TMD米国陆军仪仗队服装真好看

来源:百度文库 编辑:超级军网 时间:2024/04/29 19:42:42
<p><u><font color="#0000ff">国陆军仪仗队</font></u><br/><br/><br/><br/></p><p></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font color="#ff3300">不知道咱的国旗班战士脑袋会会会剃成这样,新闻联播的国歌要接轨都不放了,界个要不要也接下轨???????<br/></font></p><br/>
[此贴子已经被新侨联委员于2006-7-21 18:41:23编辑过]
<p><u><font color="#0000ff">国陆军仪仗队</font></u><br/><br/><br/><br/></p><p></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <font color="#ff3300">不知道咱的国旗班战士脑袋会会会剃成这样,新闻联播的国歌要接轨都不放了,界个要不要也接下轨???????<br/></font></p><br/>
[此贴子已经被新侨联委员于2006-7-21 18:41:23编辑过]
<p>谁叫人家有钱吗,我们的军服其实也挺可以的。</p>
<p>没觉得比咱的仪仗队好.</p><p></p>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 确实漂亮,特别是在葬礼上鸣枪的时候。
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-21 22:43:27编辑过]
谁要说这个服装好看,我就真要怀疑他的审美观点是不是有问题了……
<p>俺也引用一下体制问题,</p><p>就这衣服,靠,没有半点隐蔽性</p><p>万一敌人来袭,怎么躲都是一颗明亮的星.</p>
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-21 21:44:38编辑过]
<p>靠,居然找东德的来凑数..............</p>
<br/><br/><br/>
<br/><br/><br/>
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
劳民伤财的做秀啊
<p>德國的帥!</p><p></p><p>要氣勢,還是解放軍比較好</p>
<p>论气势,还是老毛子的更霸道</p><p>那头昂得高高的,根本不把对方放在眼里的傲慢.</p>
<div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>深涧悠蓝</i>在2006-7-21 23:12:00的发言:</b><br/><p>论气势,还是老毛子的更霸道</p><p>那头昂得高高的,根本不把对方放在眼里的傲慢.</p></div><p></p>那种超级大檐帽,感觉很滑稽。
和美国海军的狗食盆相比,半斤八量.
还是中国军人的帅!!!
<div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>深涧悠蓝</i>在2006-7-21 23:48:00的发言:</b><br/>和美国海军的狗食盆相比,半斤八量.</div><p></p>所以亏得本帖是讲军服的,如果算上帽子,又有得比了。
<strong>米国仪仗队,除了傻,没啥感觉~~~~~~~~~~</strong>
<p>德国人爱搞火炬游行看来是传统啊~</p><p>火炬组成的方阵,一排排明晃晃的头盔.似曾相识啊</p>
<p>比不上我们的</p>
<p>那身黑衣服真的粉酷</p><p>谁死了不想找几个穿成这样的大萝卜来放几枪</p><p>就是这萝卜长的跟绊倒驴似的,歪七扭八的没个萝卜样了。</p>
黑衣服配那个裤子好看??
