超级军网中國駐聯合國大使反對四國聯盟擴大安理會案
来源：百度文库 编辑：超级军网 时间：2024/05/03 01:38:37
中央社
中國昨天指出，巴西、德國、印度和日本所公布的擴大聯合國安全理事會｜並意圖取得常任理事國席位｜的議案「十分危險」，暗示中方在必要時將使用否決權以阻止此案的通過。
中國駐聯合國大使王光亞的措詞是迄今北京最強硬的一次。王光亞在接受美聯社訪問時明白表示，中國反對目前任何擴大安理會規模的動作，因為聯合國一百九十一個會員國正陷於嚴重分歧。
巴西、德國、印度和日本（稱為『四國聯盟』或『G｜4』）在五月十六日公布這項提案，並表示將在六月送交聯合國大會表決。
王光亞昨天接受訪問時說：「我認為四國聯盟的提案非常危險，我們將和其他國家阻止本案。」
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
四國聯盟的提案如果要獲得通過，必須得到一百九十一個會員國三分之二的贊成，但這只是第一步。新的常任理事國也必須得到三分之二會員國的贊成才能選出。但最困難的步驟是修改聯合國憲章的最後決議案，此案不只要取得三分之二會員國的支持，也必須得到擁有否決權的安理會五個常任理事國的贊成。中央社
中國昨天指出，巴西、德國、印度和日本所公布的擴大聯合國安全理事會｜並意圖取得常任理事國席位｜的議案「十分危險」，暗示中方在必要時將使用否決權以阻止此案的通過。
中國駐聯合國大使王光亞的措詞是迄今北京最強硬的一次。王光亞在接受美聯社訪問時明白表示，中國反對目前任何擴大安理會規模的動作，因為聯合國一百九十一個會員國正陷於嚴重分歧。
巴西、德國、印度和日本（稱為『四國聯盟』或『G｜4』）在五月十六日公布這項提案，並表示將在六月送交聯合國大會表決。
王光亞昨天接受訪問時說：「我認為四國聯盟的提案非常危險，我們將和其他國家阻止本案。」
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
四國聯盟的提案如果要獲得通過，必須得到一百九十一個會員國三分之二的贊成，但這只是第一步。新的常任理事國也必須得到三分之二會員國的贊成才能選出。但最困難的步驟是修改聯合國憲章的最後決議案，此案不只要取得三分之二會員國的支持，也必須得到擁有否決權的安理會五個常任理事國的贊成。
中國昨天指出，巴西、德國、印度和日本所公布的擴大聯合國安全理事會｜並意圖取得常任理事國席位｜的議案「十分危險」，暗示中方在必要時將使用否決權以阻止此案的通過。
中國駐聯合國大使王光亞的措詞是迄今北京最強硬的一次。王光亞在接受美聯社訪問時明白表示，中國反對目前任何擴大安理會規模的動作，因為聯合國一百九十一個會員國正陷於嚴重分歧。
巴西、德國、印度和日本（稱為『四國聯盟』或『G｜4』）在五月十六日公布這項提案，並表示將在六月送交聯合國大會表決。
王光亞昨天接受訪問時說：「我認為四國聯盟的提案非常危險，我們將和其他國家阻止本案。」
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
四國聯盟的提案如果要獲得通過，必須得到一百九十一個會員國三分之二的贊成，但這只是第一步。新的常任理事國也必須得到三分之二會員國的贊成才能選出。但最困難的步驟是修改聯合國憲章的最後決議案，此案不只要取得三分之二會員國的支持，也必須得到擁有否決權的安理會五個常任理事國的贊成。中央社
中國昨天指出，巴西、德國、印度和日本所公布的擴大聯合國安全理事會｜並意圖取得常任理事國席位｜的議案「十分危險」，暗示中方在必要時將使用否決權以阻止此案的通過。
中國駐聯合國大使王光亞的措詞是迄今北京最強硬的一次。王光亞在接受美聯社訪問時明白表示，中國反對目前任何擴大安理會規模的動作，因為聯合國一百九十一個會員國正陷於嚴重分歧。
巴西、德國、印度和日本（稱為『四國聯盟』或『G｜4』）在五月十六日公布這項提案，並表示將在六月送交聯合國大會表決。
王光亞昨天接受訪問時說：「我認為四國聯盟的提案非常危險，我們將和其他國家阻止本案。」
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
四國聯盟的提案如果要獲得通過，必須得到一百九十一個會員國三分之二的贊成，但這只是第一步。新的常任理事國也必須得到三分之二會員國的贊成才能選出。但最困難的步驟是修改聯合國憲章的最後決議案，此案不只要取得三分之二會員國的支持，也必須得到擁有否決權的安理會五個常任理事國的贊成。
China: U.N. Council Resolution Dangerous
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 1, 2005
Filed at 5:20 a.m. ET
UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- China called a resolution by Brazil, Germany, India and Japan to expand the U.N. Security Council -- and hopefully give them permanent seats -- ''dangerous'' and hinted it would use its veto power if necessary to block final approval.
