P>The report said the Chinese military took note of the 21-day U.S.-led operation in Iraq that toppled Saddam Hussein. </P><P>“The speed of coalition ground force advances and the role of special force in [Operation Iraqi Freedom] have caused PLA theorists to rethink their assumptions about the value of long-range precision strikes, independent of ground forces in any Taiwan conflict scenario,” it says. </P><P>Watching Iraq </P><P>The Pentagon also believes the swift operation in Iraq has reinforced China’s decision to accelerate acquisition of improved information technology and improvements to its weapons mobility, firepower and precision weapons capabilities.” </P><P>China’s military budget is far greater than the $25 billion announced by Beijing in March. The Pentagon put the figure between $50 billion and $70 billion, right behind the United States in military spending, and ahead of Japan. </P><P>In the last year, China has increased the number of short-range ballistic missiles deployed in the region across from Taiwan from 450 to 500. China is developing medium-range ballistic missiles that will be deployed “in the near future.” </P><P>Its military modernization continues to be closely tied to purchases from Russia, which climbed 7 percent in the last year. These deals include a $1 billion deal for 24 Su-30 fighter aircraft and $500 million for SA-20 surface-to-air missile systems. </P><P>China’s long-term defense industrial goal of domestically producing weapons on par with those of the industrialized world within the next decade will be met with uneven success “at best,” the report notes. </P><P>“With few exceptions, such as ballistic missile research, development and production, most of China’s domestic defense industries are inefficient and remain vulnerable to dependencies on foreign suppliers of technology,” the report says. </P><P>One recent success, however, is China’s space enterprise. In 2003, Beijing launched and recovered its first manned space mission. This civilian effort, the Pentagon argues, is part of a larger drive to advance military space capabilities including reconnaissance, navigation and communications.
E-mail: jsherman@defensenews.com.
</P>
你啊你，我怎么说你好哦，你的英文不错，但是你脑子很差，你显然不明白什么叫暗示，你也不明白台湾在看到这些文字后是多么的欢心鼓舞，你啊，还是好好学习算了，我们就不要求你太多啦，你能好好做人，在社会上过好每一天就谢天谢地了
中国的愤青都喜欢模拟自己被强 奸，更喜欢到处张扬，太有趣的现象。
<B>以下是引用<I>8179</I>在2004-6-16 23:53:00的发言：</B>
中国的愤青都喜欢模拟自己被强 奸，更喜欢到处张扬，太有趣的现象。
<P>小孩，你再这样在本论坛挑拨是非，你信不信我动用老鸟们的特权发起投票封你的IP，我们可以让你发表你认为是“合理”的言论，但是你到处挑起论战，惹是生非，现在又恶言相加，这里是超级大本营的论坛，不是别的地方，你再猖狂，我就要动手啦</P>
外交部已经表态。