<div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>决不后退</i>在2006-7-22 5:23:00的发言:</b><br/><p>德国人爱搞火炬游行看来是传统啊~</p><p>火炬组成的方阵,一排排明晃晃的头盔.似曾相识啊</p></div><p></p><p></p><p>这种火炬游行德文叫做“Zapfenstreich”,的确是普鲁士军队的旧传统来的,只是被纳粹利用了而已。不过的确勾起了大家对于纳粹的不快联想,在德国国内也引起了抗议和争论。</p><p>下面是去年的旧闻一则,供参考。</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Torch-lit military ceremony in Berlin accused of reviving Nazi</p><p>Independent, The (London),&nbsp; Oct 27, 2005&nbsp; by Philip Blenkinsop in Berlin</p><p><br/>Plans by Germany's armed forces to stage a torch-lit musical ceremony in Berlin in a 50th anniversary celebration have drawn protests for being overly militaristic and a throw-back to the Nazi period.</p><p>About500 soldiers were due to hold flaming torches and play trumpets, pipes and drums outside the Reichstag parliament building last night, watched by military leaders, President Horst Khler and the Nato secretary- general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.</p><p><strong>But demonstrators, angered that the ceremony was taking place near parliament for the first time since the Second World War, were expecting about 1,000 protesters to march along Berlin's central Unter den Linden avenue at the same time. Critics say it is an archaic tradition that should have been scrapped when the postwar German armed forces, the Bundeswehr, were formed in 1955.</strong></p><p><strong>Hundreds of police blocked the protesters from proceeding beyond the Brandenburg Gate to the nearby Reichstag.<br/></strong></p><p><strong>The 'Zapfenstreich', originally just a signal indicating lights- out dating back to the end of the 16th century, took on a musical form and has been an institution for the German armed forces since 1838.</strong></p><p><strong>Wolf-Dieter Narr, a professor of politics at Berlin's Free University, argued that the ceremony belonged to the eras of German imperialism and the Nazis. 'I don't claim it was the product of the Nazis, but it was certainly a ceremony they used,' Professor Narr said.</strong></p><p><strong>Demonstrators' posters featured torch-carrying soldiers reminiscent of the Wehrmacht under Hitler.</strong></p><p>Frank Brendle, of an alliance of anti-ceremony groups, said the transformation of Germany's military from a purely defensive force to more professional units capable of operating abroad was another focus of the protest.</p><p>'It is an expression of militarised politics. We have moved from an army of defence to one of attack,' Mr Brendle said.</p><p><strong>But the outgoing Defence Minister, Peter Struck, defended the celebrations. 'The tattoo has nothing to do with Nazis or the Wehrmacht, but is an old Prussian tradition,' he said.</strong></p><p>'I can understand that someone who is generally against the military should attack such a ceremony. But I know that the majority of the population thinks of the tattoo as a good event.' REUTERS</p>
<p>还是老毛子的厉害,二战结束后的那个阅兵,真的太牛了,一堆堆的德国军旗阿。</p>
象一具具僵尸!!
<p>又见“外国的月亮就是圆”</p>
<p>3军仪仗队的好!</p><p>国外的看好德国的!</p><p>美国的哪个无声仪仗队也不错!</p><p>最最没品位的是英国的仪仗队,感觉像烧过的玉米棒子!</p>
<p>美国的挺不错的!</p><p>一会我找找咱们自己国家的仪仗队的图看看!</p>
还是我们的好看
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 前年有一次去北大玩儿,正赶上北大和美国西点军校搞什么活动,看到几个西点军校生在未名湖边照相留念,其中还有黑人,从军装和外表看确实很精神,有气质。。。</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 但是,说起仪仗队来,记得以前看过一个资料,中国的仪仗队是世界上最优秀的仪仗队了,要知道,中国可是礼仪之邦,从始皇帝的车马仗一直到大清的八旗军阵,恐怕是世界上无人可及的。。。</p>
<p>葬礼上穿美军仪仗服最合适。</p>
<p>每次看到他们的帽子我就觉得 很搞笑.感觉好象把眼睛都遮住了.</p><p>大家仔细看第二张图中,左边的那个走在前面的军官.大伙说他能看得见前面的路吗?这Y是不是盲人啊?</p><p>5楼的那个什么gigi007就TM欠抽.在超大还真第一次看到这么露骨的把舔美国狗屁眼的东西</p>
<p>我就喜欢美军的小翻领,设计真人性化,果然是民主国家。</p>
我就喜欢美军的小翻领,设计真人性化,果然是民主国家[em05]
<p>单就审美观,各花个入眼。</p><p>但个别人士想以此联系到战斗力,证明“民主战士”的不可战胜。那我们只</p><p>能对他的智慧表示遗憾。</p><p>记住:天朝的人民军队一直因装备服饰等被对手列强辱称“叫化子军队”。</p><p>而让敌寇闻之胆寒,竖立了我们民族威信的也正是这支“该死的”“毛主义</p><p>的叫化子的军队”!!</p><p>万岁!天朝最强的儿女!万岁!天朝军队!!</p>
<p>我就觉得美军的好看,美军陆军的颜色来源于内战的衣服颜色。我们的衣服设计的太丑了,有些模仿国外的又学不像,有点不论不类。幸好仪仗队员都是经过精心挑选的,不然还真不好看,特别是空军的颜色很别扭。</p>
还是解放军的好!!!!!!!!!!