超级军网看看老外对咱们的空军军力分析图！！！晕
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/04/27 16:19:38
note that J-6/JJ-6 Framer aircraft not included. Some J-7s listed may be JJ-7s etc. Flanker varients are almost impossible to tell apart).
Generally the PLAAF/PLAN tends to leave its aircraft in the open. Few bases have hardened aircraft shelters and many of the shelters seen probably aren't hardened anyway. J-7s are probably over-reported because many seem to be in storage rather than actual use.
What strikes me is the relatively few "current generation" combat aircraft seen:
We must remember that what I recorded was not a representative sample in the statistical sense because aircraft dispersal is not a uniform. But the conspicuous lack of J-10s (although some of these satalite images may be years old) is all the same telling IMO.
转自：http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1934&page=3note that J-6/JJ-6 Framer aircraft not included. Some J-7s listed may be JJ-7s etc. Flanker varients are almost impossible to tell apart).
Generally the PLAAF/PLAN tends to leave its aircraft in the open. Few bases have hardened aircraft shelters and many of the shelters seen probably aren't hardened anyway. J-7s are probably over-reported because many seem to be in storage rather than actual use.
What strikes me is the relatively few "current generation" combat aircraft seen:
We must remember that what I recorded was not a representative sample in the statistical sense because aircraft dispersal is not a uniform. But the conspicuous lack of J-10s (although some of these satalite images may be years old) is all the same telling IMO.
转自：http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1934&page=3
Generally the PLAAF/PLAN tends to leave its aircraft in the open. Few bases have hardened aircraft shelters and many of the shelters seen probably aren't hardened anyway. J-7s are probably over-reported because many seem to be in storage rather than actual use.
What strikes me is the relatively few "current generation" combat aircraft seen:
We must remember that what I recorded was not a representative sample in the statistical sense because aircraft dispersal is not a uniform. But the conspicuous lack of J-10s (although some of these satalite images may be years old) is all the same telling IMO.
转自：http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1934&page=3note that J-6/JJ-6 Framer aircraft not included. Some J-7s listed may be JJ-7s etc. Flanker varients are almost impossible to tell apart).
Generally the PLAAF/PLAN tends to leave its aircraft in the open. Few bases have hardened aircraft shelters and many of the shelters seen probably aren't hardened anyway. J-7s are probably over-reported because many seem to be in storage rather than actual use.
What strikes me is the relatively few "current generation" combat aircraft seen:
We must remember that what I recorded was not a representative sample in the statistical sense because aircraft dispersal is not a uniform. But the conspicuous lack of J-10s (although some of these satalite images may be years old) is all the same telling IMO.
转自：http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1934&page=3
西飞沈飞和成都 陕西各飞机制造厂这么多年的产量原来都被他们老外吃了。。
对了还要加上俄罗斯共青城的
对了还要加上俄罗斯共青城的
哈哈
路过,留名
路过,留名
Generally the PLAAF/PLAN tends to leave its aircraft in the open. Few bases have hardened aircraft shelters and many of the shelters seen probably aren't hardened anyway. J-7s are probably over-reported because many seem to be in storage rather than actual use.
中国人习惯把飞机露天放置，大多数机场没有机库，因此可以以GE上发现的飞机为准……;P ;P ;P
中国人习惯把飞机露天放置，大多数机场没有机库，因此可以以GE上发现的飞机为准……;P ;P ;P
随便，我们自己知道自己有什么东西就可以了
哈哈，缩水也太······
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈;P
保密真的有效果?;P
这个老外的IQ是多少......................?;P
文登飞机场有J8II?,没有见过