翻了几页，这段南海仲裁要出来了，没有见到有人提尼加拉 ...

Nicaragua v. United States
尼加拉瓜 诉 美利坚合众国

The Republic of Nicaragua v. The United States of America (1986) ICJ 1 is a public international law case decided by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ ruled in favor of Nicaragua and against the United States and awarded reparations to Nicaragua. The ICJ held that the U.S. had violated international law by supporting the Contras in their rebellion against the Nicaraguan government and by mining Nicaragua's harbors.
尼加拉瓜共和国诉美利坚合众国是由国际法庭裁决的国际公法案件。针对美利坚合众国，国际法庭做出了有利于尼加拉瓜的判决，并判决美国对尼加拉瓜作出赔偿。国际法庭认为，美国支持游击队针对尼加拉瓜政府进行叛乱，并在尼加拉瓜港口布雷，其行为违反国际法。

After five vetoes in the Security Council between 1982 and 1985 of resolutions concerning the situation in Nicaragua [4], the United States made one final veto on 28 October 1986[24] (France, Thailand, and United Kingdom abstaining) of a resolution calling for full and immediate compliance with the judgment.[25]
1982到1985年，联合国安理会五次作出与尼加拉瓜有关的决议，被美国行使五次否决权。在1986年10月28日，联合国作出决议要求对国际法院判决立刻作出全面执行，美国对此进行了最后一次否决（法国，泰国和英国弃权）。

Nicaragua brought the matter to the U.N. Security Council, where the United States vetoed a resolution (11 to 1, 3 abstentions) calling on all states to observe international law. Nicaragua also turned to the General Assembly, which passed a resolution 94 to 3 calling for compliance with the World Court ruling. Two states, Israel and El Salvador, joined the United States in opposition. At the same session, Nicaragua called upon the U.N. to send an independent fact-finding mission to the border to secure international monitoring of the borders after a conflict there; the proposal was rejected by Honduras with U.S. backing. A year later, on November 12, 1987, the General Assembly again called for "full and immediate compliance" with the World Court decision. This time only Israel joined the United States in opposing adherence to the ruling.[26][27]
尼加拉瓜在联合国安理会控诉有关判决事实，联合国作出决议（11:1，3国弃权）呼吁各国遵守国际法，这一决议被美国行使否决权否决。尼加拉瓜进而转向联合国大会，后者以94:3通过决议，要求遵循国际法庭判决。投反对的三国为美国，以色列和萨瓦尔多。在同一次大会上，尼加拉瓜请求联合国派遣独立真相调查团，在其边界发生一次冲突之后，加强对于边界的国际监督。这一请求被洪都拉斯拒绝，后者得到了美国支持。一年后，1987年11月12日，联合国大会再次呼吁对国际法庭判决“立刻做出全面执行”。这一次只有以色列加入美国所在的反对票阵营。

The United States argued that the Court did not have jurisdiction, with U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Jeane Kirkpatrick dismissing the Court as a "semi-legal, semi-juridical, semi-political body, which nations sometimes accept and sometimes don't."
美国提出，国际法庭对于这一案件没有管辖权。美国驻联合国大使珍妮·科克帕特里克(Jeane Kirkpatric)把国际法院斥为“一个半法律，半司法，半政治的机构，世界各国有时候听它的，有时候不听。”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicaragua_v._United_States