The language used by China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya appeared to be the strongest yet by Beijing. Wang made clear in an interview with The Associated Press that China opposed any move to expand the council now because the 191 U.N. member states are deeply divided.
Brazil, Germany, India and Japan -- known as the Group of Four or G-4 -- circulated the resolution on May 16 and have indicated they will put it to a vote by the General Assembly in June.
''I think what has been proposed by G-4 is very dangerous, so as far as China is concerned, we will work with others to see that this will not happen,'' Wang said in an interview Tuesday.
He said the resolution will split the U.N. membership, and if the G-4 push for a vote ''the whole atmosphere in this house is being undermined, is being destroyed.''
Every member also has a different opinion on who should be permanent members, he said. China has opposed Japan's bid for a permanent seat, complaining about what many Asians consider Japan's lack of atonement for World War II abuses.
The result, Wang said, will be that U.N. members will not be able to discuss other more important issues that Secretary-General Kofi Annan wants included in a major overhaul of the United Nations to meet the global threats and challenges of the 21st century -- from a new peacebuilding commission and human rights council to new measures to reduce poverty and promote education.
After 10 years of seemingly endless debate, Annan told U.N. member states in March that he wants a decision on council expansion before September, when he has invited world leaders to a summit to consider restructuring the United Nations. He suggested that if consensus wasn't possible, the General Assembly president should consider calling a vote.
There is wide support for expanding the Security Council, whose composition reflects the post-World War II era when the United Nations was created, to represent the global realities today. But the size and membership of an expanded council remains contentious.
The G-4 resolution needs to be approved by two-thirds of the 191 member states to be adopted, but that's only a first step. New permanent members would then have to be elected by a similar two-thirds votes. But the most difficult step is a final resolution to change the U.N. Charter, which not only requires a two-thirds vote but also approval by the Security Council's five permanent members who wield veto power -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France.
China's Wang said that ''if it comes to the last stage, I'm sure our legislature would take into account the feelings of others -- and I don't think they will take a very positive action on this.''
At a meeting last Friday hosted by France, China urged the four other permanent members not to cosponsor the G-4 resolution, council diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity. But Britain and France are likely to back it, the diplomats said.
Council diplomats noted that over time, positions change -- as witnessed by the last council expansion in 1965 when some key opponents eventually voted ''yes.''
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 1, 2005
Filed at 5:20 a.m. ET
UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- China called a resolution by Brazil, Germany, India and Japan to expand the U.N. Security Council -- and hopefully give them permanent seats -- ''dangerous'' and hinted it would use its veto power if necessary to block final approval.
The language used by China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya appeared to be the strongest yet by Beijing. Wang made clear in an interview with The Associated Press that China opposed any move to expand the council now because the 191 U.N. member states are deeply divided.
Brazil, Germany, India and Japan -- known as the Group of Four or G-4 -- circulated the resolution on May 16 and have indicated they will put it to a vote by the General Assembly in June.
''I think what has been proposed by G-4 is very dangerous, so as far as China is concerned, we will work with others to see that this will not happen,'' Wang said in an interview Tuesday.
He said the resolution will split the U.N. membership, and if the G-4 push for a vote ''the whole atmosphere in this house is being undermined, is being destroyed.''
Every member also has a different opinion on who should be permanent members, he said. China has opposed Japan's bid for a permanent seat, complaining about what many Asians consider Japan's lack of atonement for World War II abuses.
The result, Wang said, will be that U.N. members will not be able to discuss other more important issues that Secretary-General Kofi Annan wants included in a major overhaul of the United Nations to meet the global threats and challenges of the 21st century -- from a new peacebuilding commission and human rights council to new measures to reduce poverty and promote education.
After 10 years of seemingly endless debate, Annan told U.N. member states in March that he wants a decision on council expansion before September, when he has invited world leaders to a summit to consider restructuring the United Nations. He suggested that if consensus wasn't possible, the General Assembly president should consider calling a vote.
There is wide support for expanding the Security Council, whose composition reflects the post-World War II era when the United Nations was created, to represent the global realities today. But the size and membership of an expanded council remains contentious.
The G-4 resolution needs to be approved by two-thirds of the 191 member states to be adopted, but that's only a first step. New permanent members would then have to be elected by a similar two-thirds votes. But the most difficult step is a final resolution to change the U.N. Charter, which not only requires a two-thirds vote but also approval by the Security Council's five permanent members who wield veto power -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France.
China's Wang said that ''if it comes to the last stage, I'm sure our legislature would take into account the feelings of others -- and I don't think they will take a very positive action on this.''
At a meeting last Friday hosted by France, China urged the four other permanent members not to cosponsor the G-4 resolution, council diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity. But Britain and France are likely to back it, the diplomats said.
Council diplomats noted that over time, positions change -- as witnessed by the last council expansion in 1965 when some key opponents eventually voted ''yes.''
中国要明确告诉世界：在联合国改革的进程中，谁沾上日本谁倒霉。
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-2 0:19:54编辑过]
呵呵，硬起来了！
我想不仅仅是针对鬼子吧，可能的话是否和头疼中的未成型欧盟、军售、贸易纠纷－－－德国等有关？
我想不仅仅是针对鬼子吧，可能的话是否和头疼中的未成型欧盟、军售、贸易纠纷－－－德国等有关？
支持咖啡俱乐部。
A方案不仅要求入常,而且还要求否决权
明显是找死
明显是找死
王光亞昨天接受訪問時說：「我認為四國聯盟的提案非常危險，我們將和其他國家阻止本案。」
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
---------------------------------------------------------
丑话说在前头了，谁要是不怕被群殴的就过来吧！！而且被群殴完之后还要钉十字架游街！！
kao！！想想都打冷战！！
他說，這項提案將會造成聯合國的分裂，如果推動表決，「這個機構的整個氛圍將遭到破壞，遭到毀滅。」
---------------------------------------------------------
丑话说在前头了，谁要是不怕被群殴的就过来吧！！而且被群殴完之后还要钉十字架游街！！
kao！！想想都打冷战！！
小日本不能进入!
巴西、德國、印度干什么非要和狗日的混在一起?
斗争越来越诡异了
肉搏战呀!
一定要挺住!
[em01]
一定要挺住!
[em01]
谁沾上日本谁倒霉
[B]以下是引用[I]耗子药煮面[/I]在2005-6-2 12:00:00的发言：[/B][BR]巴西、德國、印度干什么非要和狗日的混在一起?
现在他们是一条船上的
人多力量大呗
[em01][em02]
四年来一次那个好，每四年抽打狗日的！好！
支持！！！
那就看谁笑到最后，我想国家领导人是有政治智慧的。我们就等鼓掌吧
我的感觉是连B方案都不会通过！！ 没人喜欢新的地区强国！！